Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of water quality and risk assessment by coupled geospatial and statistical approach along lower Damodar river

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater quality is regulated by hydrological, physical, geochemical and biological factors. The current study assessed groundwater quality with the help of a water quality index by integrating the analysis of physicochemical parameters and heavy metals at 40 rural locations in Hooghly and Howrah districts along the lower Damodar river. The water quality index showed that 51.89 km2 out of the 601.17 km2 study area exceeded acceptable limits (water quality index > 100) of potable water. Arsenic was the most sensitive parameter followed by iron, manganese and fluoride. Bairakurchi area was severely contaminated due to high concentration of arsenic and iron, and Haraditiya was severely contaminated due to high concentration of iron. A risk assessment was performed for adults and children on exposure to heavy metals, using deterministic and probabilistic approaches. Monte Carlo simulation was applied for the probabilistic analysis and sensitivity analysis to determine the parameters most influencing risk hazard. The hazard index demonstrated that children were at higher risk than adults. The sensitivity analysis showed that concentration of heavy metals greatly influenced risk value. Principal component analysis and correlation matrix were applied to ascertain the relationship among the parameters. Five principal components were extracted with 76.29% cumulative variance. A strong correlation was found between heavy metals and physicochemical parameters, i.e. arsenic and iron (0.928), arsenic and manganese (0.809), iron and turbidity (0.867) and calcium and hardness (0.957).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Data have high importance, and it will be provided on demand.

Code availability

ArcGIS 10.5

References

  • Ako AA, Shimada J, Hosono T, Ichiyanagi K, Nkeng GE, Fantong WY, Eyong GET, Roger NN (2011) Evaluation of groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking, domestic, and agricultural uses in the Banana Plain (Mbanga, Njombe, Penja) of the Cameroon Volcanic Line. Environ Geochem Health 33(6):559–575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alberto WD, Del Pilar DM, Valeria AM, Fabiana PS, Cecilia HA, de los Ángeles, B.M. (2001) Pattern recognition techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality a case study: Suquı́a River Basin (Córdoba–Argentina). Water Res 35(12):2881–2894

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan P, Saleem A, Mallikarjun ND (2011) Groundwater quality mapping using geographic information system (GIS): A case study of Gulbarga City, Karnataka. India Afr J Environ Sci Techno 5(12):1069–1084

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Batabyal AK (2018) Hydrogeochemistry and quality of groundwater in a part of Damodar Valley, Eastern India: an integrated geochemical and statistical approach. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 32(8):2351–2368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batabyal AK, Gupta S (2017) Fluoride-contaminated groundwater of Birbhum district, West Bengal, India: Interpretation of drinking and irrigation suitability and major geochemical processes using principal component analysis. Environ Monit Assess 189(8):1–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhardwaj R, Gupta A, Garg JK (2017) Evaluation of heavy metal contamination using environmetrics and indexing approach for River Yamuna, Delhi stretch. India Water Sci 31(1):52–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bose P, Sharma A (2002) Role of iron in controlling speciation and mobilization of arsenic in subsurface environment. Water Res 36(19):4916–4926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brindha K, Jagadeshan G, Kalpana L, Elango L (2016) Fluoride in weathered rock aquifers of southern India: managed aquifer recharge for mitigation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(9):8302–8316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cangemi M, Madonia P, Albano L, Bonfardeci A, Di Figlia MG, Di Martino RMR, Nicolosi M, Favara R (2019) Heavy metal concentrations in the groundwater of the Barcellona-Milazzo Plain (Italy): Contributions from Geogenic and Anthropogenic Sources. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(2):285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi A, Bhattacharjee S, Singh AK, Kumar V (2018) A new approach for indexing groundwater heavy metal pollution. Ecol Indic 87:323–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SC, Liao CM (2006) Health risk assessment on human exposed to environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons pollution sources. Sci Total Environ 366(1):112–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cude CG (2001) Oregon water quality index a tool for evaluating water quality management effectiveness 1. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37(1):125–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feuyit G, Lambi JN, Njoyim-Tamungang E, Laminsi S (2019) Assessment of the nutrients in the leachate and the groundwater quality for drinking and farming around the nkolfoulou landfill in Yaoundé, Cameroon. J Chem 2019:16–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fijani E, Moghaddam AA, Tsai FTC, Tayfur G (2017) Analysis and Assessment of Hydrochemical Characteristics of Maragheh-Bonab Plain Aquifer. Northwest Iran Water Resour Manag 31(3):765–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fordyce FM, Vrana K, Zhovinsky E, Povoroznuk V, Toth G, Hope BC, Iljinsky U, Baker J (2007) A health risk assessment for fluoride in Central Europe. Environ Geochem Health 29(2):83–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galhardi JA, Bonotto DM (2016) Hydrogeochemical features of surface water and groundwater contaminated with acid mine drainage (AMD) in coal mining areas: a case study in southern Brazil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(18):18911–18927

