Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi-dimensions optimization for optimum modifications of light-shelves parameters for daylighting and energy efficiency

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The greatest role in the building design is to optimize the use of natural daylight harvests to ensure human comfort and energy usage. This research aims to introduce an optimized office workspace that meets both daylight availability and energy efficiency. Honeybee and Ladybug plugins for grasshopper parametric software is utilized to simulate daylight and energy where multi-objective genetic optimization using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms method is explored with octopus plugin, which is able to provide the best overall solution as a trade-off for multiple and conflicting design objectives simultaneously. The optimization focused on single-objective which shows major differences between daylight availability and energy efficiency while optimization for multi-objective together proved to be an efficient tool to research the trade-offs between the two contradictory objectives. The final best optimum balanced solutions can improve the sDA300/50% by decreasing with an average of −11.88%, −2.34%, −5.94%, and −20.78%, while the UDI300-2000 lx increased with an average by 39.39%, 29.23%, 46.17%, and 19.40%. The energy efficiency is slightly increased by + 1.33%, −0.61%, + 1.33%, and + 1.29%, in March, June, September, and December, respectively, compared to the reference model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alrubaih M, Zain M, Alghoul M, Ibrahim N, Shameri M, Elayeb O (2013) Research and development on aspects of daylighting fundamentals. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 21:494–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayoub M (2018) Integrating illuminance and energy evaluations of cellular automata controlled dynamic shading system using new hourly-based metrics. Sol Energy 170:336–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahdad AAS, Fadzil SFS, Taib N (2020) Optimization of daylight performance based on controllable light-shelf parameters using genetic algorithms in the tropical climate of Malaysia. J Daylighting 7:122–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahdad AAS, Syed Fadzil SF, Taib N (2020b) Evaluating kinetic light-shelves and their impacts on daylighting performance Indonesian . J Electr Eng Comput Sci 19:482–490. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v19.i1.pp482-490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahdad AAS, Syed Fadzil SF, Taib N (2020) Evaluating the effects of light-shelves to daylight distribution at south facing window using physical scaled-model method International. J Sustain Build Technol Urban Dev 11:2–15. https://doi.org/10.22712/susb.20200002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakmohammadi P, Noorzai E (2020) Optimization of the design of the primary school classrooms in terms of energy and daylight performance considering occupants’ thermal and visual comfort. Energy Rep 6:1590–1607

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellia L, Fragliasso F (2017) New parameters to evaluate the capability of a daylight-linked control system in complementing daylight. Build Environ 123:223–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Berardi U, Anaraki HK (2015) Analysis of the impacts of light shelves on the useful daylight illuminance in office buildings in Toronto. Energy Procedia 78:1793–1798

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzikonstantinou I, Sariyildiz S, Bittermann MS Conceptual airport terminal design using evolutionary computation. In: 2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2015. IEEE, pp 2245–2252

  • Chi DA, Moreno D, Navarro J (2017) Design optimisation of perforated solar façades in order to balance daylighting with thermal performance. Build Environ 125:383–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6:182–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimi-Moghadam A, Ildarabadi P, Aliakbari K, Arabkoohsar A, Fadaee F (2020) Performance analysis of light shelves in providing visual and thermal comfort and energy savings in residential buildings. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02565-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ​Ebrahimi-Moghadam A, Ildarabadi P, Aliakbari K, Fadaee, F. (2020b). Sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization of energy consumption and thermal comfort by using interior light shelves in residential buildings. Renew Energy 159:736-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.127

  • Eltaweel A, Su Y (2017) Controlling venetian blinds based on parametric design; via implementing Grasshopper’s plugins: a case study of an office building in Cairo. Energy Build 139:31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Eltaweel A, Yuehong S (2017) Using integrated parametric control to achieve better daylighting uniformity in an office room: a multi-Step comparison study. Energy Build 152:137–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang Y, Cho S (2019) Design optimization of building geometry and fenestration for daylighting and energy performance. Sol Energy 191:7–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Fathy F, Fareed HA Performance-driven Façade Design Using an Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization Approach. In: International Conference for Sustainable Design of the Built Environment-SDBE London, 2017. p 217

  • Gossard D, Lartigue B, Thellier F (2013) Multi-objective optimization of a building envelope for thermal performance using genetic algorithms and artificial neural network. Energy Build 67:253–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalali Z, Noorzai E, Heidari S (2020) Design and optimization of form and façade of an office building using the genetic algorithm Science and Technology for the. Built Environ 26:128–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Joarder M, Rahman A, Ahmed ZN, Price A, Mourshed M A simulation assessment of the height of light shelves to enhance daylighting quality in tropical office buildings under overcast sky conditions in Dhaka, Bangladesh. In: Building Simulation, Glasgow, Scotland, 2009. pp 1706–1713

  • Kamaruzzaman SN, Edwards R, Zawawi EMA, Che-Ani AI (2015) Achieving energy and cost savings through simple daylighting control in tropical historic buildings. Energy Build 90:85–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaman S, Ekici B, Cubukcuoglu C, Koyunbaba BK, Kahraman I Design of rectangular façade modules through computational intelligence. In: 2017 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2017. IEEE, pp 1021–1028

  • Kim H, Clayton MJ (2020) A multi-objective optimization approach for climate-adaptive building envelope design using parametric behavior maps. Build Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirimtat A, Krejcar O, Ekici B, Tasgetiren MF (2019) Multi-objective energy and daylight optimization of amorphous shading devices in buildings. Sol Energy 185:100–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontadakis A, Tsangrassoulis A, Doulos L, Topalis F (2017) An active sunlight redirection system for daylight enhancement beyond the perimeter zone. Build Environ 113:267–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavin C, Fiorito F (2017) Optimization of an external perforated screen for improved daylighting and thermal performance of an office space. Procedia Eng 180:571–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim Y-W, Ahmad MH, Ossen DR (2013) Internal shading for efficient tropical daylighting in Malaysian contemporary high-rise open plan office. Indoor Built Environ 22:932–951

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim Y-W, Heng C (2016) Dynamic internal light shelf for tropical daylighting in high-rise office buildings. Build Environ 106:155–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim Y-W, Kandar MZ, Ahmad MH, Ossen DR, Abdullah AM (2012) Building façade design for daylighting quality in typical government office building. Build Environ 57:194–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim YW, Ahmad MH (2015) The effects of direct sunlight on light shelf performance under tropical sky. Indoor Built Environ 24:788–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlefair PJ (1995) Light shelves: computer assessment of daylighting performance. Int J Light Res Technol 27:79–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Machairas V, Tsangrassoulis A, Axarli K (2014) Algorithms for optimization of building design: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 31:101–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangkuto RA, Feradi F, Putra RE, Atmodipoero RT, Favero F (2018) Optimisation of daylight admission based on modifications of light shelf design parameters. J Build Eng 18:195–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangkuto RA, Siregar MAA, Handina A (2018) Determination of appropriate metrics for indicating indoor daylight availability and lighting energy demand using genetic algorithm. Sol Energy 170:1074–1086

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer MJ, Szilágyi A, Gróf G (2020) Environmental and economic multi-objective optimization of a household level hybrid renewable energy system by genetic algorithm. Appl Energy 269:115058

    Google Scholar 

  • Meresi A (2016) Evaluating daylight performance of light shelves combined with external blinds in south-facing classrooms in Athens, Greece. Energy Build 116:190–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Moazzeni MH, Ghiabaklou Z (2016) Investigating the influence of light shelf geometry parameters on daylight performance and visual comfort, a case study of educational space in Tehran Iran. Buildings 6:26

    Google Scholar 

  • Motamedi S, Liedl P (2017) Integrative algorithm to optimize skylights considering fully impacts of daylight on energy. Energy Build 138:655–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabil A, Mardaljevic J (2006) Useful daylight illuminances: a replacement for daylight factors. Energy build 38:905–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa CE, Aries MB, van Loenen EJ, Hensen JL (2012) Considerations on design optimization criteria for windows providing low energy consumption and high visual comfort. Appl Energy 95:238–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino A, Cammarano S, Verso VRL, Corrado V (2017) Impact of daylighting on total energy use in offices of varying architectural features in Italy: results from a parametric study. Build Environ 113:151–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilechiha P, Mahdavinejad M, Pour Rahimian F, Carnemolla P, Seyedzadeh S (2020) Multi-objective optimisation framework for designing office windows: quality of view, daylight and energy efficiency. Appl Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart CF, Andersen M (2006) Development and validation of a radiance model for a translucent panel. Energy Build 38:890–904

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart CF, Walkenhorst O (2001) Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds. Energy Build 33:683–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Roshan M, Barau AS (2016) Assessing anidolic daylighting system for efficient daylight in open plan office in the tropics journal of building. Engineering 8:58–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Roudsari MS, Pak M, Smith A Ladybug: a parametric environmental plugin for grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally-conscious design. In: Proceedings of the 13th international IBPSA conference held in Lyon, France Aug, 2013. pp 3128–3135

  • Shahbazi Y, Heydari M, Haghparast F (2019) An early-stage design optimization for office buildings’ façade providing high-energy performance and daylight. Indoor Built Environ 28:1350–1367

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi X, Yang W (2013) Performance-driven architectural design and optimization technique from a perspective of architects. Autom Constr 32:125–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard M (2014) MS 1525. Energy efficiency and use of renewable energy for non-residential buildings–Code of practice (Second revision), Department of Standards Malaysia

  • Sun Y et al (2020) Analysis of the daylight performance of window integrated photovoltaics systems. Renew Energy 145:153–163

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabadkani A, Shoubi MV, Soflaei F, Banihashemi S (2019) Integrated parametric design of adaptive facades for user’s visual comfort. Autom Constr 106:102857

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang R, Lu S, Feng W (2020) Impact of adjustment strategies on building design process in different climates oriented by multiple performance. Appl Energy 266:114822

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrier GA, Raphael B (2017) Performance evaluation of light shelves. Energy Build 140:19–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi YK, Yin J, Tang Y (2018) Developing an advanced daylight model for building energy tool to simulate dynamic shading device. Sol Energy 163:140–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Yufka M, Ekici B, Cubukcuoglu C, Chatzikonstantinou I, Sariyildiz IS Multi-Objective skylight optimization for a healthcare facility foyer space. In: 2017 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2017. IEEE, pp 1008–1014

  • Zazzini P, Romano A, Di Lorenzo A, Portaluri V, Di Crescenzo A (2020) Experimental analysis of the performance of light shelves in different geometrical configurations through the scale model approach. J Daylighting 7:37–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang A, Bokel R, van den Dobbelsteen A, Sun Y, Huang Q, Zhang Q (2017) Optimization of thermal and daylight performance of school buildings based on a multi-objective genetic algorithm in the cold climate of China. Energy Build 139:371–384

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by King Saud University, Vice Deanship of Research Chairs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ali Ahmed Salem Bahdad: Methodology, Simulation, Writing-Original draft preparation, investigation and data analysis, Sharifah Fairuz Syed Fadzil: Conceptualization, methodology, supervision, Hilary Omatule Onubi and Saleh Ahmed BenLasod: Reviewing and Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. S. Bahdad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Shahid Hussain.

Appendix

Appendix

Tables 8, 9, and 10 presented the optimum parameters values of selected solutions.

Table 8 Optimum parameters values of LS in all optimum solutions for sDA and UDI
Table 9 Optimum parameters values of LS in all optimum solutions for EUI
Table 10 Optimum parameters values of LS in all optimum solutions for best balanced UDI, sDA, and EUI

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bahdad, A.A.S., Fadzil, S.F.S., Onubi, H.O. et al. Multi-dimensions optimization for optimum modifications of light-shelves parameters for daylighting and energy efficiency. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 2659–2676 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03328-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03328-9

Keywords

Navigation