Abstract
Despite being located within a primary region of crop diversity, documentation of Tajik crop and crop wild relative (CWR) resources is far from comprehensive, particularly regarding CWR. Here, we compile the first inventory of food CWR of Tajikistan. A total of 549 food CWR taxa belonging to 36 families and 125 genera were documented as occurring in the country. Among them, 71 taxa were recognized as native close relatives of globally important crops (category 1A), 67 as native distant relatives of these crops (1B) and 411 as native taxa with an undetermined relationship to these crops (1C). This documented CWR diversity far exceeds previous scientific assessments for the country and, in doing so, distinguishes the Tajik region from surrounding countries. Within the country, the results indicate a clear gradient of food CWR taxonomic richness from the eastern part of the country (least diversity) to the western part (greatest diversity). This trend adds important new information to the body of literature published by N. I. Vavilov and others, who mainly stressed the importance of the Pamir region (Eastern Tajikistan) for crop and CWR diversity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The world’s major regions where various crop species were domesticated and subsequently evolved over thousands of years were first outlined a century ago by the Russian scientist N. I. Vavilov. Based on observations of diversity within and among cultivated plant species, as well as the presence of crop progenitors and other crop wild relative (CWR) taxa, Vavilov listed Central Asia among the key centres of origin of cultivated plants (Vavilov 1926), now commonly referred to as primary regions of diversity (Khoury et al. 2016). During his travels, in 1916 and again in 1924, he conducted studies in the Pamir region of Tajikistan, where he documented 37 distinct varieties of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and 10 varieties of dwarf wheat (Triticum sphaerococcum Percival), among others (Muminjanov 2008).
Since Vavilov’s activity — tragically interrupted by the politics of the time — the diversity and potential of crop and CWR genetic resources in Tajikistan have only received occasional attention, which is worrying given increasing threats to native plant diversity from economic development, globalization, demographic change and other factors (Muminjanov 2008; Sõukand et al. 2021). Recent phytosociological and taxonomic studies have led to a comprehensive flora published for the country, with 4269 plant species listed (Nowak et al. 2020b). In a series of articles by Ovchinnikov, published between 1957 and 1991, at least 1226 Tajik species were documented as useful plants, 168 of those directly used as food. In a neighbouring region, a study by Sitpayeva et al. (2020) in Kazakhstan’s Tian Shan mountains confirmed unique species richness of CWR with almost 300 species documented. Based on these data, the number of CWR species in Tajikistan may far exceed the current estimates indicated within global databases (e.g. Vincent et al. 2019).
CWR inventories have been compiled for many countries worldwide, but in the Central Asian region, various gaps remain (USDA-NPGS 2021), with the exceptions of works focused on China (Kell et al. 2015) and Kazakhstan (Sitpayeva et al. 2020). Other research has focused mainly on selected prioritized taxa, for example, in Uzbekistan, where scientists identified five CWR species of key importance from among 70 previously selected wild nutritional, technical and ornamental plants as part of a UNEP/GEF CWR project (Hunter 2012).
In view of the still scarce knowledge of CWR in the Central Asian region, in this paper, we present the first comprehensive inventory of Tajikistan’s CWR, based on the national flora (Nowak et al. 2020b) in combination with additional work by the authors, as well as other relevant data on plant genetic resources. We assess this diversity in the context of that documented in nearby as well as more distant countries and outline hotspots of diversity within Tajikistan that could represent areas of focus for conservation.
2 Methods
2.1 Research area
Tajikistan covers 141,400 km2 and is located in Middle Asia. Its territory is land locked and mountainous, with elevation varying from 300 m to 7495 m and mountains making up 93% of the territory (TAJSTAT 2018a). It stretches between the continental Asian deserts in the west and south and the great mountain ranges of Tian Shan, Kunlun, Hindu Kush and Karakorum in the north, east and south-east, all having vertical belts from hot to permafrost deserts. According to bioclimatic classifications, the country is typified by a Mediterranean (i.e. wet winters and dry summers) type of macrobioclimate (Rivas-Martínez et al. 2002). However, the strong influences of the vast Asiatic continent make the climatic conditions much harsher than that of the Mediterranean. The Irano-Turanian bioclimatic zone should be distinguished from the Mediterranean by higher continentalism, lower precipitation with the precipitation peak from winter to spring, a longer dry season and lower winter temperature minima (Djamali et al. 2012). The area has a low percentage of cloud cover and, subsequently, high level of solar insolation (2090–3160 h of sunshine). It is characterized by a considerable variation in annual temperatures and moderate humidity. In the alpine and nival belts of the high mountains, the climate is much harsher than in lower elevations. At lower elevations, the average temperatures range between 23 to 30°C in July and −1 to 3°C in January, while in the eastern Pamirs, the average temperature in July is 5 to 10°C, and the average temperature in January is −15 to −20°C. Annual precipitation ranges in the western Pamir-Alai from ca. 350 mm (Zeravshan Mts.) to ca. 600 mm in the Hissar Range (in some locations up to 2000 mm). In the western part of the country, the lower limit of permanent snow is at an altitude of 3500–3600 m a.s.l. and in its eastern regions at 5800 m a.s.l. (Latipova 1968; Narzikulov and Stanyukovich 1968; Safarov 2003).
2.2 A Tajik national CWR inventory
The creation of a Tajik national inventory of food CWR followed UN Food and Agriculture Organization’s (FAO) methodological guidance (Maxted et al. 2013). The prioritized food crop checklist is available in the Supplementary Information subsection. Our database builds on the list of 4269 native Tajik flora (Nowak et al. 2020b) supplemented by research conducted between 2006 and 2020 within the borders of the country (Nowak et al. 2020a). The selection of genera related to the most important food crops was based on FAOSTAT world production information (group with domain code “QC-Domain:Production:Crops”) (FAO 2020). We also included genera recognized as synonyms of crop genera based on information in the Catalogue of Life (Bánki et al. 2022), as well as genera with very close genetic relationships to crop genera and that exhibit the same methods of use or were previously recognized as CWR in other peer-reviewed scientific publications. This produced a list of 627 important food CWR species present in Tajikistani flora, among which 549 are native (Table 1).
The gene pool relationship level between food CWR and their associated crops was determined based on information from USDA GRIN-Global Taxonomy (USDA-NPGS GRIN-Global 2021) and the Harlan and de Wet CWR Inventory (Vincent et al. 2013). The 141 species with genetic relationship information in these data sources were assigned to primary, secondary and tertiary relative groups. All species were then classified following Khoury et al. 2020: 1A, indicating native close relatives of globally important crops; 1B, distant (tertiary) native relatives of crop species; 1C, taxa within the crop genus with an undetermined relationship to the crop(s); 1D, non-native, close relatives; and 1E, non-native, distant relatives (Table 2). CWR native to Tajikistan (1A, 1B, 1C) was further analysed in terms of their distribution and conservation status in the country. All accepted taxonomic names were verified against the Taxonomic Name Resolution Service (Boyle et al. 2013).
2.3 Spatial analysis
To explore the potential spatial distribution of CWR in Tajikistan, we used a database listing ca. 4300 vascular plant species in Tajikistan, which are reported in the 10-volume work dedicated to the flora of the former Soviet Socialist Republic of Tajikistan, prepared by a multiauthor team (Kinzikaeva 1988; Kochkareva 1986; Ovchinnikov 1957, 1963, 1968, 1975, 1978, 1981; Rasulova 1991) and supplemented by a few other authors (Nowak et al. 2020b). This database contains the following information about each species: (1) its presence and absence in phytogeographical subregions; (2) its presence and absence in elevation ranges at every 100 m band, which is the maximum precision reported in the Flora of Tajikistan; and (3) conservation status for each species at the national and global scale (Nowak et al. 2020b). From this database, we extracted data for the 549 native CWR species of Tajikistan.
To understand the geographic and ecological patterns of Tajik CWR, we used a system of operational geographic units (OGUs) defined by phytogeography and elevation. Each unit represents a polygon of a phytogeographical subregion according to the division proposed by Grubov (2010) (Fig. 1) and a 100-m elevation belt. In this way, we obtained 808 OGUs, each of which with relatively homogeneous environmental parameters within (Raduła et al. 2021). Using the available literature, based on the presence/absence data, we compiled all assessed CWR elevation distributional ranges for each phytogeographical subregion in Tajikistan. We then calculated potential CWR richness for each OGU. The elevations above 5100 in East Tajikistan A, B and C, Alaian and Zeravshanian C and above 5700 in West Pamirian A, B and C, East Pamirian, were omitted because no vascular plants occur at those ranges.
Finally, we calculated maps of elevation ranges in phytogeographical subregions based on a digital elevation model (DEM) with ca. 100 m resolution (Jarvis et al. 2008). To each OGU, based on CWR data, we attributed information about CWR richness and conservation status.
2.4 Conservation status and prioritization
An updated conservation status of CWR species was created based on the Tajik plant conservation status database created by Nowak et al. for the Red List of vascular plants of Tajikistan (2020b). Priority CWR taxa for conservation were identified based on degree of threat, with focus on critically endangered, endangered and vulnerable species (CR, EN, VU) (Maxted et al. 2007). We also included data on the distribution of CWR species recently recognized as extinct (EX). We performed a conservation gap analysis similar to those proposed by Burley (1988) and Maxted et al (2007) by using distributional data for the priority CWR taxa to identify national CWR hotspots. We did not, however, suggest placement of the proposed hotspots based on already existing conservation areas coverage because of the insufficient effectiveness of plant conservation in these areas due to management and design gaps (Fig. 6). Instead, we prioritized geographical areas with the highest CWR distribution density. In three cases, localities of the highest CWR diversity coincided with already established protected areas; in these, genetic CWR reserves were proposed within protected area borders.
Finally, to propose CWR in situ conservation areas in Tajikistan, we used the CLUZ tool for QGIS based on the Marxan software for conservation planning (Smith 2019). For analytics, we used distribution data on food CWR species endangered at the national level. Additional determinants influencing locality selection included urbanized areas, percentage of food CWR species in relation to the subregional plant inventory and distribution of localities within country’s borders (prioritizing evenness across the country). Highly urbanized areas were determined by coordinate search in Google Earth Pro (Gorelick et al. 2017).
3 Results and discussion
3.1 CWR inventory of Tajikistan
A total of 549 food CWR belonging to 36 families and 125 genera were identified as occurring in Tajikistan (Table 2). The families with the highest numbers of taxa include the Poaceae (27), Brassicaceae (18) and Rosaceae (14). The genera with the highest number of taxa include Allium (85), Elymus (20) and Valerianella (19). Seventy-one taxa were recognized as native close relatives of globally important crops (1A), 67 as native distant relatives of these crops (1B) and 411 as native taxa with an undetermined relationship (although likely distant) to these crops (1C). According to Nowak et al (2020b) and Ovchinnikov (1957, 1963, 1968, 1975, 1978, 1981) there are 162 endemic species among the CWR priority species listed. The most numerous group of endemics consists of species from the genus Allium (48 species). There are also 9 endemic species belonging to the genus Cicer, 9 to the genus Melilotoides, 7 to the genus Elymus and 7 to the genus Rosa.
3.2 Spatial analysis
The highest potential richness of food CWR taxa occurred in intermountain valleys and in floodplains. This mainly entailed the southwestern phytogeographical subregions of Tajikistan — Tajikistan 7a–c, with up to 187 taxa. Conversely, the lowest richness occurred in the East Pamirian subregion (11) (Grubov 2010), with a maximum of 53 taxa (Fig. 2).
Comparing overall subregional plant richness to the number of food CWR taxa, the differences between these subregions were lower and the diversity in Pamirian intermountain valleys was more visible (Fig. 3). This analysis confirms an exceptionally high number of food CWR in southwestern Tajik regions not only in terms of their overall richness, but also their high proportion in relation to the overall local flora. The percentage of CWR in this area reached 15% of all plant species, while the percentage of food CWR in East Pamirian subregion was 7.3%. However, this analysis also shows that the highest percentage of CWR taxa in relation to local flora occurred in the Mogoltausian (Fig. 1 (2)) region, where the percentage value reached 16.7%.
The subregions with the highest overall number of important food CWR taxa were South Tajikistanian B (261 species), South Tajikistanian A (259 species) and Hissaro-Darvasian A (240 species). Subregions with the lowest numbers of food CWR species were Alaian (20 species), Turkestanian B (74 species) and East Pamirian (78 species) (Fig. 4).
After standardizing data by average number of food CWR taxa per 100 km2 in each subregion, a much clearer diversity gradient was evident, from the eastern part of the country (least diversity) to the west (most) (Fig. 5). High values of species per 100 km2 in Mogoltausian, Turkestanian B and Hissaro-Darvasian F regions were related to their relatively small areas and occurrence in numerous CWR distribution areas.
3.3 Conservation prioritization
Based on Nowak et al. (2020b) for the Tajik Red List of vascular plants at a national level, 180 (32.79% of total) have been assessed as threatened. These include 31 (5.65%) as critically endangered (CR), 85 (15.48%) endangered (EN), 62 (11.29%) as vulnerable (VU) and 2 (0.36%) as recently extinct (not seen for more than 50 years). Globally, 72 Tajik food CWR taxa (13.11%) have been classified as threatened, including 20 critically endangered (3.64%), 32 (5.83%) endangered, 18 (3.28%) vulnerable and 2 (0.36%) extinct.
Based on richness and distribution of endangered CWR taxa, we identified 11 hotspots which might be considered as candidates for protected area status (Fig. 6).
Geobotanical subregions with the highest number of endangered CWR included 7a, South Tajikistanian A; 7b, South Tajikistanian B; and 7c, South Tajikistanian C. In these areas, the highest richness of endangered CWR taxa occurred in the valleys of rivers Kafirnigan, Vakhsh and Surkhob which should be given consideration as possible areas for CWR genetic reserves (Fig. 6 (1, 2, 3)). The proposed specific location of a genetic reserve for CWR conservation, when considering both existing conservation areas and CWR hotspots as suggested by Maxted et al (2007), would be situated in an overlaying area of Sarikhosor Nature Park and Nureksky Nature Reserve. Both areas are classified as habitat/species management areas (category IV) by the IUCN (UNEP-WMC 2021). Simultaneously, this area overlaps with distribution areas of high number of endangered CWR taxa (Fig. 6 (4)). Another area which should be recognized as a local hotspot for CWR genetic diversity and possible placement of a genetic reserve lies in the Zeravshan river valley (Fig 6 (5)). Despite high urbanization of the Prisyrdarian region, it may also be important to locate a proposed CWR protected area between the city of Konibodom and the Isfara River (Fig. 6 (6)).
East Pamirian CWR hotspots are characterized by less endangered CWR taxa and to lower floristic richness in general (Nowak et al. 2020a). The CWR hotspot locations based on the highest richness of endangered CWR taxa in the East Pamirian subregion were located in the Gunt valley, the eastern part of Murgab valley and the valley of Rangkul lake. Two hotspots were also located within the borders of the Zorkul and Muzkul Nature Reserve (IUCN Category VI) (Fig. 6 (7, 8, 9, 10, 11)).
We note that the placement of new conservation areas in central-west Tajikistan is likely to be more challenging due to high urbanization in this area.
3.4 Neighbouring countries and international comparisons
The area of Hissaro-Darvaz open woodlands of Tajikistan, as well as other “redkolesa” (groves) in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, has been described as a mix of steppe and sparse woodlands with important CWR species from the Amaryllidaceae, Brassicaceae, Poaceae, Lamiaceae and Rosaceae families, with particular attention given to wild nut and fruit forests (Stolton et al. 2006). This area is considered as an important hotspot of biodiversity globally but is still poorly known in terms of the composition of its native flora (Mittermeier et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2020).
We identified the highest potential richness of food CWR taxa in intermountain valleys and in floodplains of Tajikistan, findings which agree with research conducted in the neighbouring Kazakhstani Tian Shan (Sitpayeva et al. 2020). Our spatial analysis demonstrates that the highest richness of food CWR taxa occur in western regions of Tajikistan, potentially contradicting Vavilov’s emphasis on the Pamirs as the most important region in Middle Asia for food-related diversity (Vavilov 1926). This said, the presence of at least 78 CWR taxa of important crops in the East Pamirian subregion (38,629 km2) should still be considered a high level of diversity, worthy of conservation and exploration. Our analysis provides novel insights into previously under-recognized diversity in the plant genetic resources community in the southwestern subregions — South Tajikistanian B (8781 km2) with 261 taxa and South Tajikistanian A (4055 km2) with 259 taxa.
While comparing the number of food CWR listed in the present analysis with global databases containing information on CWR occurring in Tajikistan and neighbouring countries, there are recognizable differences between these sources of data. The number of taxa recorded in our CWR list for Tajikistan is considerably larger than the number listed in GRIN-Global Taxonomy CWR database (+ 431 taxa) and that of the Harlan and de Wet CWR Inventory (+ 480 taxa) (Table 1). The absolute number obtained from our investigation is also considerably higher than counts for all neighbouring countries except China, which is 67 times larger than Tajikistan. These discrepancies are most likely a result of our more comprehensive and long-term effort to document Tajik flora. Thus, more CWR should also be expected to be recorded in the future in surrounding countries.
We also note that out of 549 native CWR taxa, 411 belong to group 1C — with an undetermined relationship to the main crop species. This is evidence that further work is needed in Tajikistan to understand its natural heritage of CWR and the potential value of these plants as genetic resources for crop improvement.
According to crop wild relatives’ global portal (2022), 29 national CWR inventories have been compiled. These include collective lists for the Nordic and Euro-Mediterranean countries. Moreover, in the last year, checklists for countries such as Tunisia (El Mokni et al. 2022) and Romania (Sandru 2021) have been compiled. Countries with a defined inventory of CWR include 5 African countries, 3 North American countries, 1 South American country, 4 Asian countries and 16 European countries. From these, the number of priority CWR species ranges from 105 species in Guatemala (Azurdia et al. 2011) to 871 in China (Kell et al. 2015). Considering the number of prioritized CWR species defined in our study for Tajikistan (549), this country may be distinguished as a CWR hotspot in terms of species richness.
3.5 Local importance of CWR
Many crops, including native CWR, are used by local people for food, medicine, energy and other livelihood purposes (Kassam et al. 2010). However, the Statistical Agency of Tajikistan (TAJSTAT 2018b) reports information only for a few agricultural crops, such as production and consumption of potatoes, cotton and grapes, and does not include CWR at all. Moreover, there is little research on this topic in Tajikistan. For example, a Google Scholar search using the key terms “crop wild relative” and “Tajikistan” shows only 37 results. Most of these mentions of Tajikistan appeared in publications about CWR occurring in other countries, without details about CWR in the region of interest (Google Scholar 2022). The same search terms entered into the general Google search engine returned 871 results, but similar problems were encountered (Google Search 2021). So far, Tajikistan has appeared in a global CWR study with 173 priority crop relatives shown, including a wheat relative — Aegilops tauschii Cossi possessing genes that increase resistance to Hessian fly impact, and a peach relative Prunus ferganensis (Kostov & Rjabov) Kovalev & Kostov showing drought resistance (Vincent et al. 2013). One study (Keusgen et al. 2006) reported that local people cultivate Allium species (common onion and garlic) and also collect related wild taxa for food (spices, vegetables) and medicinal purposes. Another study (Kassam et al. 2010) listed 58 plants used in the Pamirs for food and/or medicinal purposes. Of these, 27 were considered CWR species, 26 of which are present in our list. Rumex confertus Willd. listed by Kassam et al. (2010) is not considered a native species by Nowak et al. (2020b).
3.6 Plant genetic resource activities in Tajikistan
Given the diversity and importance of crops in this region, a number of measures have been undertaken for their conservation, breeding and management. Of particular interest is the review of international and local work carried out between 2006 and 2013 in Tajikistan, presented by Turok et al. (2013), which focused on conservation and evaluation of genetic resources. It should be noted that the efforts were mainly aimed at crop improvement, using existing, introduced and crossbred varieties, with no mention of the use of CWR in this process. The main objective was to achieve greater food security through increased yields, disease and pest control, improved drought tolerance and other traits. Nevertheless, these activities also included wild fruit trees. During this period, Turok et al. (2013) reported significant achievements. For example, germplasm of cereals, potatoes, food legumes, sorghum, pearl millet and various vegetable crops was enriched. Improved crop varieties with higher productivity and stress tolerance were developed and commercialized, including four new varieties of wheat, two of potato, one of barley, three of chickpea, one of pearl millet and many vegetable varieties, using new plant genetic material that has been introduced, tested and adapted to local conditions.
To preserve plant genetic resources, a national gene bank was opened in 2002 at the Research Institute of Crop Husbandry of Tajikistan, and the National Centre for Plant Genetic Resources was established in 2007 (Turok et al. 2013). In addition, 55 traditional varieties of fruit plants have been conserved in the national orchard in Sughd region with an area of 493 ha (Turok et al. 2013). For training and capacity building, a regional training centre for apricot genetic resources has been established in the Sughd branch of the Tajik Institute of Horticulture, where 180 varieties of apricot trees are grown and two national training centres for fruit trees have been established in the Tajik Institute of Horticulture in Dushanbe and the Pamir Biological Institute in Khorog (Turok et al. 2013). In terms of policy, a national law on “Conservation and sustainable use of crop genetic resources” has been developed (Turok et al. 2013).
One project coordinated by Bioversity International and funded by the Global Environment Facility Trust Fund, and implemented by UNEP in 2005, aimed to provide farmers, institutes and local communities with knowledge, methodologies and policies for in situ/on-farm conservation of horticultural crops and wild fruit species in Middle Asia, including Tajikistan (UNEP 2005). Through this project, it was evident that many valuable local populations and old varieties of peach, quince, cherry, pomegranate, persimmon and others are still grown in home gardens and small farms. The project identified 122 varieties and forms of apricots, 79 apples, 27 grapes, 22 pears, 9 walnuts, 7 mulberries, 6 pistachios and 3 peaches maintained by farmers in Tajikistan. Most of them have unique characteristics such as drought and frost resistance, excellent taste, fruit size and appearance (Turok et al. 2013).
Other noteworthy projects conducted by Bioversity International in Tajikistan include “Reviving biocultural heritage: Strengthening the socioeconomic and cultural basis of agrobiodiversity management for development in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan” in 2005–2009 funded by The Christensen Fund; “Conservation for diversified and sustainable use of fruit tree genetic resources in Middle Asia” initiated in 2013 jointly with Centre de Recherche Public Gabriel Lippmann (CRPGL), Luxembourg; and “Regeneration of Barley and Wheat Collections in Tajikistan”, implemented by the Tajik National Centre for Genetic Resources with financial support from the Global Crop Diversity Trust in 2008-2011 (Turok et al. 2013).
3.7 Conservation concerns
An estimated 90% of fruit and nut forests in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan have been destroyed in the last 50 years (Hunter 2012). For a long time, there was no reliable information on exactly how many vascular plant species, including CWR, are threatened in Tajikistan. Since the publication of Nowak et al. (2020b), the extent of the gradual decline in species diversity, mainly caused by threats from agriculture, urbanization and climate change, is better known. Unfortunately, there are still no reliable data on how many species are currently legally protected, due to the fact that there is still no law protecting flora in Tajikistan (Nowak et al. 2020a).
