Abstract
Introduction
The real-life effectiveness of adalimumab biosimilars in patients with psoriasis has rarely been investigated.
Objective
To investigate drug survival of adalimumab biosimilars in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis and factors associated with its discontinuation.
Methods
We carried out a retrospective observational study including all consecutive patients with chronic plaque psoriasis who initiated adalimumab biosimilar MSB11022 (Idacio), ABP501 (Amgevita), or SB5 (Imraldi) between 1 January 2018 and 1 January 2021. The 1-year drug survival of adalimumab biosimilar and independent factors associated with its discontinuation were investigated. Cox regression models were fit to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of adalimumab discontinuation. A propensity score matching (PSM) model was adopted as sensitivity analysis.
Results
The study involved a total of 410 patients with follow-up of 549.84 person-years, 271 (66.1%) men, a mean (SD) age of 51.8 (14.5) years, and a baseline PASI of 14.54 (5.02). Among adalimumab biosimilars, 250 (61%) patients received MSB11022, 98 (24%) received ABP501, and 62 (15%) received SB5. Drug survival of adalimumab biosimilars at 1 year was 81.5% in the overall study population. Obesity was associated with increased risk of adalimumab discontinuation (HR = 2.01; 95% CI 1.33–3.03), whereas psoriatic arthritis (aHR = 0.32; 95% CI 0.16–0.64) and receiving adalimumab as first systemic treatment (aHR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.27–0.70) were associated with lower risk.
Conclusion
The real-life effectiveness of adalimumab biosimilars in patients with psoriasis is consistent with that previously reported for the originator.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Why carry out this study? |
High-quality biosimilars of anti-tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors have been providing a cheaper, yet effective option for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. |
The real-life effectiveness of adalimumab biosimilars in patients with psoriasis has rarely been investigated. |
What was learned from the study? |
Drug survival of adalimumab biosimilars at 1 year was approximately 80%, which is consistent with that of the originator, previously reported. |
Drug survival of adalimumab biosimilars in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis is longer when used as first systemic treatment than after failure of other conventional systemics such as methotrexate, acitretin, or cyclosporine. |
Introduction
Adalimumab is a fully human anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) monoclonal antibody indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults and pediatric patients (aged > 4 years) [1]. Patients with concomitant psoriatic arthritis (PsA), inflammatory bowel disease, hidradenitis suppurativa, and/or uveitis could be good candidates for adalimumab since it is effective also in these disorders [2]. High-quality TNF-α inhibitor biosimilars have been providing a cheaper, yet effective option, therefore being suitable for prescription early in the patient care path [3, 4]. The biological properties of biosimilars in terms of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic features and immunogenicity are comparable to the originator [5]. The US Food and Drug Administration and/or the European Medicines Agency have so far approved several adalimumab biosimilars, including MSB11022 (Idacio), ABP501 (Amgevita), SB5 (Imraldi), BI695501 (Cyltezo), GP2017 (Hyrimoz), FKB327 (Hulio), PF06410293 (Amsparity/Abrilada), and CTP17 (Celltrion) [6]. The real-life effectiveness of adalimumab biosimilars in patients with psoriasis has rarely been investigated [7]. Drug survival, which is the probability of continuing to receive a selected therapy over a certain period, is deemed an indirect predictor of effectiveness [8]. The objective of this study is to investigate the drug survival of adalimumab biosimilars in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis and the factors associated with discontinuation.
