Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction of Uracil and Uridine with the Cosolvent and Denaturant Aqueous Urea at Molecular Level: Effect of Na+, K+ and Ca++ Ions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For in silico drug protein–nucleic acids interaction studies, the change in thermodynamic parameters plays an important role, specifically for deriving QSAR equations. The present study is a step towards finding new thermodynamic descriptors. The characteristic changes in physico-chemical properties of uracil and its corresponding nucleoside–uridine, components of RNA, with urea having –CO–NH– function typical of proteins in the presence of alkali metal ions (Na+, K+ and Ca++) have been studied using ultrasonic, volumetric and viscometric techniques. Density, viscosity and ultrasonic velocity of the solutions of base/nucleoside and urea (10−4 mol l−1) in presence of salt solution (in the range 0.1–0.5 mol l−1) have been measured. The thermodynamic parameters have been deduced from the experimental data. This study has highlighted the role of the thermodynamic parameters in ligand–nucleic acid interactions at the molecular level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pandey JD, Haroon S, Dubey KK, Upadhyaya M, Dey R, Misra K (2000) Interaction of 6-aminopurine (adenine) in water and aqueous urea solutions. Can J Chem 78:1561–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rodgers MT, Armentrout PB (2000) Non covalent interactions of nucleic acid bases (uracil, thymine and adenine) with alkali metal ions. Threshold collision-induced dissociation and theoretical studies. J Am Chem Soc 122:8548–8558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Meyer M, Suhnel J (2003) Interaction of cyclic cytosine, guanine, thymine, uracil and mixed guanine–cytosine base tetrads with K+, Na+ and Li+ ions—a density functional study. J Biomol Struct Dyn 20:507–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Swiatek J (1994) Interaction of metal ions with nucleic acids and their subunits. An electrochemical approach. J Coord Chem 33:191–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Costa M, Heck JD (1984) Metal ions in biological systems, vol 20. Marcel Dekkar, New York, pp 259–278

    Google Scholar 

  6. Luisi BF, Xu WX, Otwinowski Z, Freedman LP, Ymamoto KR, Sigler PB (1991) Crystallographic analysis of the interaction of the glucocorticoid receptor with DNA. Nature 352:497–505

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Steitz TA (1993) Structural studies of protein–nucleic interaction. Cambridge University press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barton JK (1994) Metal/nucleic acid interactions. Bioinorganic chemistry. University Press, Mill Valley, pp 455

  9. Hong J, Capp MW, Anderson CF, Saecker RM, Felitsky DJ, Anderson MW (2004) Preferential interactions of glycine, betaine and of urea with DNA: implications for DNA hydration for effects of the solute on DNA stability. Biochemistry 23:14744–14758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eli P, Ariyama T, Nishigaki K, Husimi Y (1999) Characterization of imidazole as a DNA denaturant by using TGGE of PCR products from a random pool of DNA. J Biochem 124:790–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pandey JD, Haroon S, Chhabra J, Dey R, Misra K (2005) Effect of Na+, K+ and Ca2+ Ions on physico-chemical properties of thymine, cytosine, thymidine and cytidine in aqueous urea solution. Chin J Chem 23:157–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pandey JD, Jain P, Vyas V (1994) Speed of sound, viscosity and refractive index of multicomponent systems: analysis of experimental data from the Bertrand–Acree–Burchfield equation. Can J Chem 72:2486–2492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pandey JD, Dubey N, Dwivedi DK, Dey R (2001) Prediction of heat of mixing from internal pressure data. Phys Chem Liq 39:781–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Suryanarayana CV (1986) Measurement of internal pressure in liquid systems. Indian J Chem Sec A 25A:538–540

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gills EA, Rajabi K, Firdgen TD (2009) Structures of hydrated Li+–thymine and Li+–uracil complexes by IRMPD specroscopy in the N–H/O–H stretching region. Phys Chem A 113:824–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghosh P, Mukhopadhyay TK, Sarkar AR (1984) Interaction of divalent metal ions with Uracil III. Complexes of MnII, FeII, CoII, NiII, CuII with Uracil acting as bidentate ligand. Transition Met Chem 9:46–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu H, Sun JL, Hua YH, Han Ke-Li, Yang S (2004) Photodissociation of gaseous metal ion-nucleobase complexes: Mg+–uracil and Mg+–thymine. Chem Phys Lett 389:342–347

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hedwig GR (2006) Isentropic and isothermal compressibilities of the backbone glycyl group of proteins in aqueous solution. Biophys Chem 124:35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krishna Misra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srivastava, T., Pandey, A., Sethi, R. et al. Interaction of Uracil and Uridine with the Cosolvent and Denaturant Aqueous Urea at Molecular Level: Effect of Na+, K+ and Ca++ Ions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A Phys. Sci. 82, 179–186 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-012-0017-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-012-0017-9

Keywords

Navigation