Abstract
In this work, we employ algebraic renormalization technique to show the renormalizability to all orders in perturbation theory of the Lorentz- and CPT-violating QED. Essentially, we control the breaking terms by using a suitable set of external sources. Thus, with the symmetries restored, a perturbative treatment can be consistently employed. After showing the renormalizability, the external sources attain certain physical values, which allow the recovering of the starting physical action. The main result is that the original QED action presents the three usual independent renormalization parameters. The Lorentz-violating sector can be renormalized by 19 independent parameters. Moreover, vacuum divergences appear with extra independent renormalization. Remarkably, the bosonic odd sector (Chern-Simons-like term) does not renormalize and is not radiatively generated. One-loop computations are also presented and compared with the existing literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For self-consistency, we just define
This can be understood in the following way: let Φμ and Q μ be a generic field and a background vector field, respectively. Under observer Lorentz transformation, i.e., exchange of references systems, these fields behave as \({\Phi }^{\prime \mu } ={\Lambda }^{\mu }_{\phantom {\mu }\nu }{\Phi }^{\nu } \) and \(Q^{\prime \mu } ={\Lambda }^{\mu }_{\phantom {\mu }\nu }Q^{\nu }\). On the other hand, under particle Lorentz transformation the reference systems do not transform, but the fields transform as \({\Phi }^{\prime \mu } ={\Lambda }^{\mu }_{\phantom {\mu }\nu }{\Phi }^{\nu } \) and \(Q^{\prime \mu } =Q^{\mu }\). The generalization to (pseudo-)tensorial backgrounds are immediate.
Even though the ghost and anti-ghost fields are not required in the Abelian theory at Landau gauge, we opt to introduce them for the following reasons: (i) It is a direct way to keep the off-shell BRST symmetry of the action S 0. (ii) Due to the discrete Faddeev-Popov symmetry, the trivial and non-trivial sectors of the BRST cohomology become explicit (see Table 1). (iii) With the introduction of the b field, it is easy to see that photon propagator keeps its transversality to all orders in perturbation theory. (iv) As expected, the tree-level decoupling of the ghosts is kept at all orders in perturbation theory, see Section 4.1. This feature will bring important consequences for the renormalization properties of the CPT-odd bosonic violating sector of the action (2.1).
The embedding concept used here is discussed in detail in Ref. [53].
The external sources \(\overline {Y}\) and Y will be defined in Section 4 in order to control the nonlinear BRST transformations of the spinor fields.
Clearly, in contrast to the background fields, the external sources are not “frozen” with respect to CPT symmetries. Hence, they enjoy discrete mappings. Thus Δ(−1) can be made CPT-invariant, avoiding a lot of counterterms and renormalization parameters. Furthermore, all of them, if included, are also avoided by the Ward identities of the model.
The reader can see for instance [59], where the authors claim the absence of gauge anomalies at one-loop order, and point out the possibility of the renormalizability of the Lorentz-violating QED to all orders.
References
D. Colladay, V.A. Kostelecky, Phys. Rev. D. 55, 6760 (1997). arXiv:hep-ph/9703464
D. Colladay, V.A. Kostelecky, Phys. Rev. D. 58, 116002 (1998). arXiv:hep-ph/9809521
R. Jackiw, V.A. Kostelecky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3572 (1999). arXiv:hep-ph/9901358
V.A. Kostelecky, Phys. Rev. D. 69, 105009 (2004). arXiv:hep-th/0312310 hep-th/0312310
V.A. Kostelecky, R. Potting, Gen. Rel. Grav. 37, 1675 (2005). Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 14, 2341 (2005). arXiv:gr-qc/0510124
J.S. Diaz, A. Kostelecky, Phys. Rev. D. 85, 016013 (2012). arXiv:1108.1799 [hep-ph]
V. Bargmann, Annals Math. 48, 568 (1947)
V. Bargmann, E.P. Wigner, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 34, 211 (1948)
C. Becchi, A. Rouet, R. Stora, Annals Phys. 98, 287 (1976)
I.V. Tyutin, Lebedev Institute preprint No. 39. arXiv:0812.0580 [hep-th] (1975)
T. Kugo, I. Ojima, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 66, 1 (1979)
V.A. Kostelecky, S. Samuel, Phys. Rev. D. 39, 683 (1989)
