Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The optimal blendings of diesel, biodiesel and gasoline with various exhaust gas recirculations for reducing NOx and smoke emissions from a diesel engine

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the purpose of reducing both NOx and smoke from diesel engine exhaust, the blendings of gasoline into diesel/biodiesel mixture were studied to determine the optimal ratio of diesel/biodiesel/gasoline at various speeds and loads under different exhaust gas recirculations (EGRs) in an electronic-controlled common-rail injection turbocharged diesel engine. With blending biodiesel, the modification of EGR suppressed the NOx emission but increased the opacity at higher load. With the increase in gasoline addition, the biodiesel proportion needs to be higher for promoting the oxidation of soot. Considering the emission reductions of opacity and NOx, as well as the issues of cost and lubricity, it is recommended that 20% biodiesel and 5% gasoline would be the optimal blending ratio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.

Funding

Funding was provided by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Grant No. 108-2221-E-006-220-MY3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. -C. Wang.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: M. Abbaspour.

Appendix

Appendix

See Figs. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34 and Tables 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11.

Fig. 11
figure 11

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D100 under OR condition

Fig. 12
figure 12

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D90B10 under OR condition

Fig. 13
figure 13

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D80B20 under OR condition

Fig. 14
figure 14

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D70B30 under OR condition

Fig. 15
figure 15

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D100 under EGR 20%

Fig. 16
figure 16

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D90B10 under EGR 20%

Fig. 17
figure 17

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D80B20 under EGR 20%

Fig. 18
figure 18

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D70B30 under EGR 20%

Fig. 19
figure 19

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D90B5G5 under OR condition

Fig. 20
figure 20

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D85B10G5 under OR condition

Fig. 21
figure 21

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D80B15G5 under OR condition

Fig. 22
figure 22

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D75B20G5 under OR condition

Fig. 23
figure 23

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D70B25G5 under OR condition

Fig. 24
figure 24

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D90B5G5 under EGR 20%

Fig. 25
figure 25

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D85B10G5 under EGR 20%

Fig. 26
figure 26

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D80B15G5 under EGR 20%

Fig. 27
figure 27

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D75B20G5 under EGR 20%

Fig. 28
figure 28

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D70B25G5 under EGR 20%

Fig. 29
figure 29

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D80B10G10 under OR condition

Fig. 30
figure 30

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D70B20G10 under OR condition

Fig. 31
figure 31

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D70B15G5 under OR condition

Fig. 32
figure 32

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity with HC emissions with D80B10G10 under EGR 20%

Fig. 33
figure 33

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D70B20G10 under EGR 20%

Fig. 34
figure 34

The engine operating air–fuel equivalent ratio (λ), NOx, opacity and HC emissions with D70B15G5 under EGR 20%

Table 5 The wear characteristics of the fuels: (a) D0B50G50 and (b) D50B25G25
Table 6 The brake specific fuel consumption and air–fuel equivalent ratio with blending various proportions of biodiesel
Table 7 The brake specific fuel consumption and air–fuel equivalent ratio with blending various proportions of biodiesel and fixed proportion of gasoline
Table 8 The brake specific fuel consumption and air–fuel equivalent ratio with blending various proportions of biodiesel and gasoline
Table 9 The results of NOx, HC and opacity with blending various proportions of biodiesel (The values in italics under the original values are the one with EGR made up to 20%)
Table 10 The results of NOx, HC and opacity with blending various proportions of biodiesel and fixed proportion of gasoline (The values in italics under the original values are the one with EGR made up to 20%)
Table 11 The results of NOx, HC and opacity with blending various proportions of biodiesel and gasoline (The values in italics under the original values are the one with EGR made up to 20%)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, R.H., Ong, H.C. & Wang, W.C. The optimal blendings of diesel, biodiesel and gasoline with various exhaust gas recirculations for reducing NOx and smoke emissions from a diesel engine. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 17, 4623–4654 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02809-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02809-7

Keywords

Navigation