Skip to main content

Prediction of Water Pipe Failure Using Fuzzy Inference System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 (CSCE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 241))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 494 Accesses

Abstract

Recurrent incidences of pipeline failure bring about serious physical, economical, and environmental consequences. Therefore, developing pragmatic approaches to model the water distribution infrastructure is crucial for preserving these assets. The objective of this paper is to develop a pipe failure prediction model grounded in fuzzy inference system and the probability of failure analysis to estimate the rate of failure in water infrastructure. First, the attributes that contribute to water pipelines deterioration are identified. Second, the fuzzy logic engine is designed to simulate the defined codes and functions. Third, probability of failure schemes are generated to address the uncertainties and predict the risk associated with water pipes’ failure. The developed model was applied to the water network of the city of El Pedregal in Peru. This paper developed an automated tool, expected to improve the quality of decision making, as it can assist water utility managers and infrastructure engineers in optimizing their future plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASCE (2017) Infrastructure report card. https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/cat-item/drinking_water/

  2. AWWA (American Water Works Association) (2012) Buried no longer: confronting america’s water infrastructure challenge. http://www.urbanwaterslearningnetwork.org/resources/awwa-confronting-americas-water-infrastructure-challenge2017/

  3. Campanella K, Andreasen C, Diba A, Himmelberger H, Leighton J, Santini J, Vause K (2016) 2015 establishing the level of progress in utility asset management survey results. Proc Water Environ Fed 2016(1):462–490. https://doi.org/10.2175/193864716821123341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dawood T, Elwakil E, Novoa HM, Delgado JFG (2019) water pipe failure prediction and risk models: state-of-the-art review. Can J Civ Eng 47(10):1117–1127. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2019-0481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Elwakil E (2011) Knowledge discovery based simulation system in construction (Doctoral dissertation, Concordia University)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elwakil E, Zayed T (2015) construction knowledge discovery system using fuzzy approach. Can J Civ Eng 42(1):22–32. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2014-0153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Esragh F, Mamdani EH (1979) a general approach to linguistic approximation. Int J Man Mach Stud 11(4):501–519

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Fayaz M, Ullah I, Kim D.-H (2018) Underground risk index assessment and prediction using a simplified hierarchical fuzzy logic model and Kalman filter. Processes, 6(103). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr6080103

  9. Harvey R, McBean EA, Gharabaghi B (2014) Predicting the timing of water main failure using artificial neural networks. J Water Resour Plan Manag 140(4):425–434. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jang J-SR, Sun C-T, Mizutani E (1997) Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing: a computational approach to learning and machine intelligence. Prentice Hall, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kleiner Y, Sadiq R, Rajani B (2004) Modeling failure risk in buried pipes using fuzzy Markov deterioration. Pipeline Div Spec Congress, ASCE, San Diego, California, USA. https://doi.org/10.1061/40745(146)7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li D, Yao W (2016) Risk assessment of long-distance water transmission pipeline based on fuzzy similarity evaluation approach. In: 12th international conference on natural computation, fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (ICNC-FSKD), Changsha, China. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7603331

  13. Malinowska AA (2017) Fuzzy inference-based approach to the mining-induced pipeline failure estimation. Nat Hazards 85:621–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2594-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rajani B, Kleiner Y, Sadiq R (2006) Translation of pipe inspection results into condition ratings using the fuzzy synthetic evaluation technique. Int J Water Supply Res Technol Aqua 55(1):11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ricci PF, Sagen LA, Whipple CG (1981) Technological risk assessment series E, applied series no 81, NATO ASI Series, Erice (Italy)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sadiq R, Kleiner Y, Rajani BB (2004) Fuzzy cognitive maps for decision support to maintain water quality in ageing water mains. In: 4th international conference on decision-making in urban and civil engineering, Porto, Portugal, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sadiq R, Kleiner Y, Rajani B (2007) Water quality failures in distribution networks—risk analysis using fuzzy logic and evidential reasoning. Risk Anal 27(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15396924.2007.00972.x

  18. Snider B, McBean EA (2020) Improving urban water security through pipe-break prediction models: machine learning or survival analysis. J Environ Eng 146(3):04019129

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the collaboration of the Universidad Nacional de San Agustín (UNSA) in Arequipa, Peru, and Purdue University in Indiana, USA through Discovery Park’s Center for the Environment (C4E).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Elwakil .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dawood, T., Elwakil, E., Novoa, H.M., Delgado, J.F.G. (2023). Prediction of Water Pipe Failure Using Fuzzy Inference System. In: Walbridge, S., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 . CSCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 241. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0511-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0511-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0510-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0511-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics