Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Living on the Edge: Neighborhood Boundaries and the Spatial Dynamics of Violent Crime

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

Neighborhood boundaries are a defining aspect of highly segregated urban areas. Yet, few studies examine the particular challenges and spatial processes that occur at the bordering region between two neighborhoods. Extending the growing literature on spatial interdependence, this article argues that neighborhood boundaries—defined as sharp changes in the racial or socioeconomic composition of neighborhoods—are a salient feature of the spatial structure with implications for violent crime and other outcomes. Boundaries lack the social control and cohesion of adjacent homogeneous areas, are contested between groups provoking intergroup conflict, and create opportunities for criminal behavior. This article presents evidence linking racial neighborhood boundaries to increased violent crime. The findings illustrate the importance of neighborhood boundaries for our understanding of spatial dimensions of population dynamics above and beyond the characteristics of neighborhoods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Related research has attempted to overcome the limitations of predefined, mutually exclusive spatial units with nonoverlapping boundaries and instead has used alternative definitions of neighborhoods (Hipp et al. 2012; Sampson et al. 1997; Spielman and Logan 2013).

  2. Also note Pattillo’s later work (2013), in which she argued that members of the black middle class often reside at the boundary between white middle-class communities and poor black neighborhoods. This location influences the opportunities and disadvantages of the black middle class in important ways (see also Sharkey 2014).

  3. The correlation between boundary values based on Wombling and edge intensity as an alternative boundary detection method used by Legewie and Schaeffer (2016) ranges from 0.71 for proportion Hispanic to 0.74 for proportion African American.

  4. The definition of the index is \( HH1=1-{\sum}_{i=1}^I{s}_i^2 \), where s is the population share of group i, and I is the number of groups in a given census block.

  5. Major roads are based on the 2010 TIGER/Line Files (U.S. Census Bureau 2012) and are defined as either divided, limited-access highways or main arteries that are part of the U.S. highway, state highway, or county highway system (primary or secondary roads).

References

  • Anderson, E. (1990). Streetwise: Race, class, and change in an urban community. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, K. T., & Seguin, C. (2015). Group threat and policy change: The spatial dynamics of prohibition politics, 1890-1919. American Journal of Sociology, 121, 475–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (2003). Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers, and spatial econometrics. International Regional Science Review, 26, 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergesen, A., & Herman, M. (1998). Immigration, race, and riot: The 1992 Los Angeles uprising. American Sociological Review, 63, 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, M., Honaker, J., & King, G. (2017). A unified approach to measurement error and missing data: Overview and applications. Sociological Methods & Research, 46, 303–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H. M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York, NY: Capricorn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1, 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P. L., Brantingham, P. J., Vajihollahi, M., & Wuschke, K. (2009). Crime analysis at multiple scales of aggregation: A topological approach. In D. Weisburd, W. Bernasco, & G. J. Bruinsma (Eds.), Putting crime in its place (pp. 87–107). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, E., Henly, J. R., Elliott, D. S., & Irwin, K. (2009). Subjective constructions of neighborhood boundaries: Lessons from a qualitative study of four neighborhoods. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31, 461–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, C. Z. (2003). The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 167–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, M. R. T., & Fortin, M.-J. (2014). Spatial analysis: A guide for ecologists (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DeSena, J. N. (1990). Protecting one’s turf: Social strategies for maintaining urban neighborhoods. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, M., & Valdez, N. (2012). Unpolicing the urban: Poor consequences of third-party policing for inner-city women. American Sociological Review, 78, 117–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dormann, C. F., McPherson, J. M., Araujo, M. B., Bivand, R., Bolliger, J., Carl, G., . . . Wilson, R. (2007). Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: A review. Ecography, 30, 609–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, L. (2006). Using geographic information systems to reconceptualize spatial relationships and ecological context. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 567–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, S. C., & Cayton, H. R. (1993). Black metropolis: A study of Negro life in a northern city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1945)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, M., Wright, R., & Parks, V. (2004). Work together, live apart? Geographies of racial and ethnic segregation at home and at work. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94, 620–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, W. F., Fortin, M.-J., & Soykan, C. (2003). Integrating edge detection and dynamic modeling in quantitative analyses of ecological boundaries. BioScience, 53, 730–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, A. D. (1960). Urban racial violence in the United States changing ecological considerations. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hipp, J. R., Faris, R. W., & Boessen, A. (2012). Measuring “neighborhood”: Constructing network neighborhoods. Social Networks, 34, 128–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hipp, J. R., Tita, G. E., & Boggess, L. N. (2011). A new twist on an old approach: A random-interaction approach for estimating rates of inter-group interaction. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27, 27–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1964). The paternity of an index. American Economic Review, 54, 761–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S., Kaplan, G. A., Morenoff, J., Raudenbush, S. W., Williams, D. R., & Young, E. A. (2012). Chicago Community Adult Health Study, 2001–2003 (Technical Report No. ICPSR31142-v1). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31142.v1

  • Hwang, J. (2016). The social construction of a gentrifying neighborhood: Reifying and redefining identity and boundaries in inequality. Urban Affairs Review, 52, 98–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquez, G. M., Maruca, S., & Fortin, M.-J. (2000). From fields to objects: A review of geographic boundary analysis. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2, 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. (1979). Patterns of collective racial violence. In H. D. Graham & T. R. Gurr (Eds.), Violence in America: Historical and comparative perspectives (pp. 393–422). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., Poulsen, M., & Forrest, J. (2007). The geography of ethnic residential segregation: A comparative study of five countries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97, 713–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-A., & Hipp, J. R. (2017). Physical boundaries and city boundaries: Consequences for crime patterns on street segments? Crime & Delinquency, 64, 227–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. (2017). Defensible spaces in Philadelphia: Exploring neighborhood boundaries through spatial analysis. Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 3(2), 81–101.

  • Lamont, M., & Molnar, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, T., & Legewie, J. (Forthcoming). Urban data science. In R. A. Scott, M. Buchmann, & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Legewie, J. (2012). Die schätzung von kausalen effekten: Überlegungen zu methoden der kausalanalyse anhand von kontexteffekten in der schule [The estimation of causal effects: An introduction into methods of causal analysis based on peer effects in education]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 64, 123–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legewie, J. (2018). Neighborhood boundaries and violent crime. An introduction to boundary detection methods in R (SocArXiv Papers). https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/jc78a

  • Legewie, J., & Schaeffer, M. (2016). Contested boundaries: Explaining where ethno-racial diversity provokes neighborhood conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 122, 125–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, S., Banerjee, S., & Carlin, B. P. (2009). Bayesian wombling for spatial point processes. Biometrics, 65, 1243–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R. (2012). Making a place for space: Spatial thinking in social science. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 507–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., Spielman, S., Xu, H., & Klein, P. N. (2011). Identifying and bounding ethnic neighborhoods. Urban Geography, 32, 334–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2005). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.

  • Lu, H., & Carlin, B. P. (2005). Bayesian areal wombling for geographical boundary analysis. Geographical Analysis, 37, 265–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, H., Reilly, C. S., Banerjee, S., & Carlin, B. P. (2007). Bayesian areal wombling via adjacency modeling. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 14, 433–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. P., & Addington, L. A. (2006). Understanding crime statistics: Revisiting the divergence of the NCVS and the UCR. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morenoff, J. D., & Sampson, R. J. (1997). Violent crime and the spatial dynamics of neighborhood transition: Chicago, 1970–1990. Social Forces, 76, 31–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morenoff, J. D., Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39, 517–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2014). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olzak, S. (1994). The dynamics of ethnic competition and conflict. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D. W. (2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattillo, M. (2005). Black middle-class neighborhoods. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 305–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattillo, M. (2007). Black on the block: The politics of race and class in the city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pattillo, M. E. (2013). Black picket fences: Privilege and peril among the black middle class. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rieder, J. (1985). Canarsie: The Jews and Italians of Brooklyn against liberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberto, E. (2015). Spatial boundaries and the local context of residential segregation (arXiv:1509.02574 [physics.soc-ph]). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0cb0/4b5d06078f50c0d6c561e67b4543f26c91ea.pdf

  • Rubin, D. B. (2004). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Clark, M. H., & Steiner, P. M. (2008). Can nonrandomized experiments yield accurate answers? A randomized experiment comparing random and nonrandom assignments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 1334–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, L. G., & Stockman, G. C. (2001). Computer vision. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, P. (2014). Spatial segmentation and the black middle class. American Journal of Sociology, 119, 903–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, J., Andresen, M. A., Brantingham, P. L., & Spicer, V. (2017). Crime on the edges: Patterns of crime and land use change. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 44, 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielman, S. E., Folch, D., & Nagle, N. (2014). Patterns and causes of uncertainty in the American Community Survey. Applied Geography, 46, 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielman, S. E., & Logan, J. R. (2013). Using high-resolution population data to identify neighborhoods and establish their boundaries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103, 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suttles, G. D. (1972). Social construction of communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). 2010 TIGER/Line Shapefiles technical documentation (Technical report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

  • Womble, W. H. (1951). Differential systematics. Science, 114, 315–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Dave Brady, Rory Kramer, Merlin Schaeffer, and Patrick Sharkey for helpful comments and discussions. An example analysis with software to implement different boundary detection methods is available at https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/jc78a (Legewie 2018). Replication materials for all results in this article are available online at https://osf.io/hfjgw/.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joscha Legewie.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 168 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Legewie, J. Living on the Edge: Neighborhood Boundaries and the Spatial Dynamics of Violent Crime. Demography 55, 1957–1977 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0708-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0708-1

Keywords

Navigation