Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Environmentally sustainable production of tomato in a coir substrate hydroponic system using a frequency domain reflectometry sensor

  • Research Report
  • Published:
Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 August 2015

Abstract

Open hydroponic systems are the most widely used hydroponic systems in Korea. However, water drainage from the open hydroponics often causes significant environmental pollution due to agrochemicals and loss of water and nutrients. The objectives of this study were to show the potential application of an irrigation schedule based on threshold values of volumetric substrate water content tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. ‘Betatini’) cultivation in a commercial hydroponic farm. This study was performed for minimizing effluent from coir substrate hydroponics using a frequency domain reflectometry (FDR) sensor-automated irrigation (FAI), as compared with conventional timer-irrigation (TIMER) from the farmer’s experience. The irrigation volume and retained water volume in the substrate of the TIMER during autumn to winter cultivation were 6.1-fold and 2-fold higher, respectively, than those of the FAI with slightly higher fruit weight and no difference in plant growth in the TIMER. This resulted in 1.9-fold higher water use efficiency (WUE) in the FAI. The irrigation volume and retained water volume in the substrate of TIMER during spring to summer were 3.2-fold and 1.8-fold higher, respectively, than those of the FAI with no difference in fruit weight or plant growth between the two treatments, which led to a 1.9-fold higher WUE in FAI. Approximately 61% fertilizer cost savings and a substantial decrease in drained solution volume were observed for FAI compared to those with TIMER. The use of the FAI technique for a least-drainage hydroponic system can be achieved in a large-scale hydroponic farm, resulting in efficient and environmentally sustainable use of water and fertilizer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Abad, M., P. Noguera, R. Puchades, A. Maquieira, and V. Noguera. 2002. Physico-chemical and chemical properties of some coconut dusts for use as a peat substitute for containerised ornamental plants. Biores. Technol. 82:241–245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R.G., L.S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration, guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56, FAO, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arguedas, F.R., J.D. Lea-Cox, and A.G. Ristvey. 2007. Revisiting the measurement of plant available water in soilless substrates. Proc. Southern Nursery Assoc. Res. Conf. 52:111–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Asher, J., C.J. Phene, and A. Kinarti. 1992. Canopy temperature to assess daily evapotranspiration and management of high frequency drip irrigation systems. Agr. Water Manag. 22:379–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blok, C. and J.B.G.M. Verhagen. 2009. Trends in rooting media inDutch horticulture during the period 2001-2005: The new growing media project. Acta Hortic. 819:47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, S.E. and M.W. van Iersel. 2008. Morphology and irrigation efficiency of Gaura lindheimeri growth with capacitance sensorcontrolled irrigation. HortScience 43:1555–1560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas-Lailhacar, B., M.D. Dukes, and G.L. Miller. 2010. Sensor-based automation of irrigation on bermudagrass, during wet weather conditions. J. Irr. Drain. Eng. 134:120–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, E.Y., K.Y. Choi, and Y.B. Lee. 2013a. Non-drainage irrigation scheduling in coir substrate hydroponic system for tomato cultivation by a frequency domain reflectometry sensor. Europ. J. Hortic. Sci. 78:132–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, E.Y., S.K. Seo, K.Y. Choi, and Y.B. Lee. 2014. Development of a non-drainage hydroponic system with a coconut coir substrate by a frequency domain reflectometry sensor for tomato cultivation. J. Plant Nutr. 37:748–764.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, E.Y., Y.H. Woo, M. Son, K.Y. Choi, and Y.B. Lee. 2013b. Nutrient solution concentration effects on non-drainage irrigation scheduling in coir substrate hydroponic system for tomato cultivation by a FDR sensor. Intl. J. Food Agr. Environ. 11:636–641.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehret, D.L., J.G. Menzies, and T. Helmer. 2005. Production and quality of greenhouse roses in recirculating nutrient systems. Sci. Hortic. 106:103–113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fares, A. and V. Polyakov. 2006. Advances in crop water management using capacitive water sensors. Adv. Agron. 90:43–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farina, E., F. Di Battista, and M. Palagi. 2007. Automation of irrigation in hydroponics by FDR sensors-Experimental results from field trials. Acta Hortic. 747:193–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, J.E., S.R. Green, H.W. Caspari, A. Diaz-Espero, and M.V. Cuevas. 2008. The use of sap flow measurements for scheduling irrigation in olive, apple and Asian pear trees and in grapevines. Plant Soil 305:91–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, A. 1998. Influence of different surplus irrigation and substrate on production of greenhouse tomatoes. Acta Hortic. 458:33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuffrida, F., S. Argento, V. Lipari, and C. Leonardi. 2003. Methods for controlling salt accumulation in substrate cultivation. Acta Hortic. 614:799–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilhorst, M.A. 2000. A pore water conductivity sensor. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64:1922–1925.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hook, W.R. and N.J. Livingston. 1996. Errors in converting time domain reflectometry measurements of propagation velocity to estimates of soil water content. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60:35–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaimez, R.E., F. Rada, and C. García-Nuñez. 1999. The effect of irrigation frequency on water and carbon relations in three cultivars of sweet pepper (Capsicum chinense Jacq), in a tropical semiarid region. Sci. Hortic. 81:301–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, L., D.B. Dresbøll, and K. Thorup-Kristensen. 2014. Root growth of perennials in vertical growing media for use in green walls. Sci. Hortic. 166: 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J.G. and M.W. van Iersel. 2001. Interactions between temperature and fertilizer concentration affect growth of subirrigated petunias. J. Plant Nutr. 24:753–765.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.P. 2003. Frequency domain versus travel time analyses of TDR waveforms for soil moisture measurements. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67:720–729.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noguera, P., M. Abad, V. Noguera, R. Puchades, and A. Maquieira. 2000. Coconut coir waste, a new and viable ecologically-friendly peat substitute. Acta Hortic. 517:279–286.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osvalde, A. 2011. Optimization of plant mineral nutrition revisited: The roles of plant requirements, nutrient interactions, and soil properties in fertilization management. Environ. Expt. Biol. 9:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, A.P., U. Saha, X. Hao, and S. Khosla. 2008. Irrigation management in greenhouse tomato production in rockwool. Acta Hortic. 799:521–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raviv, M., S. Medina, Y. Shamir, and Z. Ner. 1993. Very low medium moisture tension-A feasible criterion for irrigation control of container-grown plants. Acta Hortic. 342:111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, R., J.L. Muriel, and I. Garcia. 2009. Automatic irrigation system in almonds and walnuts trees based on sap flow measurements. Acta Hortic. 846:135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, R., J.L. Muriel, I. Garcia, and D.M. de la Pena. 2012. Research on automatic irrigation control: State of the art and recent results. Agr. Water Manag. 114:59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runia, W.T. and J.J. Amsing. 2001. Disinfection of recirculating water from closed cultivation systems by heat treatment. Acta Hortic. 548:215–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, F.G. and J.H. Lieth. 2002. Irrigation control in hydroponics, p. 265–296. In: D. Savvas and H. Passam (eds.). Hydroponic production of vegetables and ornamentals. Embryo Publishing, Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, B.S. 1999. Future prospects and countermeasures for hydroponics in 21C. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 17:796–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonneveld, C. 2002. Composition of Nutrient solutions, p. 179–210. In: D. Savvas and H. Passam (eds.). Hydroponic Production of Vegetables and Ornamentals. Embryo Publications, Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R.B., M. Gallardo, L.C. Valdez, and M.D. Fernandez. 2007. Determination of lower limits for irrigation management using in situ assessments of apparent crop water uptake made with volumetric soil water content sensors. Agr. Water Manag. 92:13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topp, G.C., J.L. Davis, and A.P. Annan. 2003. The early development of TDR for soil measurements. Vadose Zone J. 2:492–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S.L. and T.E. Bilderback. 2004. Irrigation timing: Effect on plant growth, photosynthesis, water-use efficiency and substrate temperature. Acta Hortic. 644:29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zekki, H., L. Gauthier, and A. Gosselin. 1996. Growth, productivity, and mineral composition of hydroponically cultivated greenhouse tomatoes, with or without nutrient solution recycling. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 121:1082–1088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, L.Z. and X. Li. 2011. Study of automatic control system for irrigation. Adv. Mat. Res. 219:1463–1467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural Science, Korea National Open University, 86 Daehak-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 110-791, Korea

    Eun-Young Choi

  2. Department of Green Convergence Technology, 268 Chungwondae-ro, Chungcheongbuk-do, 380-701, Korea

    Yong-Han Yoon

  3. Department. of Controlled Agriculture, Kangwon National University, 1 Kangwondae-gil, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do, 200-701, Korea

    Ki-Young Choi

  4. Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of Seoul, 90 Jeonnong-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 130-743, Korea

    Yong-Beom Lee

Authors
  1. Eun-Young Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yong-Han Yoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ki-Young Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yong-Beom Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-Beom Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, EY., Yoon, YH., Choi, KY. et al. Environmentally sustainable production of tomato in a coir substrate hydroponic system using a frequency domain reflectometry sensor. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 56, 167–177 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-015-0036-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-015-0036-y

Additional key words

Search

Navigation