Methods
A retrospective observational study including all consecutive adult patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis attending the Dermatology Unit of the University Hospital of Verona was undertaken. Eligible patients were considered those who met the following inclusion criteria: age > 18 years; clinically confirmed diagnosis of moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis; those who initiated adalimumab biosimilar MSB11022, ABP501, or SB5 between 1 January 2018 and 1 January 2021. Exclusion criteria were history of any previous treatment with other biological drugs and concomitant treatment with any conventional systemic including methotrexate and/or phototherapy. Clinical data of the patients were retrieved from the electronic medical records and retrospectively analyzed up to 1 February 2022. The following clinical parameters were collected at enrollment: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, severity (PASI) and duration of psoriasis, history of any previous systemic treatment for psoriasis, and disease localization in sensitive areas including palmoplantar, nails, and skin folds. Treatment cycle was defined as time from initiation of adalimumab biosimilar to its discontinuation, switching, swapping, or last observation. The primary endpoint was to investigate the drug survival of adalimumab biosimilars at 1 year. The secondary end point was to investigate the independent factors (age, gender, obesity, psoriatic arthritis, and receiving adalimumab biosimilar as first systemic treatment) associated with its discontinuation. MSB11022, ABP501, and SB5 were selected because they are the only biosimilars that we are allowed to prescribe based on the current framework agreement of the Veneto region [9,10,11]. Adalimumab biosimilars were prescribed according to the label and reimbursement national criteria [9,10,11]. Adalimumab is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PASI > 10, body surface area > 10, Dermatology Life Quality Index > 10, and/or involvement of sensitive areas) and is reimbursed in case of contraindication, failure, and/or intolerance to at least one conventional systemic including methotrexate, cyclosporine, and phototherapy [12]. Adalimumab biosimilars have occasionally been prescribed as first systemic treatment because of contraindications to conventional drugs according to the EuroGuiDerm guideline [13] and/or patient refusal of conventional systemic for personal beliefs related to their risk of toxicity. This study was performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later amendments. The ethics committee exempted the study from the informed consent requirement because we only retrospectively accessed a deidentified database for the purpose of data analysis.
Statistical Analysis
The cumulative incidence of drug discontinuation over time was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox regression models were fit to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% CIs for risk of adalimumab discontinuation. Log-rank test was applied to compare patients receiving adalimumab biosimilar as first systemic treatment versus those who had experienced other conventional systemics before. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed by fitting a regression model in which disease duration was used as the predictor matching variable and receiving adalimumab biosimilar as first treatment was the dependent variable. After fitting the logistic regression model, the logit transformation of PSM for all patients was collected for subsequent use in the matched groups. By the PSM procedure, patients treated with adalimumab biosimilar as first systemic treatment were matched with those who had been treated with other conventional systemic drugs before using a 1:1 nearest-neighbor algorithm without replacement and with a caliper width of 0.50 standard deviation. The analysis was conducted using the STATA software (version 13; StataCorp, Collage Station, TX, USA).
Results
Descriptive characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1. The study included 410 patients, 271 (66.1%) men, with a mean (SD) age of 51.8 (14.5) years, and PASI of 14.5 (5.0). A total of 150 (36.6%) patients received adalimumab biosimilar as first systemic, and 260 (63.4%) had been treated before with conventional systemic, including methotrexate (181, 70%), cyclosporine (64, 25%), acitretin (12, 5%), and fumarates (3, 1%) (Supplementary Fig. 1). Two hundred fifty (61%) patients received MSB11022, 98 (24%) received ABP501, and 62 (15%) received SB5. The overall cohort of patients had follow-up of 549.81 person-years, with an incident rate of drug discontinuation of 0.20 (95% CI 0.16–0.24). A total of 109 drug discontinuations were found. Treatment failure was the most common reason for drug discontinuation occurring, in 87 (80%) of patients. In the other 22 patients (20%), adalimumab was withdrawn due to safety issues, remission of psoriasis, or upon patient request (Supplementary Fig. 1). Drug survival of adalimumab biosimilars at 1 year was 81.5% (Fig. 1A). No differences in drug survival among the three adalimumab biosimilars were found. According to univariate and multivariate time-dependent analysis, obesity was associated with increased risk of adalimumab discontinuation (aHR = 2.01; 95% CI 1.33–3.03), whereas psoriatic arthritis and receiving adalimumab as first systemic were associated with lower risk (aHR = 0.32; 95% CI 0.16–0.64; aHR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.27–0.70, respectively), as reported in Table 2.
We compared the retention rate of patients receiving adalimumab as first systemic versus those who received it after conventional systemic. No differences in terms of clinical characteristics including psoriasis severity and disease localization in sensitive areas were found between the two groups except for a longer disease duration in patients who have already received conventional systemic treatments (Supplementary Table 1). The cumulative incidence of drug discontinuation in the two groups is shown in Fig. 1B (log-rank test for equality of survivor functions, p < 0.001). Stratified analyses yielded drug survival at 6, 12, and 24 months of 95.0%, 92.0%, and 86.7% versus 84.2%, 75.4%, and 68.9% for those who received adalimumab as first systemic versus those already treated with conventional drugs, respectively. After PSM adjustment based on disease duration, being naïve to conventional drugs was still associated with lower risk of adalimumab discontinuation (aHR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.31–0.96) (Supplementary Fig. 2; Supplementary Tables 2, 3).
Discussion
In this study, we investigated the real-word effectiveness of adalimumab biosimilars in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. In our population, drug survival of adalimumab biosimilars at 1 year was 81.5%, consistent with previous findings [14,15,16,17,18]. The long-term efficacy and safety profile is emerging from different national registries, such as the Italian PsoBiosimilars, British BADBIR, and Danish DERMBIO registries [3], but real-world data for adalimumab biosimilars in patients with psoriasis are needed.
Drug survival of biologics is useful to evaluate long-term drug performance in daily practice and can be affected by different clinical and metabolic variables [15, 16]. A recent metaanalysis of 16 cohort studies found that female sex and obesity were associated with reduced biological drug survival, while PsA were associated with prolonged persistence [17, 18]. Obesity is another well-known predictor for biologic discontinuation. Higher body surface area, lower blood drug levels, or an increase in proinflammatory cytokines and adipokines deeply linked to obesity have been hypothesized to explain this phenomenon [19]. In our population, BMI higher than 30 kg/m2 was associated with poor drug survival, whereas PsA predicted longer drug survival. Mourad et al. [20] speculated that the greater combined therapeutic benefit, the increased motivation of healthcare providers, and/or increased awareness of the importance of treatment persistence could explain this observation. Adalimumab is known to more likely induce antidrug antibody when given without concomitant methotrexate, and shows longer drug survival when used in combination therapy [21]. However, adalimumab is approved and is almost exclusively in real life used as monotherapy for plaque psoriasis, as recommended by European and national guidelines [22].
Of significance, in this study, a substantial proportion of patients receiving adalimumab biosimilar as first systemic showed longer drug survival compared with those with failure of previous conventional drugs (92% versus 75.4% at 1 year, respectively). This is consistent with the finding that patients treated with a second-line biologic have already failed one or more treatments and will therefore be at increased risk of failing another drug [23]. A recent cost-effectiveness analysis conducted in the UK showed that adalimumab biosimilars may represent an ideal first-line biologic treatment [24]. Given the longer drug survival, staring early with adalimumab biosimilar might prevent or delay switching to other, more expensive drugs, with marked pharmacoeconomic advantages. Biosimilars have reduced cost compared with their biologic originator, but pharmacoeconomic studies comparing them with conventional drugs are lacking.
Moreover, whether early intervention with biologics, including adalimumab, could impact on the psoriasis course in terms of prevention of PsA and/or cumulative life course impairment (CLCI) is currently under investigation [25,26,27,28,29]. Two recent studies by Acosta Felquer et al. [27] and Gisondi et al. [26] found that earlier treatment with biologics may delay or reduce the risk of incident PsA compared with skin-directed therapies such as phototherapy or topical therapies. The persistence of the disease burden over time leads to a nonreversible impact on patient life that could potentially be prevented by early introduction of biologics [30, 31].
We acknowledge the limitations of our study, including the retrospective, nonrandomized, real-life design, and monocentric sampling. The major limitation of the study is confounding by indication; i.e., patients treated with adalimumab biosimilars as first-line therapy may be selected because of medical contraindications, personal beliefs related to toxicity, or pharmacoeconomic reasons. Another limitation is negative selection; i.e., patients treated with adalimumab who have already failed one treatment are at increased risk of failing another drug. We cannot exclude that use of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) might have selected out some more recalcitrant patients and that some other patients can be easily controlled with conventional DMARDs. Drug survival is not a perfect predictor of drug efficacy, as it also reflects safety. Reasons for drug discontinuation are difficult to confirm, particularly since an assessment of PASI and BSA variations was not provided. In addition, dose tapering may not be intercepted by drug survival, although we rarely use this practice in our real life. In this study, we considered three different biosimilars, because we are required to prescribe the biosimilar with lowest cost, which can vary depending on contingent calls of tenders. Nonetheless, this study also has strengths, including the periodical follow-up allowing the completeness of the database and the adjustment for potential bias such as disease duration based on propensity score matching.
Conclusions
The real-life effectiveness of adalimumab biosimilars in patients with psoriasis is consistent with that previously reported for the originator. The favorable cost-effective profile of biosimilars is expected not only to allow wider access to biologics but also to redefine the standard of care of psoriasis [3, 32]. Given increasing healthcare costs and cost-cutting initiatives, starting patients with biosimilars can lower the cost of therapy while still allowing maintenance of high-quality care [3].
References
2022. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/humira. Accessed 17 Feb 2022.
Gisondi P, Bellinato F, Conti A, Dapavo P, Piaserico S, De Simone C, et al. Consensus on the place in therapy of TNF-α inhibitors in the treatment of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:e470–2.
Barker J, Girolomoni G, Egeberg A, Goncalves J, Pieper B, Kang T. Anti-TNF biosimilars in psoriasis: from scientific evidence to real-world experience. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020;31:794–800.
The European Medicines Agency, The European Commission. Biosimilars in the EU - Information guide for healthcare professionals. In: Prepared jointly by the European Medicines Agency and the European Commission. ©European Med Agency. 2019. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/leaflet/biosimilars-eu-information-guide-healthcare-professionals_en.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2022.
Prignano F, Choi J, Pieper B, Iversen L. Anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in psoriasis: addressing key challenges using biosimilars. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2021;21:75–80.
Zhou X, Chen Z, Bi X. An update review of biosimilars of adalimumab in psoriasis—bioequivalence and interchangeability. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021;15:2987–98.
Samtsov AV, Bakulev AL, Khairutdinov VR, Kokhan MM, Korotaeva TV, Minullin IK, et al. Long-term data on the proposed adalimumab biosimilar BCD-057 in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2022;17: e0263214.
Ford I, Norrie J. Pragmatic trials. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:454–63.
2022. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2018/08/07/18A05194/sg. Accessed 17 Feb 2022.
2022. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2020/02/03/20A00685/sg. Accessed 17 Feb 2022.
2022. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2018/09/18/18A05962/sg. Accessed 17 Feb 2022.
2022. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2018/05/22/18A03476/sg. Accessed 17 Feb 2022.
Nast A, Smith C, Spuls PI, Avila Valle G, Bata-Csörgö Z, Boonen H, et al. EuroGuiDerm Guideline on the systemic treatment of Psoriasis vulgaris—part 1: treatment and monitoring recommendations. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:2461–98.
Graier T, Salmhofer W, Jonak C, Weger W, Kölli C, Gruber B, et al. Biologic drug survival rates in the era of anti-interleukin-17 antibodies: a time-period-adjusted registry analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184:1094–105.
Svedbom A, Ståhle M. Real-world comparative effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and methotrexate: a Swedish register analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:525–32.
Ricceri F, Rosi E, Di Cesare A, Scandagli I, Fastame MT, Prignano F. Long-term safety and efficacy of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha biosimilar agents in the treatment of psoriasis: a single Center study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2021;30:1–9.
Gniadecki R, Bang B, Bryld LE, Iversen L, Lasthein S, Skov L. Comparison of long-term drug survival and safety of biologic agents in patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172:244–52.
No DJ, Inkeles MS, Amin M, Wu JJ. Drug survival of biologic treatments in psoriasis: a systematic review. J Dermatolog Treat. 2018;29:460–6.