Habitat protection in 34 of the world’s 825 ecoregions with the highest levels of agrobiodiversity was found to be significantly lower than the global average (Stolton et al. 2006). Ten of these have highly inadequate protection (less than 4% of protected areas). One of these areas is the Alai-Western Tian Shan steppe zone (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan) (Stolton et al. 2008). On a brighter note, in recent decades, large protected areas have been established in the Pamir-Alai, now covering about 22% of the country (Safarov 2003). Among them are four strict nature reserves: Tigrovaya Balka, Romit, Dashtidjum and Zorkul nature reserves. Other protected areas that have been established, partly to protect juniper forests, are Dashtijum, Saivotin, Kusavlisai and Childukhtaron reserves. Zeravshan reserve has been established to conserve river valley vegetation. In addition, several agrobiodiversity management and conservation strategies and programmes have been developed in protected areas. Under the aforementioned UNEP project (2005), 11 nurseries were established on an area of 3.37 ha, which produced 87 local varieties including 22 apple varieties, 25 apricots, eight pears, eight peaches, six walnuts, nine grapevines, six mulberries and three pistachios (Turok et al. 2013). In addition, 135 local varieties including 41 apple, 35 apricot, 14 pear, 12 grape, 12 walnut, seven mulberry, six peach, four almond and four pistachio varieties were established in 15 demonstration sites covering 26.33 ha of land in farmers’ orchards (Turok et al. 2013). Wild walnut, pistachio, apple and pear varieties were also established in three demonstration points of forestry companies covering 6.05 ha (Turok et al. 2013). In terms of protected areas for crop plant genetic diversity in Tajikistan, the IUCN Category Ia Dashtidjum State Nature Reserve covers 53,400 ha to protect stands of juniper, pistachio, almond, pomegranate and wild fig forests and open woods. The Zeravshansky (Sarezmsky) Reserve is also known to be rich in CWR (Stolton et al. 2006). In addition to the above, there are 19 specially protected areas; the best known include the Tigrovaya Balka, Romit, Dashtijum and Zorkul reserves (Muminjanov 2008).
However, inadequate management of protected areas continues to have a negative influence on plant diversity conservation. Many protected areas in Central and Middle Asia were established under Soviet rule and still apply historical (and in our opinion inadequate) standards. It is also important to note that the density of protected areas in Middle Asia is mainly concentrated in mountainous regions, which tend not to coincide with overall plant species richness, nor with our current understanding of CWR richness. Moreover, government institutions are still unable to manage and monitor all valuable vegetation types and plant populations. Due to the lack of legal guidelines for plant conservation even in strict nature reserves, threats from human activities such as road construction and mining in the Romit Valley continue to affect plant diversity (Nowak et al. 2020a). Improving the effectiveness of nature conservation in the Pamir-Alai requires urgent development of action plans with specific priorities for hotspots of this diversity.
Our research shows that the location of current conservation areas will not provide sufficient protection for Tajik CWR. To confirm the most effective locations of CWR protected areas based on our research, further geobotanical surveys will need to be conducted in selected areas, and new protected areas will probably need to be established, especially in the southwestern regions.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Altieri MA (1999) The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Elsevier, In Invertebrate biodiversity as bioindicators of sustainable landscapes. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-50019-9.50005-4
Altieri MA, Nicholls CI, Henao A, Lana MA (2015) Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems. Agron Sustain Dev 35:869–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0285-2-2
Azurdia C, Williams KA, Williams DE, Van Damme V, Jarvis A, Castaño SE (2011) Atlas of Guatemalan crop wild relatives. http://www.ars.usda.gov/Services/docs.html. Accessed 11 Jun 2022
Bánki O, Roskov Y, Döring M, Ower G, Vandepitte L, Hobern D, Remsen D, Schalk P, DeWalt RE, Keping M, Miller J, Orrell T, Aalbu R, Adlard R, Adriaenssens EM, Aedo C, Aescht E, Akkari N, Alfenas-Zerbini P et al (2022) Catalogue of life checklist (Roskov, Ed.; Version 2022-05-20). Catalogue of Life. https://doi.org/10.48580/dfpn
Boyle B, Hopkins N, Lu Z, Raygoza Garay JA, Mozzherin D, Rees T, ... Enquist BJ (2013) The taxonomic name resolution service: an online tool for automated standardization of plant names. BMC Bioinformatics, 14(1), 1-15.
Crop wild relatives global portal (2022) Crop Wild Relatives: CWR checklists, strategies, action plans. (n.d.). http://www.cropwildrelatives.org/cwr-strategies/. Accessed 13 Jun 2022
Burley FW (1988) Monitoring biological diversity for setting priorities in conservation. Biodiversity 227:230
Djamali M, Brewer S, Breckle SW, Jackson ST (2012) Climatic determinism in phytogeographic regionalization: a test from the Irano-Turanian region, SW and Central Asia. Flora Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 207:237–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2012.01.009
FAO (2010) The second report on the state of the world’s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. FAO, Rome
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2020) FAOSTAT statistical database. [Rome]:FAO
Grubov VI (2010) Schlussbetrachtung zum Florenwerk” Rastenija Central’noj Azii”[Die Pflanzen Zentralasiens] und die Begründung der Eigenständigkeit der mongolischen Flora. Feddes Repertorium 121:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/fedr.201011123
Google Scholar: Google Scholar’s Search Engine (2022) https://scholar.google.com/. Accesed 13 Jun 2022
Google Search (2021) Google. https://www.google.com/. Accessed 12 Aug 2021
Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M et al (2017) Google Earth Engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens Environ 202:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
El Mokni R, Barone G, Maxted N et al (2022) A prioritised inventory of crop wild relatives and wild harvested plants of Tunisia. Genet Resour Crop Evol 69:1787–1816
Hajjar R, Hodgkin T (2007) The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: a survey of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica 156:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9363-0
Hammer K, Knüpffer H, Xhuveli L, Perrino P (1996) Estimating genetic erosion in landraces — two case studies. Genet Resour Crop Evol 43:329–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132952
Hunter D (2012) Crop wild relatives: a manual of in situ conservation. Routledge
Jarvis A, Reuter HI, Nelson A, Guevara E (2008) Hole-filled SRTM for the globe version 4, available from the CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90m Database. http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org. Accessed 21 Sep 2020
Kassam KA, Karamkhudoeva M, Ruelle M, Baumflek M (2010) Medicinal plant use and health sovereignty: findings from the Tajik and Afghan Pamirs. Hum Ecol 38(6):817–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-010-9356-9
Kell S, Qin H, Chen B et al (2015) China’s crop wild relatives: diversity for agriculture and food security. Agric Ecosyst Environ 209:138–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.02.012
Keusgen M, Fritsch RM, Hisoriev H et al (2006) Wild Allium species (Alliaceae) used in folk medicine of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomedicine 2:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-2-18
Khoury CK, Achicanoy HA, Bjorkman AD et al (2016) Origins of food crops connect countries worldwide. Proc R Soc B 283:20160792. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.0792
Khoury CK, Carver D, Greene SL et al (2020) Crop wild relatives of the United States require urgent conservation action. PNAS 117:33351–33357. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2007029117
Kinzikaeva GK (1988) Flora Tadzhikskoi SSR. T. IX. Marenovye - Slozhnotsvetnye. Izdatelstvo Nauka
Kochkareva TF (1986) Flora Tadzhikskoi SSR. T. VIII. Kermekovye - Podorozhnikovye. Izdatelstvo Nauka
Latipova WA (1968) Kolichestvo osadkov. in Atlas Tajikskoi SSR. Narzikulov IK, Stanyukovich KW (eds). Akademia Nauk Tajikskoi SSR. 68–69
Liu L, Yusupov Z, Suyunkulov H, Jiang Z (2020) The complete chloroplast genome of Allium ferganicum. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 5:2772–2773. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2020.1788454
Maxted N, Brehm JM, Kell S (2013) Resource book for the preparation of National Plans for Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives and Landraces. FAO: Rome, Italy 463
Maxted N, Scholten M, Codd R, Ford-Lloyd B (2007) Creation and use of a national inventory of crop wild relatives. Biol Conserv 140:142–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.006
Mittermeier RA, Turner WR, Larsen FW, et al (2011) Global biodiversity conservation: the critical role of hotspots. In: Biodiversity hotspots. Springer: pp 3–22 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20992-5_1
Muminjanov H (2008) State of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture (PGRFA) in the Republic of Tajikistan. Country report. FAO. http://www.fao.org/pgrfa-gpa-archive/tjk/Tajikistan2.pdf. Accesed 07 Sep 2021
Narzikulov IK, Stanyukovich KW (1968) Atlas Tajikskoi SSR. Akademia Nauk Tajikskoi SSR
Nowak A, Nobis M, Nowak S, Nobis A, Dembicz I, Kusza G, et al (2020a) Illustrated flora of Tajikistan and adjacent areas. Polish Academy of Sciences. Botanical Garden Center for Biological Diversity Conservation : Polish Botanical Society, Warsaw; Cracow; Opole
Nowak A, Świerszcz S, Nowak S et al (2020b) Red list of vascular plants of Tajikistan – the core area of the Mountains of Central Asia global biodiversity hotspot. Sci Rep 10:6235. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63333-9
Ovchinnikov PN ed (1957) Flora Tadzhikskoi SSR. T. I, Paprotnikoobraznye - Zlaki, Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moskva-Leningrad, pp 546
