Skip to main content

Scientific note: Imidacloprid found in wild plants downstream permanent greenhouses in Sweden

This article has been updated

In 2018, a few months after the European Food Safety Authority had identified high risk to bees for several field uses of three neonicotinoids (EFSA 2018a, b, c), the European Commission decided to permanently ban them from outdoor plant protection (European Comission 2018a, b, c). This was an expansion of an earlier ban on their use in crops attractive to bees (European Comission 2013). The new ban covered all outdoor cultivations, only giving some room for emergency authorization (European Comission 2020). However, all three substances were still allowed in permanent greenhouses, under the condition that treated plants remain in a greenhouse during their entire life cycles (European Comission 2018a, b, c). The three neonicotinoids were imidacloprid, clothianidin and thiamethoxam.

A recent screening of pesticides in streams adjacent to commercial greenhouses in southernmost Sweden identified imidacloprid as one of the most common pesticides in the water (Kreuger et al. 2019). Spray application and soil treatment with imidacloprid have never been allowed in outdoor cultivations in Sweden, but until the EU-wide ban, farmers could sow seeds coated with imidacloprid (Pedersen et al. 2009). However, the concentrations of imidacloprid found in surface water downstream greenhouses were in several cases up to two orders of magnitude higher than those found within the Swedish monitoring program in high-intensity agricultural areas (Boye et al. 2019). There was also a link between detections in surface water and registered applications in the greenhouses, indicating the discharge of contaminated water, for example during backwashing of irrigation systems (Kreuger et al. 2019). Because neonicotinoids are systemic and plants can absorb them via their roots (Sur and Stork 2003), we suspected that the presence of imidacloprid in water could result in uptake by plants growing nearby the streams, constituting a potential route of exposure to bees and other insects. On the 4th and 5th of June 2019, we revisited six of the sites from the stream water screening study (Kreuger et al. 2019) and collected anthers (as a substitute for pollen) from wild plants growing adjacent to the streams to measure their imidacloprid content. We collected entire anthers, with a lot of pollen, to obtain sufficient amounts to allow quantification of imidacloprid (n = 8). As not all plants were flowering at the time of collection we also collected leaves to investigate if imidacloprid was present systemically in the plants (n = 15). The samples were kept in a cooler box, with ice blocks, during the day of collection, and were then transferred to a −20 freezer.

In brief, the analytical procedure was as follows: Stable isotope-labelled internal standards, including imidacloprid-d4, were added to all samples. Leaf and anther samples were homogenized with drying agent (Na2SO4) using Precellys tubes with 2.8-mm ceramic beads and a Precellys Evolution Homogenizer (Bertin instruments, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France). Extraction was performed in the same tubes and instrumental setup using two portions of acetonitrile. Leaf sample extracts were further cleaned by dispersive solid-phase extraction with octadecylsilane (C18) and primary and secondary amine (PSA) adsorbents (roQ kit KSO 8921, Phenomenex, USA), evaporated to dryness, and finally reconstituted in acetonitrile and water. Study samples, blank samples, recovery samples and calibration samples were analyzed with liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (6460 triple quadrupole from Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, USA).

We detected imidacloprid at five out of six sites, with detections in 50% of the samples for both anthers and leaves (Online Resource 1-2, figure 1). The detection of imidacloprid in anthers indicates that bees foraging for pollen can get exposed to imidacloprid despite the extensive ban on outdoor plant protection. As the high concentrations of imidacloprid in the sampled streams have previously been linked to application in greenhouses (Kreuger et al. 2019), it is possible that this was also the source of the imidacloprid that we detected in plants along the same streams. However, because Sweden has now further restricted the use of imidacloprid, by only allowing it in greenhouses where no leakage or unintentional discharge can occur (Kemikalieinspektionen 2019), we cannot verify this. While acknowledging that the sample size in our study was low, we note that the concentrations of imidacloprid in anthers (up to 4.5 ng/g, Online Resource 1) were within the range where chronic exposure to imidacloprid reduces reproduction in solitary bees and bumblebees (~1.5 ng/g, Woodcock pers. comm.; Woodcock et al. 2017). As there may be other flowering plants from which the bees can forage, these concentrations are likely higher than the resulting chronic exposure that the bees experience. However, it is also possible that the identified concentrations do not cover the entire range of imidacloprid concentrations that can be found in wild flowering plants.

Figure 1.
figure 1

Concentrations (ng/g) of imidacloprid in anthers (n=8) and leaves (n=15)

While we cannot verify the source of imidacloprid in the wild plants, our results suggest that exposure via pollen from wild plants along streams that have been contaminated through discharge from greenhouses is possible. In order to reduce the risk of exposing bees and other insects to systemic pesticides, such as imidacloprid, there is a need to assess this pathway further.

Data availability

Data are presented in Online Resource 1-2.

Code availability

No analyses have been performed. All data are presented in Online Resource 1.

Change history

  • 24 November 2021

    Updated to include OA funding note to fulfill the contractual requirement of the Compact agreement.

References

  • Boye, K., Lindström, B., Boström, G. & Kreuger, J. (2019) Long-term data from the Swedish national environmental monitoring program of pesticides in surface waters. J. Environ. Qual. 48:1109–1119

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • EFSA (2018a) Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for bees for the active substance imidacloprid considering the uses as seed treatments and granules. EFSA J. 16, e05178. doi: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5178

  • EFSA (2018b) Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for bees for the active substance clothianidin considering the uses as seed treatments and granules. EFSA J. 16, e05177. doi: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5177

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • EFSA (2018c) Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for bees for the active substance thiamethoxam considering the uses as seed treatments and granules. EFSA J. 16, e05179. doi: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5179

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2013) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 485/2013 of 24 May 2013 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011, as regards the conditions of approval of the active substances clothianidin, thiamethoxam and imidacloprid, and prohibiting the use and sale of seeds trated with plant protection products containing those active substances. O.J. 139, 12–26

  • European Commission (2018a) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/784 of 29 May 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the conditions of approval of the active substance clothianidin. O.J. 132, 35–39

  • European Commission (2018b) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/783 of 29 May 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the conditions of approval of the active substance imidacloprid. O.J. 132, 31–34

  • European Commission (2018c) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/785 of 29 May 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the conditions of approval of the active substance thiamethoxam O.J. 132, 40–44

  • European Commission (2020) Neonicotinoids. https://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/approval_active_substances/approval_renewal/neonicotinoids_en?fbclid=IwAR2WlpXkToz1pD0z_XvyIwiWkTJIWGlZSpWN8cflUOHPmOqlptHaQGtmCNQ. Accessed 20 Dec 2020

  • Kemikalieinspektionen (2020) Aktuella beslut 2019 https://www.kemi.se/bekampningsmedel/vaxtskyddsmedel/aktuellt-om-vaxtskyddsmedel/aktuella-beslut-2019. Accessed 20 Dec 2020

  • Kreuger, J., Jonsson, O., Löfkvist, K., Hansson, T., Boström, G., Gutfreund, C., Lindström, B., Gönczi, M. (2019) Screening av växtskyddsmedel i vattendrag som avvattnar växthusområden i södra Sverige 2017-2018. CKB rapport 2019:1. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, T., Bommarco, R., Ebbersten, K., Falk, A., Fries, I., Kristiansen, P., Kryger, P., Nätterlund, H., Rundlöf, M. (2009) Massdöd av bin – samhällsekonomiska konsekvenser och möjliga åtgärder. Jordbruksverket rapport 2009: 24. Swedish Board of Agriculture, Jönköping

    Google Scholar 

  • Sur, R., Stork, A. (2003) Uptake, translocation and metabolism of imidacloprid in plants. B. Insectol. 56, 35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, B. A., Bullock, J. M., Shore, R. F., Heard, M. S., Pereira, M. G. et al. (2017) Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees. Science 356, 1393–1395. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1190

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M Dacke for comments.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Lund University. LH was financed by Formas (2018-01466 and 2014-01603 (to HS)), MR by Formas (2018-02283) and the chemical analyses by the Swedish Research Council VR (330-2014-6439 (to MR))

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LH conceived the idea and planned the study together with OJ and MR, LH performed field work, JK and OJ performed lab work, LH wrote the manuscript with contribution from HS, JK, OJ and MR.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lina Herbertsson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable (no humans or animals involved)

Consent to participate

Not applicable (no humans or animals involved)

Consent for publication

Not applicable (no humans or animals involved)

Conflict of interest

The author declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Manuscript editor: Monique Gauthier

Une note scientifique sur les découvertes d'imidaclopride dans les plantes sauvages en aval de serres permanentes en Suède.

néonicotinoïdes / rejets / pesticides / protection des plantes / pollinisateurs.

Eine wissenschaftliche Notiz über Funde von Imidacloprid in Wildpflanzen unterhalb von Dauergewächshäusern in Schweden.

Neonicotinoide / Einleitung / Pestizide / Pflanzenschutz / Bestäuber.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A.Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(PDF 156 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Herbertsson, L., Jonsson, O., Kreuger, J. et al. Scientific note: Imidacloprid found in wild plants downstream permanent greenhouses in Sweden. Apidologie 52, 946–949 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-021-00876-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-021-00876-4

Keywords

  • neonicotinoids
  • discharge
  • pesticides
  • plant protection
  • pollinators