Abstract
This study presents the wet deposition and bulk deposition of major ions in Kirklareli (Turkey). In the samples of wet deposition and bulk deposition, concentrations of major cations (Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+, K+, NH4+) and major anions (Cl−, NO3−, SO42−) were determined, and pH values were also measured. In both deposition types, order of magnitude for the average concentration (mg L−1) of major ions is as Ca2+ > NH4+ > Na+ > K+ > Mg2+ for cations and as SO42− > Cl− > NO3− for anions. Average concentration values of main cations and main anions in bulk deposition samples were found to be higher than those in wet deposition samples. By calculating the enrichment factors of the chemical components and non-sea salt concentration values, the sources of ions in wet deposition and bulk deposition were tried to be determined. In both deposition types, ions with the highest average enrichment factor are Ca2+, SO42−, and K+. Non-sea salt fraction value of Ca2+ and SO42− ions is 97% both in wet deposition and bulk deposition types. In addition, principal component analysis, one of the multivariate statistical methods for source assessment of ions in wet deposition and bulk deposition samples, was performed. The trajectories of the cyclones affecting the study area are divided into groups, and the chemical components in the wet deposition samples were compared according to the groups. The average concentration values of K+, Cl−, and NO3− in cyclone group 2 were higher than that of cyclone group 1.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- WD:
-
Wet deposition
- BD:
-
Bulk deposition
- DD:
-
Dry deposition
- EF:
-
Enrichment factor
- NSS:
-
Non-sea salt
- NSSF:
-
Non-sea salt fraction
- PCA:
-
Principal component analysis
- CG:
-
Cyclone group
- PC:
-
Principal component
References
Akkoyunlu BO, Tayanç M (2003) Analyses of wet and bulk deposition in four different regions of Istanbul, Turkey. Atmos Environ 37:3571–3579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00349-2
Akkoyunlu BO, Baltaci H, Tayanc M (2019) Atmospheric conditions of extreme precipitation events in western Turkey for the period 2006–2015. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 19:107–119. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-107-2019
Al-Momani IF, Ataman OY, Anwari MA, Tuncel S, Köse C, Tuncel G (1995) Chemical composition of precipitation near an industrial area at Izmir, Turkey. Atmos Environ 29:1131–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00027-V
Anatolaki Ch, Tsitouridou R (2009) Relationship between acidity and ionic composition of wet precipitation: a two years study at an urban site, Thessaloniki, Greece. Atmos Res 92:100–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.09.008
Baltaci H, Akkoyunlu BO, Arslan H, Yetemen O, Ozdemir ET (2019) The influence of meteorological conditions and atmospheric circulation types on PM10 levels in western Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 191:466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7609-7
Brewer PG (1975) Minor elements in seawater. In: Riley JP, Skirrow G (eds) Chemical oceanography, vol 1, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London, pp 415–496
ÇDR (2020) Kırklareli İli 2019 yılı Çevre Durum Raporu, T.C. Kırklareli Valiliği Çevre ve Şehircilik İl Müdürlüğü, ÇED, İzin ve Denetim Şube Müdürlüğü. https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/ced/icerikler/kirklarel-_-cdr2019-20200708151830.pdf
Cerqueira MRF, Pinto MF, Derossi IN, Esteves WT, Santos MDR, Matos MAC, Lowinsohn D, Matos RC (2014) Chemical characteristics of rainwater at a southeastern site of Brazil. Atmos Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2014.031
Chantara S, Chunsuk N (2008) Comparison of wet-only and bulk deposition at Chiang Mai (Thailand) based on rainwater chemical composition. Atmos Environ 42:5511–5518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.03.022
Dufour CML, Chapman B, Lore JA, Nosal M (1985) Acid deposition near a sour gas plant in southwestern Alberta. Water Air Soil Pollut 24:361–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00282488
Golobočanin D, Žujić A, Milenković A, Miljević N (2008) Precipitation composition and wet deposition temporal pattern in Central Serbia for the period from 1998 to 2004. Environ Monit Assess 142:185–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9919-4
