Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identifying the underlying constructs linking urban form and travel behaviour using a grounded theory approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of urban form in influencing travel behaviour has gained particular interest to scholars and policy makers to achieve a broader goal of sustainability despite varied scholastic opinion on the effectiveness of this relationship. While transportation forms the nexus of any urban environment, it also accounts for about thirty-six per cent of the total energy consumption in the UK [Department of Energy and Climate Change, UK, 2013]. Thus, an emphasis to reduce greenhouse emissions in this sector remains a key policy objective to achieve sustainability. Also there is an overemphasis of research in this area on quantitative association between key variables as opposed to qualitative exploration in order to understand complex human behaviour. The study reported in this paper has been designed to address this gap. Using a grounded theory analysis, this paper reports findings from 6 focus group discussions and 17 in-depth interviews. Fifty-three participants were recruited from three case study areas across Northern Ireland to represent the urban continuum. Seven overarching categories have been identified explaining the interrelationships between urban form and travel behaviour in the Northern Ireland context. However, at a macro-scale, land-use policies have played a dominant role in shaping the travel patterns and this has translated in the form of car dependency and residential immobility over the years in Northern Ireland. Although current policy now adopts a more integrated approach to curb urban sprawl and achieve modal split, soft policy measures have proved useful in increasing the effectiveness of these policy interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aditjandra PT (2013) The impact of urban development patterns on travel behaviour: lessons learned from a British metropolitan region using macro-analysis and micro-analysis in addressing the sustainability agenda. Res Transp Bus Manag 7:69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aditjandra PT, Mulley C, Nelson JD (2009) Neighbourhood design impact on travel behavior: a comparison of US and UK experience. Projections 9:28–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Aditjandra PT, Cao X, Mulley C (2012) Understanding neighbourhood design impact on travel behaviour: an application of structural equations model to a British metropolitan data. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 46(1):22–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Aditjandra PT, Mulley C, Nelson JD (2013) The influence of neighbourhood design on travel behaviour: empirical evidence from North East England. Transp Policy 26:54–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam JB, Wadud Z, Alam JB, Polak JW (2013) Energy demand and economic consequences of transport policy. Int J Environ Sci Technol 10:1075–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan G (2003) A critique of using grounded theory as a research method. Electron J Bus Res Methods 2(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Antipova A, Wang F, Wilmot C (2011) Urban land uses, socio-demographic attributes and commuting: a multilevel modeling approach. Appl Geogr 31(3):1010–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bains G, Ridley A, Carrarini A, Craig S (2011) Car dependency scorecard 2011: the top European cities for sustainable transport. Campaign for Better Transport, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Banister D (1996) Energy, quality of life and the environment: the role of transport. Transp Rev 16(1):23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banister D (2007) Land use, planning and infrastructure issues in transport, commissioned paper for the shadow committee on climate change. Transport Studies Unit, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Banister D (2008) The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transp Policy 15(2):73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boal FW (1996) Integration and division: sharing and segregating in Belfast. Plan Pract Res 11(2):151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohte W, Maat K, van Wee B (2009) Measuring attitudes in research on residential self-selection and travel behaviour: a review of theories and empirical research. Transp Rev 29(3):325–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao X, Mokhtarian PL, Handy SL (2009) Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour; a focus on empirical findings. Transp Rev 29(3):359–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton KJ, Handy S (2003) Qualitative methods in travel behaviour research. In: Jones D, Stopher P (eds) Transport survey quality and innovation. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 283–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper J, Ryley T, Smyth A (2001) Contemporary lifestyles and the implications for sustainable development policy: lessons from the UK’s most car dependent city, Belfast. Cities 18(2):103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane R, Crepeau R (1998) Does neighborhood design influence travel? A behavioral analysis of travel diary and GIS data. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 3(4):225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Regional Development (2010) Regional development strategy 2035: building a better future. DRDNI, Belfast

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Energy and Climate Change (2013) Energy consumption in the UK (2013). Department of Energy and Climate Change, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey I (2004) Grounded theory. In: Seale C, Gobo G, Gubrium JF, Silverman D (eds) Qualitative research practice. Sage, London, pp 80–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Dur F, Yigitcanlar Y (2014) Assessing land-use and transport integration via a spatial composite indexing model. Int J Environ Sci Technol. doi:10.1007/s13762-013-0476-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner B, Abraham C (2007) What drives car use? A grounded theory analysis of commuters’ reasons for driving. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 10(3):187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser BG (1992) Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press, Mill Valley

