Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Why Do Older People Change Their Ratings of Childhood Health?

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

A growing number of studies in life course epidemiology and biodemography make use of a retrospective question tapping self-rated childhood health to assess overall physical health status. Analyzing repeated measures of self-rated childhood health from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), this study examines several possible explanations for why respondents might change their ratings of childhood health. Results reveal that nearly one-half of the sample revised their rating of childhood health during the 10-year observation period. Whites and relatively advantaged older adults—those with more socioeconomic resources and better memory—were less likely to revise their rating of childhood health, while those who experienced multiple childhood health problems were more likely to revise their childhood health rating, either positively or negatively. Changes in current self-rated health and several incident physical health problems were also related to the revision of one’s rating of childhood health, while the development of psychological disorders was associated with more negative revised ratings. We then illustrate the impact that these changes may have on an adult outcomes: namely, depressive symptoms. Whereas adult ratings of childhood health are likely to change over time, we recommend their use only if adjusting for factors associated with these changes, such as memory, psychological disorder, adult self-rated health, and socioeconomic resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Most variables come from RAND HRS data, Version L (RAND 2011). The exceptions are childhood health ratings, childhood health conditions, childhood SES, and a recent move, which are derived from the Core HRS data (HRS 2003, 2012).

  2. In 1998, response rates for the main HRS sample, AHEAD, CODA, and WB were 86.7 %, 91.4 %, 72.5 %, and 69.9 %, respectively. In 2008, response rates were 88.6 %, 90.7 %, 90.4 %, and 87.0 %, respectively. We do not use sampling weights in multivariate analyses because the HRS user guide does not necessitate their use (HRS 2001). Since most of the variables used to construct the post-stratification weights are included in our analytic models, unweighted estimates are generally preferred (Winship and Radbill 1994).

  3. Small Internet subsamples were given these questions in 2006 and 2007. If not reported in 2008, we used the 2006 or 2007 responses from the Internet subsamples.

  4. Note that the “cluster” option is incompatible with both the xtlogit and xtologit procedures.

  5. We refer to the different comparisons as “equations” because they together constitute one multinomial logistic regression model.

  6. We also estimated intermediate models in nested blocks. It was no single block, but rather the covariates as a whole that appeared to result in this nonsignificance.

References

  • Beckett, M., Da Vanzo, J., Sastry, N., Panis, C., & Peterson, C. (2001). The quality of retrospective data: An examination of long-term recall in a developing country. Journal of Human Resources, 36, 593–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benyamini, Y., Blumstein, T., Lusky, A., & Modan, B. (2003). Gender differences in the self-rated health–mortality association: Is it poor self-rated health that predicts mortality or excellent self-rated health that predicts survival? The Gerontologist, 43, 396–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, D. L., Hayward, M. D., & Crimmins, E. M. (2001). Does childhood health affect chronic morbidity in later life? Social Science & Medicine, 52, 1269–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, T. F., & Kennedy, S. (2002). The reliability of self-assessed health status. Journal of Health Economics, 21, 643–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diehr, P., Williamson, J., Patrick, D. L., Bild, D. E., & Burke, G. (2001). Patterns of self-rated health in older adults before and after sentinel events. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 49, 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, J. B., & Todd, M. (2011). Does self-reported health bias the measurement of health inequalities in U.S. Adults? Evidence using anchoring vignettes from the health and retirement study. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 66, 478–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K. F., & Farmer, M. M. (1999). Utility of health data from social surveys: Is there a gold standard for measuring morbidity? American Sociological Review, 64, 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K. F., & Kelley-Moore, J. A. (2001). Self-rated health and mortality among black and white adults: Examining the dynamic evaluation thesis. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 56B, S195–S205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisvold, D., & Golberstein, E. (2013). The effect of school quality on black-white health differences: Evidence from segregated southern schools. Demography, 50, 1989–2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, S. A. (2007). The long-term effects of poor childhood health: An assessment and application of retrospective reports. Demography, 44, 113–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, S. A., & Bishop, N. J. (2010). What do retrospective reports of childhood health capture? Evidence from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study. Research on Aging, 32, 698–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, S. E., Concato, J., & Gill, T. M. (2002). Stressful life events among community-living older persons. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17, 841–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, R. M., & Weir, D. (2010). Recent developments in longitudinal studies of aging in the United States. Demography, 47(Suppl), S111–S130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Health and Retirement Study. (2001). Sampling weights: Revised for Tracker 2.0 and beyond. Washington, DC: National Institute on Aging.

    Google Scholar 

  • Health and Retirement Study. (2003). HRS 1998 core public use dataset. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan and National Institute on Aging.

    Google Scholar 

  • Health and Retirement Study. (2012). HRS 2008 core public use dataset. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan and National Institute on Aging.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal, 7, 281–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idler, E. L., & Kasl, S. V. (1995). Self-ratings of health: Do they also predict change in functional ability? Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 50B, S344–S353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joorman, J., Teachman, B. A., & Gotlib, I. H. (2009). Sadder and less accurate? False memory for negative material in depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 412–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kistner, J. A., David-Ferdon, C. F., Repper, K. K., & Joiner, T. E., Jr. (2006). Bias and accuracy of children’s perceptions of peer acceptance: Prospective associations with depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krall, E. A., Valadian, I., Dwyer, J. T., & Gardener, J. (1988). Recall of childhood illness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 41, 1059–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. J., Moody-Ayers, S., Landefeld, C. S., Walter, L. C., Lindquist, K., Segal, M. R., & Covinsky, K. E. (2007). The relationship between self-rated health and mortality in older black and white Americans. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55, 1624–1629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima-Costa, M. F., Cesar, C. C., Chor, D., & Proietti, F. A. (2012). Self-rated health compared with objectively measured health status as a tool for mortality risk screening in older adults: 10-year follow-up of the Bambuí cohort study of aging. American Journal of Epidemiology, 175, 228–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2005). Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 167–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palloni, A. (2006). Reproducing inequalities: Luck, wallets, and the enduring effects of childhood health. Demography, 43, 587–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAND. (2011). RAND HRS data, version L. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Center for the Study of Aging, National Institute on Aging, and the Social Security Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riosmena, F., Wong, R., & Palloni, A. (2013). Migration selection, protection, and acculturation in health: A binational perspective on older adults. Demography, 50, 1039–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharfstein, D. O., Rotnitzky, A., & Robins, J. M. (1999). Adjusting for nonignorable drop-out using semi-parametric nonresponse models (with comments). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 1096–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. P. (2009). Reconstructing childhood health histories. Demography, 46, 387–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Mheen, H., Stronks, K., Looman, C. W. N., & Mackenbach, J. P. (1998). Recall bias in self-reported childhood health: Differences by age and educational level. Sociology of Health and Illness, 20, 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. S., Beckett, L. A., Barnes, L. L., Schneider, J. A., Bach, J., Evans, D. A., & Bennett, D. A. (2002). Individual differences in rates of change in cognitive abilities of older persons. Psychology and Aging, 17, 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winship, C., & Radbill, L. (1994). Sampling weights and regression analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 23, 230–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajacova, A., & Dowd, J. B. (2011). Reliability of self-rated health in US adults. American Journal of Epidemiology, 174, 977–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. (1983). Methodological issues in the assessment of life events: A review of issues and research. Clinical Psychology Review, 3, 339–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Andrew Halpern-Manners, Ann Howell, Jessica Kelley-Moore, Daniel Mroczek, and Lindsay Wilkinson for helpful comments on drafts of this article. Support for this research was provided by grants from the National Institute on Aging to K. Ferraro (R01 AG033541 and AG043544).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike Vuolo.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Vital and reinterview status in 2008 by childhood health ratings in 1998, n (total percentage)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vuolo, M., Ferraro, K.F., Morton, P.M. et al. Why Do Older People Change Their Ratings of Childhood Health?. Demography 51, 1999–2023 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0344-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0344-3

Keywords

Navigation