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gogu RC, Dassargues A (2000) Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods. Environ Geol 39(6):549–559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Golekar RB, Patil SN, Baride MV (2013) Human health risk due to trace element contamination in groundwater from the Anjani and Jhiri river catchment area in northern Maharashtra. India Earth Sci Res J 17(1):17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Herojeet R, Rishi MS, Kishore N (2015) Integrated approach of heavy metal pollution indices and complexity quantification using chemometric models in the Sirsa Basin, Nalagarh valley, Himachal Pradesh. India Chin J Geochem 34(4):620–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ICMR (Indian Council of Medical Research) (2009) Nutrient requirements and recommended dietary allowances for Indians. A report of the expert group of the ICMR, Hyderabad, India, p 334

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilavarasan N, Ilangovan R, Rajesh Prasanna P (2016) Water quality assessment on Ooty lake in Nilgiris district. J Environ Biol 37(6):1463–1472

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnny JC, Sashikkumar MC, Kirubakaran M, Mathi LM (2018) GIS-based assessment of groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and irrigation purpose in a hard rock terrain: a case study in the upper Kodaganar basin, Dindigul district, Tamil Nadu, India. Desalin Water Treat 102:49–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalra K, Vasthare R, Singhal DK, Shankara UK (2019) Assessment of concentrations of trace elements in the groundwater sources along the course of Swarna river in Udupi district, Karnataka state. India Int J Civ Eng 10(2):1366–1375

    Google Scholar 

  • Karunanidhi D, Aravinthasamy P, Subramani T, Wu J, Srinivasamoorthy K (2019) Potential health risk assessment for fluoride and nitrate contamination in hard rock aquifers of Shanmuganadhi River basin. South India Hum Ecol Risk Assess 25(1–2):250–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khozyem H, Hamdan A, Tantawy AA, Emam A, Elbadry E (2019) Distribution and origin of iron and manganese in groundwater: case study, Balat-Teneida area, El-Dakhla Basin. Egypt Arab J Geosci 12(16):1–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar SM, Ravindranath S (1998) Water Studies-Methods for monitoring water quality. Center for Environment Education (CEE), Banglore, Karnataka, India, p 191

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar PS, Delson PD, Babu PT (2012) Appraisal of heavy metals in groundwater in Chennai city using a HPI model. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 89(4):793–798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lapworth DJ, Krishan G, MacDonald AM, Rao MS (2017) Groundwater quality in the alluvial aquifer system of northwest India: New evidence of the extent of anthropogenic and geogenic contamination. Sci Total Environ 599–600:1433–1444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorite-Herrera M, Jimenez-Espinosa R, Jimenez-Millan J, Hiscock KM (2008) Integrated hydrochemical assessment of the Quaternary alluvial aquifer of the Guadalquivir River, southern Spain. Appl Geochem 23(8):2040–2054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maanan M, Saddik M, Maanan M, Chaibi M, Assobhei O, Zourarah B (2015) Environmental and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in sediments of Nador lagoon, Morocco. Ecol Indic 48:616–626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahato MK, Singh PK, Tiwari AK, Singh AK (2016) Risk assessment due to intake of metals in groundwater of east Bokaro coalfield, Jharkhand. India Expo Health 8(2):265–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miguel ED, Iribarren I, Chacon E, Ordonez A, Charlesworth S (2007) Risk-based evaluation of the exposure of children to trace elements in playgrounds in Madrid (Spain). Chemosphere 66(3):505–513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan SV, Nithila P, Reddy SJ (1996) Estimation of heavy metals in drinking water and development of heavy metal pollution index. J Environ Sci Health A 31(2):283–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagarajan R, Rajmohan N, Mahendran U, Senthamilkumar S (2010) Evaluation of groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and agricultural use in Thanjavur city, Tamil Nadu. India Environ Monit Assess 171(1–4):289–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nriagu JO, Bhattacharya P, Mukherjee AB, Bundschuh J, Zevenhoven R, Loeppert RH (2007) Arsenic in soil and groundwater: an overview. Trace Metals Other Contaminants Environ 9:3–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odukoya AM (2015) Geochemical and quality assessment of groundwater in some Nigerian basement complex. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12(11):3643–3656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozel HU, Ozel HB, Cetin M, Sevik H, Gemici BT, Varol T (2019) Base alteration of some heavy metal concentrations on local and seasonal in Bartin River. Environ Monit Assess 191(9):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozel HU, Gemici BT, Gemici E, Ozel HB, Cetin M, Sevik H (2020) Application of artificial neural networks to predict the heavy metal contamination in the Bartin River. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(34):42495–42512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pal P, Sen M, Manna A, Pal J, Pal P, Roy S, Roy P (2009) Contamination of groundwater by arsenic: a review of occurrence, causes, impacts, remedies and membrane-based purification. J Integr Environ Sci 6(4):295–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Planning Commission. (2011). Faster, sustainable and more inclusive growth: An approach to the 12th five year plan (No. id: 4452)

