Abstract
After the Paris Climate Conference (COP21), countries worldwide are making progress toward carbon neutrality targets. However, despite flourishing economically, emerging countries fail to ensure environmental sustainability. Hence, it is crucial for these countries to identify the macroeconomic factor that could address the ecological concerns. Therefore, this paper examines the linkage between environmental innovations, energy productivity, economic globalization, and economic growth on environmental degradation in emerging countries. Based on the data from 1990 to 2017, the study applies the advanced panel data estimation tool cross-sectional autoregressive distributed lags (CS-ARDL) for the long-run and short-run empirical estimation that allows cross-sectional dependence and heterogeneity in slope parameters. The empirical results unveil that environmental innovations and energy productivity significantly improve environmental quality by reducing the ecological footprint. Moreover, the results unfold that economic globalization worsens the environmental quality by exacerbating the ecological footprint, while an inverted U-shaped relationship between environmental degradation and economic growth confirms the validity of the environment Kuznets curve in emerging countries. Results suggest that the government should develop such strategies that encourage environmental innovations and energy productivity to balance the speed of economic globalization and economic growth.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed in this study are accessible from the corresponding author on demand.
Notes
Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, China, Chile, India, Egypt, Hungary, Mexico, Malaysia, Poland, Philippines, Peru, Russia, South Africa, Korea, Rep., Turkey, Thailand.
Abbreviations
- AMG:
-
Augmented mean group
- CD:
-
Cross-section dependence
- CS-ARDL:
-
Cross-sectional autoregressive distributed lags
- GDP:
-
Economic growth
- EF:
-
Ecological footprint
- EKC:
-
Environmental Kuznets curve
- EPR:
-
Energy productivity
References
Ahmad M, Jiang P, Majeed A et al (2020) The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: an advanced panel data estimation. Resour Policy 69:101817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101817
Ahmad M, Jiang P, Murshed M et al (2021) Modelling the dynamic linkages between eco-innovation, urbanization, economic growth and ecological footprints for G7 countries: does financial globalization matter? Sustain Cities Soc 70:102881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102881
Ahmed Z, Wang Z, Mahmood F et al (2019) Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:18565–18582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05224-9
Ahmed Z, Zhang B, Cary M (2021) Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecol Indic 121:107060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107060
Akram R, Chen F, Khalid F et al (2021) Heterogeneous effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on economic growth of BRICS countries: a fixed effect panel quantile regression analysis. Energy 215:119019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119019
Aldieri L, Carlucci F, Vinci CP, Yigitcanlar T (2019) Environmental innovation, knowledge spillovers and policy implications: a systematic review of the economic effects literature. J Clean Prod 239:118051
Al-Mulali U, Weng-Wai C, Sheau-Ting L, Mohammed AH (2015) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecol Indic 48:315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.029
Alola AA, Bekun FV, Sarkodie SA (2019) Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Sci Total Environ 685:702–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.139
Andersson FNG (2018) International trade and carbon emissions: The role of Chinese institutional and policy reforms. J Environ Manag 205:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.052
Antonelli C, Feder C (2020) The new direction of technological change in the global economy. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 52:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.09.013
Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91:877–908. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.877
Atasoy BS (2017) Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across the U.S.: evidence from panel mean group estimators. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 77:731–747
Charfeddine L, Mrabet Z (2017) The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: a panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 76:138–154
Chen W, Lei Y (2018) The impacts of renewable energy and technological innovation on environment-energy-growth nexus: new evidence from a panel quantile regression. Renew Energy 123:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.026
Cheng Z, Li L, Liu J (2018) Industrial structure, technical progress and carbon intensity in China’s provinces. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:2935–2946
Choi B, Park W, Yu BK (2017) Energy intensity and firm growth. Energy Econ 65:399–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.015
Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econom 188:393–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007
Cramer W, Guiot J, Fader M et al (2018) Climate change and interconnected risks to sustainable development in the Mediterranean. Nat Clim Change 8:972–980
Danish UR, Khan SUD (2020) Determinants of the ecological footprint: role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc 54:101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996
Danish HST, Baloch MA et al (2019) Linking economic growth and ecological footprint through human capital and biocapacity. Sustain Cities Soc 47:101516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101516
Destek MA, Ulucak R, Dogan E (2018) Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: the role of ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:29387–29396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2911-4
Ding Q, Khattak SI, Ahmad M (2021) Towards sustainable production and consumption: assessing the impact of energy productivity and eco-innovation on consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions (CCO2) in G-7 nations. Sustain Prod Consum 27:254–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.004
Dogan E, Seker F (2016) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 60:1074–1085
Dreher A (2006) Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Appl Econ 38:1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500392078
Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29:1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
Eberhardt M (2012) Estimating panel time-series models with heterogeneous slopes. Stata J Promot Commun Stat Stata 12:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1201200105
Erdoğan S, Yıldırım S, Yıldırım DÇ, Gedikli A (2020) The effects of innovation on sectoral carbon emissions: evidence from G20 countries. J Environ Manag 267:110637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110637
Figge L, Oebels K, Offermans A (2017) The effects of globalization on Ecological Footprints: an empirical analysis. Environ Dev Sustain 19:863–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9769-8