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon I (2008) Density and the built environment. Energy Policy 36(12):4652–4656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy S (1996) Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 1(2):151–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headicar P (2003) The contribution of land use planning to reducing traffic growth: the English experience. EJTIR 3(2):137–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman R, Banister D (2007) Transport and reduced energy consumption: what role can urban planning play? Working paper no. 1026 edn, University of Oxford

  • Kitamura R, Mokhtarian PL, Laidet L (1997) A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation 24:125–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leck E (2006) The impact of urban form on travel behavior: a meta analysis. Berkeley Plan J 19:37–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Maat K, van Wee B, Stead D (2005) Land use and travel behaviour: expected effects from the perspective of utility theory and activity-based theories. Environ Plan 32(1):33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEldowney M, Scott M, Smyth A (2003) Integrating land-use planning and transportation-policy formulation in the Belfast Metropolitan area. Irish Geogr 36(2):112–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEldowney M, Ryley T, Scott M, Smyth A (2005) Urban Form and reducing the demand for car travel: towards an integrated policy agenda for the Belfast Metropolitan Area? In: Renewing urban communities Ashgate, Aldershot, Hampshire, England, pp 75–93

  • Naess P (2003) Urban structures and travel behaviour. Experiences from empirical research in Norway and Denmark. EJTIR 3(2):155–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess P (2011) ‘New urbanism’ or metropolitan-level centralization? A comparison of the influences of metropolitan-level and neighborhood-level urban form characteristics on travel behavior. J Transp Land Use 4(1):25–44

    Google Scholar 

  • NINIS (2011) Northern Ireland level information. NISRA, NI

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen T, Dieleman FM, Dijst M (2001) Travel behaviour in Dutch monocentric and policentric urban systems. J Transp Geogr 9(3):173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuttleworth I, Power J, McKinstry D (2000) Examining 1991 travel-to-work patterns in the Belfast Urban Area as a context for urban employment policy. Appl Geogr 20(2):177–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simma A, Axhausen KW (2003) Interaction between travel behaviour, accessibility and personal characteristics: the case of upper Austria. EJTIR 3(2):179–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Snellen D, Borgers A, Timmermans H (2002) Urban form, road network type, and mode choice for frequently conducted activities: a multilevel analysis using quasi-experimental design data. Environ Plan A 34(7):1207–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stead D (2001) Relationships between land use, socioeconomic factors, and travel patterns in Britain. Environ Plan 28(4):499–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strategic Investment Board NI (2012) Investment Strategy for Northern Ireland 2011–2021. Northern Ireland Executive, Belfast

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Susilo YO, Maat K (2007) The influence of built environment to the trends in commuting journeys in the Netherlands. Transportation 34(5):589–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susilo YO, Williams K, Lindsay M, Dair C (2012) The influence of individuals’ environmental attitudes and urban design features on their travel patterns in sustainable neighborhoods in the UK. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 17(3):190–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Planning Service November 2004, Belfast Metropolitan Area Plan Draft Plan, The Department of the Environment (DOE), NI

  • Timmermans H, van der Waerden P, Alves M, Polak J, Ellis S, Harvey AS, Kurose S, Zandee R (2003) Spatial context and the complexity of daily travel patterns: an international comparison. J Transp Geogr 11(1):37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Kaa EJ (2010) Prospect theory and choice behaviour strategies: review and synthesis of concepts from social and transport sciences. EJTIR 10(4):299–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker D, Myrick F (2006) Grounded theory: an exploration of process and procedure. Qual Health Res 16(4):547–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Yigitcanlar Y, Teriman S (2014) Rethinking sustainable urban development: towards an integrated planning and development process. Int J Environ Sci Technol. doi:10.1007/s13762-013-0491-x

Download references

Acknowledgments

The findings presented in this paper forms part of a doctoral research sponsored by the University of Ulster, Jordanstown, UK. The authors would like to thank all the participants and experts for their invaluable time and comments to further strengthen the dialogue between land use and transport in the Northern Ireland context. And finally the authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Banerjee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Banerjee, U., Hine, J. Identifying the underlying constructs linking urban form and travel behaviour using a grounded theory approach. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 11, 2217–2232 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0585-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0585-0

Keywords

Navigation