Advertisement

A farm-level assessment of labor and mechanization in Eastern and Southern Africa

  • Frédéric BaudronEmail author
  • Michael Misiko
  • Bisrat Getnet
  • Raymond Nazare
  • John Sariah
  • Pascal Kaumbutho
Research Article

Abstract

Once again, agricultural mechanization is top on the policy, research, and development agendas in sub-Saharan Africa. However, whether labor is limiting in this region—and mechanization is in demand—remains debated. The hypothesis of this study is that labor is a major limiting factor to the productivity of most farming systems in Africa. We used farm-level data (including detailed labor data) from eight sites dominated by smallholder agriculture and spanning four countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, and analyzed this unique dataset using multivariate methods (generalized linear models, boundary line analysis, and binary classification and regression trees). Labor and/or other sources of farm power (draught power or tractor power) were found to limit land productivity in all study sites. We also found that the overall contribution of female labor to farming was much lower than commonly stated—between 7 and 35%—and that the labor intensity experienced by women in agriculture was dependent to a large degree on men’s tasks. Our results reveal a much higher demand for mechanization than previously found by macroeconomic analyses, and point to a problem of access rather than demand. Our results also add to recent evidence debunking the persistent myth that women provide the bulk of the farming labor, and demonstrate that reducing labor intensity experienced by women in farming depends to a large degree upon understanding labor intensity experienced by men, rather than poorly founded generalizations about how women are overworked. This is the first time farm-level data containing detailed labor assessment and spanning four countries are used to assess mechanization demand in Africa. This paper also plays a pioneering role in debunking a number of myths related to labor in African smallholder agriculture, with implications for the mechanization agenda of the region.

Keywords

Agricultural intensification Drudgery Gender gap Land consolidation 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) (grant number FSC/2012/047) with additional support from CRP MAIZE and CRP WHEAT.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ali DA, Deininger K (2015) Is there a farm size–productivity relationship in African agriculture? Evidence from Rwanda. Land Econ 91:317–343.  https://doi.org/10.3368/le.91.2.317 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asiama KO, Bennett R, Zevenbergen J (2017) Land consolidation for sub-Saharan Africa’s customary lands – the need for responsible approaches. Am J Rural Dev 5:39–45.  https://doi.org/10.12691/AJRD-5-2-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baudron F, Sims B, Justice SE, Kahan DG, Rose R, Mkomwa S, Kaumbutho P, Sariah J, Nazare R, Moges G, Gérard B (2015) Re-examining appropriate mechanization in Eastern and Southern Africa: two-wheel tractors, conservation agriculture, and private sector involvement. Food Secur 7:889–904.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0476-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benin S, Johnson M, Abokyi E et al (2013) Revisiting agricultural input and farm support subsidies in Africa: the case of Ghana’s mechanization, fertilizer, block farms, and marketing programs. IFPRI Discuss Pap 01300:1–121.  https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23891.17447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beuchelt TD, Badstue L (2013) Gender, nutrition- and climate-smart food production: opportunities and trade-offs. Food Secur 5:709–721.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-013-0290-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biggs S, Justice SE, Lewis D (2011) Patterns of rural mechanisation, energy and employment in South Asia: reopening the debate. Econ Polit Wkly xlvi:78–82Google Scholar
  7. Binswanger-Mkhize HP, Savastano S (2017) Agricultural intensification: the status in six African countries. Food Policy 67:26–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.021 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Cabral L (2016) Brazil’s tropical solutions for Africa: tractors, matracas and the politics of “appropriate technology”. Eur J Dev Res 28:414–430.  https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2016.13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daum T, Birner R (2017) The neglected governance challenges of agricultural mechanisation in Africa – insights from Ghana. Food Secur 9:959–979.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0716-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diao X, Silver J, Takeshima H (2016) Agricultural mechanization and agricultural transformation. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  11. Doss CR (2001) Designing agricultural technology for African women farmers: lessons from 25 years of experience. World Dev 29:2075–2092.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00088-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eerdewijk A Van, Danielsen K (2015) Gender matters in farm power. Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  13. FAO, AUC (2018) Sustainable agricultural development: a framework for Africa. Addis Ababa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  14. Headey DD, Jayne TS (2014) Adaptation to land constraints: is Africa different? Food Policy 48:18–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jahnke HE (1982) Livestock production systems and livestock development in tropical Africa, Kieler WisGoogle Scholar
  16. Jayne TS, Chamberlin J, Traub L, Sitko N, Muyanga M, Yeboah FK, Anseeuw W, Chapoto A, Wineman A, Nkonde C, Kachule R (2016) Africa’s changing farm size distribution patterns: the rise of medium-scale farms. Agric Econ (United Kingdom) 47:197–214.  https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johansen C, Haque ME, Bell RW, Thierfelder C, Esdaile RJ (2012) Conservation agriculture for small holder rainfed farming: opportunities and constraints of new mechanized seeding systems. F Crop Res 132:18–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.11.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kahan D, Bymolt R, Zaal F (2017) Thinking outside the plot: insights on small-scale mechanisation from case studies in East Africa. J Dev Stud 00:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2017.1329525 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lal R (2004) Carbon emission from farm operations. Environ Int 30:981–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mazoyer M, Roudart L (2006) A history of world agriculture from the neolithic age to the current crisis, Earthscan. London, U.K.Google Scholar
  21. Montgomery DR (2007) Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:13268–13272.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611508104 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Moyo S (2016) Family farming in sub-Saharan Africa: its contribution to agriculture, food security and rural development. Brasília, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  23. Neuman WL (2006) Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches, 6th ed. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, USAGoogle Scholar
  24. Palacios-Lopez A, Christiaensen L, Kilic T (2017) How much of the labor in African agriculture is provided by women? Food Policy 67:52–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.017 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Peterman A, Behrman JA, Quisumbing AR (2014) A review of empirical evidence on gender differences in nonland agricultural inputs, technology, and services in developing countries. In: Gender in Agriculture. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 145–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pingali P (2007) Agricultural mechanization: adoption patterns and economic impact. In: Evenson R, Pingali P (eds) Handbook of agricultural economics, Elsevier. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 2779–2805Google Scholar
  27. Rigg J, Salamanca A, Thompson EC (2016) The puzzle of East and Southeast Asia’s persistent smallholder. J Rural Stud 43:118–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sims B, Kienzle J (2006) Farm power and mechnization for small farms in sub-Saharan Africa. FAO, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  29. Thierfelder C, Baudron F, Setimela P, Nyagumbo I, Mupangwa W, Mhlanga B, Lee N, Gérard B (2018) Complementary practices supporting conservation agriculture in southern Africa. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0492-8
  30. Women’s World Bank (2016) Policy frameworks to support women’s financial inclusion. New York, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center)HarareZimbabwe
  2. 2.CIMMYTNairobiKenya
  3. 3.Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural ResearchAddis AbabaEthiopia
  4. 4.University of ZimbabweHarareZimbabwe
  5. 5.Selian Agricultural Research InstituteArushaTanzania
  6. 6.Kenya Network for Dissemination of Agricultural TechnologiesNairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations