Skip to main content
Log in

Projecting demand for mineral-based critical materials in the energy transition for electricity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mineral Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several large scenario exercises in the last years present decarbonizing transitional energy pathways to 2050 and beyond. This changing energy landscape toward net zero is new territory to explore but is expected to be more intensive in mineral based materials than the current system. Mapping this territory and understanding the critical material needs to support the transition are essential for demanders and suppliers as well as policy makers seeking to orchestrate the transition. Our contribution is to provide such decision makers for electricity markets with a transparent tool that can be easily understood and modified as our transitional knowledge improves. In this tool, we take the International Energy Agency’s conservative Beyond Two Degrees scenario, which projects renewable energy penetration for 15 electricity technologies, supplemented by Bloomberg’s Electrical Vehicle Outlook. Coupling these electricity projections with estimates of material use per GW of new capacity, we estimate resulting needs for 33 materials through 2050. Assuming constant material intensities and recycle rates, our model finds dramatic increases in most included materials from 2021 to 2050. The total projected tonnage increases in materials used for the transition is 294% with a compounded average annual growth rate of 4.8%. However, there is wide heterogeneity across materials (from slightly negative for tungsten to nearly 1300% for lithium). Projected 2050 sales vary from less than 30 tonnes for hafnium and yttrium (with quantity demanded growth of − 4.8% from 2021 to 2050) to more than 17 million tonnes for steel (with growth of 291%) and aluminum (growth 419%). At 2021 prices, 2050 sales revenue varies from less than a million dollars for boron (growth of 164%) to more than $42 billion for aluminum (growth 419%), nickel (growth of 279%), and steel (growth of 291%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Modeling material is posted at http://dahl.mines.edu/CDF23.xlsx or in CDF24.xlsx.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank two anonymous referees for their helpful comments and Jordan Lee Calderon for editorial comments on a previous version of this paper.

Funding

This work received partial general support from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, New York, NY, USA, and from the King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol A. Dahl.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Authors Michael Tanner and Wilson C Martin currently work for Sandstone Group, Dallas, TX, USA, and Occidental Petroleum, Denver, CO, USA, respectively. Their work related to this research was conducted while they were Masters students at the Colorado School of Mines. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Disclaimer

The material in this research represents their own views and not necessarily those of their respective employers.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Message from the authors: In this short paper, we honor Phillip Crowson for his prominence in mineral market analysis. With his broad industry experience, ability to judge the quality of quantitative data, keen intellect, and analytical skills, Dr. Crowson has effectively enhanced the understanding of these markets for both the academic and business community for many decades.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Collins, G., Dahl, C.A., Fleming, M. et al. Projecting demand for mineral-based critical materials in the energy transition for electricity. Miner Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-024-00424-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-024-00424-3

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation