• The Obesity Epidemic: Causes and Consequences (A Cameron and K Backholer, Section Editors)
  • Open Access
  • Published:

Longitudinal Associations Between Childhood Obesity and Academic Achievement: Systematic Review with Focus Group Data



The purposes of this study were to review the evidence on longitudinal associations between child and adolescent obesity and academic achievement and to provide perceptions of adolescents with obesity and their parents on this topic.

Recent Findings

Synthesis of 31 studies (from 17 cohorts) suggested that relationships between obesity and academic achievement are not well established, except for adolescent girls’ maths attainment, potentially mediated by both weight-related bullying and executive cognitive functions. Focus groups with adolescent girls with obesity confirmed experiences of psychosocial distress at school particularly during Physical Education. Adolescents perceived that obesity was not related to academic achievement directly, but by their attitude to school.


Interventions are warranted to promote psychosocial wellbeing and cognitive abilities linked to academic achievement in adolescent girls with obesity. Physical Education should be a positive experience for children and adolescents with obesity.


The prevalence of childhood obesity is increasing in many countries with adverse societal impact [1]. Nevertheless, to date, successful efforts to tackle the problem of childhood obesity have been insufficient [1]. Further economic evaluation is required, including an improved understanding of the link between academic achievement and childhood obesity ‘strengthening the economic arguments for interventions’ [1]. A high value is placed on academic achievement by policymakers, schools, and families [2]. If obesity in childhood and adolescence is related to academic achievement, this would provide increased support for interventions aimed at preventing and treating obesity in young people.

‘Direct’ mechanisms for how childhood obesity could be associated to poorer academic achievement have been postulated [3, 4] which are associated with children’s cognitive ability [5, 6••]. ‘Indirect’ mechanisms could include obesity-related adverse physical and mental health leading to increased school absenteeism [7], obesity-related psychosocial distress (e.g. isolation, bullying) [8, 9], stigmatisation by peers and teachers [10, 11], poor sleep due to obesity-related disordered breathing [12, 13], cardio-metabolic co-morbidities [14,15,16], nutritional intake [17] and low levels of physical activity or fitness [18].

Two literature reviews have examined the association between overweight/obesity and academic achievement [19, 20]. Both concluded, from cross-sectional data, that children and adolescents with overweight and obesity typically perform less well in school compared to normal-weight peers. Caird et al. [19] noted a lack of longitudinal studies addressing potential mediators of the relationship between childhood obesity and academic achievement. Since the publication by Caird et al. [19] further evidence on the longitudinal relationship between obesity and academic achievement has emerged. Further, limited research has been undertaken to gain insight into the views of adolescents with obesity and their parents on the link between obesity and academic achievement. Adolescent girls with obesity tend to experience weight-related bullying in school more often which might make them more vulnerable to lower academic achievement [21]. Therefore, the aims of this study were to systematically review and critique the evidence on the longitudinal associations between childhood obesity and academic achievement and to complement the review findings with qualitative data on the perspectives of adolescent girls specifically, and their parents. The following research questions were addressed:

  1. 1.

    Is there evidence of a longitudinal association between childhood or adolescent obesity and academic achievement?

  2. 2.

    Does a change in obesity status over time influence the association with academic achievement?

  3. 3.

    What factors moderate or mediate the association between childhood or adolescent obesity and academic achievement?

  4. 4.

    How do adolescent girls with obesity and their parents perceive the link between obesity and academic achievement?

PART 1: Methods and Results of the Systematic Review


In January 2017, a literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Education Resource Information Centre and SportDiscus; this was restricted to English language but not publication year. The search strategy was adapted for each database and is shown for Medline (ovid) in Table 1. Reference lists and forward citations of included studies were screened. Titles and abstracts were screened independently for eligibility (AM, JNB). Full-text articles were independently screened for inclusion by AM, JNB and SM (DHS arbitrated) using the following inclusion criteria:

  1. (i).

    Study design: observational prospective cohort studies

  2. (ii).

    Participants: healthy 3–18-year olds (i.e. absence of conditions associated with overweight/obesity and impaired school performance)

  3. (iii).

    Exposure: measures or estimates (i.e. self-reported) of body weight status as either body mass index (BMI; values, percentiles or z scores), body fat or waist circumference. Eligible exposures were also the BMI-derived weight status classifications overweight, obesity and overweight and obesity combined

  4. (iv).

    Outcome: measures or estimates of academic achievement limited to standardised test scores, teacher- or self-reported grades of specific school subjects or average attainment during compulsory education

Table 1 Search strategy for ovid Medline

Experimental studies were excluded as these are systematically reviewed elsewhere [22]; an update of the evidence from experimental studies is currently in progress.

Data were independently extracted by two reviewers and cross-checked using a tested and pre-defined data extraction template. Included studies were independently scored for methodological quality by AM and SM, disagreements were resolved through discussion. Quality assessment was scored using criteria for observational longitudinal research [23]. Quality domains included sampling and recruitment, participant characteristics, attrition, data collection methods, and data (total 19 items). Quality criteria were scored as positive, negative or ‘unclear’. If a study provided no or insufficient information, we scored the criterion at issue as ‘unclear’. Where the study referred to additional publications, we retrieved the publication to score the quality criterion. Studies were considered of high methodological quality when the percentage of items that scored positively was ≥70% [24].