Ovchinnikov PN ed (1963) Flora Tadzhikskoi SSR. T. II, Osokovye - Orkhidnye. Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moskva-Leningrad, pp 456
Ovchinnikov PN ed (1968) Flora Tadzhikskoi SSR. T. III, Opekhovye - Gvozdichnye. Izdatelstvo Nauka, Leningrad, pp 710
Ovchinnikov PN ed (1975) Flora Tadzhikskoi SSR. T. IV, Rogolistnikovye - Rozotsvetnye. Izdatelstvo Nauka, Leningrad, pp 576
Ovchinnikov PN ed (1978) Flora Tadzhikskoi SSR. T. V, Krestotsvetne - Bobovye. Izdatelstvo Nauka, Leningrad, pp 678
Ovchinnikov PN ed (1981) Flora Tadzhikskoi SSR. T. VI, Bobovye (rod Astragal). Izdatelstvo Nauka, Leningrad, pp 725
PFAF. Plants for a Future (2021) In Ken fern/plants for a future (1995–2019). https://pfaf.org/user/Default.aspx. Accessed 21 Jul 2021
Raduła M, Świerszcz S, Nobis M et al (2021) Palaeoclimate has a major effect on the diversity of endemic species in the hotspot of mountain biodiversity in Tajikistan. Sci Rep 11:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98027-3
Rasulova MR ed (1991) Flora Tadzhikskoi SSR. Slozhnotsvetnye. Izdatelstvo Nauka, Leningrad, pp 619
Rivas-Martínez S, Rivas-Saenz S, Penas A (2002) Worldwide bioclimatic classification system. Backhuys Pub. Kerkwerve, The Netherlands
Safarov N (2003) National strategy and action plan on conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. Governmental Working Group of the Republic of Tajikistan, Dushanbe
Sandru MD (2021) National inventory and prioritization of crop wild relatives from Romania. Sci Papers Ser Agro 64:2
Sitpayeva GT, Kudabayeva GM, Dimeyeva LA et al (2020) Crop wild relatives of Kazakhstani Tien Shan: Flora, vegetation, resources. Plant Divers 42:19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2019.10.003
Smith RJ (2019) The CLUZ plugin for QGIS: designing conservation area systems and other ecological networks. RIO 5. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e33510
Sõukand R, Prakofjewa J, Pieroni A (2021) The trauma of no-choice: wild food ethnobotany in Yaghnobi and Tajik villages, Varzob Valley Tajikistan. Genet Resour Crop Evol 68:3399–3411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-021-01200-w
Stolton S, Boucher T, Dudley N et al (2008) Ecoregions with crop wild relatives are less well protected. Biodiversity 9:52–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2008.9712883
Stolton S, Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd B, et al (2006) Food stores: using protected areas to secure crop genetic diversity. A research report by WWF, Equilibrium and the University of Birmingham UK. WWF. http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/food_stores.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2021
TAJSTAT (2018a) Tajikistan in figures. Agency for statistics under the President of the Republic of Tajikistan. http://stat.ww.tj/publications/June2019/tajikistan-in-figures-2018a.pdf. Accessed 12 Aug 2021
TAJSTAT (2018b) Main indicators of the household budget survey of the Republic of Tajikistan. Agency for statistics under the President of the Republic of Tajikistan. http://stat.ww.tj/publications/June2019/key-indicators-2018b.pdf. Accessed 12 Aug 2021
Turok J, Begmuratov M, Akramov K, Carli C, Christmann S, Glazirina M, Toderich K (2013) Agricultural research collaboration in Tajikistan. Working Paper #14, International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA). https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/7901. Accessed 15 Oct 2021
UNEP (2005) In situ/on farm conservation and use of agricultural biodiversity (horticultural crops and wild fruit species) in Central Asia. United Nations Environment Programme. https://www.thegef.org/project/situon-farm-conservation-and-use-agricultural-biodiversity-horticultural-crops-and-wild. Accesed 15 Jun 2021
UNEP-WCMC (2021) Protected area profile for tajikistan from the world database of protected areas, July 2021. www.protectedplanet.net. Accessed 12 Aug 2021
USDA-NPGS (2022) GRIN-Global. http://www.cropwildrelatives.org/cwr-strategies/ Accessed 14.09.2022
USDA-NPGS (2021) GRIN-Global. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/search Accessed 12Aug 2021
Vavilov NI (1926) Centers of origin of cultivated plants. NI Vavilov origin and geography of cultivated plants
Vincent H, Amri A, Castañeda-Álvarez NP et al (2019) Modeling of crop wild relative species identifies areas globally for in situ conservation. Commun Biol 2:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0372-z
Vincent H, Wiersema J, Kell S et al (2013) A prioritized crop wild relative inventory to help underpin global food security. Biol Conserv 167:265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.08.011
Funding
The research was partially supported by the National Science Centre, Poland, grant no. 2020/04/X/NZ8/00032.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MK contributed to the concept of the study, CWR data analysis and first draft of the paper. SŚ contributed to the spatial analysis. CK contributed to research methodology and discussion. AN, ML and BP contributed to the research discussion. All the authors contributed to the final draft and to revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Kotowski, M.A., Świerszcz, S., Khoury, C.K. et al. The primal garden: Tajikistan as a biodiversity hotspot of food crop wild relatives. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 42, 112 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00846-9
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00846-9