Ganda F (2019) The impact of innovation and technology investments on carbon emissions in selected organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. J Clean Prod 217:469–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.235
Georgatzi VV, Stamboulis Y, Vetsikas A (2020) Examining the determinants of CO2 emissions caused by the transport sector: Empirical evidence from 12 European countries. Econ Anal Policy 65:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2019.11.003
GFN (2020). Global Footprint Network. http://data.footprintnetwork.org/?_ga=2.119469760.875854760.1592913814-1106911989.1586515594#/
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge, MA
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110:353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
Gygli S, Haelg F, Potrafke N, Sturm JE (2019) The KOF Globalisation Index—revisited. Rev Int Organ 14:543–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2
Halicioglu F (2009) An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 37:1156–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.012
Hanif I, Faraz Raza SM, Gago-de-Santos P, Abbas Q (2019) Fossil fuels, foreign direct investment, and economic growth have triggered CO2 emissions in emerging Asian economies: some empirical evidence. Energy 171:493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.011
Hassan ST, Xia E, Khan NH, Shah SMA (2019) Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:2929–2938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3803-3
Huaman RNE, Jun TX (2014) Energy related CO2 emissions and the progress on CCS projects: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 31:368–385
Ji X, Umar M, Ali S et al (2020) Does fiscal decentralization and eco-innovation promote sustainable environment? A case study of selected fiscally decentralized countries. Sustain Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2132
Kapetanios G, Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2011) Panels with non-stationary multifactor error structures. J Econom 160:326–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.10.001
Khan MK, Teng JZ, Khan MI, Khan MO (2019) Impact of globalization, economic factors and energy consumption on CO2 emissions in Pakistan. Sci Total Environ 688:424–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.065
Le TH, Chang Y, Park D (2016) Trade openness and environmental quality: international evidence. Energy Policy 92:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.030
Liu X, Bae J (2018) Urbanization and industrialization impact of CO2 emissions in China. J Clean Prod 172:178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.156
Mensah CN, Long X, Boamah KB et al (2018) The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:29678–29698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2968-0
Ozcan B, Apergis N, Shahbaz M (2018) A revisit of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey: new evidence from bootstrap rolling window causality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:32381–32394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3165-x
Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Work Pap Econ 0435
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econom 22:265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econom 142:50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
Rahman MM (2020) Environmental degradation: the role of electricity consumption, economic growth and globalisation. J Environ Manag 253:109742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109742
Rudolph A, Figge L (2017) Determinants of Ecological Footprints: what is the role of globalization? Ecol Indic 81:348–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.060
Saboori B, Sulaiman J (2013) Environmental degradation, economic growth and energy consumption: evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve in Malaysia. Energy Policy 60:892–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.099
Santra S (2017) The effect of technological innovation on production-based energy and CO2 emission productivity: evidence from BRICS countries. Afr J Sci Technol Innov Dev 9:503–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2017.1308069
Shabir M, Ali M, Hashmi SH, Bakhsh S (2021) Heterogeneous effects of economic policy uncertainty and foreign direct investment on environmental quality: cross-country evidence. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-021-15715-3
Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Ozturk I (2016) Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis and the role of globalization in selected African countries. Ecol Indic 67:623–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.024
Shahbaz M, Nasir MA, Roubaud D (2018) Environmental degradation in France: the effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations. Energy Econ 74:843–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.020
Su HN, Moaniba IM (2017) Does innovation respond to climate change? Empirical evidence from patents and greenhouse gas emissions. Technol Forecast Soc Change 122:49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.017
Tang CF, Tan BW (2015) The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy 79:447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.033
Töbelmann D, Wendler T (2020) The impact of environmental innovation on carbon dioxide emissions. J Clean Prod 244:118787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118787
Ulucak ZŞ, İlkay SÇ, Özcan B, Gedikli A (2020) Financial globalization and environmental degradation nexus: evidence from emerging economies. Resour Policy 67:101698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101698
Wang L, Vo XV, Shahbaz M, Ak A (2020) Globalization and carbon emissions: is there any role of agriculture value-added, financial development, and natural resource rent in the aftermath of COP21? J Environ Manag 268:110712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110712
Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69:709–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
Zaidi SAH, Zafar MW, Shahbaz M, Hou F (2019) Dynamic linkages between globalization, financial development and carbon emissions: evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. J Clean Prod 228:533–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.210
Zhang YJ, Peng YL, Ma CQ, Shen B (2017) Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Policy 100:18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.005
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the editor, and anonymous reviewers for their honest, helpful, and constructive comments.
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MA: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing-Original Draft, Revision. MS: Writing-Original Draft, Writing, review & editing. RN: Writing-Original Draft. KS: Writing, review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors announce that there are no competing interests among them.
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: Q. Aguilar-Virgen.
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahmad, M., Shabir, M., Naheed, R. et al. How do environmental innovations and energy productivity affect the environment? Analyzing the role of economic globalization. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 7527–7538 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03620-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03620-8