Abstract
Lifespans are both shorter and more variable for blacks than for whites in the United States. Because their lifespans are more variable, there is greater inequality in length of life—and thus greater uncertainty about the future—among blacks. This study is the first to decompose the black-white difference in lifespan variability in America. Are lifespans more variable for blacks because they are more likely to die of causes that disproportionately strike the young and middle-aged, or because age at death varies more for blacks than for whites among those who succumb to the same cause? We find that it is primarily the latter. For almost all causes of death, age at death is more variable for blacks than it is for whites, especially among women. Although some youthful causes of death, such as homicide and HIV/AIDS, contribute to the black-white disparity in variance, those contributions are largely offset by the higher rates of suicide and drug poisoning deaths for whites. As a result, differences in the causes of death for blacks and whites account, on net, for only about one-eighth of the difference in lifespan variance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Following Tuljapurkar and Edwards (2011), we use age 10 to separate adult mortality from infant and child mortality. We reach the same conclusions whether we use age 10 or age 20 as the cutoff point.
Other examples can be given. Higher rates of Alzheimer’s for blacks, for example, would reduce the black-white disparity in life expectancy but increase the black-white disparity in lifespan variance. Findings about racial differences in life expectancy do not necessarily apply to racial differences in lifespan variability.
For the open-ended age category of 85+, we used age 90 as the midpoint for our calculations because for both men and women and similarly for whites and blacks, age 90 is approximately the mean age at death for those who survived to age 85.
Age-specific death rates are higher for blacks than for whites until age 87 (Fenelon 2013). Because the black-white crossover at age 87 might be due in part to age misreporting for blacks (Fenelon 2013), we performed simulations based on downward adjustments of the age at death among older blacks. These adjustments had very little effect on the difference in the black-white variance.
This result is not an artifact of the decomposition method. Using the Nau-Firebaugh method, Lariscy et al. (2013) found that allocation effects—not spread effects—account for the majority of the difference in the age-at-death variation between Hispanics and whites.
References
Arriaga, E. (1984). Measuring and explaining the change in life expectancies. Demography, 21, 83–96.
Becker, G., Philipson, T., & Soares, R. (2005). The quantity and quality of life and the evolution of world inequality. American Economic Review, 95, 277–291.
Beltrán-Sánchez, H., Preston, S. H., & Canudas-Romo, V. (2008). An integrated approach to cause-of-death analysis: Cause-deleted life tables and decompositions of life expectancy. Demographic Research, 19(article 35), 1323–1350. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.35
Das Gupta, P. (1993). Standardization and decomposition of rates: A user’s manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census.
Edwards, R. D. (2011). Changes in world inequality in length of life: 1970–2000. Population and Development Review, 37, 499–528.
Edwards, R. D. (2013). The cost of uncertain lifespan. Journal of Population Economics, 26, 1485–1522.
Edwards, R. D., & Tuljapurkar, S. (2005). Inequality in life spans and a new perspective on mortality convergence across industrialized countries. Population and Development Review, 31, 645–674.
Engelman, M., Canudas-Romo, V., & Agree, E. M. (2010). The implications of increased survivorship for mortality variation in aging populations. Population and Development Review, 36, 511–539.
Fenelon, A. (2013). An examination of black/white differences in the rate of age-related mortality increase. Demographic Research, 29(article 17), 441–472. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.17
Fries, J. F. (1980). Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity. New England Journal of Medicine, 303, 130–135.
Fries, J. F. (1984). The compression of morbidity: Miscellaneous comments about a theme. Gerontologist, 24, 354–359.
Gillespie, D. O. S., Trotter, M. E., & Tuljapurkar, S. D. (2013). Mortality change and lifespan inequality (Working Paper No. 127). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies.
Harper, S., Lynch, J., Burris, S., & Davey Smith, G. (2007). Trends in the black-white life expectancy disparity in the United States, 1983–2003. Journal of the American Medical Association, 297, 1224–1232.
Harper, S., Rushani, D., & Kaufman, J. S. (2012). Trends in the black-white life expectancy disparity, 2003–2008. Journal of the American Medical Association, 307, 2257–2259.
Heron, M. P., Hoyert, D. L., Murphy, S. L., Xu, J. Q., Kochanek, K. D., & Tejada-Vera, B. (2009). Deaths: Final data for 2006 (National Vital Statistics Reports). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
Israel, R. A., Rosenberg, H. M., & Curtin, L. R. (1986). Analytical potential for multiple cause-of-death data. American Journal of Epidemiology, 124, 161–179.
Kannisto, V. (2000). Measuring the compression of mortality. Demographic Research, 3(article 6), 1–24. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2000.3.6
Kochanek, K. D., Arias, E., & Anderson, R. N. (2013). How did cause of death contribute to racial differences in life expectancy in the United States in 2010? (NCHS data brief). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
Lariscy, J. T., Nau, C., Firebaugh, G., & Hummer, R. A. (2013, April). Racial/ethnic inequality in adult survival: Decomposition of age at death variation among U.S. adults. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, New Orleans, LA.
Lynch, S. M., & Brown, J. S. (2001). Reconsidering mortality compression and deceleration: An alternative model of mortality rates. Demography, 38, 79–95.
Lynch, S. M., Brown, J. S., & Harmsen, K. G. (2003). Black-white differences in mortality deceleration and compression and the mortality crossover reconsidered. Research on Aging, 25, 456–483.
Manton, K. G., & Singer, B. (1994). What’s the fuss about compression of mortality? Chance, 7, 21–30.
Myers, G. C., & Manton, K. G. (1984). Compression of mortality: Myth or reality? Gerontologist, 24, 346–353.
National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). (2012). Multiple cause of death file 2010. Washington, DC: CDC.
Nau, C., & Firebaugh, G. (2012). A new method for determining why length of life is more unequal in some populations than in others. Demography, 49, 1207–1230.
Noymer, A., Penner, A. M., & Saperstein, A. (2011). Cause of death affects racial classification on death certificates. PloS One, 6(1), e15812. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015812
Peltzman, S. (2009). Mortality inequality. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23, 175–190.
Pollard, J. H. (1982). The expectation of life and its relationship to mortality. Journal of Institute of Actuaries, 109, 225–240.
Pollard, J. H. (1988). On the decomposition of changes in expectation of life and differentials in life expectancy. Demography, 25, 265–276.
Smits, J., & Monden, C. (2009). Length of life inequality around the globe. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 1114–1123.
Tuljapurkar, S. (2010). The final inequality: Variance in age at death. In J. B. Shoven (Ed.), Demography and the economy (pp. 209–221). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Tuljapurkar, S., & Edwards, R. D. (2011). Variance in death and its implications for modeling and forecasting mortality. Demographic Research, 24(article 21), 497–526. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.21
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Healthy people 2020: Maternal, infant, and child health objectives. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
van Raalte, A. A., & Caswell, H. (2013). Perturbation analysis of indices of lifespan variability. Demography, 50, 1615–1640.
van Raalte, A. A., Martikainen, P., & Myrskylä, M. (2014). Lifespan variation by occupational class: Compression or stagnation over time? Demography, 51, 73–95.
Warner, M., Chen, L. H., Makuc, D. M., Anderson, R. N., & Miniño, A. M. (2011). Drug poisoning deaths in the United States, 1980–2008 (NCHS Data Brief No. 81). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
Wilmoth, J. R., & Horiuchi, S. (1999). Rectangularization revisited: Variability of age at death within human populations. Demography, 36, 475–495.
World Health Organization. (2010). WHO mortality database documentation. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/mortality_rawdata/en/index1.html
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to the Population Research Institute at The Pennsylvania State University for Population Research Infrastructure (R24HD041025), and as well as from a Family Demography Training grant (T-32HD007514). We thank Jenny Van Hook for her comments and encouragement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Online Resource 1
(DOCX 34.2 KB)
Appendix: Derivation of Equations for Spread, Allocation, and Timing Components
Appendix: Derivation of Equations for Spread, Allocation, and Timing Components
As noted in the text, the ANOVA equation for the total variance in age at death, by cause, is
where N is the total number of deaths and the c = 1, 2, . . . , C causes of death are mutually exclusive and exhaustive. The first term in Eq. (A1) is the within-category component of the variance, and the second term is the between-category component of the variance.
Among those who are victims of a given cause, the variance in age at death is
Thus:
Substituting Eq. (A3) into the ANOVA within-component in Eq. (A1), we see that the ANOVA within-cause component is the incidence-weighted sum of the within-cause variances, σ 2 c :
where p c = N c / N, the proportion of deaths due to cause c. The between-variance component in ANOVA is likewise an incidence-weighted sum of dispersion:
The difference in the variances for two populations is the difference in the ANOVA within- and between-variance components for the two populations. It follows that the difference in the overall variances of lifespans of two populations B and W, broken down by cause, is the sum of the within-component difference and the between-component difference in the two populations:
where ∑ c p cB = ∑ c p cW = 1.0. Because positive differences are more intuitive to interpret than negative differences, we designate the population with the greater variance as B, so σ 2 B − σ 2 W > 0.
Algebraic manipulation of Eq. (A6) separates the spread component, which captures the part of the total disparity in variance that is due to cause-specific differences in the variances of the two populations; the allocation component, which accounts for the contribution of differences in cause-specific incidence; and the timing component, which isolates the effect of differences between the two populations in the variability of the mean age at death across causes. Taking the population with the smaller variance as the reference, and summing over all C causes, the spread, allocation, timing, and joint components are as given in the text (also in Nau and Firebaugh 2012).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Firebaugh, G., Acciai, F., Noah, A.J. et al. Why Lifespans Are More Variable Among Blacks Than Among Whites in the United States. Demography 51, 2025–2045 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0345-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0345-2