Sbidian E, Mezzarobba M, Weill A, Coste J, Rudant J. Persistence of treatment with biologics for patients with psoriasis: a real-world analysis of 16 545 biologic-naïve patients from the French National Health Insurance database (SNIIRAM). Br J Dermatol. 2019;180:86–93.
Mourad A, Straube S, Armijo-Olivo S, Gniadecki R. Factors predicting persistence of biologic drugs in psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181:450–8.
van der Kraaij GE, Busard CI, van den Reek J, Menting SP, Musters AH, Hutten BA, et al. Adalimumab with methotrexate versus adalimumab monotherapy in psoriasis: First-year results of a single-blind randomized controlled trial. J Invest Dermatol. 2022.
Gisondi P, Fargnoli MC, Amerio P, Argenziano G, Bardazzi F, Bianchi L, et al. Italian adaptation of EuroGuiDerm guideline on the systemic treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. Ital J Dermatol Venerol 2022;157(Suppl. 1 to No. 1):1–78.
Iskandar IYK, Warren RB, Lunt M, Mason KJ, Evans I, McElhone K, et al. BADBIR Study Group. Differential Drug Survival of Second-Line Biologic Therapies in Patients with Psoriasis: Observational Cohort Study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR). J Invest Dermatol 2018;13:775–84.
Barker J, Baker H, Nadeem A, et al. Health economic assessment of optimal biological treatment for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Clin Drug Investig. 2021;41(11):1011–20.
Gisondi P, Geat D, Conti A, et al. TNF-α inhibitors biosimilars as first line systemic treatment for moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2020;16:591–8.
Gisondi P, Bellinato F, Targher G, et al. Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs may mitigate the risk of psoriatic arthritis in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81:68–73.
Acosta Felquer ML, LoGiudice L, Galimberti ML, et al. Treating the skin with biologics in patients with psoriasis decreases the incidence of psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021.
von Stülpnagel CC, Augustin M, Düpmann L, et al. Mapping risk factors for cumulative life course impairment in patients with chronic skin diseases—a systematic review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35:2166–84.
Iversen L, Eidsmo L, Austad J, et al. Secukinumab treatment in new-onset psoriasis: aiming to understand the potential for disease modification—rationale and design of the randomized, multicenter STEPIn study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32:1930–9.
Kimball AB, Gieler U, Linder D, et al. Psoriasis: is the impairment to a patient’s life cumulative? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24:989–1004.
Papp KA, Signorovitch J, Ramakrishnan K, Yu AP, Gupta SR, Bao Y, et al. Effects of adalimumab versus placebo on risk of symptom worsening in psoriasis and subsequent impacts on health-related quality-of-life: analysis of pooled data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical trials. Clin Drug Investig. 2011;31:51–60.
Sbidian E, Chaimani A, Garcia-Doval I, et al. Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;12:CD011535.
Acknowledgements
Funding
Fondazione Cariplo, Fondazione Veronesi, Impact of COVID19 infection on patients affected by inflammatory skin diseases on immunosuppressive therapies (COVISKIN); ID 1833073 rif. 2020-1363.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, F. Bellinato, P. Gisondi; Data curation, F. Bellinato; Formal analysis, F. Bellinato; Investigation, All; Project administration, F. Bellinato, P. Gisondi; Supervision, P Gisondi, G Girolomoni; Validation, all; Writing – original draft, F. Bellinato, P. Gisondi; Writing – review & editing, All.
Disclosures
Paolo Gisondi has been a consultant and/or speaker for Abbvie, Almirall, Amgen, Janssen, Leo-pharma, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB. Giampiero Girolomoni served as consultant and/or speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Eli-Lilly, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samsung bioepis, Sanofi and UCB. Elena Mason, Paolo Ricci, Martina Maurelli and Francesco Bellinato have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
This study was performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later amendments. The ethics committee exempted the study from the informed consent requirement because we only accessed retrospectively a de-identified database for the purpose of data analysis.
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bellinato, F., Gisondi, P., Mason, E. et al. Real-Life Effectiveness of Adalimumab Biosimilars in Patients with Chronic Plaque Psoriasis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 12, 1303–1311 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-022-00732-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-022-00732-y