Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bayesian areal wombling via adjacency modeling

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, public health professionals and other geostatistical researchers have shown increasing interest in boundary analysis, the detection or testing of zones or boundaries that reveal sharp changes in the values of spatially oriented variables. For areal data (i.e., data which consist only of sums or averages over geopolitical regions), Lu and Carlin (Geogr Anal 37: 265–285, 2005) suggested a fully model-based framework for areal wombling using Bayesian hierarchical models with posterior summaries computed using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, and showed the approach to have advantages over existing non-stochastic alternatives. In this paper, we develop Bayesian areal boundary analysis methods that estimate the spatial neighborhood structure using the value of the process in each region and other variables that indicate how similar two regions are. Boundaries may then be determined by the posterior distribution of either this estimated neighborhood structure or the regional mean response differences themselves. Our methods do require several assumptions (including an appropriate prior distribution, a normal spatial random effect distribution, and a Bernoulli distribution for a set of spatial weights), but also deliver more in terms of full posterior inference for the boundary segments (e.g., direct probability statements regarding the probability that a particular border segment is part of the boundary). We illustrate three different remedies for the computing difficulties encountered in implementing our method. We use simulation to compare among existing purely algorithmic approaches, the Lu and Carlin (2005) method, and our new adjacency modeling methods. We also illustrate more practical modeling issues (e.g., covariate selection) in the context of a breast cancer late detection data set collected at the county level in the state of Minnesota.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banerjee S, Gelfand AE and Sirmans CF (2003). Directional rates of change under spatial process models. J Am Stat Assoc 98: 946–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee S, Carlin BP and Gelfand AE (2004). Hierarchical modeling and analysis for spatial data. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag J (1974). Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 36: 192–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag J (1986). On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures. J R Stat Soc Ser B 48: 259–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Best NG, Waller LA, Thomas A, Conlon EM and Arnold RA (1999). Bayesian models for spatially correlated diseases and exposure data (with discussion). In: Bernardo, JM (eds) Bayesian statistics, Vol 6, pp 131–156. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin BP and Banerjee S (2003). Hierarchical multivariate CAR models for spatio-temporally correlated survival data (with discussion). In: Bernardo, JM (eds) Bayesian statistics, Vol 7, pp 45–63. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin BP and Louis TA (2000). Bayes and empirical Bayes methods for data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Ration, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton DG and Kaldor JM (1987). Empirical Bayes estimates of age-standardized relative risks for use in disease mapping. Biometrics 43: 671–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geman S and Geman D (1984). Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 6: 721–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harville DD (1997). Matrix algebra from a statistician’s perspective. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Helterbrand JD (1996). One-pixel-wide closed boundary identifications. IEEE Trans Image Process 5: 780–783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helterbrand JD, Cressie N and Davidson JL (1994). A statistical approach to identifying closed object boundaries in images. Adv Appl Probab 26: 831–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges JS, Carlin BP and Fan Q (2003). On the precision of the conditionally autoregressive prior in spatial models. Biometrics 59: 316–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff PD, Raftery AE and Handcock MS (2002). Latent space approaches to social network analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 97: 1090–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu H and Carlin BP (2005). Bayesian areal wombling for geographical boundary analysis. Geogr Anal 37: 265–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oden NL, Sokal RR, Fortin M-J and Goebl H (1993). Categorical wombling: detecting regions of significant change in spatially located categorical variables. Geogr Anal 25: 315–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short M, Carlin BP and Bushhouse S (2002). Using hierarchical spatial models for cancer control planning in Minnesota (United States). Cancer Causes Control 13: 903–916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter DJ, Best DG, Carlin BP and van der Linde A (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 64: 583–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas AJ and Carlin BP (2003). Late detection of breast and colorectal cancer in Minnesota counties: an application of spatial smoothing and clustering. Stat Med 22: 113–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YJ and Wong GY (1987). Stochastic blockmodels for directed graphs. J Am Stat Assoc 82: 8–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Womble W (1951). Differential systematics. Science 114: 315–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley P. Carlin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, H., Reilly, C.S., Banerjee, S. et al. Bayesian areal wombling via adjacency modeling. Environ Ecol Stat 14, 433–452 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0029-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0029-9

Keywords

Navigation