A narrative evidence synthesis was performed for which individual study findings were synthesised graphically by school subjects, type of obesity measure and sex. The primary analysis considered the study quality in that studies with an overall quality score of <70%, and studies with a quality score ≥70% but with self-reported weight and height, and/or academic achievement were removed from the evidence synthesis. Where both objectively and subjectively assessed academic achievement was available, findings of objectively obtained scores were considered for the evidence synthesis. Study and population characteristics and assessment tools for academic achievement varied substantially between included studies. Although several studies utilised similar cohort studies for their analyses, combining effect sizes of the same study population would result in overestimation of the effect size [25]. Therefore, no meta-analysis was performed.


The systematic literature search results were summarised in Fig. 1. Eighty potentially relevant full-text articles were identified, of which 30 articles (31 studies) were included in this review.

Fig. 1

Literature search and study selection flow diagram

A detailed description of population characteristics, exposure, outcomes, confounding/mediating variables and main results of the included studies is provided in Table 2. The included studies comprised 17 distinct cohort datasets, of which 11/31 studies performed secondary analysis of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study—Kindergarten Class (ECLS-K) in the USA [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Seven studies used five other datasets from the USA [35, 37,38,39,40,41,42], and eight studies utilised existing cohort datasets from Canada [43, 44], the UK [45, 46], The Netherlands [47, 48], Australia [49], and Taiwan [50]. Five studies from Australia, Germany, Taiwan, Thailand, and Peru used primary data for their prospective analyses [51,52,53,54]. The number of participants ranged from 405 to 21,260 (median 3362 participants) and the follow-up periods ranged from 1 to 9 years (median 3 years). Twenty-four studies assessed the association between overweight and/or obesity and academic achievement whereas two studies related percentage body fat [46, 53], one study BMI z scores [32] and two studies BMI [40, 54], to children’s academic achievement. Measures of academic achievement were obtained from school records or standardised tests by 25 studies and five studies relied on teacher or self-reported academic attainment [37, 42, 44, 52, 55].

Table 2 Characteristics of included studies reporting on the longitudinal relationship between child and adolescent obesity and academic achievement

Sixteen studies assessed the association between overweight or obesity at one time point and academic achievement later in life (Fig. 2a). Of those, eight studies were excluded from the primary analysis due to methodological shortcomings (Fig. 2b). Fourteen studies using data from eight cohorts assessed the association between change in obesity status and academic achievement (Fig. 2b). However, only four studies (two cohorts) were of high methodological quality and so included in the primary analysis (Fig. 2a). Change in obesity status was classified as persistent obesity, development of obesity, and ‘growing out’ of obesity (change from obesity to overweight or healthy weight).

Fig. 2

Evidence synthesis on the longitudinal association between child and adolescent overweight and obesity and academic achievement. a Primary analysis with 15 high-quality studies. b 24 high- and low-quality studies. Each study may be represented in multiple outcomes and weight categories

All included studies adjusted for a number of confounding variables known to be associated with both obesity and academic achievement such as measures of socioeconomic status (e.g. parental education, family income). The quality scoring of each individual study ranged from 53% [26] to 95% [30, 45]. The level of agreement for the quality scoring between the reviewers (AM, SM) was 96% (k = 0.91). In 24/30 studies, methodological quality was scored high (≥70%).

Association Between Overweight or Obesity and Academic Achievement

Figures 2a, and b shows the graphically synthesised data of the included studies on the association between child and adolescent overweight and obesity and academic achievement, namely reading/language, maths, science and a combined average of school subjects. Table 1 also summarises the results for each of the included studies.

Overweight and Academic Achievement

Five high-quality studies (four articles) assessed the link between overweight and maths achievement with one study [34] suggesting significantly lower maths scores in adolescents with overweight at 14 years compared to healthy weight peers (n = 5072). Four studies reported that there was no evidence of an association between overweight and maths achievement [31, 35, 49].

In terms of reading achievement, six high-quality studies (five articles) consistently concluded that there is no evidence of a significant negative association between overweight and reading achievement [31, 35, 41, 45, 49].

Overweight-related associations with science achievement was assessed in one study (n = 18,820) which indicated no significant relationship between overweight at age 7 years and science achievement at 14 years [31].

Eight studies assessed the association between overweight and average achievement score of multiple school subjects [37, 38, 42, 44, 47, 48, 50, 55]. All but one study [47] showed methodological limitations and so were removed from the primary analysis (Fig. 2a). The study indicated that there is no significant association between children aged 8 years with overweight and average achievement at 12 years (n = 1543).

Obesity and Academic Achievement

Ten articles assessed the association between obesity at baseline and academic achievement at follow-up [27, 31, 35, 36, 38, 39, 42, 45, 47, 49].

Based on three high-quality studies using data from three distinct cohorts (n = 8641), there was consistent evidence for significantly lower maths scores at age 13–14 years in girls with obesity compared to healthy-weight peers [35, 45, 49]. This finding was not evident in preschool-aged girls with obesity [35]. Two studies, provided data jointly for girls and boys from the ECLS-K cohort, and suggested a significantly negative association between obesity at age 5–7 years and maths achievement at age 14 years [31, 34]. For boys with obesity, three of the four cohort studies did not find a significant association [35, 45].

Six high-quality studies (four articles) provided evidence on reading achievement in children with obesity compared to children with healthy weight (Fig. 2a). One study considered boys and girls as one study sample and found that students with obesity at age 7 years performed less well in reading and language achievement at age 14 compared to peers with healthy weight [31]. Where studies distinguished between reading achievement of boys and girls, 4/5 studies suggested no association in both sexes (Table 2).

There was no evidence of an association between obesity and science achievement when girls and boys were analysed as one study sample [31], whereas stratified analysis for gender suggested lower science scores in girls with obesity but not in boys at age 13 and 16 years [45].

Associations Between Change in Obesity Status and Academic Achievement

Persistent Obesity and Academic Achievement

Using the same cohort (ECLS-K), two studies reported significantly lower maths achievement scores in girls and boys aged 9 and 11 with persistent obesity [29, 30].

Data from two high-quality studies (two cohorts) on reading achievement were conflicting for girls, with one study indicating a significantly negative association at age 13 and 16 years [45] and one study indicating no significant association at age 9 years [30]. The latter study also indicated no evidence of an association between boys with persistent obesity and reading achievement (Table 2).

No high-quality data were available for science scores and combined average scores of multiple school subjects (Fig. 2b).

Development of Obesity and Academic Achievement

There was no evidence of an association between developing obesity and reading [30, 45] and science [45] achievement in boys and girls.

Developing obesity was not significantly associated with lower maths scores in male and female adolescents aged 13 and 16 years [45] but was in younger children aged 9 and 11 years [29, 30]. When combining data of boys and girls and using a longer follow-up duration up to age 14 years, Kranjac (2015) confirmed a negative association between adolescents who developed obesity over time and maths achievement, compared to peers that maintained a healthy weight [34].

Data from high-quality studies were lacking for combined average school subject achievement.

‘Growing Out’ of Obesity and Academic Achievement

Based on a single high-quality study [45], there was no evidence of an association between growing out of obesity and reading/language, maths and science achievement (Table 2). No data were available for combined school subject achievement.

Moderating or Mediating Factors

The present systematic literature review and data synthesis of high-quality studies indicated that the association between childhood obesity and academic achievement varied by sex, age and school subject. A significantly negative association between obesity and maths achievemement was evident in adolescent girls, while the evidence suggested no association with math achievement in younger girls with obesity and in boys with obesity in general.

Out of the 30 included studies, six studies performed mediation analyses to identify the role of plausible factors that potentially mediate the relationship between child/adolescent obesity and academic achievement. The following mediating factors were assessed:

Cognitive Abilities

Manes (2015) concluded that childhood obesity at age 9 years indirectly predicted academic achievement at age 15 years through the cognitive processes involving executive functioning and concentration [40]. In contrast, Booth et al. (2014) suggested no mediating role of full-scale intelligence quotient between obesity at age 11 years and academic achievement at age 16 years [45].

Age of Menarche

Booth et al. also found no mediating effect of age of menarche [45].

Physical Health

One study indicated that self-reported health problems influencing performance at school did not mediate the association between obesity age 8 years and academic achievement age 12 years [47].

Internalising Behaviour (Including Anxiety, Self-Esteem and Depressive Symptoms)

Teacher-rated internalising behaviour was found to have a significant mediating effect between persistent obesity from preschool age and maths achievement in boys and girls aged 9 and 11 years [29]. However, Manes (2015) reported that internalising symptoms assessed using a standardised inventory did not mediate the association between obesity and maths and reading achievement [40]. This finding was supported by four other studies, which assessed the mediating role of depression [38, 45, 47, 55].


Two studies consistently concluded that the association between child and adolescent obesity and academic achievement at age 14 is not mediated by general self-efficacy [34, 55].

Psychosocial Factors

Psychosocial distress in the form of being bullied [47] and teacher-rated interpersonal skills [29] had significant mediating effects between weight status at age 7–8 and academic achievement in girls age 11–12 years.

In summary, the current evidence suggested that cognitive processes involving executive functions and psychosocial factors might mediate the association between obesity and academic achievement.

PART 2: Methods and Results of the Qualitative Research

This preliminary exploratory qualitative study was complementary to the quantitative data from the systematic review providing more in-depth insight of a few adolescent girls, and providing them with a voice that allows greater understanding of the relationship between obesity and academic achievement [35, 45, 49].


Following completion of a weight management programme (Get Going NHS Lothian: www.nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk/getgoing/) in Scotland, four obese adolescent girls (aged 12–15 years, mean body mass index 99.6th percentile relative to 1990 UK reference) and one of their respective parent/guardians (i.e. 4 dyads in total) participated in separate focus groups of 60 to 90 min (i.e. two focus groups). Focus groups were led by AM, included semi-structured open-ended questions and were audio recorded and subsequently transcribed verbatim using NVivo10 [56]. Data from adolescents and parents/guardians were analysed separately following an inductive thematic analysis [57]. The text was coded and similar codes were clustered into hierarchical themes. Trustworthiness of the analysis was enhanced through independent coding (AM, AN) and member checking. This study was approved by the University of Edinburgh and the National Health Service South East Scotland Research Ethics Committee.


From the focus groups, it was evident that, despite negative body weight-related experiences in school, the girls had a generally positive attitude to education and school. They said that they do very well in school and usually outperform healthy-weight classmates. The only subject the girls mentioned that they were not good at was Physical Education (PE) and this was perceived to be related to the girls’ body weight. Parents/guardians and adolescents perceived that academic achievement is not necessarily related to body weight per se; academic achievement depends on pupils’ attitude towards learning and efforts put into school work. However, both adolescents and parents/guardians believed that the reason for the girls’ good academic achievement is that they were less distracted from school work due to the lack of friends and absence of good peer relationships. The girls said that having friends in class can lead to girls spending more time talking to their friends rather than concentrating and taking school seriously.

Additional themes emerged on female adolescents’ experiences in the school environment that were directly influenced by their body weight status. Both adolescent girls and parents/guardians reported negative psychological consequences of obesity, for example, low self-confidence and unhappiness due to body weight. Social consequences were also highlighted, for example, the girls reported difficulties being accepted and understood by healthy-weight peers in school, and were felt to be lacking friends. From both adolescents’ and parents/guardians’ responses, it emerged that the girls experienced rejection by peers in school, negative body weight-related comments, classmates laughing and gossiping about them and that at times they feel isolated and ignored. The girls viewed having a higher body weight than other teenagers in school as a disadvantage during PE, and for getting appropriately sized clothes for school (lab coats, school uniform, PE kits). PE was reported to be an environment where the girls were strongly exposed to body weight-related teasing. Some girls also felt ignored and excluded from activities by PE teachers. In contrast, classroom teachers were perceived as non-judgmental towards the increased body weight. Eating healthily in school and receiving support from classmates to do so was described as difficult and sometimes even a reason for being isolated from peers.


This paper builds on previous reviews on childhood obesity and its association with academic achievement [19, 20], specifically focusing on longitudinal studies. It also provides insight into mediators or moderators, and perceptions of adolescent girls with obesity and their families on the obesity-academic achievement association. In summary, the systematic evidence synthesis showed that obesity is negatively associated with adolescent girls’ maths achievement. There is some evidence that this negative association is mediated by psychosocial experiences such as body weight-related bullying and participants’ cognitive abilities involving executive functions. However, discrepancies arise for other subjects and age groups where there was less convincing evidence of associations. The role of change in obesity status over time on academic achievement is less well investigated in the majority of existing literature.

Studies in younger children and pre-adolescents generally indicated no association between obesity and academic achievement. This finding is plausible when taking into consideration the developmental trajectories of cognitive abilities related to academic achievement, social functioning and emotional control such as executive function [58, 59] (i.e. reasoning, working memory, cognitive flexibility, inhibition). These cognitive abilities begin developing in infancy but develop steeply from the age of 6 years, develop throughout adolescence and reach adult levels at about age 20 [59,60,61]. It is suggested that puberty influences neural reorganisation in the prefrontal cortex, the brain area linked to executive functions [62]. Therefore, obesity-related deficits in academic achievement might manifest only during adolescence [58].

Working memory, reasoning, inhibition and cognitive flexibility are strongly associated with maths achievement [63] and have been shown to be impaired in children and adolescents with obesity [6••]. Although maths and reading share multiple cognitive processes [64], for non-verbal maths tasks, different brain regions are implicated [65]. The brain regions invoked during non-verbal maths tasks are also areas (prefrontal cortex, hippocampus) which have been suggested to be associated with obesity and energy-balance related behaviours [6667, 68••]. This might explain why obesity in childhood and adolescence appeared to be negatively associated with maths but not reading/language achievement. Further research to understand these mechanisms is warranted.

The negative association between obesity and academic achievement in girls, but to a lesser extent in boys, could be attributed to the fact that obese girls face more incidences of body weight-related stigmatisation [21] and are more likely to be distressed by teasing/bullying than boys [69, 70]. Weight-based teasing was shown to be linked to lower academic achievement [70].

Consistent with the published literature [71,72,73,74,75] were the experiences of participants from our focus group study who experienced social rejection, difficulties in making friends and stigmatisation, although not from teachers. Stigmatisation and teasing was particularly evident in PE, and consistent with previous research [67, 69], the girls reported that their body weight stopped them performing well in this environment. Although, it appears body weight did influence the school experience for our participants, they did not feel that their body weight directly influenced academic achievement of other school subjects specifically, but instead highlighted the importance of attitude to school. Similar to previous research [65], participants reported focusing on education rather than social relationships with peers, perhaps as a coping mechanism to avoid obesity-related bullying and peer rejection.

Strengths and Limitations

Strengths of this work include the use of rigorous systematic review methodology and a focus on longitudinal data to provide a more nuanced insight into the association between obesity and academic achievement. The ability to distinguish between obesity and overweight as exposure variables was also a strength. Adding focus group data provided useful preliminary insight into the perceptions of adolescent girls with obesity and their parents to complement and advance the observational literature.

However, some limitations are notable. Included studies were in English language only; thus, we might have missed relevant studies published in non-English language. Focus group findings are limited in their generalisability given the low number of participants (saturation of themes potentially not reached) and the fact that all those who participated had recently completed a weight management programme (non-participation and non-completion might influence perceptions).

