Abstract
Objective
To investigate the clinical characteristics, the neuroimaging features and associated anomalies observed in children affected by Dandy–Walker malformations (DWM) and variants (DWV) in a single tertiary hospital in Catania and compare our data to their existent in the literature.
Methods
A retrospective case series using the medical records has been performed on 28 children diagnosed with DWM and DWV admitted to a single tertiary section of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Catania, Italy from January 2005 to January 2021. We reviewed the neuroimaging using the new diagnostic criteria of Klein et al.
Results
Associated anomalies were frequently reported. Among these, hydrocephalus was found in 13/28 (48%), and hydrocephalus plus corpus callosum anomalies in three children (10%). We described corpus callosum, cardiac and genitourinary anomalies in 2/28 (7%), 3/28 (10%), and 3/28 (10%), respectively. The most common clinical features were the developmental delay and epilepsy observed in 19/28 (67%) and in 9/28 (32%) of the cases. The first exam at the diagnosis was MRI in 17/28 patients, followed by transfontanellar ultrasound in 5/28, computed tomography in 4/28 and prenatal ultrasound in 2/28. To note, a child with DWM was affected by Down syndrome and one by congenital disorders of N-linked glycosylation (CDG-IId).
Conclusions
Children with DWV were more commonly observed than children with DWM. Hydrocephalus is an anomaly, frequently and equally reported in both DWM and DMV. Perinatal complications were frequent adverse events with severe respiratory distress and need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cognitive involvement and epilepsy were the most common comorbidities. Single DWV is associated with a better developmental outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In 1887 there was the first description of DWM. Since then, new neuroimaging tools, such as MRI, allowed researchers to extend the knowledge on the anatomy of the posterior fossa and particularly of the cerebellar vermis. In 1989 Barkovich et al. proposed one of the most used radiological classification, defined the entity of “Dandy–Walker complex” and “Dandy–Walker spectrum” [1]. In 2003, Klein et al. reviewed the classification by Barkovich et al., focused the attention on these radiological criteria for the diagnosis [2] (Fig. 1).
-
1.
Large, median posterior fossa cyst widely communicating with the fourth ventricle
-
2.
Absence of the lower portion of the vermis at different degrees (lower 3/4, lower half, lower 1/4)
-
3.
Hypoplasia, anterior rotation, and upward displacement of the remnant of the vermis
-
4.
Absence or flattening of the angle of the fastigium
-
5.
Large bossing posterior fossa with elevation of the torcular
-
6.
Anterolateral displacement of normal or hypoplastic cerebellar hemispheres
It is important reserving the diagnosis of DWM to the cases that respond to the above-mentioned criteria by Klein et al., to avoid increasing confusion [3]. Differently to the DWM, DWV is characterized by mild vermian hypoplasia and a normal-sized posterior fossa with a small cystic cavity that communicates with the fourth ventricle [3,4,5]. The association of DWV with other congenital anomalies is largely limited to few reports.
The purpose of this retrospective case series was to analyze the clinical features and associated anomalies in children affected by DWM and DWV, reporting clinical differences between the two different groups.
Methods
We reviewed the charts and MRI of 28 children between January 2005 and January 2021. The clinical aspects, the anomalies associated and the neurological outcome were also recorded.
Patients with DWM were identified by Klein’s criteria. (Fig. 1) Patients with DWV were identified by these characteristics: normal-sized posterior fossa, a posterior fossa cystic lesion that appeared to communicate with the fourth ventricle and mild inferior vermian hypoplasia. We report comorbidities associated with the anomalies, including other neurological anomalies, cardiac defects, genitourinary abnormalities. If possible, the presence of a chromosomal defect or syndrome association was documented.
Results
We included in the study 28 patients, 4 with diagnosis of DWM and 24 with diagnosis of DWV. 11 patients were female and 17 were boys. The mean gestational age at the diagnosis was 12 months. No patients were premature, but 13 newborns (46%) at birth suffered by severe respiratory distress or other disturbances, which required treatment in neonatal intensive care. Nineteen patients (67%) were diagnosed based on findings of MR imaging studies, 5 based on ultrasonography (3 on transfontanellar US after birth, 2 in prenatal age), 4 on CT scans. No associated anomalies were reported in 10 children (35%). Hydrocephalus was described in 13 children (46%), carpus callosum anomalies in 2 (7%), hydrocephalus plus corpus callosum anomalies in 3 children (10%). Epileptic seizures were found in 9 (32%) children and developmental delay (DD) in 19 (67%). Cardiac abnormalities were seen in 3 (10%); cardiac defect consisted of patent ductus arteriosus, ventricular septal defect, and Fallot’s tetralogy. Gastrointestinal anomalies were observed in 1 child, who presented congenital diaphragmatic hernia associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Three children manifested genitourinary anomalies (cryptorchidism in 1 and pelvis ectasia in 2). In addition, 1 child was affected by panhypopituitarism, 1 by Down syndrome and 1 by CDG type II-d (Table 1)
Discussion
DWM and DWV are rarely reported in literature [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. The exact cause of these disorders remains unknown [5,6,7,8].
