Skip to main content
Log in

Water distribution network failure analysis under uncertainty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Failure analysis of water distribution network gains prime importance as it plays a crucial role in meeting the increasing demand for water in megacities. Water interruption can occur due to instances of component failure such as in pipes and valves. Water distribution network is a complex system comprising a variety of components and their interrelations. To avoid sub-optimization, a comprehensive framework for failure analysis is needed, in order to include all parts of water distribution network. The primary aim of the study was to propose a framework for failure analysis in which fuzzy set theory was combined with fault tree analysis as a useful model to deal with uncertainties resulting from unavailability of data. The proposed framework was applied to a water distribution network in Tehran to demonstrate its validity. Water supply interruption was considered a top event in the fault tree. As a result, the occurrence probability of top event was 0.29. According to sensitivity results, isolation valve failure was the critical minimal cut set with the value of 0.16, which shows a 55% decrease in top event probability. Thus, it is concluded that in decision-making process, a focus should be maintained on the critical minimal cut set, while suggesting corrective actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agathokleous A, Christodoulou S (2016) An expanded methodology for imprinting the condition of an urban water distribution network. Procedia Eng 162:196–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghaarabi E, Aminravan F, Sadiq R, Hoofar M, Rodriguez MJ, Najjara H (2014) Comparative study of fuzzy evidential reasoning and fuzzy rule-based approaches: an illustration for water quality assessment in distribution networks. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28:655–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berardi L, Ugarelli R, Rostum J, Giustolisi O (2014) Assessing mechanical vulnerability in water distribution networks under multiple failures. Water Resour Res 50:2586–2599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boryczko K, Cieslak BT (2014) Analysis of risk failure in water main pipe network and of delivering poor quality water. Environ Prot Eng 40. http://epe.pwr.wroc.pl/2014/4-2014/Boryczko_4-2014

  • Cai B, Liu H, Xie M (2016) A real-time fault diagnosis methodology of complex systems using object-oriented Bayesian networks. Mech Syst Signal Process 80:31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheliyan AS, Bhattacharyya SK (2018) Fuzzy fault tree analysis of oil and gas leakage in subsea production systems. J Ocean Eng Sci 3:38–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SJ, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diao K, Sweetapple C, Farmani R, Fu G, Ward S, Butler D (2016) Global resilience analysis of water distribution systems. Water Res 106:383–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong HY, Yu DU (2005) Estimation of failure probability of oil and gas transmission pipelines by fuzzy fault tree analysis. J Loss Prev Process Ind 18(4):83–88

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008) Identification and description of hazards for water supply systems. TECHNEAU web. https://www.techneau.org/fileadmin/files/Publications/Publications/Deliverables/D4.1.4.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2018