Implications for Research and Practice

The current evidence on the association between obesity and maths attainment is available primarily from North American and European cohorts and entirely from high-income countries. Further research is needed to establish if an obesity-related deficit in academic achievement is evident in children and adolescents from middle-low-income countries. Given the current steep rise in the prevalence of childhood obesity in these countries [1], if there is an association between obesity and academic achievement in these contexts, the subsequent economic impact of obesity-related deficits may have even more implications for economic growth of middle-low-income countries and for human capital. Prospective cohort studies indicated that adolescent obesity is negatively associated with years of schooling [76, 77], school completion [78], enrolment in higher education [79, 80], income [76, 77, 81] and employment status [82]. The economic argument for the implementation of effective childhood obesity prevention and treatment programmes could therefore be substantial.

The current evidence is also limited on the impact of mediating factors. None of the included longitudinal studies evaluated the mediating effects of sleep deprivation, physical activity levels, type of physical activity, diet/nutritional status and co-morbidities, despite the literature suggesting an important role of these factors in the causal pathway between childhood obesity and academic achievement [12, 13, 15,16,17, 83]. However, most recently (after our literature search was performed), new findings were published on the link between meeting lifestyle-behaviour recommendations at age 11 years and academic achievement at age 12 years (n = 4253). Researchers concluded that overweight or obesity was not associated with maths or reading achievement expectation but academic achievement was associated with meeting dietary, sleep and screen time recommendations [84]. Future longitudinal studies should include mediation analysis of those factors to contribute to understanding the underlying mechanisms of a negative association between adolescent obesity and academic achievement. This in turn will help to identify the most promising intervention strategy for promoting educational outcomes. In addition, the ability to identify a factor as a mediator depends on the reliability and validity of the measure and so researchers should avoid utilising crude measurement methods.

Academic achievement might be influenced by a teacher-bias towards obesity, in that children and adolescents are perceived as having poorer reasoning, social, physical and cooperation skills which impact on academic achievement [10, 11, 33, 85•]. However, the empirical evidence is inconsistent [42, 44, 48, 52]; thus, further research to provide empirical tests of this perspective is warranted. Nonetheless, there is convincing evidence on limited educational opportunities when PE teachers hold a biased perception about the abilities of children with obesity [86,87,88]. Our focus group data also indicated that during PE, the girls felt ignored and not supported by the teachers. This finding highlights the importance of promoting positive PE experiences among adolescent girls with obesity and indicate a potential role for physical literacy programmes in schools. Whitehead (2010) [89] placed special emphasis on physical literacy being defined by competence-based and interest-based motivation in PE [89]. Chen (2015) recently suggested that a physically literate person should be characterised by self-regulated motivation for physical activity [90]. For adolescents with obesity, the PE experiences should be educational, including learning the values and benefits of physical activity for health and quality of life for sustained participation in physical activity. Regular aerobic physical activity, as part of the school curriculum or extracurricular, was shown to benefit children’s and adolescents’ cognition and academic achievement [18, 91]. Children and adolescents with obesity seem to be even more responsive to physical activity programmes for improved cognitive abilities and academic achievement [22, 92•]. This demands PE teachers more to fully understand the complexity of motivation processes in order to deliver positive PE experiences for adolescents with obesity. Furthermore, school-wide policy action is needed to address weight-based teasing/bullying.


The educational cost of obesity is primarily evident for adolescent girls’ maths achievement potentially mediated by psychosocial distress and lower executive cognitive functions. There is less consistent evidence for other academic subjects though, suggesting differential relationships. The high prevalence of obesity in adolescent girls means that in addition to the threat to physical and mental health, this large population group is at risk of poor educational outcomes. Poor academic achievement might have long-term consequences on later life opportunities and economic implications. Therefore, findings of this review provide developmental and economic arguments for improved efforts in promoting psychosocial well-being and cognitive abilities linked to academic achievement in adolescent girls with obesity.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.

    Lobstein T, Jackson-Leach R, Moodie ML, Hall KD, Gortmaker SL, Swinburn BA, et al. Child and adolescent obesity: part of a bigger picture. Lancet 2015.

  2. 2.

    Clarke J, Fletcher B, Lancashire E, Pallan M, Adab P. The views of stakeholders on the role of the primary school in preventing childhood obesity: a qualitative systematic review. Obes Rev. 2013;14(12):975–88.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Skledar M, Nikolac M, Dodig-Curkovic K, Curkovic M, Borovecki F, Pivac N. Association between brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met and obesity in children and adolescents. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2012;36(1):136–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Zhao J, Bradfield JP, Li M, Wang K, Zhang H, Kim CE, et al. The role of obesity-associated loci identified in genome-wide association studies in the determination of pediatric BMI. Obesity. 2009;17(12):2254–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Smith E, Hay P, Campbell L, Trollor J. A review of the association between obesity and cognitive function across the lifespan: implications for novel approaches to prevention and treatment. Obes Rev. 2011;12(9):740–55.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    •• Liang J, Matheson B, Kaye W, Boutelle K. Neurocognitive correlates of obesity and obesity-related behaviors in children and adolescents. Int J Obes. 2014;38(4):494–506. This systematic review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the association between cognitive abilities and obesity. The researcher highlight the role of certain cognitive abilities in engaging in obesity-related behaviours.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Pan L, Sherry B, Park S, Blanck HM. The association of obesity and school absenteeism attributed to illness or injury among adolescents in the United States, 2009. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(1):64–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gunnarsdottir T, Njardvik U, Olafsdottir A, Craighead L, Bjarnason R. Teasing and social rejection among obese children enrolling in family-based behavioural treatment: effects on psychological adjustment and academic competencies. Int J Obes. 2012;36(1):35–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Krukowski RA, Smith West D, Philyaw Perez A, Bursac Z, Phillips MM, Raczynski JM. Overweight children, weight-based teasing and academic performance. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2009;4(4):274–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Shackleton NL, Campbell T. Are teachers' judgements of pupils' ability influenced by body shape. Int J Obes. 2014;38(4):520–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    MacCann C, Roberts R. Just as smart but not as successful: obese students obtain lower school grades but equivalent test scores to nonobese students. Int J Obes. 2013;37(1):40–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Tan E, Healey D, Schaughency E, Dawes P, Galland B. Neurobehavioural correlates in older children and adolescents with obesity and obstructive sleep apnoea. J Paediatr Child Health 2013.

