Skip to main content
Log in

Efficiency of tree-based water status indicators at the onset of water deficit in citrus

  • Research Report
  • Cultivation Physiology
  • Published:
Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This experiment evaluates the potential of using parameters based on tree trunk fluctuations for detecting water deficit in citrus trees under two different water saving-irrigation strategies: sustained deficit irrigation and partial root-zone drying. Three irrigation treatments were applied: 1) Control: trees were irrigated with 100% of their evapotranspirative needs (ETc); 2) 60 sustained deficit irrigation (SDI): 60% ETc; and 3) partial root-zone drying (PRD): 100% ETc needs, applied to only one-half of root zone. Maximum daily shrinkage (MDS), trunk growth rate (TGR), and MDS ratio (ratio between MDS of stressed trees and control trees) were determined. Day-to-day MDS values varied largely and could not be used to determine tree water deficit. TGR did not show significant differences among treatments at this level of stress. Nevertheless, the MDS ratio was a reliable indicator to measure tree water status, and it was more sensitive for detecting water deficit at the onset of a water deficit in trees under SDI than in trees under PRD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Ballester, C. 2013. Regulated deficit irrigation in citrus: Agronomic response and water stress indicators. PhD Diss., Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, M.K.V. 2012. The water relations and irrigation requirements of citrus (Citrus spp.): A review. Exp. Agric. 48:347–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Swaef, T., K. Steppe, and R. Lemeur. 2009. Determining reference values for stem water potential and maximum daily trunk shrinkage in young apple trees based on plant responses to water deficit. Agric. Water Manage. 96:541–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Orellana, Y., M.C. Ruíz-Sánchez, J. Alarcón, W. Conejero, M.F. Ortuño, E. Nicolás, and A. Torrecillas. 2007. Preliminary assessment of the feasibility of using maximum daily trunk shrinkage for irrigation scheduling in lemon trees. Agric. Water Manage. 89:167–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhamer, D.A. and E. Fereres. 2001. Irrigation scheduling protocols using continuously recorded trunk diameter measurement. Irrigation Sci. 20:115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhamer, D.A., E. Fereres, M. Mata, J. Girona, and M. Cohen. 1999. Sensitivity of continuous and discrete plant and soil water status monitoring in peach trees subjected to deficit irrigation. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 124:437–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, L.X., Y.K. Wang, X.B. Li, and P. Zhang. 2012. Improved irrigation scheduling for pear-jujube trees based on trunk diameter sensing data. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 11:1597–1606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.S. and D.F. Handley. 2000. Using water stress to control vegetative growth and productivity of temperate fruit trees. HortScience 35:1048–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H.G. 1998. Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration. J. Exp. Bot. 49:387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melgar, J.C., J.M. Dunlop, and J.P. Syvertsen. 2010. Growth and physiological responses of the citrus rootstock Swingle citrumelo seedlings to partial rootzone drying and deficit irrigation. J. Agric. Sci. 148:593–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahor, A. and S. Cohen. 2003. Sensitivity and variability of maximum trunk shrinkage, midday stem water potential, and transpiration rate in response to withholding irrigation from field-grown apple trees. HortScience 38:547–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortuño, M.F., J.J. Alarcón, E. Nicolás, and A. Torrecillas. 2004. Interpreting trunk diameter changes in young lemon trees under deficit irrigation. Plant Sci. 167:275–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortuño, M.F., J.J. Brito, W. Conejero, Y. García-Orellana, and A. Torrecillas. 2009. Using continuously recorded trunk diameter fluctuations for estimating water requirements of lemon trees. Irrigation Sci. 27:271–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortuño, M.F., W. Conejero, F. Moreno, A. Moriana, D.S. Intrigliolo, C. Biel, C.D. Mellisho, A. Pérez-Pastor, R. Domingo, M.C. Ruiz-Sánchez, J. Casadesus, J. Bonany, and A. Torrecillas. 2010. Could trunk diameter sensors be used in woody crops for irrigation scheduling? A review of current knowledge and future perspectives. Agric. Water Manage. 97:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Conde, A., A. Kusakabe, and J.C. Melgar. 2014. Physiological responses of citrus to partial rootzone drying irrigation. Sci. Hortic. 169:234–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruíz-Sánchez, M.C., R. Domingo, and J.R. Castel. 2010. Review. Deficit irrigation in fruit trees and vines in Spain. Span. J. Agric. Res. 8:S5–S20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholander, P., H. Hammel, E. Bradstreet, and E. Hemmingsen. 1965. Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148:339–345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Velez, J.E., D.S. Intrigliolo, and J.R. Castel. 2007. Scheduling deficit irrigation of citrus trees with maximum daily trunk shrinkage. Agric. Water Manage. 90:197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Carlos Melgar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elsayed-Farag, S., Melgar, J.C. Efficiency of tree-based water status indicators at the onset of water deficit in citrus. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 56, 305–309 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-015-0136-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-015-0136-8

Additional key words

Navigation