Skip to main content

Red mason bee (Osmia bicornis) thermal preferences for nest sites and their effects on offspring survival

Abstract

Ectotherms usually require a narrow range of thermal conditions for development; thus, parental selection of oviposition sites is crucial. In a field experiment, we investigated female solitary red mason bee (Osmia bicornis) preferences for potential nest site temperatures and their effects on offspring development. The results showed that bees detected and avoided nest sites with high temperatures (28°C) and often chose cooler (24°C) or ambient temperatures (average 18–20°C). This is a protective behaviour because offspring survival decreases with increasing nest temperature, mostly due to mortality at the egg stage. Elevated temperatures also led to weight loss in adult bees. However, hot nest temperatures appeared to deter adults or kill parasite larvae, as the highest numbers of parasites were observed in unheated nests. We concluded that choosing the proper temperature for nests is an important element in bee life strategies, especially in warming environments.

Introduction

Many species of animals provide direct care to their offspring during development to increase their survival rate (Clutton-Brock 1991). Choosing the right nest site by parents is one of the most important factors impacting offspring survival (Trumbo 1996; Refsnider and Janzen 2010). Parental selection of an oviposition site is crucial, especially for ectotherms whose body temperature depends on the ambient temperature (AT) and who develop successfully under a narrow range of microhabitat conditions. These types of animals, which often live in environments with fluctuating temperatures (daily and seasonal), should be equipped with behavioural or/and physiological mechanisms necessary to recognize and avoid adverse nesting conditions. Indeed, many ectotherms choose locations with favourable thermal microhabitats (Trumbo 1996; Pike et al. 2012; Potter et al. 2009). Flat-rock spiders choose oviposition sites beneath large and hot rocks, which provide the most suitable conditions for developing offspring and are convenient for adults (Pike et al. 2012). Similarly, to ensure the best conditions for colony development, ponerine ants select nesting sites under large, hot rocks (Thomas 2002). Ants are able to regulate the temperature at which their brood is raised by relocating them among numerous nest chambers and selecting the temperature most suitable for offspring development (Roces and Núñez 1989).

Temperature is an extremely important environmental factor that affects many life history traits of animals, particularly those that depend on external sources of body heat (Stillwell and Fox 2005). Temperature conditions during development have an impact on the sizes of the body and its cells (Partridge et al. 1994; Atkinson 1994; Czarnoleski et al. 2013; Kierat et al. 2017) as well as development time (Atkinson 1994; Radmacher and Strohm 2011). Significant departure from optimal development temperatures may cause decreased fitness and high mortality in offspring (Groh et al. 2004; Bosch and Kemp 2004; Sgolastra et al. 2011; Giejdasz and Fliszkiewicz 2016). Notably, increased temperatures can also indirectly impact ectotherms. While warming could benefit high-latitude insects by increasing the opportunities for oviposition and foraging, it may simultaneously be nullified by indirect costs of increased parasite activity (Thomas and Blanford 2003; Forrest and Chisholm 2017).

Climatic changes observed in recent decades have prompted an expansion of knowledge on the possible effects. Overall, mean temperatures are rising, extreme weather conditions, such as heat waves, are more frequent and intense, the spring season is starting earlier than normal, and the growing seasons are prolonged (Menzel et al. 2006; Schwartz et al. 2006; IPCC 2014). These factors have many consequences for ectotherms (Deutsch et al. 2008), such as the disruption of synchronization between insects and their host plants (Memmott et al. 2007; Schenk et al. 2018) or the shifting of animal ranges towards the poles (Chen et al. 2011). Extreme weather events, such as heat waves, may cause significant decreases in fitness parameters (Fischer et al. 2014), while prolonged summers and delayed winters may disrupt the start of obligatory diapause, resulting in high mortality (Sgolastra et al. 2011). Global climate change also affects pollinating insects, whose drastic decline is already being observed (Biesmeijer et al. 2006; Koh et al. 2016; Powney et al. 2019; Soroye et al. 2020).

