Skip to main content
Log in

Microbial Dynamics and Nutritional Status of Namsing: A Traditional Fermented Fish Product of Mishing Community of Assam

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study reports on the microbial dynamics and the accompanied nutritional changes during the fermentation process of Namsing. Fermentation of fish during Namsing preparation revealed a significant increase in mineral content with the passage of fermentation time. Changes in microbial dynamics such as mesophilic bacteria, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and Enterobacteriaceae were monitored during the indigenous fermentation process. The mesophilic bacterial count of Namsing was 3.44 log CFU/g on the first day which increased to 8.2 log CFU/g on the 7th day and decreased gradually to 3.36 log CFU/g on the 28th day of fermentation. Yeasts and moulds were not detected during the fermentation period. Lactic acid bacteria were not detected until the 21st day. However on the 28th day, the lactic acid bacteria were recorded in the range of 1–2 log CFU/g. Coliform or other gram-negative bacteria were detected in the range of 2–2.8 log CFU/g till the end of fermentation. A total of 27 isolates were selected for further study based on their colony morphology and identified through biochemical and molecular analysis. The isolates belonged to the genus Bacillus (40.7%), Lactobacillus (7.4%), Kurthia (14.8%), Providencia (11%), Wohlfahrtiimonas (7.4%), Paenibacillus (3%), Staphylococcus (3%) Klebsiella (7.4%) and Vagococcus (3%). Among the 27 isolates, 11 isolates were further screened quantitatively for protease activity and using casein as substrate. The highest protease activity (15.60 ± 0.31 units/mL) was shown by the isolate Kurthia gibsonii (N11).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sathe GB, Mandal S (2016) Fermented products of India and its implication: a review. Asian J Dairy Food Res 35:1–9. https://doi.org/10.18805/ajdfr.v35i1.9244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tamang JP, Tamang N, Thapa S et al (2012) Microorganisms and Nutritional value of Ethnic fermented foods and alcoholic beverages of North East India. Indian J Tradit Knowl 11:7–25

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goswami G, Deka P, Das P et al (2017) Diversity and functional properties of acid-tolerant bacteria isolated from tea plantation soil of Assam. 3 Biotech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0864-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Thapa N (2016) Ethnic fermented and preserved fish products of India and Nepal. J Ethn Foods 3:69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jef.2016.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tamang JP (2015) Naturally fermented ethnic soybean foods of India. J Ethn Foods 2:8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jef.2015.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Majumdar RK, Roy D, Bejjanki S, Bhaskar N (2016) An overview of some ethnic fermented fish products of the Eastern Himalayan region of India. J Ethn Foods 3:276–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jef.2016.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. AOAC (1999) Official methods of analysis, 16th edn. The Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg

    Google Scholar 

  8. AOAC (2000) Official methods of analysis, 17th edn. The Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Maryland, USA

    Google Scholar 

  9. AOAC (1984) Official methods of analysis, 14th edn. The Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D et al (2013) MEGA6: molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cupp-Enyard C (2008) Sigma’s non-specific protease activity assay—casein as a substrate. J Vis Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/899

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Beaumont M (2002) Flavouring composition prepared by fermentation with Bacillus spp. Int J Food Microbiol 75:189–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Richard MJ, Roussel AM (1999) Micronutrients and ageing: intakes and requirements. Proc Nutr Soc 58:573–578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yirankinyuki FF, Lamayi DW, Sadiq BA, Yakubu MU (2013) Proximate and some minerals analysis of Colocasia Esculenta (TARO) leaves. J Med Biol Sci 3:8–14

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goswami G, Baruah H, Boro RC, Barooah M (2016) Fermentation reduces anti-nutritional content and increases mineral availability in Poita bhat. Asian J Chem 28:1929–1932. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2016.19820

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mohite BV, Chaudhari GA, Ingale HS, Mahajan VN (2013) Effect of fermentation and processing on in vitro mineral estimation of selected fermented foods. Int Food Res J 20:1373–1377

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nazmanara Khanum M, Takamura H, Matoba T (1999) Nutritional composition of a semi-fermented fish product (Chapa Shutki) in Bangladesh. J Home Econ Jpn 50:703–712

    Google Scholar 

  18. Osman OA, Sulieman AME, Elkhalifa EA, Mustafa WA (2012) Chemical and microbiological characteristics of fermented fish product, Fassiekh. Food Pub Heal 2:213–218. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.fph.20120206.05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thapa N, Pal J, Tamang JP (2006) Phenotypic identification and technological properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditionally processed fish products of the Eastern Himalayas. Int J Food Microbiol 107:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.08.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Whitman WB, Parte AC (2009) The firmicutes, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Garrity GM (2005) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. The proteobacteria. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  22. Borsodi AK, Kiss RI, Cech G et al (2010) Diversity and activity of cultivable aerobic planktonic bacteria of a saline Lake located in Sovata, Romania. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 55:461–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-010-0077-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Garrity GM, Holt JG (2001) The road map to the manual. Bergey’s manual® systematic bacteriology. Springer, New York, pp 119–166

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmed S, Dora KC, Sarkar S et al (2013) Quality analysis of shidal—A traditional fermented fish product of Assam, North-East India. Indian J Fish 60:117–123

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stackebrandt E, Frederiksen W, Garrity GM et al (2002) Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1043–1047. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02360-0.02360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mi-na U, Lee C-H (1996) Isolation and identification of Staphylococcuss sp. from Korean fermented fish products. Microbiol Biotechnol 6:340–346

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schmidtke LM, Carson J (1994) Chararacteristics of Vagococcus salmoninarum isolated from diseased salmonid fish. J Appl Bacteriol 77:229–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1994.tb03068.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shewmaker PL, Steigerwalt AG, Morey RE et al (2004) Vagococcus carniphilus sp. nov., isolated from ground beef. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:1505–1510. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02908-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pereira Rodarte M, Dias, Vilela DM, Schwan RF (2011) Proteolytic activities of bacteria, yeasts and filamentous fungi isolated from coffee fruit (Coffea arabica L.). Acta Sci Agron Mar 33:457–464. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v33i3.6734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Chantawannakul P, Oncharoen A, Klanbut K et al (2002) Characterization of proteases of Bacillus subtilis strain 38 isolated from traditionally fermented soybean in Northern Thailand. Sci Asia 28:241–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and DBT-AAU center, Assam Agricultural University (AAU) for providing the necessary facilities to carry out the present work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madhumita Barooah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to publish this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chowdhury, N., Goswami, G., Hazarika, S. et al. Microbial Dynamics and Nutritional Status of Namsing: A Traditional Fermented Fish Product of Mishing Community of Assam. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 89, 1027–1038 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-018-1022-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-018-1022-9

Keywords

Navigation