  • Rakotondrabe F, Ngoupayou JRN, Mfonka Z, Rasolomanana EH, Abolo AJN, Ako AA (2018) Water quality assessment in the Bétaré-Oya gold mining area (East-Cameroon): Multivariate Statistical Analysis approach. Sci Total Environ 610–611:831–844

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reza R, Singh G (2010) Heavy metal contamination and its indexing approach for river water. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7(4):785–792

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sankaran S, Sundararajan N, Khadija S (2015) Geochemical analysis of groundwater samples in the vicinity of lakes and drainage network. J Geol Soc India 86(4):459–467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shankar S, Shanker U (2014) Arsenic contamination of groundwater: A review of sources, prevalence, health risks, and strategies for mitigation. Sci World J 2014:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh G, Kamal RK (2017) Heavy metal contamination and its indexing approach for groundwater of Goa mining region. India Appl Water Sci 7(3):1479–1485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sracek, A., Bhattacharya, P., Jacks, G. and Gustafsson, J.P. (2001). Mobility of arsenic and geochemical modeling in groundwater environment. Groundwater Arsenic Contamination in the Bengal Delta Plain of Bangladesh, p.9.

  • Tahri M, Benyaich F, Bounakhla M, Bilal E, Gruffat JJ, Moutte J, Garcia D (2005) Multivariate analysis of heavy metal contents in soils, sediments and water in the region of Meknes (Central Morocco). Environ Monit Assess 102(1–3):405–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taiwo AM, Awomeso JA (2017) Assessment of trace metal concentration and health risk of artisanal gold mining activities in Ijeshaland, Osun State Nigeria— Part 1. J Geochem Explor 177:1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari AK, Singh PK, Singh AK, De Maio M (2016) Estimation of Heavy Metal Contamination in Groundwater and Development of a Heavy Metal Pollution Index by Using GIS Technique. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 96(4):508–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UNDESA (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs). (2013). World Population Prospects. Population Division Database. Detailed indicators 2012 Revision.

  • USEPA. (1989). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A). US Environmental Protection Agency EPA/540/1–89/ 002

  • USEPA. (2004). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment) Final. US Environmental Protection Agency.

  • Verma P, Singh PK, Sinha RR, Tiwari AK (2020) Assessment of groundwater quality status by using water quality index (WQI) and geographic information system (GIS) approaches: a case study of the Bokaro district. India Appl Water Sci 10(1):1–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vesali Naseh MR, Noori R, Berndtsson R, Adamowski J, Sadatipour E (2018) Groundwater pollution sources apportionment in the ghaen plain. Iran Int J Environ Res Public Health 15(1):172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Xu B, Guo Z, Han J, Li H, Jin L, Chen F, Xiong Y (2019) Human health risk assessment of groundwater arsenic contamination in Jinghui irrigation district, China. J Environ Manage 237:163–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to acknowledge the authorities of IIT(ISM), Dhanbad, for financial support to Prof. V.V. Govind Kumar under the FRS project (FRS (120)/2017-18/ME) and Prof. Srinivas Pasupuleti under PDA for carrying out this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RKS collected the data, analysed the samples and contributed in manuscript preparation. VGKV was involved in funding, supervised the work and contributed in manuscript correction. SP helped in funding, supervised the work and contributed in manuscript correction.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Pasupuleti.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Editorial Responsibility: Har Pant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, R.K., Villuri, V.G.K. & Pasupuleti, S. Evaluation of water quality and risk assessment by coupled geospatial and statistical approach along lower Damodar river. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 9549–9570 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03644-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03644-0

Keywords

Navigation