Abstract
Urban development is an ongoing economic and social phenomenon that significantly impacts ecological systems. This study aims to investigate the land use changes and physical development patterns of Maragheh City and its effects on the urban landscape as a medium-sized city in the northwest of Iran. To reach this goal, land use maps for 1986, 1996, 2006, 2016, and 2020 were first processed from Landsat 5, 7, and 8 satellite images. ENVI 5.3 and ArcMap software were used to analyze land use alteration patterns, and FRAGSTATS software was used for land use metrics. The results indicate that constructed lands from 1986 to 2020 had the most changes and increased by 2157 ha, while green areas decreased by about 443 ha. This trend indicates the lack of land use integration and infill growth which created urban sprawl. Therefore, the growth pattern of Maragheh City in recent decades has followed scattered and unbalanced horizontal growth. There are significant ecological challenges in this area due to this trend, including the destruction of farms and fertile agricultural land and the replacement of it with scattered and incoherent urban and rural settlements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Since the twentieth century, urbanization has become one of the most significant impacts of human activities on the earth, affecting the quality of life and sustainability of ecosystems (Trinder and Liu 2020; Shao et al. 2021). While urban areas occupy only 3% of the earth’s surface (Sarvestani et al. 2011), they are growing at an unimaginable rate and scale in many countries around the globe (Sun et al. 2013). This situation has led to critical conditions such as urban sprawl, especially in developing countries with high urban development rates (Vermeiren et al. 2012). Urban sprawl is an inevitable byproduct outside of dense urban centers (Xu et al. 2019; Cobbinah and Darkwah 2016) and is a scattering of physical development toward peripheral areas of the city (Tewolde and Cabral 2011; Galster et al. 2001). In developing countries, urban sprawl and its subsequent effects on the landscape are influenced by complex interactions of structural factors related to population growth, policy, and economic development (PoojaSonde et al. 2020; Tang et al. 2008). In the last decade, world academics and researchers have studied the effects of urban development on green cover and ecosystems using various methods (Wu et al. 2019; Nguyen et al. 2020). They found that the correlation between urban green space and urban development is complicated and depends on different forces (Quigley 2002; Syphard et al. 2011). Depending on the intensity of the pressures and the changes in the urban ecosystem, these changes may cause landscape transformation over time (Gökyer 2013; Mosammam et al. 2017). Thus, studying the green cover changes spatial patterns is one of the urban sustainability aspects (Nguyen et al. 2020) and can help planners and stakeholders recognize drivers of land use changes and take required actions (Alizadeh Zenouzi et al. 2022).
The results of a study by de Barros Ferraz et al. (2005), which investigated the process of forest conversion to urban areas using landscape metrics, indicated the destruction of all forest lands in Rondônia in Brazil if the trend of the changes will continue in the future. Also, Kushwaha et al.’s (2021) study indicated that economic, geopolitical, and urban functions had influenced mainly the urban areas of Delhi in India. Also, using the Markov chain model, they concluded that if the current trend continues, the city will experience sprawl toward the surrounding area. However, Wei et al. (2020) believe that urban sustainability can be enhanced with long-term urban green space planning, land use management, and preventing agricultural fragmentation in peripheral areas.
According to the Forman model, an ecological city benefits from the suitable distribution, composition, continuity, and extent of green and open spaces as structural components of the urban landscape (Forman 1995). Therefore, preserving natural green space is a vital factor in establishing the sustainability of communities’ ecological services and the health and well-being of urban life (Hodson and Sander 2021; Vargas-Hernández and Zdunek-Wielgołaska 2021). Forman and Gordon (1986) also outlined the main characteristics of a landscape matrix, including relative area, connectivity, and control over dynamics (Ingegnoli 2002). Therefore, spatial metrics can characterize landscape structure and recognize urban growth patterns. Also, based on spatial properties, it can evaluate possible urban growth options (Aguilera et al. 2011). Metrics can quantify spatial landscapes’ characteristics (Uuemaa et al. 2009; Li and Wu 2004). Landscape metrics are connected to ecological operations in studies related to environmental landscapes (DiBari 2007; Luck and Wu 2002). In this regard, spatial metrics are a helpful tool for planners who need to reliably characterize the processes of urban development and their effects (Kim and Ellis 2009). Landscape ecology emphasizes the structural analysis of the landscape, the spatial changes, and the consequences of ecological processes in these landscapes (Botequilha-Leitão et al. 2006). Landscape ecology and spatial planning converge in the same workspace because of their precise spatial dimension (Antrop 2001). Therefore, landscape ecology has been continuously used in spatial planning (Steinitz et al. 2003; Corry and Nassauer 2005). Regular monitoring of urban physical development and its impact on different urban ecosystems prevents decreasing the ecosystems’ capacity to support urban life. The nature, pattern, and intensity of urban growth and their effect on ecosystems can be explored via land cover maps (Martínez-Harms and Balvanera 2012). In this regard, remote sensing is one of the most valuable and powerful tools (Chuvieco 2008). This technique helps the researchers visualize past trends and predict future urban growth for proper urban development planning (Das and Angadi 2021). It has many benefits, including using different scales, collecting data in non-visible zones, and homogeneous, high-frequency, and cost-effective data with historical records (Chuvieco 2008; Pôças et al. 2011). According to previous studies, satellite remote sensing data have successfully monitored urban growth and its impacts on urban land cover. As such, it is one of the primary sources for extracting land cover maps (Fenta et al. 2017; Weng 2012). Urban growth is dynamic and happens in different processes globally. Therefore, urban growth impacts affect various landscapes differently (Zubair 2021). Landsat 7 and 8 images have been widely used to recognize green cover and their changes (Townshend et al. 2012; Estoque & Murayama 2015; Mancino et al. 2020; Tan et al. 2010). Identifying contributors to land cover change and urban sprawl is vital for sustainable land use planning (Magidi & Ahmed 2019). It requires analyzing the urban development process and determining suitable change detection algorithms that apply the trends of urban sprawl measurement. Urban sprawl monitoring via GIS and remote sensing techniques can be reliable and cost-effective tools that have empowered urban researchers and planners to detect urban land use change from a historical perspective, too (Araya & Cabral 2010; Sudhira & Ramachandra 2007). These tools are also helpful during the decision-making process (Hegazy & Kaloop 2015; Sudhira et al. 2005). However, when combined with landscape metrics, remote sensing can fully describe the fundamental urban land alteration process and patterns (McGarigal 2002; Mallupattu and Sreenivasula Reddy 2013). Landscape metrics can quantitatively describe and measure the basic spatiotemporal patterns and structures of landscapes (Abebe 2013; Aguilera et al. 2011; Liu and Yang 2015).
Maragheh City, one of the medium cities in the northwest of Iran, has faced many ecological problems, including losing lots of green areas. Therefore, the quantitative and qualitative changes in the Maragheh City landscape and the continuation of this process and resulting problems led to the formation of this research problem. The findings and results of this study could be beneficial for controlling the current and ongoing environmental challenges in the studied area. Therefore, in this study, the development pattern of Maragheh City during the last years and its impact on the urban ecological landscape was analyzed by remote sensing and landscape metrics.
The key contributions of this research are using a combination of descriptive tools, including Landsat satellite imagery, and spatial analysis tools, including GIS, FRAGSTATS, and IDRISI, to achieve the research objectives.
The main aim of the present study is to investigate land use changes and their impact on the structure of the landscape of Maragheh.
Therefore, the objectives of this study include the following:
-
To discover the physical development process of the city in the last years,
-
Investigating the impacts of urban development on the landscape of the city, and
-
Simulation of the land use changes by 2030.
This study is necessary to have a clear insight into the past land use changes process and prevent the destruction of green areas to support the landscape ecology of Maragheh. Therefore, implementing this study would benefit the resident and natural habitats of the studied area by helping preserve the ecological balance of the area by considering green spaces in the planning programs. The innovation of this study is conducting the combination methods of satellite image data, landscape metrics, and simulation models to measure, evaluate, analyze, and predict the quantity and quality of land use changes. Therefore, the prediction of land use changes to identify possible ecological damages and preparing necessary measures for the proper urban and surrounding areas’ land use planning to have ecologically balanced urban areas is another scope of this study.
Therefore, this study tries to answer the following questions:
What was the development process of Maragheh City in the past decades?
What effects had the development process of Maragheh on the city’s ecological landscape?
How will land use changes process in the future years?
Methodology
Study area
The city of Maragheh, with geographical coordinates of 37° and 21 min to 37° and 25 min north longitude and 46° and 12 min to 46° and 17 min longitude, is located in the northwest corner of Iran (Shorabeh et al. 2022). Maragheh City, with 30,417 ha of area, has a 175,600 population (Statistics Center of Iran, General Population and Housing Census 2020). The population of Maragheh has increased 1.7 times in the last 30 years (1990–2020). However, the city area has grown faster than its population and caused the structure of Maragheh City with unrestrained growth has been disturbed. The destruction of ecological elements like green spaces and arboretums has happened during rapid urban development.
Figure 1 shows Maragheh’s city location. This city leads to Tabriz City from the north; Bostan Abad, Hashtrood, and Charavimaq cities from the east; Oscou, Ajab Shir, Bonab, and Malekan cities from the west; and is connected to the province of West Azerbaijan from the south. The city expanded from the central part to the outer parts of the surrounding highways, especially the northeastern parts (Valiasr town) and the west of the Sufi Chai River. Also, the rustic texture and villages in the southeast and southwest of the city have developed towards Maragheh with irregular and illegal construction.
In the past, the imbalanced growth of the area and the Maragheh population has caused the sprawl and scattered spatial pattern of urban development. The horizontal growth of the city has destroyed natural landscapes and replaced them with residential neighborhoods. In such a way that under the influence of construction development, the city of Maragheh structure has become disturbed and disordered, and most importantly, environmental challenges have been imposed on this city.
The city of Maragheh has a semi-cold to cold climate. The city of Maragheh has a colder climate compared to other parts of the country. The primary core of Maragheh City was developed in the valley of the Sufi Chai river and the flat plain at altitude levels of 1400 to 1500 m. The average height of Maragheh City is about 1495.5 m above sea level. The city of Maragheh is located in the Sufi Chai river basin, the region’s most critical surface stream.
The structural form of Maragheh City is almost checkered, mainly seen in the recent development. In general, from 1986 to 2016, the city’s physical development was very slow towards the west, but the city had a sudden development towards the east. This trend has continued until now (Ghorbani et al. 2021).