Karaca M, Deniz A, Tayanç M (2000) Cyclone track variability over Turkey in association with regional climate. Int J Climatol 20:1225–1236. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0088(200008)20:10%3c1225::AID-JOC535%3e3.0.CO;2-1
Kulshrestha UC, Sarkar AK, Srivastava SS, Parashar DC (1996) Investigation into atmospheric deposition through precipitation studies at New Delhi (India). Atmos Environ 30:4149–4154. https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(96)00034-9
MEU (2016) Air Quality Monitoring Station of Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Urbanization. https://sim.csb.gov.tr/STN/STN_Report/StationDataDownloadNew
Migliavacca D, Teixeira EC, Wieganda F, Machado ACM, Sanchez J (2005) Atmospheric precipitation and chemical composition of an urban site, Guaíba hydrographic basin, Brazil. Atmos Environ 39:1829–1844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.12.005
Mosello R, Marchetto A, Tartari GA (1988) Bulk and wet atmospheric deposition chemistry at Pallanza (N. Italy). Water Air Soil Pollut 42:137–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00282397
Niu H, He Y, Lu XX, Shen J, Du J, Zhang T, Pu T, Xin H, Chang L (2014) Chemical composition of rainwater in the Yulong Snow Mountain region, Southwestern China. Atmos Res 144:195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.03.010
Okay C, Akkoyunlu BO, Tayanç M (2002) Composition of wet deposition in Kaynarca, Turkey. Environ Pollut 118:401–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00292-5
Oruc I, Georgieva E, Hristova E, Velchev K, Demir G, Akkoyunlu BO (2021) Wet deposition in the cross-border region between Turkey and Bulgaria: chemical analysis in view of cyclone paths. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 106:812–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-021-03210-x
Rolph G, Stein A, Stunder B (2017) Real-time environmental applications and display sYstem: READY. Environ Model Softw 95:210–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.025
Roy A, Chatterjee A, Tiwari S, Sarkar C, Das SK, Ghosh SK, Raha S (2016) Precipitation chemistry over urban, rural and high altitude Himalayan stations in eastern India. Atmos Res 181:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.06.005
Sat24 (2015) Sat24.com - The Meteo Company BV. http://www.sat24.com/history.aspx
Scheider WA, Snyder WR, Clark B (1979) Deposition of nutrients and major ions by precipitation in south-central Ontario. Water Air Soil Pollut 12:171–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047121
Seinfeld JH (1975) Air pollution: physical and chemical fundamentals. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York
Singer A, Shamay Y, Fried M, Ganor E (1993) Acid rain on Mt Carmel, Israel. Atmos Environ Part A Gen Top 27:2287–2293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90398-I
Stein AF, Draxler RR, Rolph GD, Stunder BJB, Cohen MD, Ngan F (2015) NOAA’s HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 96:2059–2077. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1
Vermette SJ, Drake JJ, Landsberger S (1988) Intra-urban precipitation quality: Hamilton, Canada. Water Air Soil Pollut 38:37–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279584
Wu Y, Xu Z, Liu W, Zhao T, Zhang X, Jiang H, Yu C, Zhou L, Zhou X (2016) Chemical compositions of precipitation at three non-urban sites of Hebei Province, North China: influence of terrestrial sources on ionic composition. Atmos Res 181:115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.06.009
Zhang M, Wang S, Wu F, Yuan X, Zhang Y (2007) Chemical compositions of wet precipitation and anthropogenic influences at a developing urban site in southeastern China. Atmos Res 84:311–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2006.09.003
Acknowledgements
The author thanks his colleagues for the support on the publication of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: Samareh Mirkia.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oruc, I. Analyzing the wet and bulk deposition with receptor models in Kirklareli, Turkey. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 1601–1610 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03621-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03621-7