Abstract
The effects of global warming and CO2 level were investigated on tree growth and fruit characteristics of ‘Niitaka’ pear. The treatments consisted of ambient temperature and 390 μL·L−1 CO2 (control group), ambient temperature + 4°C and 390 μL·L−1 CO2 (elevated temperature group), ambient temperature and 700 μL·L−1 CO2 (elevated CO2 group), and ambient temperature + 4°C and 700 μL·L−1 CO2 (elevated climate group). Fruit weight was the highest in elevated CO2 group (543.0 g), but lowest in elevated temperature group (394.3 g). Flesh firmness at harvest was the highest in elevated temperature group. For fruit skin color, Hunter L* and b* values were not significantly different among treatments, while Hunter a* value was higher on those treated with higher temperature and CO2 concentration. Photosynthetic rate in July and August was high in plants under elevated CO2 concentration. In contrast, the elevated temperature and elevated climate groups showed relatively high photosynthetic rate in early July, then became far lower than those of the control and the elevated CO2 group in late August. Rapid increase in fruit diameter was observed on fruits grown under elevated climate, then slowed down after the middle fruit growth stage. Soluble solids content increased at harvest time in groups with elevated CO2.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Adams, S.R., K.E. Cokshull, and C.R.J. Cave. 2001. Effect of temperature on the growth and development of tomato fruits. Ann. Bot. 88:869–877.
Bowes, G. 1993. Facing the inevitable: plants and increasing atmospheric CO2. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 44:309–332.
Choi, J.H., J.J. Choi, J.W. Han, J.W. Choi, W.J. Jung, H.S. Suh, and W.S. Kim. 2003. Effect of stone cell development with soil drought for vegetative growth in ‘Niitaka’ pears. J. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 21:66. (Abstr.)
Faust, M. 1989. Physiology of temperate zone fruit trees. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
Georgios, A.F. and C. Paul. 2009. Global warming and carbon dioxide through sciences. Environ. Intl. 35:390–401.
Haun, R.J. and D.C. Coston. 1983. Relationship of daily growth and development of peach leaves and fruit to environmental factors. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108:666–671.
Havaux, M., H. Greppin, and R. Strasser. 1991. Functioning of photosystem I and II in pea leaves exposed heat stress in the presence or absence of light, analysis using in vivo fluorescence, absorbance, oxygen and photoacoustic measurements. Planta 186: 88–98.
Heinicke, A.J. and N.F. Childers. 1937. The daily rate of photosynthesis during the growing season of 1935, of a young apple tree of bearing age. Cornell Univ. Exp. Sta. Memoir 201. p. 34.
Hulme, M., Z.C. Zaho, and T. Jiang. 1994. Recent and future climate change in East Asia. Intl. J. Climatology 14:637–658.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II, and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, Geneva.
Islam, S., T. Matsui, and Y. Yoshida 1996. Effect of carbon dioxide enrichment on physico-chemical and enzymatic changes in tomato fruits at various stages of maturity. Sci. Hortic. 65:137–49.
Ito, J., S. Hasegawa, K. Fujita, S. Ogasawara, and T. Fujiwara. 2002. Changes in water relations induced by CO2 enrichment govern diurnal stem and fruit diameters of Japanese pear. Plant Sci. 163: 1169–1176.
Jang, H.I., H.H. Seo, and S.J. Park. 2002. Strategy for fruit cultivation under the changing climate. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 20:270–275.
Kimball, B.A., K. Kobayashi, and M. Bindi. 2002. Responses of agricultural crops to free-air CO2 enrichment. Adv. in Agron. 77: 293–36.
Lakso, A.N. and E.J. Seeley. 1978. Environmentally induced responses of apple tree photosynthesis. HortScience 13:646–650.
Lee, J.E and W.S. Kim. 2001. Morphological characters of stone cells and their effect on fruit quality of pears. J. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 42:449–452.
Mooney, H.A., O. Bjorkman, and G.J. Collatz. 1978. Photosynthetic acclimation to temperature in the desert shrub, Larrea divaricata. Plant Physiol. 61:406–410.
Sakuma, F., T. Umeya, K. Tahira, S. Katagiri, and H. Hiyama. 1995. Effects of high temperature and/or gibberellins treatments during early fruit development on the occurrence of watercore fruit in Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai cv. Housui). J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 64:243–249.
Saure, M.C. 1990. External control of anthocyanin formation in apple. Sci. Hort. 42:181–218.
Schneider, S.H. 2001. What is ‘dangerous’ climate change. Nature 411:17–19.
Seo, H.H. 2003. Site selection criteria for the production of high quality apples based on agroclimatology in Korea. PhD Thesis, Kyung Hee Univ., Suwon, Korea.
Sugiura, T. 1997. Interpretation of climatic ecology response and development model to predict growth and development of pear tree. PhD Diss., Kyoto Univ., Kyoto.
Tomana, T. and H. Yamada. 1988. Change in sugar composition during maturation stage of apple fruits grown at different locations. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 57:178–183.
Zamski, E. and A.A. Schaffer. 1996. Photoassimilate distribution in plants and crops (Source-sink relationships). Marcel Dekker Inc., New York. p. 851–881.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
These authors are contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Han, JH., Cho, J.G., Son, IC. et al. Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and temperature on photosynthesis and fruit characteristics of ‘Niitaka’ pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai). Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 53, 357–361 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-012-0047-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-012-0047-x