The methods
The present study is applied research with a descriptive-analytical method intended to investigate and analyze the urban growth and development trend of Maragheh City. Landscape metrics were conducted in this study to explore the development pattern of Maragheh City. This method helps to show the mosaic pattern of urban land uses and its changes in urban development processes. Landscape metrics can be used in decisions related to urban growth, land use planning, and urban green space development planning (Botequilha and Ahren 2002). These metrics are essential for bringing the language of urban planners and ecologists closer together. Metrics define the shape, geometry, and nature of a landscape’s distribution of structural components and compare them quantitatively (Herzog and Lausch 2001). Researchers use landscape metrics modeling in different cities worldwide to study urban structures (Ramachandra et al. 2012; Akın and Erdoğan 2020). Thus, landscape ecology can describe the systems quantitatively that is required for the study of landscape change and function (McGarigal and Marks 1995).
The process of doing this study is shown in Fig. 2. In this study, Landsat satellite images for 1986, 1996, 2006, 2016, and 2020 were prepared to explore the land use changes in the studied area. After preprocessing operations, land use maps are monitored based on the classification method and using an artificial neural network by ENVI software in five classes (constructed lands, barren lands, agricultural lands, water, and green lands). A random sampling method was used as terrestrial reality points (control points) to check the accuracy of the maps obtained from the classification of satellite images. Then, with the control points collected through Google Earth images, land use maps, and visual interpretation, the classification accuracy was calculated using the error matrix and statistical parameters (overall accuracy and kappa coefficient). The generated maps for measuring land use metrics patterns in the study area were entered into FRAGSTATS software (McGarigal 2002) for analysis and calculation.
The characteristics of satellite images used in this study can be seen in Table 1.
As it is demonstrated in Table 2, different metrics have been used to analyze the satellite image information.
After identifying the landscape changes in Maragheh, land use simulation for the future years has been done using the Markov chain and cellular automata models in IDRISI Selva software. The Markov chain analysis is one of the most common methods used in simulation and modeling processes (Mondal et al. 2020). The estimated values in 2030 are based on 1986–2020, using the Markov chain model in IDRISI.
Results and discussion
In this part, land use patterns of Maragheh have been investigated using ENVI 5.3 and ArcMap software, and land use metrics have been analyzed by FRAGSTATS software. Also, land use changes simulation has been simulated with the Markov chain model and the Markov chain combination model with cellular automata to find out the possible changes in the land uses in Maragheh City.
Land use changes process in Maragheh
To explore the land use changes from 1986 to 2020, first, radiometric and atmospheric corrections were done on the images in the study area. Then, five land use classes, including barren land, constructed lands, agricultural land, gardens, green spaces, and water surfaces, were selected according to land use distributions in the city of Maragheh regarding land cover. In the next step, a maximum of 3 × 3 was processed on the final images using the monitored neural network and filtering method. Finally, land use maps were extracted.
The error matrix was first formed for classification accuracy, and then two indicators of total precision and kappa coefficient were used. The error matrix is shown in Table 3.
After analyzing the land use change maps in GIS, tables for the land use and land cover change were obtained based on the classified images of consecutive years in the area. Land use changes in the city show, from 1986 to 2020, barren land in the city decreased from 17,096 ha in 1986 to 14,646 ha in 2020. The constructed land, which was about 526 ha in 1986, increased to 2395 ha at the end of the period. However, green lands with an area of 6484 ha in 1986 decreased to 6140 ha in 2020. Agricultural land, with 8472 ha in 1986, increased to 9118 ha in 2020. Finally, water areas from 115 ha in 1986 increased to 394 ha in 2020 due to the construction of dams (Table 4).
Figure 3 shows the changes in each land use rate from 1986 to 2020. The classified information layers regarding land use from 1986 to 2020 have overlapped in these maps.
According to Fig. 4, constructed lands between 1986 and 2020 increased by about 2156 ha, gardens and green space decreased by about 443 ha, barren lands decreased by about 2444 ha, and agricultural lands increased by about 506. Finally, water surfaces have increased by 225 ha.
According to Fig. 5, constructed lands more than other land uses are spread green spaces around the city. Therefore, constructed lands, gardens and green spaces, water surfaces, agricultural lands, and barren lands have experienced changes during the study period in Maragheh City, respectively.
The trend of expansion of Maragheh City shows that with the creep of the city and spatial development on the surrounding rural areas, urban issues in all economic, social, cultural, and spatial dimensions have been mixed with rural structures and caused rural land use changes, mainly agricultural and natural resources.
Land use metrics of Maragheh
After classifying land use in Maragheh City, images were entered into the FRAGSTATS software to calculate the land use metrics. A set of metrics were analyzed to understand better and describe the ecosystem dynamics and landscape structure. Therefore, the most relevant landscape metrics and the categories with the most changes were studied for the study area. Therefore, the results of comparing landscape metrics from 1986 to 2020 were presented. According to Table 5, the CA metric shows that constructed lands have increased from 526 ha in 1986 to 2683 ha in 2020. There is a significant decrease in gardens and green spaces from 6484 ha in 1986 to 6041 ha in 2020. Also, based on the NP metric, which determines the number of spots in a particular class and is used to measure the degree of fragmentation of metric classes, from Table 5, it can be seen that the number of land use spots has increased. In other words, the more spots, the less the continuity of the categories. In this study, the number of urban spots has increased; consequently, their continuity has decreased.