  • Fusco F, Arandia E (2017) State estimation for water distribution networks in the presence of control devices with switching behavior. Procedia Eng 186:592–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamboa-medina MM, Reis LFR (2016) Sampling design for leak detection in water distribution networks. Procedia Eng 186:460–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haghighi A, Keramat A (2012) A fuzzy approach for considering uncertainty in transient analysis of pipe networks. J Hydroinformatics 14:1024–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu HM, Chen TC (1994) Aggregation of fuzzy opinion under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79(1):279–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen HA, Jerez DJ (2018) A stochastic framework for reliability and sensitivity analysis of large scale water distribution networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 176:80–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose N, Sumam KS (2016) Optimal water distribution network design accounting for valve closure. Procedia Technol 24:332–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jun H, Loganathan GV, Kim JH, Park S (2008) Identifying pipes and valves of high importance for efficient operation and maintenance of water distribution systems. Water Resour Manag 22:719–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabir G, Demissie G, Sadiq R, Tesfamariam S (2015a) Integrating failure prediction models for water mains: Bayesian belief network based data fusion. Knowl Based Syst 85:159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabir G, Tesfamariam S, Francisque A, Sadiq R (2015b) Evaluating risk of water mains failure using a Bayesian belief network model. Eur J Oper Res 240:220–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabir G, Tesfamarian S, Loeppky J, Sadiq R (2015c) Integrating Bayesian linear regression with ordered weighted averaging: uncertainty analysis for predicting water main failures. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst 1(3):04015007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabir G, Tesfamariam S, Sadiq R (2016a) Bayesian model averaging for the prediction of water main failure for small to large Canadian municipalities. Can J Civ Eng 43:233–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabir G, Tesfamariam S, Sadiq R (2016b) Predicting water main failures: a Bayesian model updating approach. Knowl Based Syst 110:144–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapelan Z, Savic D, Mahmoud H (2017) A response methodology for reducing impacts of failure events in water distribution networks. Procedia Eng 186:218–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Zou Z, An Y (2016a) Water quality assessment in Qu river based on fuzzy water pollution index method. J Environ Sci 50:87–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Chen G, Zhu H (2016b) Quantitative risk analysis on leakage failure of submarine oil and gas pipelines using Bayesian network. Process Saf Environ Prot 103:163–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin TC, Wang MJ (1997) Hybrid fault tree analysis using fuzzy sets. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 58(6):205–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindhe A, Rosen L, Norberg T, Bergstedt O, Petterson Thomas JR (2011) Cost-effectiveness analysis of risk-reduction measures to reach water safety targets. Water Res 45:241–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Walski T, Fu G, Zhang C (2017) Failure impact analysis of isolation valves in a water distribution network. J Water Resources Plan Manag 143:04017019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miri Lavasani MR, Wang J, Yang Z, Finlay J (2011) Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis on oil and gas offshore pipelines. Int J Mar Sci Eng 1(1):29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo-Duque W, Ferre-Huguet N, Domingo JL, Schuhmacher M (2006) Assessing water quality in rivers with fuzzy inference systems: a case study. Environ Int 32(6):733–742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Onisawa T (1988) An approach to human reliability in man-machine systems using error possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 27(2):87–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onisawa T, Nishiwaki Y (1988) Fuzzy human reliability on the CHERNOBYL accident. Fuzzy Sets Syst 28(7):115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orojloo M, Shahdany SMH, Roozbahani A (2018) Developing an integrated risk management framework for agricultural water conveyance and distribution systems within fuzzy decision making approaches. Sci Total Environ 627:1363–1376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pan N, Wang H (2007) Assessing failure of bridge construction using fuzzy fault tree analysis. In: 4th international conference on fuzzy system and knowledge discovery, vol 1(2), pp 96–100

  • Shafiqul Islam M, Sadiq R, Rodriguez MJ, Najjaran H, Francisque A, Hoorfar M (2014) Water distribution system failure: a framework for forensic analysis. Environ Syst Decis 34:168–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvert W (2000) Fuzzy indices of environmental conditions. Ecol Model 130(1–3):111–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stamatelatos M, Vesely W, Dugan J, Fragola J, Minarick J, Railsback J (2002) Fault tree handbook with aerospace applications. NASA office of Safety and Mission Assurance. NASA Headquarters. Washington, DC, p 20546. https://elibrary.gsfc.nasa.gov/_assets/doclibBidder/tech_docs/25.%20NASA_Fault_Tree_Handbook_with_Aerospace_Applications%20-%20Copy.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2018

  • Sugeno M (1999) Fuzzy modelling and control, 1st edn. CRC Press, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Takdastan A, Mirzabeygi M, Yousefi M, Abbasnia A, Khodadadia R, Soleimani H, Mahvi AH, Naghan DJ (2018) Neuro-fuzzy inference system Prediction of stability indices and sodium absorption ratio in Lordegan rural drinking water resources in west Iran. Data Brief 18:255–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka H, Fan L, Lai S, Toguchi K (1983) Fault tree analysis by fuzzy probability. IEEE Trans Reliab 32(4):453–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesfamariam S, Sadiq R, Najjaran H (2010) Decision making under uncertainty-an example for seismic risk management. Risk Anal 30(1):78–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TPWW (2018) Tehran Province Water & Wastewater Co. Web. http://www.tpww.ir/en/aboutus. Accessed 15 June 2018

  • Urbanik PK (2015) Failure analysis and assessment on the exemplary water supply network. Eng Fail Anal 57:137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Shen K, Wang B, Dong C, Khan F, Wang Q (2017) Failure probability analysis of the urban buried gas pipelines using Bayesian networks. Process Saf Environ Prot 111:678–686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber P, Medina-Oliva G, Simon C, Lung B (2012) Overview on Bayesian networks applications for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25(4):671–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the help of Tehran Province Water and Wastewater Company (TPWWC) for providing valuable information and data to perform the case study. We also are grateful to the editors and anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Miri Lavasani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: J. Aravind.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aghapoor Khameneh, P., Miri Lavasani, S.M., Nabizadeh Nodehi, R. et al. Water distribution network failure analysis under uncertainty. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 17, 421–432 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02362-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02362-y

Keywords

Navigation