Abstract
Despite the long and widespread use of grafting in tomato cultivation, the structural changes that occur at the graft union during the early stages of the union remain poorly understood. In this study, the structural development of the graft union in tomato plants was examined 3, 5, 8, 11 and 14 days after grafting (DAG) using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and a paraffin sectioning technique. The paraffin-sectioned images of the transection revealed that parenchymal cells from the graft union divided and proliferated in most combinations, and these cells could be detected at various stages of development. The SEM images of the scion and rootstock longitudinal sections showed that many interconnecting structures appeared at 8 DAG and were followed by a vascular rearrangement that did not connect the scion and rootstock. Vascular bundle bridges appeared at 11 DAG and connected the scion and rootstock. The connection of graft union between rootstock and scion is influenced by the plant growth condition. In our managed environment, period for formation of the connection structure formation between the rootstock and scion was 7-14 days after grafting.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aloni, B., L. Karni, G. Deventurero, Z. Levin, R. Cohen, N. Katzir, M. Lotan-Pompan, M. Edelstein, H. Aktas, E. Turhan, D.M. Joel, C. Horev, and Y. Kapulnik. 2008. Physiological and biochemical changes at the rootstock-scion interface in graft combinations between Cucurbita rootstocks and a melon scion. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 83:777–783.
Aloni, B., R. Cohen, L. Karni, H. Aktas, and M. Edelstein. 2010. Hormonal signaling in rootstock-scion interactions. Sci. Hortic. 12:119–126.
Botha C.E.J. and A.J.E. Van Bel. 1992. Quantification of symplastic continuity as visualised by plasmodesmograms: diagnostic value for phloem-loading pathways. Planta 187:359–366.
Cookson, S.J., M.J. Clemente Moreno, C. Hevin, L.Z. Nyamba Mendome, S. Delrot, C. Trossat-Magnin, and N. Ollat. 2013. Graft union formation in grapevine induces transcriptional changes related to cell wall modification, wounding, hormone signalling, and secondary metabolism. J. Exp. Bot. 64:2997–3008.
Ermel, F.F., J.L. Poessel, M. Faurobert, and A.M. Catesson. 1997. Early scion/stock junction in compatible and incompatible pear/pear and pear/quince grafts: a histo-cytological study. Ann. Bot. 79:505–515.
Fernandez-Garcia N., M. Carvajal, and E. Olmos. 2004. Graft union formation in tomato plants: peroxidase and catalase involvement. Ann. Bot. 93:53–60.
Hartmann H.T., D.E. Kester, F.T. Davies, and R.L. Geneve. 2002. Plant propagation. Principles and practices. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; ISBN 0–13-679235–9. p. 849.
Jefree, C.E. and M.M. Yeoman. 1983. Development of intercellular connections between opposing cells in a graft union. New Phytol. 93:491–509.
Kollmann, R. and C. Glockmann. 1991. Studies on graft unions on the mechanism of secondary formation of plasmodesmata at the graft interface. Protoplasma 165:71–85.
Martínez-Ballesta, M.C., C. Alcaraz-López, B. Muries, C. Mota-Cadenas, and M. Carvajal. 2010. Physiological aspects of rootstock-scion interactions. Sci. Hortic. 127:112–118.
Pina, A., P. Errea, and H.J. Martens. 2012. Graft union formation and cell-to-cell communication via plasmodesmata in compatible and incompatible stem unions of Prunus spp. Sci. Hortic. 143: 144–150.
Pina, A., P. Errea, A. Schulz, and H.J. Martens. 2009. Cell-to-cell transport through plasmodesmata in tree callus cultures. Tree Physiol. 29:809–818.
Roberts, A.G. and K.J. Oparka. 2003. Plasmodesmata and the control of symplastic transport. Plant Cell Environ. 26:103–124.
Stoddard, F.L. and M.E. McCully. 1979. Histology of the development of the graft union in pea roots. Canadian J. Bot. 57:1486–1501.
Soumelidou, K., Battey, N.H., John, P., and J.R. Barnett. 1994. The anatomy of the developing bud union and its relationship to dwarfing in apple. Ann. Bot. 74:605–611.
Tiedemann, R. 1989. Graft union development and symplastic phloem contact in the hetero graft Cucumis sativus on Curcubita ficifolia. J. Plant Physiol. 134: 427–440.
Trinchera, A.L., G. Pandozy, S. Rinaldi, P. Crino, O. Temperini, and E. Rea. 2013. Graft union formation in artichoke grafting onto wild and cultivated cardoon: An anatomical study. J Plant Physiol. 170:1569–1578.
Turquois, N. and M. Malone. 1996. Non-destructive assessment of developing hydraulic connections in the graft union of tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 47:701–707.
Yin, H., B. Yan, J. Sun, P. Jia, Z. Zhang, X. Yan, J. Chai, Z. Ren, G. Zheng, and H. Liu. 2012. Graft-union development: a delicate process that involves cell-cell communication between scion and stock for local auxin accumulation. J. Exp. Bot. 63:4219–4232.
Zarrouk, O., P.S. Testillano, M.C. Risueno, M.A. Moreno, and Y. Gogorcena. 2010. Changes in cell/tissue organization and peroxidase activity as markers for early detection of graft incompatibility in peach/plum combinations. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 135:9–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fan, J., Yang, R., Li, X. et al. The processes of graft union formation in tomato. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 56, 569–574 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-015-0009-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-015-0009-1