Solitary bees play a crucial role in pollination (Kremen 2008). The red mason bee (Osmia bicornis L.) is a well-known pollinator that is commonly used not only in crop pollination but also in research investigations (Wilkaniec and Radajewska 1997; Bosch and Kemp 2002; Krunić and Stanisavljević 2006). Characteristics of its life cycle (such as nesting in pre-existing cavities, overwintering in the adult stage inside the cocoon, and producing one generation per year) are representative of many species of its genus, particularly the subgenus Osmia, members of which are very similar in their life cycles (Sgolastra et al. 2019). It is also easy to experimentally handle, and methods of rearing are well established (Gruber et al. 2011; Sedivy and Dorn 2014). This makes red mason bees good candidates for model species, e.g. in studies of pesticide toxicity, the effect of environmental pollution, ecological stoichiometry, or interspecific interactions (Fliszkiewicz et al. 2012a; Szentgyörgyi et al. 2017; Kierat et al. 2018; Sgolastra et al. 2019; Filipiak 2019; Eeraerts et al. 2020). Females fly throughout the spring until early summer. They nest in pre-existing cavities, such as empty stalks of plants (reed stems), under the bark of trees, or in the cracks of wood. Each nest consists of linearly aligned brood cells provisioned with pollen mixed with some regurgitated nectar (Raw 1972). On the top of each food provision, a female lays a single egg and separates each cell with a loam partition (Raw 1972). The hatched larvae consume food, spin a cocoon, and pupate to complete their development by the end of summer. They overwinter inside the cocoon as adults and emerge the following spring (Raw 1972; Giejdasz and Wilkaniec 2002). Although red mason bee females often aggregate, similar to many other solitary bee species, they do not engage in cooperative rearing, and each of them independently provides food for its own offspring. Red mason bees have many natural enemies, such as cleptoparasites that creep into their nests and eat pollen provisions, predators, and parasitoids killing bee larvae (Krunić et al. 2005; Fliszkiewicz et al. 2012a; Giejdasz and Fliszkiewicz 2016). The importance of particular species in restricting red mason bee populations depends on the locality, but among the most important nest parasites frequently listed are the mites Chaetodactylus osmiae and fly Cacoxenus indagator (Zajdel et al. 2014). Both species feed on nest contents: pollen and nectar collected by red mason females, in most cases causing developing bee death from starvation. Other, slightly less frequently encountered Osmia parasites are parasitoids: wasp Monodontomerus obscurus and predatory beetle Trichodes apiarius (Krunić et al. 2005).

While some studies have explored the impact of different temperatures during development on offspring survival, body mass, organ size, and body size in O. bicornis (Bosch and Kemp 2003, 2004; Radmacher and Strohm 2010; Sgolastra et al. 2011; Giejdasz and Fliszkiewicz 2016; Kierat et al. 2017), little is known about female preferences for thermal conditions in nests and whether they affect oviposition site choice. It is still unknown what consequences for offspring carry behind its choices. Increased temperature may confer protection against gut pathogens (Palmer-Young et al. 2019); however, there is a gap in knowledge about the connection between thermal conditions inside the nest and the rate of ectoparasites. It is important to elucidate that knowledge because of ongoing climate change.

In this study, we explored whether females preferred nest sites with specific temperatures and analysed the effects of nest temperature choice on offspring survival. Accordingly, the rate of settlement in nests with particular temperatures was assessed, and mortality at different developmental stages and adult body mass of offspring were analysed. Particular attention was also paid to the degree of mortality caused by parasites and to parasite species diversity.

Methods

Nest preparation and observation

The experiment was conducted in the area of the experimental apiary of the Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University (Krakow, Southern Poland, temperate climate) in 2017. The apiary is located in the immediate vicinity of the Institute and is surrounded by meadows and bushes.

Initially, 12 artificial nest boxes were prepared, each consisting of a bundle of 100 reed stems (each is a single nest). In four of the nest boxes, the temperature was not manipulated (AT nest boxes). The other eight boxes were each interlaced with a cable heater with a thermoregulator that is often used in terrariums (Figure S1, Supplementary materials). These thermoregulators control the temperature so that when it drops below the set level, the heaters turn on and heat to the set minimum temperature. The minimum temperature (MT) was set at 24°C in four of those nest boxes (MT 24°C) and 28°C in the remaining boxes (MT 28°C). Importantly, only the minimum temperature was regulated, while the maximum temperature inside the nest box was dependent on the conditions outside, resulting in fluctuations. Each nest box was wrapped with aluminium foil and placed in a styrofoam case (Figure S2, Supplementary materials). At the beginning of April, four sets of nest boxes were prepared, each consisting of three different nest boxes (AT, MT 24°C, and MT 28°C), and placed in different locations on the experimental apiary tool house walls (A: southeast wall, ~0.5 m above the ground; B: southeast wall, ~1.5 m above the ground; C: northwest wall, ~0.5 m above the ground; D: northwest wall, ~1.5 m above the ground; Figure S3, Supplementary materials). To each of the nest boxes, a cardboard container with 40 cocoons was attached (sex ratio 1:1, a small incision was made in each cocoon, and the colour of the hairs on the bee’s clypeus was used as an indication of sex; females, black hair; males, whiteish-yellow hair). The cocoons originated from the stock at the Institute of Environmental Science, Jagiellonian University, Krakow.

