Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Explaining farmers’ pro-environmental behaviors toward plant, soil and water conservation in Iran: an application of value–belief–norm theory

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to explain the farmers’ pro-environmental behaviors toward plant, soil and water conservation by adapting the value–belief–norm theory. This cross-sectional survey investigated 342 farmers in Mazandaran province, Iran. Data collection was done using a structured questionnaire and analyzed through structural equation modeling. The findings of the study confirmed the causal paths of variables in the value–belief–norm theory. As expected, in a causal chain, values influenced beliefs, and beliefs influenced norms, and finally norms influenced the plant, soil and water conservation behaviors among farmers. The results indicated that personal norms explained 60%, 10% and 5% of the variance of plant, soil and water conservation behavior variables, respectively. Also, ascription of responsibility explained 82% of the personal norms variance and awareness of consequences explained 35% of the variance of ascription of responsibility. In the following, ecological worldview (New Ecological Paradigm) explained 33% of the awareness of consequences’ variance, and altruistic and egocentric values explained 72% of the New Ecological Paradigm’ variance. In addition to providing support for the application of the value–belief–norm theory within the context of Iranian farmers, this study increased the understanding of the factors influencing the environmentally friendly behavior of farmers, helping agricultural policy makers and decision makers to formulate their policies for sustainable agricultural development with a better understanding of farmers’ decisions and behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

(Adapted from Stern, 2000a, b)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available from the corresponding author.

References

  • Abrahamse W (2007) Energy conservation through behavioral change: Examining the effectiveness of a tailor-made approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen

  • Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3):411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azizi Khalkheili T, Bakhshi Jahromi A, Bijani M (2012) Soil conservative behavior of farmers: the role of information and communication media. Iran Agri Ext Edu J 7(2):51–61 (In Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 16(1):74–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg S (2003) How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. J Environ Psychol 23(1):21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berenguer J (2007) The effect of empathy in pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors. Environ Behav 39(2):269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijani M, Ghazani E, Valizadeh N, Haghighi NF (2017) Pro-environmental analysis of farmers’ concerns and behaviors towards soil conservation in central district of Sari County, Iran. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 5(1):43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijani M, Ghazani E, Valizadeh N, Fallah Haghighi N (2019) Predicting and understanding of farmers’ soil conservation behavior in Mazandaran province, Iran. J Agric Sci Technol 21(7):1705–1719

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouman T, Steg L, Kiers HA (2018) Measuring values in environmental research: a test of an environmental portrait value questionnaire. Front Psychol 23(9):564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen F (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J 14(3):464–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen MF (2015) An examination of the value–belief–norm theory model in predicting pro-environmental behaviour in Taiwan. Asian J Soc Psychol 18(2):145–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen MF (2016) Extending the theory of planned behavior model to explain people’s energy savings and carbon reduction behavioral intentions to mitigate climate change in Taiwan-moral obligation matters. J Clean Prod 112:1746–1753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi H, Jang J, Kandampully J (2015) Application of the extended VBN theory to understand consumers’ decisions about green hotels. Int J Hosp Manag 51:87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury SG, Srivastava S, Singh R, Chaudhari SK, Sharma DK, Singh SK, Sarkar D (2014) Tillage and residue management effects on soil aggregation, organic carbon dynamics and yield attribute in rice–wheat cropping system under reclaimed sodic soil. Soil Tillage Res 136:76–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran WG (1934) The distribution of quadratic forms in a normal system, with applications to the analysis of covariance. Math Proc Camb Philos Soc 30(2):178–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot JIM (2008) Mean or green?: value orientations, morality and prosocial behavior. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen

  • De Groot JI, Steg L (2008) Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: how to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environ Behav 40(3):330–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Leeuw A, Valois P, Ajzen I, Schmidt P (2015) Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: implications for educational interventions. J Environ Psychol 42:128–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deus JER, Mira RG (2001) Valores, actitudes y creencias: hacia un modelo predictivo del ambientalismo. Medio Ambiente Comport Hum Rev Int Psicol Ambient 2(1):21–43

    Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT (2015) The resources input domain contains annual data on: Fertilizers, pesticides. The agricultural production domain covers, FAO statistics division 2015. http://faostat.fao.org/site

  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärling T, Fujii S, Gärling A, Jakobsson C (2003) Moderating effects of social value orientation on determinants of pro-environmental behavior intention. J Environ Psychol 23(1):1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazali EM, Nguyen B, Mutum DS, Yap SF (2019) Pro-environmental behaviours and value–belief–norm theory: assessing unobserved heterogeneity of two ethnic groups. Sustainability 11(12):3237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall Publisher, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Han H (2015) Travelers’ pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: converging value–belief–norm theory and the theory of planned behavior. Tour Manag 47:164–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornsey MJ, Harris EA, Bain PG, Fielding KS (2016) Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nat Clim Chang 6(6):622–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson S, Stoeckl N, Straton A, Stanley O (2008) The changing value of Australian tropical rivers. Geogr Res 46:275–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser FG, Hübner G, Bogner FX (2005) Contrasting the theory of planned behavior with value–belief–norm model in explaining conservation behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 35(10):2150–2170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi S (2019) Pro-environmental behaviours among agricultural students: an examination of the value–belief–norm theory. J Agric Sci Technol 21(2):249–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiatkawsin K, Han H (2017) Young travelers’ intention to behave pro-environmentally: merging the value–belief–norm theory and the expectancy theory. Tour Manag 59:76–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Shin W (2017) Understanding American and Korean students’ support for pro-environmental tax policy: the application of the value–belief–norm theory of environmentalism. Environ Commun 11(3):311–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liobikienė G, Juknys R (2016) The role of values, environmental risk perception, awareness of consequences, and willingness to assume responsibility for environmentally-friendly behaviour: the Lithuanian case. J Clean Prod 112:3413–3422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liobikienė G, Poškus MS (2019) The importance of environmental knowledge for private and public sphere pro-environmental behavior: modifying the value–belief–norm theory. Sustainability 11(12):3324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcoulides GA, Schumacker RE (1996) Advanced structural equation modeling: issues and techniques, 1st edn. Psychology Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz EM, Goldberg LR, Ashton MC, Lee K (2012) Profiling the “pro-environmental individual”: a personality perspective. J Pers 80(1):81–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh HW, Hau KT (1996) Assessing goodness of fit: is parsimony always desirable? J Exp Educ 64(4):364–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D, Merrilees B, Coghlan A (2015) Sustainable urban tourism: understanding and developing visitor pro-environmentally behaviors. J Sustain Tour 23(1):26–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustapha I (2010) Application of value beliefs norms theory to the energy conservation behavior. J Sustain Dev 3:129–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordlund A, Garvill J (2002) Value structures behind pro-environmental behavior. Environ Behav 34:740–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nugmanov AB, Tulayev YV, Tulkubayeva SA, Somova SV, Vodopyanov EM (2017) Updating of sowing terms of spring wheat in the conditions of northern Kazakhstan in conservation agriculture. Ecol Environ Conserv 23(1):293–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhananga AK, Davenport MA (2019) Predicting farmer adoption of water conservation practices using a norm-based moral obligation model. Environ Manag 64:483–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhananga AK, Davenport MA, Fulton DC, Maruyama GM, Current D (2017) An integrated moral obligation model for landowner conservation norms. Int J Soc Nat Resour 30(2):212–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman S (2003) Environmental impacts of modern agricultural technology diffusion in Bangladesh: an analysis of farmer’s perception and their determinants. J Environ Manag 68:183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond CM, Brown G, Robinson GM (2011) The influence of place attachment, and moral and normative concerns on the conservation of native vegetation: a test of two behavioural models. J Environ Psychol 31(4):323–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razzaghi Borkhani F, Mohammadi Y (2018) The role of extension services on farmers’ awareness and knowledge about conservation agriculture practices (plant, soil and water conservation). Asian J Water Environ Pollut 15(2):195–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei R, Mianaji S, Ganjloo A (2018) Factors affecting farmers’ intention to engage in on-farm food safety practices in Iran: extending the theory of planned behavior. J Rural Stud 60:152–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei R, Safa L, Ganjkhanloo MM (2020) Understanding farmers’ ecological conservation behavior regarding the use of integrated pest management—an application of the technology acceptance model. Glob Ecol Conserv 22:e00941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei-Moghaddam K, Karami E, Gibson J (2005) Conceptualizing sustainable agriculture: Iran as an illustrative case. J Sustain Agric 27(3):25–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei-Moghaddam K, Vatankhah N, Ajili A (2020) Adoption of pro-environmental behaviors among farmers: application of Value–Belief–Norm theory. Chem Biol Technol Agric 7(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues GS, Campanhola C, Kitamura PC (2003) An environmental impact assessment system for agricultural R&D. Environ Impact Assess Rev 23:219–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabzevar MS, Rezaei A, Khaleghi B (2021) Incremental adaptation strategies for agricultural water management under water scarcity condition in Northeast Iran. Reg Sustain 2(3):224–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satterfield T (2001) In search of value literacy: suggestions for the elicitation of environmental values. Environ Values 10(3):331–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz SH (1977) Normative influences on altruism. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 10. Academic Press, New York, pp 221–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz S (1992) Universals in the content and the structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 25:1–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheban K (2014) Understanding Environmental Behaviors: a modification of value–belief–norm theory applied to farmer nutrient management decisions in the Maumee Watershed (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).

  • Steg L, Vlek C (2009) Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J Environ Psychol 29(3):309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steg L, Dreijerink L, Abrahamse W (2005) Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: a test of VBN theory. J Environ Psychol 24:415–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steg L, Bolderdijk JW, Keizer K, Perlaviciute G (2014a) An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: the role of values, situational factors and goals. J Environ Psychol 38:104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steg L, Perlaviciute G, Van der Werff E, Lurvink J (2014b) The significance of hedonic values for environmentally relevant attitudes, preferences, and actions. Environ Behav 46(2):163–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC (2000a) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56:407–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC (2000b) New environmental theories: towards a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56(3):65–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC, Dietz T, Kalof L, Guagnano GA (1995) Values, Beliefs and Pro-Environmental Action: Attitude Formation towards Emergent Attitude Objects. J Appl Soc Psychol 25(18):1611–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel T, Guagnano GA, Kalof L (1999) A value–belief–norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum Ecol Rev 6:81–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabaraei M, Hasannezhad M (2009) Factors affecting the acceptance of agricultural extension programs with regards to process of agricultural development, case study: wheat farmers in Mashhad. J Agric Econ Dev 23(1):59–68 (In Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner C, Wölfing Kast S (2003) Promoting sustainable consumption: Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers. Psychol Mark 20(10):883–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valizadeh N, Bijani M, Abbasi E (2016) Pro-environmental analysis of farmers' participatory behavior toward conservation of surface water resources in southern sector of Urmia Lake’s catchment area. Iran Agric Ext Educ J 11:183–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley CT, Takahashi B, Zwickle A, Besley JC, Lertpratchya AP (2018) Sustainability Behaviors among College Students: an application of the VBN Theory. Environ Educ Res 24(2):245–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynveen CJ, Wynveen BJ, Sutton SG (2015) Applying the value–belief–norm theory to marine contexts: implications for encouraging pro-environmental behavior. Coast Manag 43(1):84–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

By the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Crop Sciences, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran

    F. Razzaghi Borkhani

  2. Department of Forestry and Forest Economics, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    B. Khaleghi

  3. Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Economics & Agricultural Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

    M. S. Mirtorabi

  4. Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

    Y. Mohammadi

Authors
  1. F. Razzaghi Borkhani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Khaleghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. S. Mirtorabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Y. Mohammadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FRB was involved in conceptualization, validation, methodology, data collection, formal analysis, software, writing; BK helped in methodology, data collection, formal analysis, software, writing—review & editing; MSM contributed to methodology, data collection, software, formal analysis, writing; YM was involved in conceptualization, data collection, software, formal analysis, writing—original draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Razzaghi Borkhani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Parveen Fatemeh Rupani.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Razzaghi Borkhani, F., Khaleghi, B., Mirtorabi, M.S. et al. Explaining farmers’ pro-environmental behaviors toward plant, soil and water conservation in Iran: an application of value–belief–norm theory. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20, 2539–2550 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04568-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04568-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation