Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Efficiency of GY*T Approach Over GT Approach in Genotypic Selection in Multiple Trait Evaluations: Case Study of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Grown Under Temperate Himalayan Conditions

  • Full-Length Research Article
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The subjectivity of index selection and unpredictable environmental variabilities cause ambiguities in multiple-trait selection across environments. In the present study, we tested and validated a recently proposed multivariate approach for genotypic selection based on multiple trait evaluations. A genotype by yield*trait (GY*T) biplot approach originally proposed was validated in this study to assess the comparative efficiency of GY*T approach over genotype by trait (GT) approach in genotypic selection on multiple traits in common bean. The analysis is based on six trials spread over four years from 2015–2018 at two locations. Based on the GY*T analysis, the biplot could improve the variation accounted for by PCI and PC2 from 71.37 to 92.81%. The genotypes WB-341, WB-1634 and WB-451 were identified as high yielding and possessed higher seed yield on account of higher values of pods per plant and seeds per pod indicating that these possess the ideal trait combination of yield, pod number and seeds per pod. The genotype WB-222 had the ideal trait combination of yield, pods per plant and plant height. Similarly the genotype WB-185 had the ideal trait combination of yield and 100-seed weight but was poor for pods per plant. The genotype WB-83 had an opposite trait profile to WB-185 especially for 100-seed weight, but was good for pods per plant, even though both had comparable yield levels. Based on the results of present study and few earlier studies, we conclude that GY*T approach based on multi-trait data is comparatively more efficient than GT biplot.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DF:

Days to flowering

DM:

Days to maturity

PH:

Plant height

NOP:

Pods per plant

PL:

Pod length

SPPL:

Seeds per pod

100SW:

100-Seed weight

SYPP:

Seed yield per plant

GT:

Genotype x Trait

GY*T:

Genotype x Yield * Trait

References

  1. Andersson E (1965) The selection of plus trees in Sweden. Sumarski List (Zagreb) No 1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Araujo KC, Vivas, M (2018) Multivariate analysis used as a tool to select snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Aus J Crop Sci 12(1): 67

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Boureima S, Yaou A (2019) Genotype by yield* trait combination biplot approach to evaluate sesame genotypes on multiple traits basis. Turk J Field Crops 24(2):237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de Oliveira TRA, de Amaral GG, de Moura RM, de Alcântara NF, da Cruz DP, de Oliveira GHF, Rocha RS (2019) GYT biplot analysis: a new approach for cowpea line selection. J Exp Agri Intern 41(5):1–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamid AE, Aglan MA, Hussein E (2019) Modified method for the analysis of genotype by trait (Gt) biplot as a selection criterion in wheat under water stress conditions. Egyp J Agron 41(3):293–312

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hazel LN (1943) The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28(6):476–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kendal E (2019) Comparing durum wheat cultivars by genotype× yield× trait and genotype× trait biplot method. Chil J Agri Res 79(4):512–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kendal E (2020) Evaluation of some barley genotypes with genotype by yield* trait (GYT) biplot method. Agric For 66(2):137–150

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mohammadi R (2019) Genotype by yield* trait biplot for genotype evaluation and trait profiles in durum wheat. Cer Res Comm 47(3):541–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Namkoong G (1969) Problems of multiple trait breeding. Second World Consult. Forest Tree Breeding. FAO-FO-FTB-69–7/4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Oliveira TR, Gravina AD, Oliveira GDA, Araújo GH, Araújo HC, Daher L , Cruz D (2018) The GT biplot analysis of green bean traits. Ciência Rural 48(6)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sofi PA, Gul M, Asmat A (2020) GY*T biplot: An efficient approach for genotypic selection in multiple trait evaluations: case study of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata l.). Agri Res J 57 (2): 140–147

    Google Scholar 

  13. Xu N, Fok M, Li J, Yang X, Yan W (2017) Optimization of cotton variety registration criteria aided with a genotype-by-trait biplot analysis. Sci Rep 7(1):17237

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yan W (2014) Crop variety trials: data management and analysis. John Wiley & Sons

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yan W, Frégeau-Reid J (2018) Genotype by Yield* Trait (GY*T) biplot: a novel approach for genotype selection based on multiple traits. Sci Rep 8(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yan W, Frégeau-Reid J, Mountain N, Kobler J (2019) Genotype and management evaluation based on Genotype by Yield* Trait (GYT) analysis. Crop Breed Genet Genomics 1:2–21

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yan W, Rajcan I (2002) Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci 42:11–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yan W, Kang M S, Ma B, Woods S, Cornelius PL (2007) GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci 47(2): 643–653

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support from department of Science & Technology, Govt. of India (Grant # SARTHI/JK/12/09) and ICAR under AICRP MULLaRP is highly acknowledged

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PAS = Conceived the research and design of experiment, IS, AA, KR = Executed the experiment, PAS = Analyzed the data and lead the manuscript preparation, PAS, IS, AA, KR = Helped in the manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parvaze A. Sofi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sofi, P.A., Saba, I., Ara, A. et al. Comparative Efficiency of GY*T Approach Over GT Approach in Genotypic Selection in Multiple Trait Evaluations: Case Study of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Grown Under Temperate Himalayan Conditions. Agric Res 11, 373–381 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-021-00577-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-021-00577-5

Keywords

Navigation