  13. 13.

    Galland B, Spruyt K, Dawes P, McDowall PS, Elder D, Schaughency E. Sleep disordered breathing and academic performance: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2015;136(4):e934–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Yau PL, Castro MG, Tagani A, Tsui WH, Convit A. Obesity and metabolic syndrome and functional and structural brain impairments in adolescence. Pediatrics. 2012;130(4):e856–e64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Spitznagel MB, Alosco M, Inge TH, Rochette A, Strain G, Devlin M, et al. Adolescent weight history and adult cognition: before and after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(5):1057–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lande MB, Kupferman JC. Cognitive function in hypertensive children. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015;17(1):508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Khan NA, Raine LB, Donovan SM, Hillman CH. IV. The cognitive implications of obesity and nutrition in childhood. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2014;79(4):51–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Donnelly JE, Hillman CH, Castelli D, Etnier JL, Lee S, Tomporowski P, et al. Physical activity, fitness, cognitive function, and academic achievement in children: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(6):1223–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Caird J, Kavanagh J, Oliver K, Oliver S, O’Mara A, Stansfield C, et al. Childhood obesity and educational attainment: a systematic review. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Taras H, Potts-Datema W. Obesity and student performance at school. J Sch Health. 2005;75(8):291–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tang-Peronard JL, Heitmann BL. Stigmatization of obese children and adolescents, the importance of gender. Obes Rev. 2008;9(6):522–34.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Martin A, Saunders DH, Shenkin SD, Sproule J. Lifestyle intervention for improving school achievement in overweight or obese children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;3:CD009728.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tooth L, Ware R, Bain C, Purdie DM, Dobson A. Quality of reporting of observational longitudinal research. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(3):280–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Singh A, Uijtdewilligen L, Twisk JW, van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJ. Physical activity and performance at school: a systematic review of the literature including a methodological quality assessment. Arch Pediat Adolesc Med. 2012;166(1):49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis: Russell Sage Foundation; 2009.

  26. 26.

    Datar A, Sturm R. Childhood overweight and elementary school outcomes. Int J Obes. 2006;30(9):1449–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Datar A, Sturm R, Magnabosco JL. Childhood overweight and academic performance: national study of kindergartners and first-graders. Obes Res. 2004;12(1):58–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gable S, Britt-Rankin J, Krull JL. Ecological predictors and developmental outcomes of persistent childhood overweight: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; 2008.

  29. 29.

    Gable S, Krull JL, Chang Y. Boys’ and girls’ weight status and math performance from kindergarten entry through fifth grade: a mediated analysis. Child Dev. 2012;83(5):1822–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wendt MHD. Economic, environmental, and endowment effects on childhood obesity and school performance. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences. 2009;70(1-A):281.

  31. 31.

    Zavodny M. Does weight affect children’s test scores and teacher assessments differently? Econ Educ Rev. 2013;34:135–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Capogrossi K, You W. Academic performance and childhood misnourishment: a quantile approach. J Fam Econ Iss. 2013;34(2):141–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kenney EL, Gortmaker SL, Davison KK, Bryn AS. The academic penalty for gaining weight: a longitudinal, change-in-change analysis of BMI and perceived academic ability in middle school students. Int J Obes. 2015;39(9):1408–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kranjac AW. The moderating effect of self-efficacy on normal-weight, overweight, and obese children's math achievement: a longitudinal analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2015;128:168–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Murasko JE. Overweight/obesity and human capital formation from infancy to adolescence: evidence from two large us cohorts. J Biosoc Sci. 2015;47(2):220–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Li J, O'Connell AA. Obesity, high-calorie food intake, and academic achievement trends among U.S. school children. J Educ Res. 2012;105(6):391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Crosnoe R, Muller C. Body mass index, academic achievement, and school context: examining the educational experiences of adolescents at risk of obesity. J Health Soc Behav. 2004;45(4):393–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sabia J, Rees D. Body weight, mental health capital, and academic achievement. Rev Econ Household. 2015;13(3):653–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Afzal AS, Gortmaker S. The relationship between obesity and cognitive performance in children: a longitudinal study. Childhood Obes (Print). 2015;11(4):466–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Manes RL. How childhood obesity predicts academic achievement: a longitudinal study. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering. 2015;75(10-B E).

  41. 41.

    Palermo TM, Dowd JB. Childhood obesity and human capital accumulation. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(11):1989–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Roberts RE, Hao DT. Obesity has few effects on future psychosocial functioning of adolescents. Eat Behav. 2013;14(2):128–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Carter MA, Dubois L, Ramsay T. Examining the relationship between obesity and math performance among Canadian school children: a prospective analysis. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2010;5(5):412–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bisset S, Fournier M, Pagani L, Janosz M. Predicting academic and cognitive outcomes from weight status trajectories during childhood. Int J Obes. 2013;37(1):154–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Booth JN, Tomporowski PD, Boyle JM, Ness AR, Joinson C, Leary SD, et al. Obesity impairs academic attainment in adolescence: findings from ALSPAC, a UK cohort. Int J Obes. 2014;38:1335–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Von Hinke Kessler Scholder S, Davey SG, Lawlor DA, Propper C, Windmeijer F. The effect of fat mass on educational attainment: examining the sensitivity to different identification strategies. Econ Hum Biol. 2012;10(4):405–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Veldwijk J, Fries MCE, Bemelmans WJE, Haveman-Nies A, Smit HA, Koppelman GH, et al. Overweight and school performance among primary school children: the PIAMA birth cohort study. Obesity. 2012;20(3):590–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ruijsbroek A, Wijga AH, Gehring U, Kerkhof M, Droomers M. School performance: a matter of health or socio-economic background? Findings from the PIAMA birth cohort study. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0134780.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Black N, Johnston DW, Peeters A. Childhood obesity and cognitive achievement. Health Econ (United Kingdom). 2015;24(9):1082–100.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Lu Y-L, Chou SJ-H, Lin ES. Gender differences in the impact of weight status on academic performance: evidence from adolescents in Taiwan. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014;46:300–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Chen L-J, Fox KR, Ku P-W, Wang C-H. A longitudinal study of childhood obesity, weight status change, and subsequent academic performance in Taiwanese children. J Sch Health. 2012;82(9):424–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Mo-suwan L, Lebel L, Puetpaiboon A, Junjana C. School performance and weight status of children and young adolescents in a transitional society in Thailand. Int J Obes. 1999;23(3):272–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Telford RD, Cunningham RB, Telford RM, Abharatna WP. Schools with fitter children achieve better literacy and numeracy results: evidence of a school cultural effect. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2012;24(1):45–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Cueto S. Height, weight, and education achievement in rural Peru. Food and Nutrition Bulletin. 2005;26(2 SUPPL. 2):S251–S60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Suchert V, Hanewinkel R, Isensee B. Longitudinal relationships of fitness, physical activity, and weight status with academic achievement in adolescents. J School Health. 2016;86(10):734–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    NVivo 10. NVivo qualitative data analysis software. QSR International Pty Ltd; 2012.

  57. 57.

    Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Best JR, Miller PH, Jones LL. Executive functions after age 5: changes and correlates. Developmental review : DR. 2009;29(3):180–200.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Davidson MC, Amso D, Anderson LC, Diamond A. Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(11):2037–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Waber DP, De Moor C, Forbes PW, Almli CR, Botteron KN, Leonard G, et al. The NIH MRI study of normal brain development: performance of a population based sample of healthy children aged 6 to 18 years on a neuropsychological battery. J Int Neuropsychol Soc JINS. 2007;13(5):729–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Boelema SR, Harakeh Z, Ormel J, Hartman CA, Vollebergh WA, van Zandvoort MJ. Executive functioning shows differential maturation from early to late adolescence: longitudinal findings from a TRAILS study. Neuropsychology. 2014;28(2):177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Juraska JM, Willing J. Pubertal onset as a critical transition for neural development and cognition. Brain Res. 1654;2017:87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Bull R, Lee K. Executive functioning and mathematics achievement. Child Dev Perspect. 2014;8(1):36–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Purpura DJ, Ganley CM. Working memory and language: skill-specific or domain-general relations to mathematics? J Exp Child Psychol. 2014;122:104–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Ashkenazi S, Black JM, Abrams DA, Hoeft F, Menon V. Neurobiological underpinnings of math and reading learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil. 2013;46(6):549–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Reinert KR, Po'e EK, Barkin SL. The relationship between executive function and obesity in children and adolescents: a systematic literature review. J Obes. 2013;2013:820956.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Richard D. Cognitive and autonomic determinants of energy homeostasis in obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11(8):489–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    •• Hassevoort KM, Khan NA, Hillman CH, Cohen NJ. Childhood markers of health behavior relate to hippocampal health, memory, and academic performance. Mind, Brain, and Education. 2016;10(3):162–70. Comprehensive literature review linking brain structure and function to educational attainment. This review also highlights the evidence on the association between lifestyle factors, including childhood obesity, and cognitive and educational performance.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Feeg VD, Candelaria LM, Krenitsky-Korn S, Vessey JA. The relationship of obesity and weight gain to childhood teasing. J Pediatr Nurs. 2014;29(6):511–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Puhl RM, Luedicke J. Weight-based victimization among adolescents in the school setting: emotional reactions and coping behaviors. J Youth Adolesc. 2012;41(1):27–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Curtis P. The experiences of young people with obesity in secondary school: some implications for the healthy school agenda. Health Soc Care Commun. 2008;16(4):410–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Davis SP, Davis M. A focus group study of African-American obese children in Mississippi. J Cult Divers. 2008;15(4):158–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Fox KR, Edmunds LD. Understanding the world of the “fat kid”: can schools help provide a better experience? Reclaiming Children Youth. 2000;9(3):177.

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Holt NL, Moylan BA, Spence JC, Lenk JM, Sehn ZL, Ball GD. Treatment preferences of overweight youth and their parents in Western Canada. Qual Health Res. 2008;18(9):1206–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Zeller MH, Reiter-Purtill J, Ramey C. Negative peer perceptions of obese children in the classroom environment. Obes (Silver Spring, Md). 2008;16(4):755–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Sargent JD, Blanchflower DG. Obesity and stature in adolescence and earnings in young adulthood. Analysis of a British birth cohort. Arch Pediat Adolesc Med. 1994;148(7):681–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Han E, Norton EC, Powell LM. Direct and indirect effects of body weight on adult wages. Econ Hum Biol. 2011;9(4):381–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Okunade A, Hussey A, Karakus M. Overweight adolescents and on-time high school graduation: racial and gender disparities. Atl Econ J. 2009;37:225–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Fowler-Brown AG, Ngo LH, Phillips RS, Wee CC. Adolescent Obesity and Future College Degree Attainment. Obes (19307381). 2010;18(6):1235–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Crosnoe R. Gender, obesity and education. Sociol Educ. 2007;80:241–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Sabia JJ, Rees DI. Body weight and wages: evidence from Add Health. Econ Hum Biol. 2012;10(1):14–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Merten M, Wickarama K, Williams A. Adolescent obesity and young adults psycholsocial outcomes: gender and racial differences. J Youth Adolescence. 2008;37:1111–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Tomporowski PD, McCullick B, Pendleton DM, Pesce C. Exercise and children's cognition: the role of exercise characteristics and a place for metacognition. J Sport Health Sci. 2015;4(1):47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Faught EL, Ekwaru JP, Gleddie D, Storey KE, Asbridge M, Veugelers PJ. The combined impact of diet, physical activity, sleep and screen time on academic achievement: a prospective study of elementary school students in Nova Scotia, Canada. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    • Kenney EL, Redman MT, Criss S, Sonneville KR, Austin SB. Are K-12 school environments harming students with obesity? A qualitative study of classroom teachers. Eat Weight Disord Stud. 2017;22(1):141–52. This qualitative interview study is the first to provide insight into classroom teachers' perception of educatioal attainment in children with obesity. The study revealed an obesity-bias in some classroom teachers.

  86. 86.

    Lynagh M, Cliff K, Morgan PJ. Attitudes and beliefs of Nonspecialist and specialist trainee health and physical education teachers toward obese children: evidence for “anti-fat” bias. J Sch Health. 2015;85(9):595–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Glock S, Beverborg AOG, Müller BC. Pre-service teachers’ implicit and explicit attitudes toward obesity influence their judgments of students. Soc Psychol Educ. 2016;19(1):97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Peterson JL, Puhl RM, Luedicke J. An experimental assessment of physical educators' expectations and attitudes: the importance of student weight and gender. J Sch Health. 2012;82(9):432–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Whitehead M. Physical literacy: throughout the lifecourse. Routledge; 2010.

  90. 90.

    Chen A. Operationalizing physical literacy for learners: embodying the motivation to move. J Sport Health Sci. 2015;4(2):125–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Martin R, Murtagh EM. Effect of active lessons on physical activity, academic, and health outcomes: a systematic review. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2017:1–20.

  92. 92.

    • Bustamante EE, Williams CF, Davis CL. Physical Activity Interventions for Neurocognitive and Academic Performance in Overweight and Obese Youth: A Systematic Review. Pediat Clin N Am. 2016;63(3):459–80. Recent systematic review and evidence synthesis of physical activity intervention effects on cognitive function and educational attainment in children with overweight and obesity.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Vasilis Antonopoulos for the assistance in the literature search and data extraction and Michael Pawlukiewicz for generating Fig. 2. We thank all participants for taking part in the focus group study and the National Health Service Lothian for their support.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Martin.

Ethics declarations

This study was approved by the University of Edinburgh and the National Health Service South East Scotland Research Ethics Committee.

Conflict of Interest

Anne Martin declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Josephine N. Booth declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Sarah McGeown declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ailsa Niven declares that she has no conflict of interest.

John Sproule declares that he has no conflict of interest.

David H. Saunders has received speaker’s honorarium from the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Neurology (ACPIN) conference.

John J. Reilly declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

This article does include any study with human subjects. Informed written consent was obtained from the study participants.


There is no funding to be disclosed.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on The Obesity Epidemic: Causes and Consequences

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin, A., Booth, J.N., McGeown, S. et al. Longitudinal Associations Between Childhood Obesity and Academic Achievement: Systematic Review with Focus Group Data. Curr Obes Rep 6, 297–313 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-017-0272-9

Download citation


  • Children
  • Adolescents
  • Obesity
  • Academic achievement
  • Systematic review
  • Longitudinal cohort studies