Skip to main content
Log in

Diesel degradation in soil catalyzed by the addition of a bioagent

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The supernatant harvested from a mesophilic, molasses-fed, non-methanogenic bioreactor, which is rich in nitrogen, phosphorous, metals, free amino acids, Sporolactobacillus sp., Prevotella sp., and Clostridium sp., is diluted with tap water and tested as the bioagent to catalyze diesel degradation in soil. Outdoor experiments are performed under the following conditions to assess the effectiveness of the bioagent: diesel doses: 9–15 mg TPH/g soil; bioagent concentrations and dose: 1–5 % at 60 ml/day; soil sample size: 600 g; ambient temperatures: 28–32 °C, and relative humidity: 40–82 % (TPH: total petroleum hydrocarbons). Diesel degradation in soil treated with 3 % bioagent, which proceeds at the rates of 1.04–1.55 mg TPH/g soil-day, is completed in about a week with up to 83 % efficiencies. In contrast, diesel degradation in soil sprinkled with water (60 ml/day) proceeds at the rate of 0.3 mg TPH/g soil-day that achieves 15–22 % degradation efficiencies. The addition of 3 % bioagent yields desired soil moisture content (10–15 %), soil pH (6.8–8.2), and nutrition inputs. Both Sporolactobacillus sp. and Prevotella sp. grown on molasses are robust, tolerant high diesel doses, able to utilize hydrophobic hydrocarbons, and readily adaptable to the soil environment. Most notably, prior acclimatization is not required to enable these properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abioye OP (2011) Biological remediation of hydrocarbon and heavy metals contaminated soil. In: Pascucci S (ed) Soil Contamination. InTech Europe, Riejka, Croatia, pp 127–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Abioye OP, Abdul AA, Agamuthu P (2010) Enhanced biodegradation of used engine oil in soil amended with organic wastes. Water Air Soil Pollut 209:173–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banat IM, Makkar RS, Cameotra SS (2000) Potential commercial application of microbial surfactants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 53:495–508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bento FM, Camargo FOA, Okeke BC, Frankenberger WT (2005) Comparative bioremediation of soils contaminated with diesel oil by natural attenuation, biostimulation and bioaugmentation. Bioresour Technol 96:1049–1055

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Britton L (1984) Microbial degradation of aliphatic hydrocarbons. In: Gibson TD (ed) Microbial Degradation of Organic Compounds. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 89–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang JJ, Chou CH, Ho CY, Chen WE, Lay JJ, Huang CC (2008) Syntrophic co-culture of aerobic Bacillus and anaerobic Clostridium for bio-fuels and bio-hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:5137–5146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choi SC, Kwon KK, Sohn JH, Kim SJ (2002) Evaluation of fertilizer additions to stimulate oil biodegradation in sand seashore mescocosms. J Microbiol Biotechnol 12:431–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou C, Han C, Chang J, Lay J (2011) Co-culture of Clostridium beijerinckii L9, Clostridium butyricum M1 and Bacillus thermoamylovorans B5 for converting yeast waste into hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:13972–13983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry TJ, Rensing C, Pepper IL (2004) New approaches for bioaugmentation as a remediation technology. Environ Sci Technol 34:447–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grishchenkov VG, Townsend RT, McDonald TJ, Autenrieth RL, Bonner JS, Boronin AM (2000) Degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons by facultative anaerobic bacteria under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Proc Biochem 35:889–896

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Han CL, Lay JJ, Shieh WK (2015) Cellulosic fermentation using the Bacillus thermoamylovorans-enabled digested sludge. J Environ Eng ASCE. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000990

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallimanis A, Frillingos S, Drainas C, Koukkou AI (2007) Taxonomic identification, phenanthrene uptake activity, and membrane lipid alterations of the PAH degrading Arthrobacter sp. strain Sphe3. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 76(3):709–717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalme S, Parshetti G, Gomare S, Govindwar S (2008) Diesel and kerosene degradation by Pseudomonas desmolyticum NCIM 2112 and Nocardia hydrocarbonoxydans NCIM 2386. Curr Microbiol 56(6):581–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Choi DH, Sim DS, Oh Y (2005) Evaluation of bioremediation effectiveness on crude oil-contaminated sand. Chemosphere 59:845–852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Korda A, Santas P, Tenente A, Santas R (1997) Petroleum hydrocarbon bioremediation: sampling and analytical techniques, in situ treatments and commercial microorganisms currently used. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 48:677–686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kostka JE, Prakash O, Overholt WA, Green SJ, Freyer G, Canion A, Delgardio J, Norton N, Hazen TC, Huettel M (2011) Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria and the bacterial Community response in Gulf of Mexico beach sands impacted by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(22):7962–7974

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kvenvolden KA, Cooper CK (2003) Natural seepage of crude oil into the marine environment. Geo-Marine Lett 23:140–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lay JJ (2013) Restoration of rot tree roots using the supernatant from a mesophilic, molasses-fed anaerobic bioreactor without methanogenesis. Presented at the 15th conference on soil and groundwater remediation, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • Lee K, Park JW, Ahn IS (2003) Effect of additional carbon source on naphthalene biodegradation by Pseudomonas putida G7. J Hazard Mater 105:157–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Margesin R, Schinner F (2001) Bioremediation (natural attenuation and biostimulation) of diesel-oil-contaminated soil in an alpine glacier skiing area. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:3127–3133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masakorala K, Yao J, Cai M, Chandankere R, Yuan H, Chen H (2013) Isolation and characterization of a novel phenanthrene (PHE) degrading strain Pseudomonas sp. USTB-RU from petroleum contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 263(2):493–500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mnif I, Ellouze-Chaabouni S, Ayedi Y, Ghribi D (2014) Treatment of diesel- and kerosene-contaminated water by B. subtilis SPB1 biosurfactant-producing strain. Wat. Environ Res 86(8):707–716