Z. Guralnik, R. Jackiw, S.Y. Pi, A.P. Polychronakos, Phys. Lett. B. 517, 450 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0106044
S.M. Carroll, J.A. Harvey, V.A. Kostelecky, C.D. Lane, T. Okamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 141601 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0105082 hep-th/0105082
J.M. Carmona, J.L. Cortes, J. Gamboa, F. Mendez, Phys. Lett. B. 565, 222 (2003). arXiv:hep-th/0207158
C.E. Carlson, C.D. Carone, R.F. Lebed, Phys. Lett. B. 549, 337 (2002). arXiv:hep-ph/0209077
M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5265 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/0001167
M.S. Berger, Phys. Rev. D. 68, 115005 (2003). arXiv:hep-th/0308036 hep-th/0308036
M.S. Berger, V.A. Kostelecky, Phys. Rev. D. 65, 091701 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0112243
S. Groot Nibbelink, M. Pospelov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 081601 (2005). arXiv:hep-ph/0404271
J. Alfaro, M. Reyes, H.A. Morales-Tecotl, L.F. Urrutia, Phys. Rev. D. 70, 084002 (2004). arXiv:gr-qc/0404113
R. Bluhm, V.A. Kostelecky, N. Russell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1432 (1997). arXiv:hep-ph/9707364
D. Bear, R.E. Stoner, R.L. Walsworth, V.A. Kostelecky, C.D. Lane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5038 (2000). Erratum-ibid. 89, 209902 (2002). arXiv:physics/0007049
R. Bluhm, V.A. Kostelecky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1381 (2000). arXiv:hep-ph/9912542
R. Bluhm, V.A. Kostelecky, N. Russell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2254 (1999). arXiv:hep-ph/9810269
V.A. Kostelecky, N. Russell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 11 (2011). arXiv:0801.0287 [hep-ph]
C. Adam, F.R. Klinkhamer, Nucl. Phys. B. 607, 247 (2001). arXiv:hep-ph/0101087
C. Adam, F.R. Klinkhamer, Phys. Lett. B. 513, 245 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0105037
V.A. Kostelecky, R. Lehnert, Phys. Rev. D. 63, 065008 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0012060
C. Adam, F.R. Klinkhamer, Nucl. Phys. B. 657, 214 (2003). arXiv:hep-th/0212028
V.A. Kostelecky, C.D. Lane, A.G.M. Pickering, Phys. Rev. D. 65, 056006 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0111123
O. Piguet, S.P. Sorella, Lect. Notes Phys. M. 28, 1 (1995)
O.M. Del Cima, D.H.T. Franco, A.H. Gomes, J.M. Fonseca, O. Piguet, Phys. Rev. D. 85, 065023 (2012). arXiv:1202.0009 [hep-th]
O.M. Del Cima, J.M. Fonseca, D.H.T. Franco, O. Piguet, Phys. Lett. B. 688, 258 (2010). arXiv:0912.4392 [hep-th]
G. de Berredo-Peixoto, I.L. Shapiro, Phys. Lett. B. 642, 153 (2006). arXiv:hep-th/0607109
D. Anselmi, M. Halat, Phys. Rev. D. 76, 125011 (2007). arXiv:0707.2480 [hep-th]
D. Anselmi, Phys. Rev. D. 89(12), 125024 (2014). arXiv:1405.3110 [hep-th]
D. Anselmi, E. Ciuffoli, Phys. Rev. D. 81, 085043 (2010). arXiv:1002.2704 [hep-ph]
D. Anselmi, M. Taiuti, Phys. Rev. D. 81, 085042 (2010). arXiv:0912.0113 [hep-ph]
S.M. Carroll, G.B. Field, R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. D. 41, 1231 (1990)
O. Piguet, A. Rouet, Phys. Rept. 76, 1 (1981)
J.H. Lowenstein, Phys. Rev. D. 4, 2281 (1971)
T.E. Clark, J.H. Lowenstein, Nucl. Phys. B. 113, 109 (1976)
Y.M.P. Lam, Phys. Rev. D. 6, 2145 (1972)
M. Duetsch, K. Fredenhagen, Commun. Math. Phys. 219, 5 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0001129
K. Symanzik, Commun. Math. Phys. 16, 48 (1970)
D. Zwanziger, Phys. Nucl. B. 399, 477 (1993)
D. Dudal, R.F. Sobreiro, S.P. Sorella, H. Verschelde, Phys. Rev. D. 72, 014016 (2005). arXiv:hep-th/0502183
L. Baulieu, S.P. Sorella, Phys. Lett. B. 671, 481 (2009). arXiv:0808.1356 [hep-th]
L. Baulieu, M.A.L. Capri, A.J. Gomez, V.E.R. Lemes, R.F. Sobreiro, S.P. Sorella, Eur. Phys. J. C. 66, 451 (2010). arXiv:0901.3158 [hep-th]
D. Dudal, S.P. Sorella, N. Vandersickel, Phys. Rev. D. 84, 065039 (2011). arXiv:1105.3371 [hep-th]
A.D. Pereira, R.F. Sobreiro, Eur. Phys. J. C. 73, 2584 (2013). arXiv:1308.4159 [hep-th]
T.R.S. Santos, R.F. Sobreiro, Phys. Rev. D. 91(2), 025008 (2015). arXiv:1404.4846 [hep-th]
G. Bonneau, Nucl. Phys. B. 593, 398 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0008210 hep-th/0008210
M. Perez-Victoria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2518 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9905061 hep-th/9905061
C. Itzykson, J.B. Zuber. International Series In Pure and Applied Physics (Mcgraw-hill, New York, 1980), p. 705
J.C. Collins. Renormalization. An Introduction To Renormalization, The Renormalization Group, And The Operator Product Expansion (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984), p. 380
W.H. Furry, Phys. Rev. 81, 115 (1951)
D.H.T. Franco, A.H. Gomes, J. Phys. A. 46, 045401 (2013)
C.G. Bollini, J.J. Giambiagi, Phys. Lett. B. 40, 566 (1972)
G. ’t Hooft, M.J.G. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B. 44, 189 (1972)
T.R.S. Santos, R.F. Sobreiro, To be published
P.W. Higgs, Phys. Lett. 12, 132 (1964)
G.S. Guralnik, C.R. Hagen, T.W.B. Kibble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 585 (1964)
R. Fukuda, T. Kugo, Prog. Theor. Phys. 60, 565 (1978)
V.P. Gusynin, V.A. Miransky, Phys. Lett. B. 76, 585 (1978)
J.M. Cornwall, Phys. Rev. D. 26, 1453 (1982)
H. Verschelde, K. Knecht, K. Van Acoleyen, M. Vanderkelen, Phys. Lett. B. 516, 307 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0105018
N. Maggiore, M. Schaden, Phys. Rev. D. 50, 6616 (1994). arXiv:hep-th/9310111
D. Dudal, S.P. Sorella, Phys. Rev. D. 86, 045005 (2012). arXiv:1205.3934 [hep-th]
S.D. Joglekar, B.W. Lee, Annals Phys. 97, 160 (1976)
M. Henneaux, Phys. Lett. B. 313, 35 (1993). Erratum-ibid. B 316, 633 (1993). arXiv:hep-th/9306101
J.C. Collins, R.J. Scalise, Phys. Rev. D. 50, 4117 (1994). arXiv:hep-ph/9403231
Acknowledgments
The Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), and the Fluminense Federal University (PROPPI-UFF) are acknowledge for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A: Vacuum Terms
We will discuss now the vacuum action, i.e., the action that taken account only terms depending on the sources. Since this action does not interfere with the renormalization of the sources, or with the dynamical content of the model, this discussion does not mess with the results obtained so far. However, we will not describe here all vacuum terms. We will present here only the most difficult vacuum terms which demand a careful analysis:
The terms that depend on the electron mass are introduced in order to guarantee the quantum stability of the vacuum action. This can be easily understood by fact that the sources \(\bar {A}^{\mu }\) and E μ suffer mix under quantum corrections. The same can be said about the sources \(\bar {\kappa }_{\mu \nu \alpha \beta }\) and C ν μ .
At the physical limit of the sources (3.6), the action (A.1) reduces to
which shows the nontrivial vacuum of the model. Now we can proceed as in Section 4.2 and seek for the most general counterterm compatible with Ward identities shown at (4.7):
where
It is then straightforward to show that the most general counterterm is
To finish the renormalizability of the vacuum term, it is needed to check the stability of the vacuum action. Thus, we have to show that
where the bare parameters are defined as
It is not difficult to achieve the following consistent expressions:
The proof that all other possible pure source term is also renormalizable follows the same prescription.
Appendix B: Discrete Mappings of the Sources
The coupling between the local sources and the Dirac bilinears depend on behavior of sources and Dirac bilinears under discrete mappings. Besides of the quantum numbers shown in the Table 3, the discrete mappings displayed in Table 4 will also select the allowed couplings.
Appendix C: Feynman Rules
In this appendix, we provide the Feynman rules used in Section 5. Instead of dealing with the direct rules that could be extracted from the action (2.1), we opt to treat the breaking terms as insertions. Thus, the set of propagators is the usual QED propagators: For the electron
For the photon:
where p μ is the particle momentum.
The fermion-photon vertex is given by
The Feynman rules for the Lorentz-violating QED terms are obtained by insertions of Lorentz-violating coefficients in fermion and photon propagators, namely
There is also an insertion at the fermion-photon vertex given by
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
S. Santos, T.R., Sobreiro, R.F. Remarks on the Renormalization Properties of Lorentz- and CPT-Violating Quantum Electrodynamics. Braz J Phys 46, 437–452 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-016-0423-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-016-0423-6