The PLAND metric is the base unit for showing the composition of a landscape. It shows how a landscape is composed of one type of spot. According to Table 6, the percentage of constructed land area has increased from 1.61 to 8.21%. Also, gardens and green spaces have increased from 19.834 to 24.02% in 2020. The LPI metric represents the percentage of the total area occupied by the most prominent spot. Table 6 shows that the predominance of spots in 1986 and 2020 is related to barren lands. Also, the trend of changes in this metric in the studied periods is that the predominance of the constructed land class spots has increased, and the size of the gardens and green spaces spot has decreased. Therefore, the destruction in the integrity of land cover that can be seen for gardens, green spaces, and agricultural land classes has been happening.
As can be seen in Table 7, according to the LSI metric, when its value equals 1, the landscape contains a spot with maximum compaction. However, as the complexity of the shape of the spots increases, its value increases, and the corresponding class becomes more scattered.
The rate of change of this metric shows that the shape of the landscape has an increasing trend for all land uses, and the spots have become more complex. This trend, especially for construction use, shows a 24% dispersion. The metric changes in E.D. margin density show that the margin density of the construction spot has increased by 19%, which indicates an increase in the influence of the constructed land use.
MPS metric shows changes in mean spot levels between 1986 and 2020 that average spot levels decreased the most in garden and green space and became more fragmented. After that, there are barren lands, and in other words, in all classes, we face a significant decrease in the average spot level, with an increase in fragmentation.
The MNN metric also shows the average Euclidean distance from the calculated metrics for the separation and proximity of land features. As shown in Table 8, the values of this metric have increased in the garden and green space class, indicating an increase in distance and scattering of spots in this class and a decrease in their ecological relationship and fragmentation in the garden and green space class. However, the value of this metric has decreased in the constructed land class, which indicates an increase in integrity.
As can be seen in Table 9, the IJI metric shows the scatter and proximity index of the relative scatter of each type of land use. This index can be used to indicate urban creep, where urban development has changed land uses and land cover. The study of this index shows that the highest value of this metric in 1986 is related to constructed lands, i.e., the constructed lands are more scattered and in 2020 is connected to gardens land. The trend of metric changes in MESH (continuity of spots) during these periods indicates an increase in disintegration and a decrease in continuity in gardens and green space. The lack of proper connection and stability between natural land uses is due to new and irregular constructions in the city. The lack of paths and green roads prevents the relationship of green spaces. The new constructions have caused the disintegration of natural lands, which will have irreparable effects on the city’s ecological sustainability in the long run.
Table 10 shows a large range of changes in the SHEI index between 0.6811 and 0.8001, indicating a greater diversity of spots in the landscape. SIEI index changes range between 0.7748 and 0.8582, indicating an increase in Simpson’s variation of spots in the landscape. There has been a decrease in the CONTAG (spot integrity) metric from 53.8538 to 48.2647%, which indicates a decrease in the degree of cohesion and an increase in fragmentation throughout the landscape. The SHDI metric (Shannon’s variation) indicates the relative diversity of spots on the land. This metric is against the continuity of the landscape. In the present study, the diversity of land appearance has reached from 1.962 to 1.2877, which shows a decreasing trend. If the results of Shannon’s diversity metrics are more than 1, the distribution is clumped, and if it is equal to 1, they are random, and if it is less than 1, they are evenly distributed. This index is more than 1 in Maragheh, which indicates the clumped distribution.
Simulation of land use change with the Markov chain model
In the Markov chain method, satellite imagery of land cover is analyzed based on the probability change matrix. The Markov chain method analyzes land use zoning images and presents output in the form of a possible change matrix and an output image of a possible change matrix for the desired year (Ahadnejad and Rabet 2010). The change probability matrix shows the probability of changing each class from the classified land use to another one. In the present study, to model land use change using the Markov chain model, the land use map of 1986 was used as a base map and 2020 as a follow-up map to predict changes until 2030. According to the results of the Markov chain probability matrix (Table 11), it can be said that the probability of land use change to public gardens and green space in 2030 is 86.39, which is the highest probability of change among land uses.
The Markov chain combination model with cellular automata
In this study, the mixed cellular automata-Markov chain model was conducted to simulate land use change. For the 2030 horizon, the land use map of 1986 and 2020 was selected as the model input using the Markov chain method. Ten years have been considered for predicting changes until 2030 to create a matrix of the probability of land use changes. Then, the Markov chain model results were used as input data to perform the cellular automata-Markov chain model. As seen in Table 12 and Fig. 6, the results of predicting changes show that changes in gardens and green spaces will increase from 6041 ha in 2020 to 7771 ha in 2030, which total will increase by 1730 ha. Also, construction lands will increase from 2683 ha in 2020 to 3304 ha in 2030.
To explore the physical development pattern of Maragheh City with the overlap of the constructed land class during 2020–2030 on the digital elevation model (Fig. 7), the Maragheh expansion trend was visually extracted. According to Fig. 7, it can be seen that the growth of 621 ha of constructed lands in the Maragheh region causes the intensity of urban physical development and irregular growth of the rural areas toward the agricultural, gardens, and green lands.
