Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Moistube Irrigation Technology: A Review

  • Review
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Irrigated agriculture is under pressure to increase water use efficiency and crop water productivity because of inter-sectoral competition for scarce water resources. The shift to micro-irrigation has improved crop quality, yield and water use efficiency. Subsurface drip irrigation significantly reduces non-beneficial water balance components such as runoff and soil evaporation. However, the problem of water loss by deep percolation still exists in this method. Moistube irrigation is a relatively new type of irrigation method where water flows out of the Moistube nanopores as a function of soil water potential and operating pressure. It supplies water continuously to the crop at 80–90% of the field capacity. Therefore, it is a form of deficit irrigation. Based on the previous studies, this paper reviews Moistube irrigation technology by highlighting its hydraulic characteristics, crop growth and yield response, water use efficiency, clogging characteristics and the soil water dynamics. Areas which need further research are also described which can provide a reference for further studies in the relevant area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashrafi S, Gupta AD, Babel MS, Izumi N, Loof R (2002) Simulation of infiltration from porous clay pipe in subsurface irrigation. Hydrol Sci J 47(2):253–268

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ayars JE, Bucks DA, Lamm FR, Nakayama FS (2007) Introduction. In: Lamm FR, Ayars JE, Nakayama FS (eds) Microirrigation for crop production: design, operation, and management, vol 13. Elsevier. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bainbridge DA (2001) Buried clay pot irrigation: a little known but very efficient traditional method of irrigation. Agric Water Manag 48(2):79–88

    Google Scholar 

  4. Batista RO, Santos D, Ferreira NM, Santos W, Barreto HBF (2012) Efficiency of chemical treatment on drip irrigation systems with sanitary sewage. Water Resour Irrig Manag 1:25–29

    Google Scholar 

  5. Camp C (1998) Subsurface drip irrigation: a review. Trans ASAE 41(5):1353–1367

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charlesworth PB, Muirhead WA (2003) Crop establishment using subsurface drip irrigation: a comparison of point and area sources. Irrig Sci 22(3–4):171–176

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cote CM, Bristow KL, Charlesworth PB, Cook FJ, Thorburn PJ (2003) Analysis of soil wetting and solute transport in subsurface trickle irrigation. Irrig Sci 22(3–4):143–156

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gourdji S, Läderach P, Valle AM, Martinez CZ, Lobell DB (2015) Historical climate trends, deforestation, and maize and bean yields in Nicaragua. Agric For Meteorol 200:270–281

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guo Y, Shen L, Yin Y (2017) The effect of different water pressure of alternate micro-irrigation on water spinach planted in greenhouse. Water Sav Irrig 42(7):16–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo Y, Shen L, Zhang G (2017) An experimental study on the dynamic growth of onion with Moistube-irrigation technology in greenhouse. Water Sav Irrig 42(2):9–11

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibragimov N, Evett SR, Esanbekov Y, Kamilov BS, Mirzaev L, Lamers JP (2007) Water use efficiency of irrigated cotton in Uzbekistan under drip and furrow irrigation. Agric Water Manag 90(1):112–120

    Google Scholar 

  12. Janani A, Sohrabi T, Dehghanisanij H (2011) Pressure variation impact on discharge characteristics of porous pipes. In: 8th International micro irrigation congress, Tehran, pp 284–296

  13. Kahlown MA, Raoof A, Zubair M, Kemper WD (2007) Water use efficiency and economic feasibility of growing rice and wheat with sprinkler irrigation in the Indus Basin of Pakistan. Agric Water Manag 87(3):292–298

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kanda EK (2019) Soil water dynamics and response of copwea to water availability under Moistube irrigation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

  15. Kanda EK, Mabhaudhi T, Senzanje A (2018) Hydraulic and clogging characteristics of Moistube irrigation as influenced by water quality. J Water Supply: Res Technol AQUA 67(5):438–446

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lamm FR (2009) Managing the challenges of subsurface drip Irrigation. In: Irrigation association technical conference. San Antonio, Texas, USA, 2-5 Dec 2009

  17. Lamm FR, Bordovsky J, Schwankl L, Grabow G, Enciso-Medina J, Peters R, Colaizzi P, Trooien T, Porter D (2012) Subsurface drip irrigation: status of the technology in 2010. Trans ASABE 55(2):483–491

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lamm FR, Trooien TP (2003) Subsurface drip irrigation for corn production: a review of 10 years of research in Kansas. Irrig Sci 22(3–4):195–200

    Google Scholar 

  19. Locascio SJ (2005) Management of irrigation for vegetables: past, present, and future. HortTechnology 15(3):482–485

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lyu W, Niu W, Gu J, Li Y, Zou X, Zhang R (2016) Effects of Moistube depth and density on tomato yield and quality in solar greenhouse. Chin J Eco-Agric 24(12):1663–1673

    Google Scholar 

  21. Niu W, Lü W, Gu J, Liang B, Guo L, Guan Y (2017) Effects of Moistube depth and spacing on soil water and salt transports of tomato in solar greenhouse. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 33(19):131–140

    Google Scholar 

  22. Niu W, Xue W (2014) Effects of mineralization degrees on soil infiltration under Moistube-irrigation. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach 45(4):163–172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Niu W, Zhang L, Shi L, Wu Z (2013) Effects of buried depth and pressure head on water movement of wetted soil during moistube-irrigation. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach 44(12):128–134

    Google Scholar 

  24. Niu W, Zhang M, Xu J, Zou X, Zhang R, Li Y (2017) Prediction methods and characteristics of flow for Moistube. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach 48(6):217–224

