A farm-level assessment of labor and mechanization in Eastern and Southern Africa
- 296 Downloads
Once again, agricultural mechanization is top on the policy, research, and development agendas in sub-Saharan Africa. However, whether labor is limiting in this region—and mechanization is in demand—remains debated. The hypothesis of this study is that labor is a major limiting factor to the productivity of most farming systems in Africa. We used farm-level data (including detailed labor data) from eight sites dominated by smallholder agriculture and spanning four countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, and analyzed this unique dataset using multivariate methods (generalized linear models, boundary line analysis, and binary classification and regression trees). Labor and/or other sources of farm power (draught power or tractor power) were found to limit land productivity in all study sites. We also found that the overall contribution of female labor to farming was much lower than commonly stated—between 7 and 35%—and that the labor intensity experienced by women in agriculture was dependent to a large degree on men’s tasks. Our results reveal a much higher demand for mechanization than previously found by macroeconomic analyses, and point to a problem of access rather than demand. Our results also add to recent evidence debunking the persistent myth that women provide the bulk of the farming labor, and demonstrate that reducing labor intensity experienced by women in farming depends to a large degree upon understanding labor intensity experienced by men, rather than poorly founded generalizations about how women are overworked. This is the first time farm-level data containing detailed labor assessment and spanning four countries are used to assess mechanization demand in Africa. This paper also plays a pioneering role in debunking a number of myths related to labor in African smallholder agriculture, with implications for the mechanization agenda of the region.
KeywordsAgricultural intensification Drudgery Gender gap Land consolidation
This study was funded by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) (grant number FSC/2012/047) with additional support from CRP MAIZE and CRP WHEAT.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Baudron F, Sims B, Justice SE, Kahan DG, Rose R, Mkomwa S, Kaumbutho P, Sariah J, Nazare R, Moges G, Gérard B (2015) Re-examining appropriate mechanization in Eastern and Southern Africa: two-wheel tractors, conservation agriculture, and private sector involvement. Food Secur 7:889–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0476-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Biggs S, Justice SE, Lewis D (2011) Patterns of rural mechanisation, energy and employment in South Asia: reopening the debate. Econ Polit Wkly xlvi:78–82Google Scholar
- Diao X, Silver J, Takeshima H (2016) Agricultural mechanization and agricultural transformation. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- Eerdewijk A Van, Danielsen K (2015) Gender matters in farm power. Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- FAO, AUC (2018) Sustainable agricultural development: a framework for Africa. Addis Ababa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
- Jahnke HE (1982) Livestock production systems and livestock development in tropical Africa, Kieler WisGoogle Scholar
- Jayne TS, Chamberlin J, Traub L, Sitko N, Muyanga M, Yeboah FK, Anseeuw W, Chapoto A, Wineman A, Nkonde C, Kachule R (2016) Africa’s changing farm size distribution patterns: the rise of medium-scale farms. Agric Econ (United Kingdom) 47:197–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mazoyer M, Roudart L (2006) A history of world agriculture from the neolithic age to the current crisis, Earthscan. London, U.K.Google Scholar
- Moyo S (2016) Family farming in sub-Saharan Africa: its contribution to agriculture, food security and rural development. Brasília, BrazilGoogle Scholar
- Neuman WL (2006) Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches, 6th ed. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, USAGoogle Scholar
- Pingali P (2007) Agricultural mechanization: adoption patterns and economic impact. In: Evenson R, Pingali P (eds) Handbook of agricultural economics, Elsevier. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 2779–2805Google Scholar
- Sims B, Kienzle J (2006) Farm power and mechnization for small farms in sub-Saharan Africa. FAO, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
- Thierfelder C, Baudron F, Setimela P, Nyagumbo I, Mupangwa W, Mhlanga B, Lee N, Gérard B (2018) Complementary practices supporting conservation agriculture in southern Africa. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0492-8
- Women’s World Bank (2016) Policy frameworks to support women’s financial inclusion. New York, USAGoogle Scholar