Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE): a reason to isolate?

  • Review
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, an increase in invasive VRE infections has been reported worldwide, including Germany. The most common gene encoding resistance to glycopeptides is VanA, but predominant VanB clones are emerging. Although neither the incidence rates nor the exact routes of nosocomial transmission of VRE are well established, screening and strict infection control measures, e.g. single room contact isolation, use of personal protective clothing by hospital staff and intensified surface disinfection for colonized individuals, are implemented in many hospitals. At the same time, the impact of VRE infection on mortality remains unclear, with current evidence being weak and contradictory. In this short review, we aim to give an overview on the current basis of evidence on the clinical effectiveness of infection control measures intended to prevent transmission of VRE and to put these findings into a larger perspective that takes further factors, e.g. VRE-associated mortality and impact on patient care, into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ECDC. Surveillance atlas of infectious diseases. 2018. Accessed 16 Aug 2018.

  2. Remschmidt C, et al. Continuous increase of vancomycin resistance in enterococci causing nosocomial infections in Germany—10 years of surveillance. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018;7:54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Werner G, et al. Enterococcus faecium strains from bloodstream infections of German hospital patients revealed a preferred prevalence of ST117 and an increasing number of vanB-type VRE between 2011 and 2017. In: European Congress of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Madrid; 2018.

  4. McDermott H, et al. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in the intensive care unit in a nonoutbreak setting: identification of potential reservoirs and epidemiological associations between patient and environmental VRE. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018;39:40–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosko AE, et al. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci infection: not just for the transplanted. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014;55:1320–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen CH, et al. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infection in Central Taiwan. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e9000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Webb BJ, et al. Prediction of bloodstream infection due to vancomycin-resistant enterococcus in patients undergoing leukemia induction or hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:1753–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Taur Y, et al. Intestinal domination and the risk of bacteremia in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:905–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. DiazGranados CA, et al. Comparison of mortality associated with vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible enterococcal bloodstream infections: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:327–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cho SY, et al. Impact of vancomycin resistance on mortality in neutropenic patients with enterococcal bloodstream infection: a retrospective study. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahony AA, et al. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium sequence type 796—rapid international dissemination of a new epidemic clone. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018;7:44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Moulin E, et al. Vancomycine-resistant enterococci (VRE): a new reality in our hospitals. Rev Med Suisse. 2018;14:791–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wagenvoort JH, et al. Environmental survival of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. J Hosp Infect. 2011;77:282–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. van Hal SJ, et al. Relentless spread and adaptation of non-typeable vanA vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium: a genome-wide investigation. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73:1487–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yeh KM, et al. Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) carriage and infection in intensive care units. Microb Drug Resist. 2004;10:177–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Amberpet R, et al. Risk factors for intestinal colonization with vancomycin resistant enterococci’ a prospective study in a level III pediatric intensive care unit. J Lab Physicians. 2018;10:89–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Liss BJ, et al. Intestinal colonisation and blood stream infections due to vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBLE) in patients with haematological and oncological malignancies. Infection. 2012;40:613–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gedik H, et al. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization and bacteremia in patients with hematological malignancies. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014;8:1113–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Biehl LM, Stemler HP, Gillis J, Peter M, Dörfel S, Vogel W, Kern WV, Gölz H, Bertz H, Rohde H, Klupp EM, Schafhausen P, Salmanton-García J, Ertel J, Zweigner J, Seifert H, Vehreschild MJGT, Impact of single room contact precautions on hospital-acquisition and transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in a high-risk setting: preliminary results from the CONTROL study||Oral #O0177 in 28th ECCMID, Madrid; 2018.

  20. Kamboj M, et al. The changing epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) bacteremia in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16:1576–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ornstein MC, et al. Impact of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia on outcome during acute myeloid leukemia induction therapy. Leuk Lymphoma. 2015;56:2536–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tavadze M, et al. Risk factors for vancomycin-resistant enterococcus bacteremia and its influence on survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49:1310–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vydra J, et al. Enterococcal bacteremia is associated with increased risk of mortality in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:764–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ford CD, et al. Frequency, risk factors, and outcomes of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus colonization and infection in patients with newly diagnosed acute leukemia: different patterns in patients with acute myelogenous and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015;36:47–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ford CD, et al. The clinical impact of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus colonization and bloodstream infection in patients undergoing autologous transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis. 2015;17:688–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Satlin MJ, et al. The emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014;55:2858–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hefazi M, et al. Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus colonization and bloodstream infection: prevalence, risk factors, and the impact on early outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Transpl Infect Dis. 2016;18:913–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fournier S, Brun-Buisson C, Jarlier V. Twenty years of antimicrobial resistance control programme in a regional multi hospital institution, with focus on emerging bacteria (VRE and CPE). Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2012;1:9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang SS, et al. Targeted versus universal decolonization to prevent ICU infection. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2255–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Martin EM, et al. Elimination of routine contact precautions for endemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus: a retrospective quasi-experimental study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37:1323–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bardossy AC, et al. Evaluation of contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus. Am J Infect Control. 2017;45:1369–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bearman G, et al. Impact of discontinuing contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus: an interrupted time series analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018;39:676–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marra AR, et al. Discontinuing contact precautions for multidrug-resistant organisms: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Am J Infect Control. 2018;46:333–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. Infection control: the case for horizontal rather than vertical interventional programs. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:S3–S5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pidot SJ, et al. Increasing tolerance of hospital Enterococcus faecium to handwash alcohols. Sci Transl Med, 2018;10:eaar6115. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aar6115.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Frakking FNJ, et al. Recommendations for the successful control of a large outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a non-endemic hospital setting. J Hosp Infect. 2018;21:S0195–6701(18)30109–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2018.02.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Stelfox HT, Bates DW, Redelmeier DA. Safety of patients isolated for infection control. JAMA. 2003;290:1899–905.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Morgan DJ, et al. Adverse outcomes associated with contact precautions: a review of the literature. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37:85–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Abad C, Fearday A, Safdar N. Adverse effects of isolation in hospitalised patients: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2010;76:97–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Martin EM, et al. Noninfectious hospital adverse events decline after elimination of contact precautions for MRSA and VRE. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018;39:788–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerd Fätkenheuer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

LMB has received lecture honoraria from Astellas and Merck/MSD, and travel grants from 3M and Gilead. MJGTV is a consultant to: Alb-Fils Kliniken GmbH, Arderypharm, Astellas Pharma, Berlin Chemie, DaVolterra, MaaT Pharma and Merck/MSD; has served at the speakers’ bureau of: Astellas Pharma, Basilea, Gilead Sciences, Merck/MSD, Organobalance, Pfizer; received research funding from: 3M, Astellas Pharma, DaVolterra, Gilead Sciences, MaaT Pharma, Merck/MSD, Morphochem, Organobalance, Seres Therapeutics.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vehreschild, M.J.G.T., Haverkamp, M., Biehl, L.M. et al. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE): a reason to isolate?. Infection 47, 7–11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-018-1202-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-018-1202-9

Keywords

Navigation