Skip to main content
Log in

Astrobiology’s Cosmopolitics and the Search for an Origin Myth for the Anthropocene

  • Thematic Issue Article: Astrobiology
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 13 September 2017

This article has been updated

We used to look up at the sky and wonder at our place in the stars. Now we just look down, and worry about our place in the dirt.

—Joseph Cooper, Interstellar

Abstract

This article analyzes astrobiology as a cosmopolitical project—the ways in which astrobiological “sensemaking” practices do philosophical, political, cultural, ontological, and ethical work as much as they do scientific work. More specifically, this article argues that astrobiology is engaged in the crafting of a new “origin myth” that makes sense of humanity’s place in the universe during our transition from the Holocene to the Anthropocene. In doing so, this article traces the ways in which astrobiology employs scientific methodologies and engages with popular culture in ways that do four kinds of major work commonly found in origin myths: telling the origin story, demarcating the boundaries between self and the other, giving normative guidance, and declaring a shared societal purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 13 September 2017

    This erratum is published as name was misspelt in references in original publication. “In James Malazita’s ‘Astrobiology’s Cosmopolitics and the Search for an Origin Myth for the Anthropocene’, Daniel Coren’s last name is misspelled as ‘Cohen’ in the references. The correct entry should be ‘Coren D (2015) Anthropocentric biocentrism in a hybrid. Ethics Environ 20(2):48–60’.”

Notes

  1. “Interview with Dr. Kelly Smith—Pt 1,” as transcribed, in: NASA Astrobiology Debates; http://www.nasadebates.org/Kelly-Smith.php.

References

  • Alaimo S (2014) Oceanic origins, plastic activism, and new materialism. In: Iovino S, Oppermann S (eds) Material ecocriticism. Indiana University Press, Indianapolis, pp 186–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball P (2013) Geoengineering: Goldilocks effect to cloud seeding. BBC.com, published March 4, 2013 at http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20130304-the-trouble-with-cloud-seeding. Accessed 30 June 2016

  • Barthes R (1972) Mythologies. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings L (2007) Ideology, advocacy, and space flight—evolution of a cultural narrative. In: Dick SJ, Launius RD (eds) Societal impacts of space flight. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, pp 483–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown M (2009) Science in democracy: expertise, institutions, and representation. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J (1949) The hero with a thousand faces. New World Library, Novato

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (1969) Ethnocentrism of disciplines and the fish-scale model of omniscience. In: Sherif M, Sherif CW (eds) Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences. Aldine, Chicago, pp 328–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporael L (2001) Evolutionary psychology: toward a unifying theory and a hybrid science. Annu Rev Psychol 52:607–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen A (2016) This is how Elon Musk wants government to work on Mars. Gizmodo. Published June 2, 2016 at http://gizmodo.com/this-is-how-elon-musk-wants-government-to-work-on-mars-1780058508. Accessed 1 Mar 2017

  • Cohen D (2015) Anthropocentric biocentrism in a hybrid. Ethics Environ 20(2):48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley C (2008) Planetary protection for the moon. Presentation delivered to the Lunar and Planetary Institute, 28 Oct 2008

  • Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species. Appleton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze G, Felix G (1983) Anti-Oedipus. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Diderot D (1754) On the interpretation of nature. Clinamen Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud S (1917) Mourning and melancholia. In: Strachey J (ed) The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund freud, volume XIV (1914–1916): on the history of the psycho-analytic movement, papers on metapsychology and other works. Hogarth Press, London, pp 237–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich S (2009) Alien oceans: anthropological voyages in microbial seas. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell E (2013) How earth’s ‘extremophiles’: could aid alien life search. Space, October 21, 2013. http://www.space.com/23234-earth-extremophiles-alien-life-search.html. Accessed 28 June 2016

  • Iovino S, Oppermann S (2014) Material ecocriticism. Indiana University Press, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Keegan R (2011) The movies go to NASA, but not all find a production partner. The Philadelphia Inquirer, September 2, 2011. http://articles.philly.com/2011-09-02/entertainment/30106123_1_apollo-space-agency-nasa. Accessed 11 June 2016

  • Knorr Cetina KK (1999) Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1991) We have never been modern. Harvard Univerity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (2010) On the modern cult of factish gods. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (2013) An inquiry into modes of existence: an anthropology of the moderns. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukacs M (2012) World’s biggest geoengineering experiment “violates” UN rules. The Guardian, originally published October 15, 2012. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/oct/15/pacific-iron-fertilisation-geoengineering. Accessed 30 June 2016

  • Morton T (2013) Hyperobjects: philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson E (2012) The moral status of extraterrestrial life. Astrobiology 12(10):976–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaxco KW, Gross M (2006) Astrobiology: a brief introduction. JHU Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Race M, Denning K, Bertka C et al (2012) Astrobiology and society: building an interdisciplinary research community. Astrobiology 12(10):958–965. doi:10.1089/ast.2011.0723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riesman A (2013) Meet the right-wing Mars guru. Motherboard, 21 Feb 2013. http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/the-right-wing-mars-guru-robert-zubrin-interview. Accessed 1 May 2017

  • Sagan C (1994) The pale blue dot: a vision of the human future in space. Ballantine Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze-Makuch D, Davies P (2010) To boldly go: a one-way human mission to Mars. J Cosmol 12:3619–3626

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaviro S (2014) No speed limit: three essays on accelerationism. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Sismondo S (2009) An introduction to science and technology studies. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobodian R (2015) Selling space colonization and immortality: a psychosocial, anthropological critique of the rush to colonize Mars. Acta Astronaut 113:89–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith K (2016) The curious case of the martian microbes: mariomania, intrinsic value, and the prime directive. In: Milligan T, Schwartz J (eds) The ethics of space exploration. Springer, Cham

  • Stallard B (2015) “Without doubt,” a sixth mass extinction event is here. Nature World News, August 2, 2015. http://www.natureworldnews.com/articles/15921/20150802/without-doubt-sixth-mass-extinction-event-occurring.htm. Accessed 29 June 2016

  • Steffen W, Grinevald J, Crutzen P, McNeill J (2011) The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Phil Trans R Soc A 369:843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stengers I (2010) Cosmopolitics I. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakoch DA (2013) Astrobiology, history, and society: life beyond earth and the impact of discovery. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zubrin R (2013) Merchants of despair: radical environmentalists, criminal pseudo-scientists, and the fatal cult of antihumanism. Encounter Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James W. Malazita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malazita, J.W. Astrobiology’s Cosmopolitics and the Search for an Origin Myth for the Anthropocene. Biol Theory 13, 111–120 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-017-0281-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-017-0281-7

Keywords

Navigation