Discussion
Rapid urban development and land use changes, especially urban green space, put ecological challenges to sustainable development (Alizadeh Zenouzi et al. 2022). These alterations in the urban environment have motivated scientists to draw the attention of decision-makers to the need to protect and develop ecological elements such as green spaces and farmlands in the cities, particularly in developing countries and/or cities (Niemelä et al. 2010; McPhearson et al. 2016). In this regard, analyzing urban growth by considering the development pattern and process dimensions helps to understand how urban landscapes change over time (Viana et al. 2019). Therefore, understanding the complex urban systems dynamics and evaluating the effects of urban development on urban ecology are among the issues that researchers are considering for environmental management and protection (Shi et al. 2021; Mörtberg et al. 2013; Wu 2014).
The findings of this study indicated that rapid urbanization in recent years has led to the occupation of green spaces with different urban constructions in Maragheh City. Also, the urban development pattern has been scattered and creeping. This situation impacts the ecological balance of the area. Thus, many socioeconomic challenges and environmental degradation happens with imbalanced ecosystems (Atasoy 2018). The physical development of cities has disturbed the balance of built-up lands and green spaces, particularly in developing countries (Arshad et al. 2022). In these cities, urban green space planning has been formed based on one-dimensional quantitative approaches that focus only on increasing the area of green spaces (Wang et al. 2020). According to this study, the density and the average size of green spots have decreased in the urban construction process.
Consequently, the fragmentation of urban green space imposes ecosystem challenges, affects the quality of living environments, and threatens urban ecological sustainability. Therefore, optimal planning and ecological measures are required to organize the landscape ecology and control urban sprawl. The results of Zhang et al (2020) study in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China, indicated the main factors for the landscape pattern changing to support urban ecological systems in the region. They include the construction of natural reserves, returning agricultural land to the forest project, and the development of urbanization according to the environmental capacities.
Physical cohesion, continuity, and extension of nature surrounding the city may be achieved by measures such as green belts, national parks, or natural corridors such as river valleys. A cohesive green network can be created by connecting minor green spots in the structure of cities by natural and artificial corridors and preventing the interruption of corridors by extending them towards green spots (Chicago Metropolitan Agency 2016). Green space planning using the green network connection theory can improve the current green space system (Kong et al. 2010). Maragheh City, as a sample of medium size city in a developing country, requires a comprehensive re-planning program for urban development and ecological landscape improvement with considering the agricultural lands and green and natural spaces conservation.
Conclusion
This study has explored the relationships between urban development patterns and landscape ecology by analyzing land use changes. Due to population growth and spatial development, the city of Maragheh is constantly experiencing land use changes, especially in its peripheral areas. The land use alteration commonly caused destroying gardens and agricultural lands, expansion of slums, and land use changes in the suburbs and surrounding rural areas. Studies of satellite imagery show that constructed land use from 1986 to 2020 had the most changes and increased by 2157 ha. Gardens and green spaces decreased by about 443 ha. This condition indicates the development of constructed lands on gardens and green lands. Therefore, constructed lands are the driving force of these changes. Also, the spatial distribution of the metrics shows a reduction in landscape coherence, an increase in landscape fragmentation, and a decrease in green spot density. Thus, the results confirm that the landscape of Maragheh City has become more complex and geometrically irregular over time and has become more fragmented. However, suitable planning programs should be considered for Maragheh City to reduce the fragmentation of the landscape and control indiscriminate and scattered development. In general, planning a green space ecological network, including the green space spots, size, shape, connections, and quality, can significantly improve the quantity and quality of the green space system in Maragheh. Planning for green areas can also promote the environmental and social benefits of green spaces and enhance the ecological sustainability of the city. Therefore, highlighting the role of the green space ecological network has particular importance for urban green space planning. In other words, planning an urban green space network is mainly a response to urban sprawl and the significant loss of natural spaces (Ignatieva et al. 2011; Kong et al. 2010).
Emphasizing green space planning and considering landscape cohesion in urban development programs to prevent urban sprawl and the consequent environmental problem is the significant contribution of this study to the relevant literature.
Overall, the present study recommends solutions to improve the city of Maragheh’s development pattern to protect landscape coherence. Following the endogenous development pattern, green spaces planning and designing for physical cohesion in harmony with various urban land uses, protection of gardens and green lands around the city, the revival of ecological networks, and prevention of urban sprawl would improve the cohesion of the studied area. Also, improving the environmental structure of Maragheh City can create cohesion, identity, and integration of residential areas and consequently contribute to sustainable urban development.
This study investigated urban development and its impacts on landscape ecology. However, more study is required to identify the critical factors for land use alteration, green space reduction, urban sprawl formation, and consequent urban ecological challenges.