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulla SI, Talwar MP, Bagewadi ZK, Hoskeri RS, Ninnekar HZ (2013) Enhanced degradation of 2-nitrotoluene by immobilized cells of Micrococcus sp. strain SMN-1. Chemosphere 90(6):1920–1924

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan CN (2005) Environmental applications of biosurfactants. Environ Pollut 133:183–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nadim F, Hoag GE, Liu S, Carley RJ, Zack P (2000) Detection and remediation of soil aquifer systems contaminated with petroleum products: an overview. J Pet Sci Eng 26:169–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NIEA E203.56B., NIEA M165.00C., NIEA S703.62B (2013) Environmental Analysis Laboratory, Environmental Protection Administration, Executive Yuan, Republic of China

  • Ortega-González DK, Zaragoza D, Aguirre-Garrido J, Ramirez-Saad H, Hernández-Rodriguez C, Jan-Roblero J (2013) Degradation of benzene, toluene, and xylene isomers by a bacterial consortium obtained from rhizosphere soil of Cyperus sp. in a petroleum-contaminated area. Folia Microbiol 58:569–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paudyn K, Rutter A, Rowe RK, Poland JS (2008) Remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soils in the Canadian Arctic by landfarming. Cold Reg Sci Technol 53:102–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pineda FG, Boll AG, Lira GC, Mesta HAM (2004) A microbial consortium isolated from a crude oil sample that uses asphaltenes as a carbon and energy source. Biodegradation 15(3):145–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirnik MP, Atlas RM, Bartha R (1974) Hydrocarbon metabolism by Brevibacterium erythrogenes: normal and branched alkanes. J Bacteriol 119:868–878

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman KSM, Thahira-Rahman J, McClean S, Marchant R, Banat IM (2002) Rhamnolipid surfactants production by strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa using low cost raw materials. Biotechnol Prog 18:1277–1281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Stehmeier LG, Voordouw G (1998) Identification of hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria in soil by reverse sample genome probing. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:637–645

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vidali M (2001) Bioremediation: an overview. Pure Appl Chem 73:1163–1172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wasilkowski D, Swedziol Z, Mrozik A (2012) The applicability of genetically modified microorganisms in bioremediation of contaminated environment. Chemik 66:817–826

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef N, Simpson DR, Duncan KE, McInerney MJ, Folmsbee M, Fincher T, Knapp RM (2007) In situ biosurfactant production by Bacillus strains injected into a limestone petroleum reservoir. Appl Environ Microbial 73(4):1239–1247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was financially supported by the National Science Council, Republic of China (Project Number: NSC 101-2221-E-327-008-MY2). The assistance from Professor Yu Z. Huang of Chun Yuan Christian University (Chungli, Taiwan) in performing the PCR analyses was greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. K. Shieh.

Appendix 1: PCR and RT-PCR procedures (Chang et al. 2008; Chou et al. 2011)

Appendix 1: PCR and RT-PCR procedures (Chang et al. 2008; Chou et al. 2011)

For PCR tests, DNA was extracted using FastDNA™ Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, USA). The samples were processed following the procedures specified in the vendor manual. Table 3 list the primers sets used. Each reaction was performed with a mixture of 3 μl of template DNA, 2 μl (10 μM) of each primer set, 33 μl of double-distilled water and 10 μl of PCR Master Mix (BioKit, Taiwan). The thermal cycling program was: 2 min at 95 °C, 30 30-s cycles at 95 °C, 30 s at 54 °C for Prevo F/R and Sporo F/R (50 °C for the Clos L1F/R and Clos E1F/R), 30 s at 72 °C, and the program was terminated at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR results were checked with gel electrophoresis.

Table 3 Primer sets

The fluorescent dye, SsoFast™ EvaGreen® Supermix, was used for real-time PCR (RT-PCR) reactions using the procedure specified in the vendor’s manual (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA). Reactions were performed in a 48-well optical reaction plate and set into a 48-well MJ Mini™ Gradient Thermal-Cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA). Primers sets are listed in Table 3. Each reaction was performed in triplicate with a mixture of 2 μl of cDNA, 1 μl (3–5 μM) of each primer set, 2 μl of double-distilled water and 5 μl of enzyme Supermix. The thermal cycling program was: 60 s at 95 °C, 40 5-second cycles of at 95 °C, 5 s at 54 °C for Prevo F/R and Sporo F/R (or 50 °C for Clos L1F/R and Clos E1F/R) and followed by a dissociation stage (i.e., 15 s at 95 °C, 15 s at 65 °C, and followed by a slow temperature rise to 95 °C). Neither primer-dimer artifacts nor nonspecific PCR amplicons were observed during the melting process. The efficiency of each reaction was between 90 % and 110 %. R2 values for all standard curves were greater than 0.99.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, Y., Lay, JJ. & Shieh, W.K. Diesel degradation in soil catalyzed by the addition of a bioagent. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13, 551–560 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0889-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0889-8

Keywords

Navigation