    Google Scholar 

  25. Qi S (2013) Research on the outflow, infiltration and anti-clogging performance of low-pressure Moistube. MSc. Dissertation, Xinjiang Agricultural University, China

  26. Qi S, Xie X, Qiu X, Liu G, Wang Z (2013) Research on flow and infiltration of low-pressure Moistube. J Irrig Drain 32(2):90–92

    Google Scholar 

  27. Qiu Z, Jiang P, Xiao J (2015) Experimental study on influence of water temperature on outflows of low pressure Moistube. Water Sav Irrig 40(6):31–38

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rodríguez-Sinobas L, Juana L, Losada A (1999) Effects of temperature changes on emitter discharge. J Irrig Drain Eng 125(2):64–73

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schlenker W, Lobell DB (2010) Robust negative impacts of climate change on African agriculture. Environ Res Lett 5(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sun Q, Wang Y, Chen G, Yang H, Dua T (2018) Water use efficiency was improved at leaf and yield levels of tomato plants by continuous irrigation using semipermeable membrane. Agric Water Manag 203:430–437

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tian D, Zheng H, Li X (2016) Study on Moistube irrigation for sunflower growth. Water Sav Irrig 41(9):94–101

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang J (2016) Experimental study on soil moisture distribution feature and production efficiency of greenhouse eggplant under Moistube irrigation. Shanxi Hydrotech 23(3):76–79

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang J, Lei M, Bi Y-j (2017) The effect of buried depth on soil moisture and growth of green pepper by Moistube irrigation. China Rural Water Hydropower 59(7):6–9

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wei Z, Chen G, Xu S, Du T (2014) Responses of tomato water consumption and yield to Moistube irrigation under controlled alternate partial root-zone irrigation. J Irrig Drain 33(Z1):139–143

    Google Scholar 

  35. Xie X, Qi S, Guohong L, Wang Z, Ma X (2014) Effects of silt content and particle size in irrigation water on Moistube outflow. J Irrig Drain 33(6):38–40

    Google Scholar 

  36. Xie X, Qi S, Liu G, Wang Z, Ma X (2014) Buried Moistube infiltration testing under sandy loam. XinJiang Agricu Sci 51(12):2201–2205

    Google Scholar 

  37. Xue W, Niu W, Zhang Z, Zhang K (2013) Effects of the tomato growth and water use efficiency in sunlight greenhouse by Moistube-Irrigation. Agric Res Arid Areas 25(6):61–66

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yang W, Tian L, Du T, Ding R, Yang Q (2008) Research prospect of the water-saving irrigation by semi-permeable Film. J Water Resour Water Eng 19(6):60–63

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yao F, Liu H, Li Y, Liu F, Yuan N (2014) Research on ecophysiological parameters of navel orange under Moistube-irrigation. J Nanchang Coll Water Conserv Hydroelectr Power 33(6):11–14

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yin Y, Shen L, Guo Y, Zhang C (2017) The effect of different Moistube spacing of alternate micro-irrigation on water spinach growth in greenhouse. Water Sav Irrig 42(9):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yoder R (1995) Mote C Porous pipe discharge uniformity. In: Lamm FR (ed) 5th International MICROIRRIGATION CONGRESS. Orlando, Florida, pp 750–755

  42. Yu X, Liu X, Zhu Y, Qi Y, Yang Q, Tang J (2017) Effects of soil texture and water pressure on moistube infiltration in vertical inserting mode. J Drain Irrig Mach Eng 35(1):71–79

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang G, Shen L, Guo Y (2016) Experimental study on the growth status of cabbages in greenhouse with Moistube irrigation technology. Water Sav Irrig 41(7):6–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang J, Niu W, Zhang L, Shi L (2012) Experimental study on characters of wetted soil in Moistube irrigation. Sci Soil Water Conserv 10(6):32–38

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang J, Wenquan N, Zhang L, Shi L, Wu Z (2014) Effects of soil initial water content on line-source infiltration characteristic in Moistube Irrigation. J Drain Irrig Mach Eng 32(1):72–79

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang K, Niu W, Wang Y, Xue W, Zhang Z (2017) Characteristics of water and salt movement in soil under Moistube-irrigation with brackish water. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach 48(1):175–182

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang K, Niu W, Xue W, Zhang Z (2015) Simulation of soil water movement under intermittent and continuous irrigation. J Irrig Drain 34(3):11–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang M, Niu W, Lu Z, Li Y, Wang J, Qiu X (2017) Effect of Moistube-irrigation on crop yield and water use efficiency. Chin J Eco-Agricu 25(11):1671–1683

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang Z, Zhang KM, Niu W, Xue J (2015) Effects of burying depth on growth of tomato and soil moisture dynamics by Moistube-irrigation in green house. Agric Res 33(2):122–129

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zhu Y, Wang X, Yang Y, Cheng Y, Guo R (2015) Study on influences of tiny sediment particles on clogging performance of Moistube. J Drain Irrig Mach Eng 33(9):818–822

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zou X, Quan T, Zhou Mengna, Yang Q, Shi Y (2017) Progress and prospects of Moistube irrigation technology research. Bull Soil Water Conserv 37(4):150–155

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edwin Kimutai Kanda.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanda, E.K., Niu, W., Mabhaudhi, T. et al. Moistube Irrigation Technology: A Review. Agric Res 9, 139–147 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-019-00448-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-019-00448-0

Keywords

Navigation