References
Abebe GA (2013) Quantifying urban growth pattern in developing countries using remote sensing and spatial metrics: a case study in Kampala, Uganda (Master’s thesis, University of Twente). http://essay.utwente.nl/84729/1/abebe.pdf
Aguilera F, Valenzuela LM, Botequilha-Leitão A (2011) Landscape metrics in the analysis of urban land use patterns: a case study in a Spanish metropolitan area. Landsc Urban Plan 99(3–4):226–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.10.004
Ahadnejad M, Rabet A (2010) Evaluation and forecast of human impacts based on land use changes using multi-temporal satellite imagery and GIS: a case study on Zanjan, Iran (1984–2009). Proceedings of International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 38(Part II). https://www.isprs.org/PROCEEDINGS/XXXVIII/part2/Papers/160_Paper.pdf
Akın A, Erdoğan MA (2020) Analysing temporal and spatial urban sprawl change of Bursa City using landscape metrics and remote sensing. Model Earth Syst Environ 6(3):1331–1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00766-1
Alizadeh Zenouzi S, Yenneti K, Teimouri R, Abbasiyan F, Palme M (2022) Analysis of Changes in vegetation index during the rapid urban spatial development period (1990–2020) in Tehran Metropolis, Iran. Atmosphere 13(12):2010
Antrop M (2001) The language of landscape ecologists and planners. A comparative content analysis of concepts used in landscape ecology. Landsc Urban Plann 55:163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00151-7
Araya YH, Cabral P (2010) Analysis and modeling of urban land cover change in Setúbal and Sesimbra. Portugal Remote Sensing 2(6):1549–1563. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs2061549
Arshad S, Ahmad SR, Abbas S, Asharf A, Siddiqui NA, Ul Islam Z (2022) Quantifying the contribution of diminishing green spaces and urban sprawl to urban heat island effect in a rapidly urbanizing metropolitan city of Pakistan. Land Use Policy 113:105874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105874
Atasoy M (2018) Monitoring the urban green spaces and landscape fragmentation using remote sensing: a case study in Osmaniye. Turkey Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 190(12):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7109-1
Botequilha A, Ahren J (2002) Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 59(2):65–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00005-1
Botequilha-Leitão A, Miller J, Ahern J, Mcgarigal K (2006) Measuring landscapes. Island Press, Washington, DC, A planner’s handbook
Chicago Metropolitan Agency (2016) Integrating green infrastructure: on to 2050 strategy paper. Available from: https://www.cmap.illinois.gov. Accessed 2 November 2016
Chuvieco E (2008) Earth observation of global change: the role of satellite remote sensing in monitoring the global environment. Springer
Cobbinah PB, Darkwah RM (2016) African urbanism: the geography of urban greenery. Urban Forum 27(2):149–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-016-9274-z
Corry RC, Nassauer J (2005) Limitations of using landscape pattern indices to evaluate the ecological consequences of alternative plans and designs. Landsc Urban Plann 72:265–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.04.003
Das S, Angadi DP (2021) Assessment of urban sprawl using landscape metrics and Shannon’s entropy model approach in town level of Barrackpore sub-divisional region, India. Model Earth Syst Environ 7(2):1071–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00990-9
de Barros Ferraz SF, Vettorazzi CA, Theobald DM, Ballester MVR (2005) Landscape dynamics of Amazonian deforestation between 1984 and 2002 in central Rondônia, Brazil: assessment and future scenarios. For Ecol Manage 204(1):69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.073
DiBari J (2007) Evaluation of five landscape-level metrics for measuring the effects of urbanization on landscape structure: the case of Tucson, Arizona, USA. Landsc Urban Plann 79:308–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.04.004
Estoque RC, Murayama Y (2015) Classification and change detection of built-up lands from Landsat-7 ETM+ and Landsat-8 OLI/TIRS imageries: a comparative assessment of various spectral indices. Ecol Ind 56:205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.037
Fenta AA, Yasuda H, Haregeweyn N, Belay AS, Hadush Z, Gebremedhin MA, Mekonnen G (2017) The dynamics of urban expansion and land use/land cover changes using remote sensing and spatial metrics: the case of Mekelle City of northern Ethiopia. Int J Remote Sens 38(14):4107–4129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1317936
Forman RTT (1995) Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecol 10(3):133–142
Forman RTT, Gordon M (1986) Landscape ecology–John Wiley, New York, p 619
Galster G, Hanson R, Ratcliffe MR, Wolman H, Coleman S, Freihage J (2001) Wrestling sprawl to the ground: defining and measuring an elusive concept. Hous Policy Debate 12(4):681–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2001.9521426
Gevaert CM, Belgiu M (2022) Assessing the generalization capability of deep learning networks for aerial image classification using landscape metrics. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 114:103054
Ghorbani R, Rostaei S, Karbasi P (2021) Creep of Maragheh City and land use changes of peripheral. Preipheral Urban Spaces Dev 3(1):1–18. https://www.jpusd.ir/article_129767.html?lang=en
Gökyer E (2013) Understanding landscape structure using landscape metrics. INTECH Open Access Publisher. https://doi.org/10.5772/55758
Hegazy IR, Kaloop MR (2015) Monitoring urban growth and land use change detection with GIS and remote sensing techniques in Daqahlia Governorate Egypt. Int J Sustain Built Environ 4(1):117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2015.02.005
Herzog F, Lausch A (2001) Supplementing land use statistics with landscape metrics: some methodological considerations. Environ Monit Assess 72:37–50
Hodson CB, Sander HA (2021) Relationships between urban vegetation and academic achievement vary with social and environmental context. Landsc Urban Plan 214:104161. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011949704308
Ignatieva M, Stewart GH, Meurk C (2011) Planning and design of ecological networks in urban areas. Landsc Ecol Eng 7(1):17–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-010-0143-y
Ingegnoli V (2002) Landscape ecology: a widening foundation. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 53–82
Kim J, Ellis C (2009) Determining the effects of local development regulations on landscape structure: comparison of the woodlands and North Houston. TX Landsc Urban Plann 92:293–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.05.013
Kong F, Yin H, Nakagoshi N, Zong Y (2010) Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation: identification based on graph theory and gravity modeling. Landsc Urban Plan 95(1–2):16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.11.001
Kushwaha K, Singh MM, Singh SK, Patel A (2021) Urban growth modeling using earth observation datasets, cellular automata-Markov chain model and urban metrics to measure urban footprints. Remote Sens Appl: Soc Environ 22:303–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100479
Li H, Wu J (2004) Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landsc Ecol 19:389–399. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000030441.15628.d6
Li F, Zheng W, Wang Y, Liang J, Xie S, Guo S, Li X, Yu C (2019) Urban green space fragmentation and urbanization: a spatiotemporal perspective. Forests 10(4):333. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10040333
Liu T, Yang X (2015) Monitoring land changes in an urban area using satellite imagery. GIS and Landscape Metrics. Applied Geography 56:42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.10.002
Luck M, Wu J (2002) A gradient analysis of the landscape pattern of urbanization in the Phoenix metropolitan area of USA. Landsc Ecol 17:327–339. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020512723753
Magidi J, Ahmed F (2019) Assessing urban sprawl using remote sensing and landscape metrics: a case study of City of Tshwane, South Africa (1984–2015). The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science 22(3):335–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2018.07.003
Mallupattu PK, Sreenivasula Reddy JR (2013) Analysis of land use/land cover changes using remote sensing data and GIS at an urban area, Tirupati, India. Sci World J 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/268623
Mancino G, Ferrara A, Padula A, Nolè A (2020) Cross-comparison between Landsat 8 (OLI) and Landsat 7 (ETM+) derived vegetation indices in a Mediterranean environment. Remote Sensing 12(2):291. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12020291
Martínez-Harms MJ, Balvanera P (2012) Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 8(1–2):17–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2012.663792
McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure (Vol. 351). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, pp 1–122
McGarigal K (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. https://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
McPhearson T, Haase D, Kabisch N, Gren Å (2016) Advancing understanding of the complex nature of urban systems. Ecol Ind 70:566–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.054
Mondal B, Chakraborti S, Das DN, Joshi PK, Maity S, Pramanik MK, Chatterjee S (2020) Comparison of spatial modelling approaches to simulate urban growth: a case study on Udaipur City, India. Geocarto Int 35(4):411–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2018.1520922
Mörtberg U, Haas J, Zetterberg A, Franklin JP, Jonsson D, Deal B (2013) Urban ecosystems and sustainable urban development—analysing and assessing interacting systems in the Stockholm region. Urban Ecosyst 16(4):763–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-012-0270-3
Mosammam HM, Nia JT, Khani H, Teymouri A, Kazemi M (2017) Monitoring land use change and measuring urban sprawl based on its spatial forms. The case of Qom city. Egypt J Rem Sens Space Sci 20:103–116
Nguyen TT, Barber P, Harper R, Linh TVK, Dell B (2020) Vegetation trends associated with urban development: the role of golf courses. PLoS one 15(2):e0228090. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228090
Niemelä J, Saarela SR, Söderman T, Kopperoinen L, Yli-Pelkonen V, Väre S, Kotze DJ (2010) Using the ecosystem services approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces: a Finland case study. Biodivers Conserv 19(11):3225–3243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9888-8
Pôças I, Cunha M, Pereira LS (2011) Remote sensing based indicators of changes in a mountain rural landscape of northeast Portugal. Appl Geogr 31(3):871–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.01.014
PoojaSonde P, Balamwar S, Ochawara RS (2020) Urban sprawl detection and analysis using unsupervised classification of high resolution image data of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust area in India. Remote Sens Appl: Soc Environ 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2019.100282
Quigley MF (2002) Franklin Park: 150 years of changing design, disturbance, and impact on tree growth. Urban Ecosyst 6(3):223–235. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026157629609
Ramachandra TV, Aithal BH, Sanna DD (2012) Insights to urban dynamics through landscape spatial pattern analysis. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 18:329–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2012.03.005
Sarvestani MS, Ibrahim AL, Kanaroglou P (2011) Three decades of urban growth in the city of Shiraz, Iran: a remote sensing and geographic information systems application. Cities 28(4):320–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.03.002
Shao Z, Sumari NS, Portnov A, Ujoh F, Musakwa W, Mandela PJ (2021) Urban sprawl and its impact on sustainable urban development: a combination of remote sensing and social media data. Geo-Spatial Inf Sci 24(2):241–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2020.1787800
Shi Y, Zhai G, Xu L, Zhou S, Lu Y, Liu H, Huang W (2021) Assessment methods of urban system resilience: from the perspective of complex adaptive system theory. Cities 112:103141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103141
Shorabeh SN, Firozjaei HK, Firozjaei MK, Jelokhani-Niaraki M, Homaee M, Nematollahi O (2022) The site selection of wind energy power plant using GIS-multi-criteria evaluation from economic perspectives. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev 168:112778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112778
Statistical Center of Iran (2020) Available online: www.amar.org.ir. Accessed 2 Mar 2022
Steinitz C, Arias H, Bassett S, Flaxman M, Goode T, Maddock T III, Mouat D, Peiser R, Shearer A (2003) Alternative futures for changing landscapes. The Upper San Pedro River Basin in Arizona and Sonora. Island Press, Washington, DC
Sudhira HS, Ramachandra TV (2007) Characterising urban sprawl from remote sensing data and using landscape metrics. In Proceedings of 10th international conference on computers in urban planning and urban management, pp 11–13. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=a6bc6246fb5f548b89df87be0c3069eade2ca59b
Sudhira HS, Ramachandra TV, Wytzisk A, Jeganathan C (2005) Framework for integration of agent-based and cellular automata models for dynamic geospatial simulations. Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science) Bangalore. https://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy/water/paper/TR100/TR100_TVR.pdf
Sun C, Wu Z, Lv Z, Yao N, Wei J (2013) Quantifying different types of urban growth and the change dynamic in Guangzhou using multi-temporal remote sensing data. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geo Inf 21:409–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2011.12.012
Syphard AD, Clarke KC, Franklin J, Regan HM, Mcginnis M (2011) Forecasts of habitat loss and fragmentation due to urban growth are sensitive to source of input data. J Environ Manage 92(7):1882–1893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.014
Tan KC, Lim HS, MatJafri MZ, Abdullah K (2010) Landsat data to evaluate urban expansion and determine land use/land cover changes in Penang Island, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 60(7):1509–1521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0286-z
Tang J, Wang L, Yao Z (2008) Analyses of urban landscape dynamics using multi-temporal satellite images: a comparison of two petroleum-oriented cities. Landsc Urban Plan 78(4):269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.011
Tewolde MG, Cabral P (2011) Urban sprawl analysis and modeling in Asmara. Eritrea Remote Sens 3(10):2148–2165. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3102148
Townshend JR, Masek JG, Huang C, Vermote EF, Gao F, Channan S, Sexton JO, Feng M, Narasimhan R, Kim D, Song K (2012) Global characterization and monitoring of forest cover using Landsat data: opportunities and challenges. Int J Digit Earth 5(5):373–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2012.713190
Trinder J, Liu Q (2020) Assessing environmental impacts of urban growth using remote sensing. Geo-Spatial Inf Sci 23(1):20–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115712
Uuemaa E, Antrop M, Roosaare J, Marja R, Mander U (2009) Landscape metrics and indices: an overview of their use in landscape research. Living Rev Landsc Res 3. www.livingreviews.org/lrlr-2009-1. Accessed 15 Mar 2010
Vargas-Hernández JG, Zdunek-Wielgołaska J (2021) Urban green infrastructure as a tool for controlling the resilience of urban sprawl. Environ Dev Sustain 23(2):1335–1354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00623-2
Vermeiren K, Van Rompaey A, Loopmans M, Serwajja E, Mukwaya P (2012) Urban growth of Kampala, Uganda: pattern analysis and scenario development. J Landsc Urban Plan 106:199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.006
Viana CM, Oliveira S, Oliveira SC, Rocha J (2019) Land use/land cover change detection and urban sprawl analysis. In Spatial modeling in GIS and R for earth and environmental sciences . Elsevier, pp 621–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815226-3.00029-6
Wang C, Zhan J, Xin Z (2020) Comparative analysis of urban ecological management models incorporating low-carbon transformation. Technol Forecast Soc Change 159:120190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120190
Wei L, Luo Y, Wang M, Su S, Pi J, Li G (2020) Essential fragmentation metrics for agricultural policies: linking landscape pattern, ecosystem service and land use management in urbanizing China. Agric Syst 182:102833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102833
Weng Q (2012) Remote sensing of impervious surfaces in the urban areas: requirements, methods, and trends. Remote Sens Environ 117:34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.030
Wu J (2014) Urban ecology and sustainability: the state-of-the-science and future directions. Landsc Urban Plan 125:209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.018
Wu S, Liang Z, Li S (2019) Relationships between urban development level and urban vegetation states: a global perspective. Urban For Urban Green 38:215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.12.010
Xu G, Dong T, Brandful P, Jiao L, Sumari NS, Chai B, Liu Y (2019) Urban expansion and form changes across African cities with a global outlook: spatiotemporal analysis of urban land densities. J Clean Prod 224:802–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.276
Xu C, Haase D, Su M, Wang Y, Pauleit S (2020) Assessment of landscape changes under different urban dynamics based on a multiple-scenario modeling approach. Environ Plan b: Urban Anal City Sci 47(8):1361–1379. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F2399808320910161
Zhang Q, Chen C, Wang J, Yang D, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Gao M (2020) The spatial granularity effect, changing landscape patterns, and suitable landscape metrics in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, 1995-2015. Ecol Indic 114:106259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106259
Zubair OA (2021) Investigating urban growth and the dynamics of urban land cover change using remote sensing data and landscape metrics. Papers Appl Geogr 7(1):67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/23754931.2020.1817136
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Teimouri, R., Ghorbani, R., Karbasi, P. et al. Investigation of land use changes using the landscape ecology approach in Maragheh City, Iran. J Environ Stud Sci 13, 271–284 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-023-00822-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-023-00822-z