During the whole experimental period, the temperature inside each nest box was recorded every 2 h by a data logger (Thermochron iButton DS1921G, Maxim/Dallas iButton Products, accuracy ±1 °C, measurements to the nearest 0.5 °C) placed between reed stems. To observe the settlement rate in the reed stems, a photo of each nest box was taken every 2 days from 29 May to 27 June 2017. Nest boxes were heated until 10 August. Considering that O. bicornis development normally takes approximately 14 weeks from oviposition to adult eclosion, we assumed that by that date, all offspring were in the imago stage (Raw 1972; Giejdasz and Wilkaniec 2002). In the autumn, nests were moved to an unheated utility room to mimic natural conditions of obligatory winter diapause.

Mortality, body mass, and parasite pressure

In the spring of the following year (mid-March), the mortality, parasitization rates, and body mass of the red mason bee offspring were analysed. First, 35 reed stems were randomly removed from each nest box. After opening the stems, the number of cells with uneaten pollen (mortality at the egg stage), dead larvae, cocoons, and parasitized cells was counted. The species of parasites were noted. The obtained cocoons were placed in plastic boxes at room temperature, and twice a day, the hatched bees were released into the wild. After 8 days, the number of unhatched bees was counted, allowing a comparison of adult mortality in each treatment group. Furthermore, 10 female and 10 male bees (in cocoons) were selected from each nest box to compare the body mass of individuals (~40 individuals for each temperature treatment). Bees were sexed as mentioned above.

Data analysis

The data from data loggers were evaluated to determine whether the temperatures in the nest boxes were maintained at the assumed levels. Based on these data, the average temperatures with standard deviations (SDs) of the nest boxes were calculated.

The number of occupied reed stems in each nest box, assessed based on the digital photos, was analysed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model (package survival in R). Two fixed factors were included in the model: the temperature in the nest boxes (AT vs. MT 24°C vs. MT 28°C) and their location (A vs. B vs. C vs. D), as well as their interaction.

To compare the mortality of offspring, a series of Poisson regression models with offsets was used (n=11). Models included the temperature (AT vs. MT 24°C vs. MT 28°C) and location (A vs. B vs. C vs. D) as fixed factors, as well as the log-transformed number of bees that survived to a given stage as an offset. The interaction between temperature and location was nonsignificant in all models and was hence removed in each case. Detailed factor comparisons were made with the significance level adjusted after the Bonferroni correction (for temperature factor: p < 0.017; for location factor: p < 0.025). In the first model, the analysis of mortality caused by parasites was performed. In that case, the number of cells with parasites to the total number of built cells was used as the dependent variable. In the second model, the analysis of mortality at the egg stage was performed, with the number of cells with uneaten pollen to the total number of built cells (without parasitized cells) as the dependent variable. Next, in the third model, the analysis of mortality at the larval stage was performed, and the number of dead larvae to the total number of individuals who survived the egg stage was used as the dependent variable. In the fourth model, to analyse the mortality of bees inside cocoons, the number of bees that hatched to the total number of bees that survived to cocoon spinning was used as the dependent variable. Finally, to analyse the overall survival of bees, another model included the number of bees that died at all stages of development to the total number of cells built as the dependent variable.

Body mass was analysed using a general linear model with three fixed factors (AT vs. MT 24°C vs. MT 28°C), location (A vs. B vs. C vs. D), sex (male vs. female), and the interaction between sex and temperature. Other interactions were nonsignificant and were removed from the model. All statistical analyses were performed using the statistical programming language R (R Core Team 2020).

Results

Temperature treatment

The average temperature in each nest box and standard deviation (Table S1, Supplementary materials) showed that the lowest temperatures and the greatest fluctuations occurred in AT nest boxes without heaters, as expected (18.7 ± 6.8°C; mean ± SD). In the nest boxes kept at a MT of 24°C, the mean temperature was relatively high (26.0 ± 2.5°C; mean ± SD) but not as high as that in the hottest nest boxes (29.9 ± 3.5°C; mean ± SD). The obtained temperature values allowed the comparison of results between treatments (Figure S4, supplementary materials). During the experiment, one of the heaters broke (location B, MT 24°C, Figure S4, Supplementary materials), and the temperature inside this nest box reached a much higher maximum value than in the other nests. This particular nest box was excluded from all analyses. The whole set of nest boxes (B location) was also excluded from nesting preference analysis.

Nesting preferences

There were differences in the rate of nest settlement between temperatures (Figure 1). Specifically, compared to AT nest boxes without heaters, there was no difference in the rate of settlement in MT 24°C boxes (z = −0.388, p = 0.692), but there was a significant drop in MT 28°C boxes (z = −5.664, p < 0.001). Nest boxes heated to MT 24°C were settled significantly more often than those heated to MT 28°C (z = −5.585, p < 0,001). Location (x2 = 232.31, p < 0.001), as well as the interaction of temperature and location (x2 = 49.895, p < 0.001), were significant. The highest rate of settlement was observed in location D (northwest side, higher), and this location differed significantly from nests located on the same wall but lower (D vs. C location; z = −8,940, p < 0.001, Figure S5, supplementary materials). Nest boxes located down on the walls but on opposite sides of the tool house also differ significantly (A vs. C: z = 8.230, p < 001). The interaction between temperature and location revealed that in the hottest nest boxes, the higher location increased their attractiveness (z = 4.418, p < 0.001).

Figure 1.
figure1

Average number of reed stems inhabited by bees as a function of time depending on temperature treatment.

Mortality and survival

The analysis of overall survival of offspring (Figure 2) demonstrated that, compared to nest boxes with AT, only high temperature inside nests (MT 28°C) caused reduced survival of bees (z = −5.864, p < 0.001), while boxes with MT 24°C did not differ significantly (z = −1.183, p = 0.237). In nest boxes with MT 24°C, the overall survival rate was significantly higher than that in boxes with MT 28°C (z = −4.539, p < 0.001). Location had no effect on the overall survival of bees (Table I, Model 1).

Figure 2.
figure2

Percent of bees that survived to adulthood and hatched from cocoons in the different temperature treatments.

Table I Accurate results for Poisson regression models used for analysis of overall survival rate and mortality caused at each stage of development and caused by parasites

The impact of parasites on bee survival depended on temperature in the nest (Table I, Model 2) and was stronger in AT nest boxes than in heated nest boxes with MT 24°C (z = −2.577, p < 0.010) and MT 28°C (z = −3.062, p < 0.003). In nest boxes with 24°C and MT 28°C, mortality caused by parasites was on similar level (z = 0.318, p = 0.750; Figure 3). In AT nest boxes, five parasite species were observed (Chaetodactylus osmiae, Trogoderma glabrum, Cacoxenus indagator, Monodontomerus obscurus, and Trichodes apiarius), with most cells (23) inhabiting Ch. osmiae mites. In nest boxes with MT 24°C and MT 28°C, only two parasite species were found (T. glabrum and C. indagator). Nest box location significantly impacts parasite pressure (Table I, Model 2). Most cells settled by parasites (52 cells) were found on the southeast wall, independent of location A (lower) and B (higher) (z = 1.966, p = 0.049, not significant after Bonferroni correction). On the other (northwest) wall, only 5 cells were inhabited by parasites.

Figure 3.
figure3

Average proportion of dead individuals at different stages of development and caused by parasites.

Mortality analysis at the egg stage showed a significant impact of temperature. Compared to AT nest boxes, egg mortality was significantly higher in both nest boxes with MT 24°C (z = 3.795, p < 0.001) and MT 28°C (z = 7.814, p < 0.001). Boxes with heaters also differed significantly from each other (z = 4.476, p < 0.001; Figure 3). Location had no impact on egg mortality (Table I, Model 3).

Similar to eggs, larvae died more often in boxes with MT 28°C than in AT boxes (z = 3.922, p < 0.001), but larvae in boxes with MT 24°C did not differ from AT nest boxes (z = 0.050, p = 0.960; Figure 3). Location also did not impact larval mortality (Table I, Model 4).

At the cocoon stage, mortality in AT nest boxes did not differ from that in MT 24°C (z = 0.567, p = 0.571) and MT 28°C (z = 2.147, p = 0.032, not significant after Bonferroni correction). There were also no differences between bee mortality in boxes with MT 24°C and MT 28°C (z = 2.171, p = 0.030, not significant after Bonferroni correction; Figure 3), and location had no significant impact (Table I, Model 5).

Body mass

There were differences in body mass between temperatures (F = 27.736, p < 0.001), locations (F = 2.908, p = 0.036), and sexes (F = 234.787, p < 0.001). The interaction between temperature and sex also showed significant differences (F = 4.8621, p < 0.009, Figure 4). In both sexes, the body mass of individuals decreased with increasing temperature, but only in the case of females were these differences statistically significant (Figure 4).

Figure 4.
figure4

Body mass of males and females with their cocoons under different temperature treatments. Values at the top of the graph indicate p-values for each comparison. Lines inside squares indicate means, squares indicate quartiles, and whiskers indicate standard errors.

Discussion

Ectotherms, which usually require a specific range of thermal conditions, usually choose nest sites that will maximize progeny development (Roces and Núñez 1989; Trumbo 1996; Thomas 2002; Pike et al. 2012). As with studies on other species (Thomas 2002; Pike et al. 2012), our results revealed that nesting sites selected by O. bicornis females are not random. Bees prefer nests higher above ground level than near to it. Although the location had an effect on the rate of settlement in nest boxes, in all three locations, the same pattern was observed. In two of the hottest free nest boxes, almost none of the reed stems were inhabited by red mason bees. In one case, bees inhabited some of the available reed stems but still less than cooler nest boxes. Therefore, in each location, bees were much more likely to inhabit the nests maintained at AT or the nests with an MT of 24°C than the nests with a MT of 28°C. These results indicate that bees recognize temperatures in their potential nests and choose those that are better for progeny development. This behaviour may be crucial in adapting to ongoing climate change. However, overheating during development is not the only danger of climate change. Bees will also have to survive prolonged summers and warm winters, which also affect red mason bee fitness (Bosch and Kemp 2004; Sgolastra et al. 2011).

The right female’s choice appears to affect survival outcome for offspring. Our results of survival to adulthood showed that the best conditions for development occurred in the nest boxes in which the temperature was not manipulated. In the nest boxes with a MT of 24°C, slightly fewer bees completed development and reached adulthood, but the most dramatic effects were observed in bees that developed in the nest boxes with MT of 28°C. It shows that a slight, even a few degree Celsius increase in temperature does not have a large effect on the survival rate of offspring, while high temperatures above 28°C are dangerous. Our results show that even in the wild, a relatively high proportion (1/3) of bees do not complete development and survive into adulthood. Considering that the results were very similar (31.4–35.8%) in all four nests without heaters, they possibly represent the natural rate of mortality in O. bicornis species. Elevating the temperature up to 28°C caused a significant and dangerous increase in mortality. As detailed analyses have shown, increased thermal conditions inside the nest affect egg mortality the most. As the temperature rises to 28°C, egg mortality increases rapidly, reaching 53%. Such high temperature is also not conducive to the development of larvae and significantly increases their mortality. Considering this result in the context of ongoing climate change, the most dangerous condition for solitary bee development will be the hot spring season. Nevertheless, it seems unlikely that on our study side, the temperatures in April or May will reach the temperatures used in the experiment. Later stages of development (inside the cocoon) seemed to be the least sensitive to elevated temperatures. Generally, parasitism had less effect on bee mortality, but it varied depending on the temperature inside the nest boxes. The greatest parasitism level was observed in nests maintained in AT, while in nest boxes with heaters, it declined significantly. Very different distributions of mortality in each stage of development were observed in the nests maintained at AT. In this case, a lower mortality rate occurred during the egg stage but was higher during development inside the cocoon and due to parasitism. Studies on another species in the Osmia genus showed that natural mortality at the egg stage was 6–31% in O. lignaria and 15% in O. cornuta (Bosch et al. 2000; Bosch and Vicens 2005). Similar to our results, Giejdasz and Fliszkiewicz (2016) also observed the highest mortality during the initial stages of development, but only at 25°C and AT. Bees raised at 30°C and 20°C showed low mortality at the egg stage. In turn, opposite results were obtained by Radmacher and Strohm (2011), who studied the effect of constant and fluctuating temperatures in nests on the survival of red mason bees. They showed that the temperature inside the nest did not affect any stages of development from egg to pupa but strongly affected the survival of adult individuals (100%, 86.2%), especially those who developed under relatively high-temperature conditions (constant 27.5°C; fluctuations 25–35°C, respectively). The conflicting results of these studies may be due to methodological differences in the later stages of the experiments. Giejdasz and Fliszkiewicz (2016) cooled the nests to 15°C in mid-summer and then overwintered them at 4°C, starting at the end of October, whereas Radmacher and Strohm (2011) maintained bees in particular temperature treatments until 2 October and then transferred them to 4°C conditions for overwintering. It is also possible that the studied populations of O. bicornis originating from other populations differed in resistance to temperature changes.

The mortality rate caused by parasites differs significantly between temperature treatments. All encountered species were known red mason bee parasite species (Krunić et al. 2005). However, most of the parasites were observed only inside unheated nests. In these nest boxes, the most abundant parasites were Ch. osmiae mites, which were not observed in other nest boxes. We suspect that elevated temperatures in nests affect the development of mites. Studies on another species from the Chaetodactylus genus showed that their development proceeded without disturbance until 37.5°C, above which the mortality of mites reached 100% (Ahn et al. 2016). Another parasite that was widely observed in unheated nest boxes but only sporadically in boxes with controlled temperatures was C. indagator. These results indicate that the larvae of this parasite species probably have a limited tolerance to increased temperature, especially considering that Giejdasz and Fliszkiewicz (2016) obtained similar results. The results of mortality caused by parasites allow us to predict that with increasing temperatures or, more often, heat waves, parasite pressure will decrease (Thomas and Blandford 2003).

The temperature inside the nest box also influenced the body mass of adult bees. We showed that both sexes of O. bicornis experienced the same pattern of weight loss due to elevated temperatures in nests; however, it was more clearly seen in the case of females. In females that developed inside the hottest nests, body weight was reduced by approximately one-third. This phenomenon can be explained by the fact that at high temperatures, bees develop faster and reach adulthood sooner than they would at low temperatures (Radmacher and Strohm 2011; Giejdasz and Fliszkiewicz 2016). This means that those bees experience a prolonged prewinter period, which is unfavourable. During the prewinter period, bees do not have access to food, but outdoor temperatures do not allow winter diapause. Therefore, a prolonged summer period is associated with great energetic costs in the form of fat body depletion and lipid loss, resulting in weight loss (Bosch et al. 2010; Radmacher and Strohm 2010; Sgolastra et al. 2011; Fliszkiewicz et al. 2012b). There are also presumptions that body weight loss is mediated by the accessibility of food at the initial stages of development. In a study by Radmacher and Strohm (2010), bees raised at 30°C left much of their food provision uneaten. Perhaps in hot conditions, pollen becomes dry and dehydrated and hence less absorbable by the larva. However, some researchers claim that despite body mass loss, bees hatching from cocoons in favourable conditions are able to compensate for energy shortages (Sgolastra et al. 2016). Another possible explanation is that weight loss occurs due to a reduction in cell and organ sizes according to the temperature-size rule (Atkinson 1994). This hypothesis was confirmed by Kierat et al. (2017), who demonstrated that red mason bees that developed at higher temperatures had smaller cells. Therefore, we suspect that body weight loss might also be related to thermal plasticity in ectotherms, enabling adjustment of the optimal cell membrane area according to the respiration rate at a given temperature (Kozłowski et al. 2003; Czarnoleski et al. 2013; Kierat et al. 2017). At higher temperatures, an organism’s demand for oxygen increases; hence, tissues composed of small cells provide an extensive network of cell membranes for oxygen distribution (Subczynski et al. 1989; Czarnoleski et al. 2013; Kierat et al. 2017). Body mass loss is particularly adverse given that it has a direct impact on female reproductive success. Smaller (also lightweight) females (Kierat et al. 2017) have difficulties providing enough provision for their offspring, which results in shifting the sex ratio of offspring towards males and lower body mass of daughters (Seidelmann et al. 2010).

Our results demonstrate that increased nest temperatures caused multiple negative effects in red mason progeny, including increased mortality and reduced body mass. The results suggest that bees recognize the thermal conditions inside nests and avoid high-risk oviposition sites. This behaviour is crucial considering ongoing climate change. It can be expected that as temperatures progressively increase, females will select cooler nest sites for oviposition. On the other hand with increasing temperatures, the pressure of parasites decreases. Therefore, we can conclude that hotter nesting sites have negative effects on the development of offspring, but at the same time decrease the pressure of parasites.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Ahn JJ, Son Y, He Y, Lee E, Park YL (2016) Effects of temperature on development and voltinism of Chaetodactylus krombeini (Acari: Chaetodactylidae): Implications for climate change impacts. PLoS ONE 11:e0161319. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161319

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson D (1994) Temperature and organism size a biological law for ectotherms? Adv Ecol Res 25:1–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biesmeijer JC, Roberts SPM, Reemer M et al (2006) Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313:351–354. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127863

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosch J, Kemp WP (2002) Developing and establishing bee, species as crop pollinators: the example of Osmia spp. (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) and fruit trees. Bull Entomol Res 92:3–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1079/BER2001139

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bosch J, Kemp WP (2003) Effect of wintering duration and temperature on survival and emergence time in males of the orchard pollinator Osmia lignaria (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Environ Entomol 32:711–716. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225x-32.4.711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bosch J, Kemp WP (2004) Effect of pre-wintering and wintering temperature regimes on weight loss, survival, and emergence time in the mason bee Osmia cornuta (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Apidologie 35:469–479. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2004035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bosch J, Vicens N (2005) Sex allocation in the solitary bee Osmia cornuta: do females bahave in agreement with Fishers's theory? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:124-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0017-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bosch J, Kemp WP, Peterson SS (2000) Management of Osmia lignaria (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) populations for almond pollination: methods to advance bee emergence. Environ Entomol 29:874–883. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225x-29.5.874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bosch J, Sgolastra F, Kemp WP (2010) Timing of eclosion affects diapause development, fat body consumption and longevity in Osmia lignaria, a univoltine, adult-wintering solitary bee. J Insect Physiol 56:1949–1957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.08.017

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen IC, Hill JK, Ohlemüller R, Roy DB, Thomas CD (2011) Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333:1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206432

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Czarnoleski M, Cooper BS, Kierat J, Angilletta MJ (2013) Flies developed small bodies and small cells in warm and in thermally fluctuating environments. J Exp Biol 216:2896-2901. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.083535

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Deutsch CA, Tewksbury JJ, Huey RB et al (2008) Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:6668–6672. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709472105

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Eeraerts M, Pisman M, Vanderhaegen R, Meeus I, Smagghe G (2020) Recommendations for standardized oral toxicity test protocol for larvae of solitary bees, Osmia spp. Apidologie 51:48-60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-019-00704-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Filipiak M (2019) Key pollen host plants provide balanced diets for wild bee larvae: A lesson for planting flower strips and hedgerows. J Appl Ecol 56(6):1410-1418. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13383

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fischer K, Klockmann M, Reim E (2014) Strong negative effects of simulated heat waves in a tropical butterfly. J Exp Biol 217:2892–2898. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.106245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fliszkiewicz M, Kuśnierczak A, Szymaś B (2012a) The accompanying fauna of solitary bee Osmia bicornis (L.) Syn. Osmia rufa (L.) nests settled in different biotopes. J Apic Sci 56(1):51-58. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10289-012-0006-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fliszkiewicz M, Giejdasz K, Wasielewski O, Krishnan N (2012b) Influence of winter temperature and simulated climate change on body mass and fat body depletnion during diapause in adults of solitary bee, Osmia rufa (Hymenoptera:Megachlidae). Environ Entomol 41(6):1621-1630. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN12004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Forrest JRK, Chisholm SPM (2017) Direct benefits and indirect costs of warm temperatures for high-elevation populations of a solitary bee. Ecology 98:359–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Giejdasz K, Fliszkiewicz M (2016) Effect of temperature treatment during development of Osmia rufa L., on mortality, emergence and longevity of adults. J Apic Sci 60:221–232. https://doi.org/10.1515/JAS-2016-0029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Giejdasz K, Wilkaniec Z (2002) Individual development of the red mason bee (Osmia rufa L., Megachilidae) under natural and laboratory conditions. J Apic Sci 46:51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Groh C, Tautz J, Rössler W (2004) Synaptic organization in the adult honey bee brain is influenced by brood-temperature control during pupal development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(12):4268-4273. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400773101

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gruber B, Eckel K, Everaars J, Dormann CF (2011) On managing the red mason bee (Osmia bicornis) in apple orchards. Apidologie 42:564-576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-011-0059-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 1132

  25. Kierat J, Szentgyörgy H, Czarnoleski M, Woyciechowski M (2017) The thermal environment of the nest affects body and cell size in the solitary red mason bee (Osmia bicornis L.). J Term Biol 68:39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kierat J, Miler K, Celary M, Woychiechowski M (2018) Interspecific interactions in solitary Aculeata - is the presence of heterospecifics important for females establishing nests? Bull Entomol Res 108:35-39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485317000475

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Koh I, Lonsdorf EV, Williams NM, Brittain C, Issacs R, Gibbs J, Ricketts TH (2016) Modelling the status, trends, and impacts of wild bee abundance in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(1):140-145. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517685113

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kozłowski J, Konarzewski M, Gawelczyk AT (2003) Cell size as a link between noncoding DNA and metabolic rate scaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:14080–14085. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2334605100

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kremen C (2008) Crop pollination services from wid bees. In: Bee pollination in agricultural ecosystem. pp 10–26

    Google Scholar 

  30. Krunić M, Stanisavljević L (2006) Augmentation of managed populations of Osmia cornuta and O. rufa (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in Southeastern Europe. Eur Journal Entomol 103:695–697. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2006.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Krunić M, Stanisavljević L, Pinzauti M, Felicioli A (2005) The accompanying fauna of Osmia cornuta and Osmia rufa and effective measures of protection. Bull Insect 58:141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Memmott J, Craze PG, Waser NM, Price MV (2007) Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. Ecol Lett 10:710–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01061.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N et al (2006) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob Change Biol 12:1969–1976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01193.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Palmer-Young EC, Ngor L, Nevarez RB, Rothman JA, Raffel TR, McFredrick QS (2019) Temperature dependence of parasitic infection and gut bacterial communities in bumble bees. Environ Microbiol 21:4706-4723. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14805

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Partridge L, Barrie B, Fowler K, French V (1994) Evolution and development of body size and cell size in Drosophila melanogaster in response to temperature. Evolution 48:1269–1276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb05311.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pike DA, Webb JK, Shine R (2012) Hot mothers, cool eggs: nest-site selection by egg-guarding spiders accommodates conflicting thermal optima. Funct Ecol 26:469–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01946.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Potter K, Davidowitz G, Woods HA (2009) Insect eggs protected from high temperatures by limited homeothermy of plant leaves. J Exp Biol 212:3448–3454. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.033365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Powney GD, Carvell C, Edwards M, Morris RKA, Roy HE, Woodcock BA, Isaac NJB (2019) Widespread losses of pollinatig insects in Britain. Nat Commun 10:1018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08974-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Radmacher S, Strohm E (2010) Factors affecting offspring body size in the solitary bee (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae). Apidologie 41:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido/2009064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Radmacher S, Strohm E (2011) Effects of constant and fluctuating temperatures on the development of the solitary bee Osmia bicornis (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Apidologie 42:711–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-011-0078-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Raw A (1972) The biology of the solitary bee Osmia rufa (L.) (Megachilidae). T Roy Ent Soc London 124:213–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1972.tb00364.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Refsnider JM, Janzen FJ (2010) Putting eggs in one basket: ecological and evolutionary hypotheses for variation in oviposition-site choice. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:39–57. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Roces F, Núñez JA (1989) Brood translocation and circadian variation of temperature preference in the ant Camponotus mus. Oecologia, 81:33–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Schenk M, Krauss J, Holzschuh A (2018) Desynchronizations in bee–plant interactions cause severe fitness losses in solitary bees. J Anim Ecol 87:139–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Schwartz MD, Ahas R, Aasa A (2006) Onset of spring starting earlier across the Northern Hemisphere. Glob Change Biol 12:343–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01097.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sedivy C, Dorn S (2014) Towards a sustainable management of bees of the subgenus Osmia (Megachilidae; Osmia) as fruit tree pollinators. Apidologie 45: 88-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-013-0231-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Seidelmann K, Ulbrich K, Mielenz N (2010) Conditional sex allocation in Red Mason bee, Osmia rufa. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:337-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0850-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sgolastra F, Kemp WP, Buckner JS, Pitts-Singer TL, Maini S, Bosch J (2011) The long summer: Pre-wintering temperatures affect metabolic expenditure and winter survival in a solitary bee. J Insect Physiol 57:1651–1659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.08.017

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sgolastra F, Arnan X, Pitts-Singer TL, Maini S, Kemp WP, Bosch J (2016) Pre-wintering conditions and post-winter performance in a solitary bee: Does diapause impose an energetic cost on reproductive success? Ecol Entomol, 41:201–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sgolastra F, Hinarejos S, Pitts-Singer TL, Boyle NK, Joseph T, Lūckmann J, Raine NE, Singh R, Williams NM, Bosch J (2019) Pesticide exposure assessment paradigm for solitary bees. Environ Entomol 48(1):22-35. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvy105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Soroye R, Newbold T, Kerr J (2020) Climate change contributes to widespread declines among bumble bees across continents. Science 367(6478):685-688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax8591

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Stillwell RC, Fox CW (2005) Complex patterns of phenotypic plasticity: interactive effects of temperature during rearing and oviposition. Ecology 86:924–934. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Subczynski WK, Hyde JS, Kusumi A (1989) Oxygen permeability of phosphatidylcholine-cholesterol membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86:4474–4478. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.12.4474

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Szentgyörgyi H, Moroń D, Nawrocka A, Tofilski A, Woyciechowski M (2017) Forewing structure of the solitary bee Osmia bicornis developing on heavy metal pollution gradient. Ecotoxicology 26:1031–1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-017-1831-2

  55. Thomas ML (2002) Nest site selection and longevity in the ponerine ant Rhytidoponera metallica (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect Soc 49:147–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-002-8294-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Thomas MB, Blanford S (2003) Thermal biology in insect-parasite interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 18:344–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00069-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Trumbo ST (1996) Parental care in invertebrates. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 25:3–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60329-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wilkaniec Z, Radajewska B (1997) Solitary bee Osmia rufa L. (Apoidea, Megachilidae) as pollinator of strawberry cultivated in an unheated plastic tunnel. Acta Hort 439:489-493. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.1997.439.83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zajdel B, Kucharska K, Kucharski D, Fliszkiewicz M, Gąbka J (2014) Accompanying fauna of red mason bees in annual and perennial nesting sites. Med Weter 70(12):745-749.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Paweł Mielczarek for helping with the construction of the nest boxes and American Journal Experts for language editing (funded by the Ph.D. Students’ Association of Jagiellonian University).

Funding

This study was funded by Jagiellonian University (grant DS/BiNoZ/INoŚ/761/17-20).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MOC, JK, and MW conceived this research and designed the experiments. MOC and JK performed the experiments. MOC and KK analysed the data. MOC, KK, MW, and JK wrote the paper and participated in the revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika Ostap-Chec.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

No approval of research ethics committees was required to accomplish the goals of this study because the experimental work was conducted with an unregulated invertebrate species.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Préférences thermiques de l'abeille maçonne rouge ( Osmia bicornis ) pour les sites de nidification et leurs effets sur la survie de la progéniture.

Osmia bicornis / préférences pour les sites de nidification / température / développement / masse corporelle.

Thermische Präferenzen der Roten Mauerbiene ( Osmia bicornis ) für Neststandorte und ihre Auswirkungen auf das Überleben ihrer Nachkommen.

Osmia bicornis / Neststandortpräferenzen / Temperatur / Entwicklung / Körpermasse.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Manuscript editor James Nieh

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(PDF 736 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ostap-Chec, M., Kierat, J., Kuszewska, K. et al. Red mason bee (Osmia bicornis) thermal preferences for nest sites and their effects on offspring survival. Apidologie 52, 707–719 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-021-00858-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Osmia bicornis
  • nest site preferences
  • temperature
  • development
  • body mass