DWM and DWV are both cystic malformations of the posterior fossa. Cystic malformations are characterized by the presence of substantial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection. Other cystic anomalies include persistent Blake’s pouch, mega cisterna magna, arachnoid cyst. The mega cisterna magna is usually a benign finding, while the other malformations could be associated with other congenital anomalies. DWM is associated with a large posterior fossa, while DWV is associated with a normal or small posterior fossa. The diagnosis is exclusively radiological. In Table 2 you can find the main characteristics of the posterior fossa malformations. In Tables 3 are synthetised the main characteristics and differences between DWM and DWV.
Many patients affected by DWM and DWV can remain clinically asymptomatic for years, while others may present with a variety of comorbidities leading to earlier diagnosis. Clinicians could investigate first symptoms related to the central nervous system, such as hydrocephalus, or could make diagnosis of other systemic symptoms such as cardiac defects, face, limbs and gastrointestinal or genitourinary system [5]. The disorder may have a clinically severe onset or to have a mild or almost asymptomatic course. In most cases the disturbances are present since birth or in the first year of life. Both the disorders the DWM and the DWV are often associated with extra and intracranial anomalies which have a relevant role in the outcome of the disorder. Children < 1 year of age often present with signs of hydrocephalus and increased intracranial pressure. Later, DWM and DWV usually presents with motor delay and incoordination. Spastic paraparesis is the most common motor deficit. The incidence of focal neurological deficits, such as nystagmus, cranial nerves palsies, truncal ataxia, explosive speech, and dysmetria, indicative of cerebellar or brain stem dysfunction, are relatively uncommon. Both DWM and DWV disorders are often associated with extra and intracranial anomalies. The incidence of focal neurological deficits, such as nystagmus, cranial nerves palsies, truncal ataxia, explosive speech, and dysmetria, indicative of cerebellar or brain stem dysfunction, are relatively uncommon. These symptoms may arise in case of persistence increased intracranial pressure. The cerebellar deficits, which usually affect axial movement rather than movements of the extremities tend markedly to improve after adequate control of hydrocephalus [1,2,3]. In older children with milder signs the disorders may present with macrocephaly, symptoms of intracranial hypertension, anomalous movements, ataxia, nystagmus, and episodes of headache. Cognitive disability and epileptic seizures may be observed. Several comorbidities may also correlate with DWM, including syndromic and non-syndromic, CNS and non-CNS anomalies, chromosomal abnormalities, cardiovascular conditions, mental illness, and severe intellectual disability [10].
DWM and DWV are often associated with other brain malformations, such as hydrocephalus and anomalies of the corpus callosum, which have a relevant role in the outcome of the disorder. Our study reports that intracranial anomalies were present in the 54% of the population, confirming the data previous in literature. In literature, hydrocephalus has been observed in 50–80% rate of patients with DWM [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Differently, in DWV has not extensive reported. Our experience confirms that hydrocephalus is correlated with DWM and DWV, with the same frequency. In case of hydrocephalus, treatment is generally focused on alleviating hydrocephalus and posterior fossa symptoms, often including surgical interventions [8]. Treatment consists of treating the manifestations and associated comorbidities. Most patients present with signs and symptoms from increased intracranial pressure, most commonly related to hydrocephalus and posterior fossa cyst. For this reason, therapy generally aims to control intracranial pressure, usually through surgery [8]. Surgical treatment may include ventriculoperitoneal (VP), or cystoperitoneal (CP) shunts. Other patients may be candidates for endoscopic procedures, including endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) [8]. In the current study, hydrocephaly occurred in 13/24 patients and approximately half required treatment with CSF diversion. Developmental delay was observed in 19 patients and of those 25% required significant assistance in their daily functioning. At the follow-up cognitive impairment and epileptic seizures were recorded with a frequency of 67% and 32%, respectively. In two of the children the cerebral malformation was part of two well defined disorders: one child presenting with the Down syndrome and the other with congenital disorder of glycosylation type II-d (CDG-IId). Although the structural cerebral anomalies of DWM and DWV are not strictly similar nevertheless share some common clinical features as high incidence in cognitive impairment and epilepsy and intracranial and extracranial associated anomalies. As a matter of facts, in this group of children we have found no notable differences in clinical features and outcome between the DWM and DWV and this in disagreement to what it has been reported by Sasaki et al. [5] who refer that development outcome is better in DWV than in DWM (Figs. 2, 3).
In contrast to the studies previous published, our casuistic reported DD in 67% of cases [7, 8, 13]. Other studies described this anomaly in only one third of the patients. In addition, Sasaki et al. reported that development outcome is better in DWV than in DWM [5]. Differently, our experience reports a negative outcome in both categories. Although, in according to the cited studies, our data confirm that contributing factors to poor neurological outcomes include the association with other CNS anomalies or neurological conditions.
Interestingly, we report that 13/28 patients were admitted in NICU for asphyxia or feeding difficulties. No other reported cases described this perinatal characteristic, probably due to a missing data in the materials’ study.
In addition, we report a patient affected by trisomy 21 and DWV. In literature, the coexistence of Down syndrome and DWM has been previously reported in few cases, suggesting that it is relatively uncommon [14, 15].
Finally, another rare association was a patient affected by carbohydrate deficient glycoprotein syndrome (CDG) and DWV. Peters et al. in 2002 reported a case of a 1.5 year old boy affected by CDG-I and DWM. No other cases were reported before our patient. So, it remains unclear if DWM/DWV are causally related to CDG or are a coincidental findings.
In the present study the frequency of isolated DWV has been more frequently observed than DWM. Clinical comparison among the clinical features presented by the disorders linked to DWM and DWV is not appropriate, considering the low frequency of patients with DWM in the present series. However, it has been noted that some features, such as hydrocephalus, cardiac anomaly, and cognitive impairment and epileptic seizures, were recorded in both the groups of children.
Limits of the study
Our study had some limitations. The study population was small, especially for the DWM, but significant for a rare condition. All the data were obtained retrospectively. Our patients were only from a single tertiary hospital in Catania and genetic testing was not performed in all patients of our cohort.
Conclusions
DWM and DWV are rare, complex, cerebral malformations both often associated with extra and intracranial anomalies. The study confirms that MRI is the election survey for the diagnosis of DWM and DWV. Although they are different radiological conditions, DWV and DWM share an high incidence in DD and intracranial and extracranial associated anomalies. The high frequency of comorbidities requires the coexistence of multidisciplinary specialists for early diagnosis and for rapid identification of the associated anomalies.
Availability of data and material
The data used to support the findings of this study may be released upon application to the corresponding author, who can be contacted at alessandradinora@gmail.com.
References
Barkovich AJ, Kjos BO, Norman D et al (1989) Revised classification of posterior fossa cysts and cyst-like malformations based on the results of multiplanar MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 10:977–988
Klein O, Pierre-Kahn A, Boddaert N, Parisot D, Brunelle F (2003) Dandy-Walker malformation: prenatal diagnosis and prognosis. Childs Nerv Syst 19:484–548
Spennato P, Cascone D, Di Martino G, Mirone G, Ruggiero C, Cinalli G (2020) Dandy-Walker Malformations/Variants. Textbook of Pediatric Neurosurgery, pp 831–856
Harwood-Nash DC, Fitz CR (1976) Neuroradiology in infants and children, vol 3. CV Mosby, St. Louis, pp 1014–1019
Sasaki-Adams D, Elbabaa SK, Jewells V, Carter L, Campbell JW, Ritter AM (2008) The Dandy-Walker variant: a case series of 24 pediatric patients and evaluation of associated anomalies, incidence of hydrocephalus, and developmental outcomes. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2(3):194–199
Asai A, Hoffman HJ, Hendrick EB, Humphreys RP (1989) DandyWalker syndrome: experience at the Hospital for Sick Children. Toronto Pediatr Neurosci 15:66–73
Golden JA, Rorke LB, Bruce DA (1987) Dandy-Walker syndrome and associated anomalies. Pediatr Neurosci 13:38–44
Hirsch JF, Pierre-Kahn A, Renier D, Sainte-Rose C, HoppeHirsch E (1984) The Dandy-Walker malformation. A review of 40 cases. J Neurosurg 61:515–522
Osenbach RK, Menezes AH (1992) Diagnosis and management of the Dandy-Walker malformation: 30 years of experience. Pediatr Neurosurg 18:179–189
Pascual-Castroviejo I, Velez A, Pascual-Pascual SI, Roche MC, Villarejo F (1991) Dandy-Walker malformation: analysis of 38 cases. Childs Nerv Syst 7:88–97
Long A, Moran P, Robson S (2006) Outcome of fetal cerebral posterior fossa anomalies. Prenat Diagn 26:707–710
Wassmer E, Davies P, Whitehouse WP, Green SH (2003) Clinical spectrum associated with cerebellar hypoplasia. Pediatr Neurol 28:347–351
Bindal AK, Storrs BB, McLone DG (1990) Management of the DandyWalker syndrome. Pediatr Neurosurg 16:163–169
Love K, Huddleston L, Olney P, Wrubel D, Visootsak J (2011) Developmental outcomes of Down syndrome and DandyWalker malformation. J Pediatr Neurol 9(3):405–408
Constantini S, Pomeranz S, Hoffman B, Martin O, Rappaport ZH (1989) Coexistence of Dandy-Walkersyndrome and Down’s syndrome. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg) 32:56–57
Acknowledgements
The authors also wish to thank American Manuscript Editors for reviewing the manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Catania within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All the authors have equally contributed to the writing of the manuscript and critically revised it for intellectual content.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
All authors declare don’t have conflict of interests.
Ethics approval
Informed consent was obtained from the parents/or caregivers of the probands.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Di Nora, A., Costanza, G., Pizzo, F. et al. Dandy–Walker malformation and variants: clinical features and associated anomalies in 28 affected children—a single retrospective study and a review of the literature. Acta Neurol Belg 123, 903–909 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-022-02059-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-022-02059-z