Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trade specialisation patterns in major steelmaking economies: the role of advanced economies and the implications for rapid growth in emerging market and developing economies in the global steel market

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mineral Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the steel-related export structure of the 15 largest steelmaking economies in 2015. The study provides a broad view of linkages between steel-related export structure, steelmaking technologies, and the level of economic development of each economy. To shed light on exporters’ patterns of specialisation, indices of revealed symmetric comparative advantage are used, indicating that patterns of steel exports differ widely across economies. In addition, this study focuses on the difference between steel exports in volume and value terms amid growing debate over the issue of value creation caused by excess capacity in the steel industry. This study concludes that the choice of steelmaking technologies and the level of economic development are significant determinants of trade specialisation patterns in major steelmaking economies. Although emerging market and developing economies have played a significant role in volume terms in the global steel market, advanced economies still have a crucial role as key suppliers, especially for high value-added products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The global export ratio (exports as a percentage of production) increased from 29.4% in 2010 to 30.7% in 2015 (World Steel Association 2016a).

  2. The definitions of advanced economies and emerging market and developing economies in this study are based on the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) World Economic Outlook Databases (IMF 2016).

  3. Gerschenkron (1962) introduced the concept of ‘advantage of economic backwardness’ as a means of identifying the development mechanism in developing economies, suggesting that a late-starting industrial economy might be able to enjoy faster growth than advanced economies by importing existing technology from abroad.

  4. Figures for production and trade in this study are taken or calculated from the World Steel Association (2016b) and the International Steel Statistics Bureau (ISSB 2016), unless otherwise indicated.

  5. China has been the driving force of the global steel industry over the past decade, although some industry analysts have pointed out that Chinese steel production might have already reached its peak and is likely to stabilise in the coming years (OECD 2015b). China’s steelmaking capacity, which was less than 200 mmt per year during 1970–2002, began rising sharply in 2003 and reached 1154 mmt in 2015, accounting for 48.4% of global nominal crude steel capacity, according to WV Stahl (2016).

  6. It should be noted that intra-regional trade has been significant in some regions (e.g. European Union or North American Free Trade Agreement), according to the World Steel Association (2016a).

  7. Detailed steel export indicators are presented in Appendix Table 5.

  8. For details of the recent financial performance of the steel industry, see, for example, the OECD (2015b, 2016b).

  9. For an explanation of each product, see, for example, De Carvalho and Sekiguchi (2015).

  10. Although Iran was ranked the 14th largest steel producer in the world in 2015, it is excluded from this study because of lack of detailed trade data.

  11. Globally, the BF/BOF route has been the major steelmaking technology, accounting for 74.2% of global crude steel production in 2015, but patterns of steel production by process vary significantly across regions.

  12. However, this does not apply to some economies. For example, the USA has been a major EAF producer, and several DRI-based mini-mill projects have been announced in recent years to take advantage of shale gas developments (OECD 2015a).

  13. However, there are some cases in which this does not apply. For example, some mini-mills, such as Nucor in the USA, have been encroaching increasingly on the flat products market, with EAF/thin slab casting technology for hot-rolled coil production (Hogan 1987; Kawabata 2005).

  14. For example, Lee and Mensbrugghe (2005), Vandenbussche and Zarnic (2008), and Bown (2013) assess the effects of US safeguard measures on steel products.

  15. For details on the product categories and regional aggregation, see ISSB (2010a, b).

  16. The level of economic development is a dummy variable that takes a value of 1 for advanced economies and 0 for emerging market and developing economies. Steelmaking technology is a dummy variable that takes a value of 1 for the BF/BOF route and 0 for the EAF route. Production item is a dummy variable that takes a value of 1 for flat products and 0 for long products.

  17. For example, Widodo (2009a, b) examines changes in comparative advantage in Asian economies with RSCA indices.

  18. Other steel products range from wire to steel castings.

  19. RSCA indices for narrow steel product groups and major exporters in 2010 and 2015 are presented in Appendices Tables 6 and 7.

  20. It should be noted that China’s implied ingots and semi-finished exports, derived from world ingots and semi-finished imports from China, reached 8.1 mmt in 2015, its third largest export item. China is ranked second behind Russia but ahead of Brazil and Ukraine, according to data derived from world ingots and semi-finished imports.

  21. This is a high-value product; its unit export value was USD 1541 per tonne in 2015.

  22. For example, Hyundai Steel completed its integrated mill project at its Dangjin works by blowing in its three blast furnaces between 2010 and 2013, and thus, South Korea now has two integrated mills. In addition, major South Korean steelmakers have commissioned new plate mills and hot strip mills over the past few years.

  23. Although the economy has the world’s highest RSCA value for electrical sheets in volume terms, the export unit value was USD 600 per tonne in 2015.

  24. Steel castings (product code 732599) are the most competitive export product of other steel products in India, with RSCA values greater than 0.8 in both volume and value terms.

  25. The author thanks an anonymous referee for bringing these issues to attention.

  26. The 82nd Session of the OECD Steel Committee discussed the role of GVCs in the context of the steel industry (OECD 2017). For a discussion on GVCs, see, for example, Gereffi et al. (2001, 2005).

References

  • Agosin M, Alvarez R, Bravo-Ortega C (2012) Determinants of export diversification around the world: 1962–2000. World Econ 35(3):295–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Iron and Steel Institute (2017) How a blast furnace works. http://www.steel.org/making-steel/how-its-made/processes/how-a-blast-furnace-works.aspx. Accessed 10 May 2017

  • Asian Development Bank (2010) Structural transformation in the Kyrgyz Republic: engineering future paths of capability accumulation. ADB Economics Working Paper Series No 200, pp 1–29

  • Balassa B (1965) Trade liberalization and “revealed” comparative advantage. Manch Sch Econ Soc Stud 33(2):99–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro R (2012) Convergence and modernization revisited. NBER Working Paper No 18295, pp 1–66

  • Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X (1991) Convergence across states and regions. Brook Papers Econ Act 1:107–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol W (1986) Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: what the long-run data show. Am Econ Rev 76(5):1072–1085

    Google Scholar 

  • Bown C (2013) How different are safeguards from antidumping? Evidence from US trade policies toward steel. Rev Ind Organ 42(4):449–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brun L (2016) Overcapacity in steel: China’s role in a global problem. Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness, Duke University

  • Cadot O, Carrère C, Strauss-Kahn V (2011) Export diversification: what’s behind the hump? Rev Econ Stat 93(2):590–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CRU (2016) China’s investigation on square bar exports. http://www.crugroup.com/about-cru/cruinsight/Chinas_investigation_on_square_bar_exports. Accessed 21 September 2016

  • D’Costa A (1999) The global restructuring of the steel industry: innovations, institutions, and industrial change. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dalum B, Laursen K, Villumsen G (1998) Structural change in OECD export specialization patterns: de-specialization and stickiness. Int Rev Appl Econ 12:447–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Carvalho A, Sekiguchi N (2015) The structure of steel exports: changes in specialisation and the role of innovation. OECD Science, technology and industry Working Papers. 2015/07. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrotă G, Căruntu C (2013) The analysis of the correlation between the economic growth and crude steel production in the period 1991–2011. Metal 52(3):425–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Döhrn R, Krätschell K (2014) Long-term trends in steel consumption. Miner Econ 27:43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi G, Humphrey J, Kaplinsky R, Sturgeon R (2001) Globalisation, value chains and development. IDS Bull 32(3):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi G, Humphrey J, Sturgeon T (2005) The governance of global value chains. Rev Int Political Econ 12(1):78–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron A (1962) Economic backward in historical perspective. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S (2006) Steel consumption and economic growth: evidence from India. Resour Policy 31:7–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann R, Hwang J, Rodrik D (2007) What you export matters. J Econ Growth 12:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse H (2009) Export diversification and economic growth. Commission on Growth and Development, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Working Paper No. 21

  • Hogan T (1983) World steel in the 1980s: a case of survival. Lexington Books, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan T (1987) Minimills and integrated mills: a comparison of steelmaking in the United States. Lexington Books, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  • Huh K (2011) Steel consumption and economic growth in Korea: long-term and short-term evidence. Resour Policy 36:107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2016) World economic outlook database, October 2016. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2016/02/weodata/weoselagr.aspx. Accessed 16 October 2016

  • International Steel Statistics Bureau (ISSB) (2005) World steel exports (all qualities)

  • International Steel Statistics Bureau (ISSB) (2010a) ISSB product guide. http://www.issb.co.uk/resources/Pdf/ISSB_TES_Product_Guide (June_2010).pdf. Accessed 22 September 2016

  • International Steel Statistics Bureau (ISSB) (2010b) ISSB geo code/country guide. http://www.issb.co.uk/resources/Pdf/ISSB_TES_Country_Guide (June_2010).pdf. Accessed 22 September 2016

  • International Steel Statistics Bureau (ISSB) (2016) Trade enquiry system. Accessed 13 October 2016

  • Kawabata N (2005) Higashi ajia tekkogyo no kouzou to dainamizumu (structure and dynamism of the iron and steel industry in East Asia). Minerva Publishing, Kyoto (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawabata N (2017) Where is the excess capacity in the world iron and steel industry? A focus on East Asia and China. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 17-E-023, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry

  • Lafay G (1992) The measurement of revealed comparative advantages. In: Dagenais MG, Muet PA (eds) International trade modeling. Chapman & Hill, London, pp 209–234

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lall S, Weiss J, Zhang J (2005) The sophistication of exports: a new measure of product characteristics. Queen Elizabeth House Working Paper No 123, Oxford University

  • Laursen K (1998) Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization. DRUID Working Paper No. 98–30, Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics

  • Laursen K (2000) Do export and technological specialisation patterns co-evolve in terms of convergence or divergence? Evidence from 19 OECD countries, 1971–1991. J Evol Econ 10:415–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen K (2015) Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization. Eurasian Bus Rev 5(1):99–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Mensbrugghe D (2005) The impact of the U.S. safeguard measures on Northeast Asian producers: general equilibrium assessments. In: Lee H, Ramstetter E, Movshuk O (eds) Restructuring of the steel industry in Northeast Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 152–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto H (1984) Gendai tekko kigyo no ruikei bunseki (typological analysis of modern iron and steel firms). Minerva Publishing, Kyoto (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2012) The future of the steel industry: selected trends and policy issues. http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/Steel%20Dec%202012%20Future%20of%20Steel%20%20OECD.pdf. Accessed 16 October 2016

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2013) The structure and prospects of the Indonesian steel industry. http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/Item%205%203%20OECD%20Naoki%20-%20Copy.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2016

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2015a) Excess capacity in the global steel industry and the implications of new investment projects. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2015b) Steel market developments: 2nd quarter 2015. Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2015c) Chairman’s statement. http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/steelcommittee78thsessionstatement.htm. Accessed 18 September 2016

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2016a) Capacity data. http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/steelcapacity.htm. Accessed 13 October 2016

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2016b) Evaluating the financial health of the steel industry. Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2016c) Background note no. 3: trade and trade policy developments, high-level meeting excess capacity and structural adjustment in the steel sector, Paris

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2016d) Monthly monetary and financial statistics. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?QueryId=169. Accessed 13 October 2016

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2017) Chairman’s statement. http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/82-oecd-steel-chair-statement.htm. Accessed 23 April 2017

  • Redding S (1999) Dynamic comparative advantage and the welfare effects of trade. Oxf Econ Pap 51:15–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik D (2013) Unconditional convergence in manufacturing. Q J Econ 128(1):165–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato H (2008) Ajia shokoku no tekkogyo: Hatten to henyo (the steel industry in Asia: development and restructuring). The Institute of Developing Economies. JETRO, Chiba (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato H (2013) Ajia shokoku ni okeru tekkogyo no hatten to gijutsu (development and technology of the steel industry in Asia). In: Baba T (ed) Ajia no sangyo hatten to sangyo gijutsu (economic development and industrial technology in Asia). Nakanishiya, Kyoto, pp 165–182 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl W (2016) Statistisches jahrbuch der stahlindustrie 2016/2017 (statistical yearbook of the steel industry 2016/2017). Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl, Düsseldorf (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbussche H, Zarnic Z (2008) US safeguards on steel and the markups of European producers. Rev World Econ 144(3):458–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wårell L (2014) Trends and developments in long-term steel demand—the intensity-of-use hypothesis revisited. Resour Policy 39:134–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widodo T (2009a) Comparative advantage: theory, empirical measures and case studies. Rev Econ Bus Stud 4:57–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Widodo T (2009b) Dynamic comparative advantages in the ASEAN+3. J Econ Integr 24(3):505–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2013) Online trade outcomes indicators—user’s manual. http://wits.worldbank.org/WITS/docs/TradeOutcomes-UserManual.pdf. Accessed 19 March 2017

  • World Steel Association (2015a) Global steel market outlook. http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/Item%204b_2%20-%20worldsteel_GlobalSteelMarketOutlook.pdf. Accessed 18 September 2016

  • World Steel Association (2015b) Creating and delivering value in the ASEAN steel industry. https://www.worldsteel.org/en/dam/jcr:ab4082e8-b93d-46d4-a6da-e86ea773db36/20150525_SEASI+conference_Final_Edwin+Basson_v3_update.pdf. Accessed 22 April 2017

  • World Steel Association (2016a) World steel in figures 2016. https://www.worldsteel.org/publications/bookshop/product-details.~World-Steel-in-Fig.s-2016~PRODUCT~World-Steel-in-Fig.s-2016~.html. Accessed 18 September 2016

  • World Steel Association (2016b) Worldsteel 2016 steel statistical yearbook. http://www.worldsteel.org/statistics/statistics-archive/yearbook-archive.html. Accessed 16 November 2016

  • World Steel Association (2016c) Fact sheet: steel and raw materials. https://www.worldsteel.org/publications/fact-sheets.html. Accessed 18 September 2016

  • World Steel Association (2016d) World steel outlook 2016–2017. https://www.worldsteel.org/en/dam/jcr:3f16260f-a885-4ce2-9cdf-4aaf3ebd9520/17.11.2016_Adam_Szewczyk_world+steel+outlook.pdf. Accessed 23 April 2017

  • World Steel Dynamics (2016) Core report EE: global steel mill product matrix. World Steel Dynamics, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoki Sekiguchi.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Steel exports by product and market destination in 2015, % shares of total exports
Table 6 Revealed symmetric comparative advantage indices for the 15 steelmaking economies in 2010
Table 7 Revealed symmetric comparative advantage indices for the 15 steelmaking economies in 2015

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sekiguchi, N. Trade specialisation patterns in major steelmaking economies: the role of advanced economies and the implications for rapid growth in emerging market and developing economies in the global steel market. Miner Econ 30, 207–227 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-017-0110-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-017-0110-2

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation