Skip to main content
Log in

Use of Molecular and Protein Based Markers for Accessing Genetic Diversity Among Hippophae salicifolia D. Don Genotypes of Uttarakhand

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to study the genetic diversity among 16 genotypes of Hippophae salicifolia D. Don of Uttarakhand region, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)–PCR analysis along with protein profiling of seed storage proteins was carried out for selection of superior genotype having high economic importance. A total of 21 RAPD primers were assayed for their specificity in detecting genetic variability in H. salicifolia genotypes, of which 11 RAPD primers were highly reproducible and were found suitable for use in PCR analysis. A total of 198 bands were scored corresponding to an average of 10.8 bands per primer with 138 bands showing polymorphism (73.2 %) with similarity coefficient ranging from 0.011 to 0.999. A dendrogram constructed based on the UPGMA clustering method revealed two major clusters. Cluster-I comprises of 13 cultivars, while cluster-II includes the remaining three cultivars. The cultivar ST-4, ST-5 and ST-16 were quite unique from the remaining cultivars as evident from the dendrogram. The analysis of total seed storage protein (quantitative) and protein profiling (qualitative) among 16 genotypes of H. salicifolia was performed to indentify novel proteins of important functional attributes. SDS-PAGE based generated profiles of seed proteins showed major differences in banding patterns among these genotypes with respect to altitude besides differences in seed protein contents. This study helps in the selection of superior genotype of H. salicifolia having higher economic importance by using developed molecular and protein based markers in Uttarakhand regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

RAPD:

Random amplified polymorphic DNA

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

SDS:

Sodium do-decyl sulphate

PAGE:

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

SBT:

Seabuckthorn

PIC:

Polymorphic information content

UPGMA:

Unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean

AFLP:

Amplified fragment length polymorphism

TBSP:

Total buffer soluble protein

SSR:

Simple sequence repeats

SNPs:

Single nucleotide polymorphism

DArT:

Diversity arrays technology

References

  1. Gupta SM, Pandey P, Grover A, Ahmed Z (2011) Breaking seed dormancy in Hippophae salicifolia, a high value medicinal plant. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 17(4):403–406

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta SM, Ahmed Z (2010) Seabuckthorn (Hippophae salicifolia L.) plant: as source donor of cold tolerant genes for improving high altitude agriculture during cold stress. Res Environ Life Sci 3(3):105–112

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta SM, Grover A, Pandey P, Ahmed Z (2012) Female plants of Hippophae salicifolia D. Don are more responsive to cold stress than male plants. Physiol Mol Biol Plant 18(4):377–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta SM, Gupta AK, Ahmed Z, Kumar A (2011) Antibacterial and antifungal activity in leaf, seed extract and seed oil of seabuckthorn (Hippophae salicifolia D. Don) plant. J Plant Pathol Microbiol 2:105. doi:10.4172/2157-7471.1000105

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yadav VK, Sah VK, Singh AK, Sharma SK (2006) Variations in morphological and biochemical characters of seabuckthorn (Hippophae salicifolia D. Don) populations growing in Harsil area of Garhwal Himalaya in India. Trop Agric Res Ext 9:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  6. Persson H (2001) Estimating genetic variability in horticultural crop species at different stages of domestication. Doctoral thesis, ISSN 1401-6249, ISBN 91-576-5838-2

  7. Farooq S, Azam F (2002) Plant breeding-II. Some pre-requisites for use. Pak J Biol Sci 5(10):1141–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Asad HS, Syed DA, Ishtiaque K, Farhat B, Lutful H, Stephen RP (2009) Evaluation of phylogenetic relationship among seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L. spp. Turkestanica) wild ecotypes from Pakistan using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Pak J Bot 41(5):2419–2426

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sezai E, Emine O, Nalan Y, Güleray A (2008) Comparison of seabuckthorn genotypes (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) based on RAPD and FAME data. Turk J Agric For 32:363–368

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bartish N IV, Jeppsson, Bartish GI (2000) Inter- and intraspecific genetic variation in Hippophae (Elaeagnaceae) investigated by RAPD markers. Plant Syst Evol 225(1–4):85–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahmad SD, Kamal M (2002) Morpho-molecular characterization of local genotypes of Hyppophae rhamnoides L. spp. Turkestanica Int J Agric Biol 5:10–13

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xin Z, Chen J (2012) A high throughput DNA extraction method with high yield and quality. Plant Methods 8:26

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Murray MG, Thompson WF (1980) Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucl Acids Res 8:4321–4326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rohlf FJ (1997) NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.0. Exeter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yap IV, Nelson RJ (1996) Winboot: a program for performing bootstrap analysis of binary data to determine the confidence of UPGMA-based dendrograms. IRRI, Manilla

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tatham AS, Fido RJ, Moore CM, Quesada DD, Kuzmicky DD, Keen JN, Shewry PR (1996) Characterisation of the major prolamins of Tef (Eragrostis tef) and Finger millet (Eleusine coracana). J Cereal Sci 24:65–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh D, Sirohi A, Sharma VS, Kumar V, Gaur A, Dhaudhary R, Choudhary N (2006) RAPD based identification of farmers collections of Kalanamak and traditional varieties of Basmati rice. Indian J Crop Sci 1:102–105

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brussell JD, Woycott M, Chappill JA (2005) Arbitrarily amplified DNA markers as characters for phylogenetic inference. Prospect Plant Eco Evol Syst 7:3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmad SD, Jasra AW, Imtiaz A (2003) Genetic diversity in Pakistani genotypes of Hippophae rhamnoides L. spp. Turkestanica Int J Agric Biol 5:10–13

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bradford MM (1976) Rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Dean, Hill campus, G.B. Pant Agriculture and Technology Ranichauri for providing seed materials. They also thank to Dr. V.K. Yadav, Hill campus Ranichauri, G.B. Pant Agriculture and Technology for providing the passport in formation of H. salicifolia genotype used into the present work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, N., Gupta, S., Singh, S. et al. Use of Molecular and Protein Based Markers for Accessing Genetic Diversity Among Hippophae salicifolia D. Don Genotypes of Uttarakhand. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 84, 47–54 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-013-0196-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-013-0196-4

Keywords

Navigation