Abstract
Interdisciplinary training has an important role to play in environmental research, but what aspects of interdisciplinary training are most helpful for graduate students as they seek to define themselves as interdisciplinary environmental scholars? In this paper, we compare two environmentally related NSF IGERT programs at the University of Wisconsin-Madison that were similar in their research focus but very different in their approach to training. One program required shared coursework, while the other required research in a shared geographical area in Yunnan, China. Our results suggest that the formal structure of interdisciplinary training programs may be less important than providing students with opportunities to interact with people from other disciplines, both intellectually and in practice. However, differences between the programs did impact participants’ approach to interdisciplinarity. Our findings also highlight the importance of professional training to ensure that all trainees are able to take advantage of interdisciplinary opportunities.
Notes
As part of its required coursework, the CHANGE IGERT had a class called “Local and Regional Approaches to Sustainability and Vulnerability” that emphasized the need for environmental researchers to recognize the inherently political, historical, and personal nature of place in their work. The class featured readings from environmental sociology, the political ecology branch of geography, and other critical literatures. Neither this seminar nor the China IGERT, however, took advantage of the more recent and critical research on place-based education (e.g., see Greenwood 2013; Tuck and McKenzie 2014), which brings similar insights about the conceptualization of place to the educational process itself.
While NW Yunnan is large and trainees could choose to work anywhere in NW Yunnan, most students were primarily focused on areas around one major city or at least used the city as their physical base. However, despite the size and richness of issues in NW Yunnan, two students found that their research interests and needs required them to work outside of this area and so exceptions were made for them: one ecology student worked in southern Yunnan at a research station and one political science student studied issues at a national level that did not coincide with issues necessarily occurring in NW Yunnan.
References
Abt Associates Inc. (2006) Evaluation of the initial impacts of the national science foundation’s integrative graduate education and research traineeship program: final report. National Science Foundation
Allendorf TD, Brandt JS, Yang JM (2014) Local perceptions of Tibetan village sacred forests in northwest Yunnan. Biol Conserv 169:303–310
Bilek A, McCord JAA, Plachinski S, Starke JA, Radloff G (2012) German biogas experience and lessons for Wisconsin. BioCycle 52(12):48
Bracken LJ, Oughton EA (2006) ‘What do you mean?’ The importance of language in developing interdisciplinary research. Trans Inst Br Geogr 31:371–382
Brandt JS, Haynes MA, Kuemmerle T, Fang ZD, Waller DM, Radeloff VC (2013) Regime shift on the roof of the world: Alpine meadows converting to shrublands in the southern Himalayas. Biol Conserv 158:116–127
Brewer GD (1999) The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sci 32:327–337
Clark SG, Steen-Adams MM, Pfirman S, Wallace RL (2011) Professional development of interdisciplinary environmental scholars. J Environ Stud Sci 1(2):99–113
Eigenbrode SD et al (2007) Employing philosophical dialogue in collaborative science. Bioscience 57:55–64
Foertsch J (2011) Outcomes of two IGERT programs at the UW-Madison: the CHANGE program and the biodiversity in Southwest China IGERT. Internal Evaluation Report
Graybill JK, Dooling S, Shandas V, Withey J, Greve A, Simon GL (2006) A rough guide to interdisciplinarity: graduate student perspectives. Bioscience 56:757–763
Greenwood D (2013) A critical theory of place-conscious education. In: Stevenson RB, Brody M, Dillon J, Wals EJW (eds) International handbook of research on environmental education. Routledge, pp. 93–100
Hackett E, Rhoten D (2009) The snowbird charrette: integrative interdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research design. Minerva 47:407–440
Haynes MA, Kung K-JS, Brandt JS, Yang YP, Waller DM (2014) Accelerated climate change and its potential impact on yak herding livelihoods in the eastern Tibetan Plateau. Clim Chang 123(2):147–160
Kinzig A (2001) Bridging disciplinary divides to address environmental and intellectual challenges. Ecosystems 4:709–715
Miller TR, Baird T, Littlefield C, Kofinas G, Chapin III FS, Redman C (2008) Epistemological pluralism: reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecol Soc 13(2):46
Mitchell RB, Weiler CS (2011) Developing next-generation climate change scholars: the DISCCRS experience. J Environ Stud Sci 1(1):54–62
Morse WC, Nielsen-Pincus M, Force J, Wulfhorst J (2007) Bridges and barriers to developing and conducting interdisciplinary graduate-student team research. Ecol Soc 12(2):8
Moselmi J, Capps K, Johnson M, Maul J, McIntyre P, Melvin A, Vadas T, Vallano D, Watkins J, Weiss M (2009) Training tomorrow’s environmental problem solvers: an integrative approach to graduate education. Bioscience 59(6):514–521
National Academy of Sciences (2005) Facilitating interdisciplinary research. National Academies, Washington, DC
Olson ER, Marsh RA, Bovard BN, Randrianarimanana HLL, Ravaloharimanitra M, Ratsimbazafy JH, King T (2012) Arboreal camera trapping for critically endangered greater bamboo lemur Prolemur simus. Oryx 16(4):593–597
Olson ER, Marsh RA, Bovard BN, Randrianarimanana HLL, Ravaloharimanitra M, Ratsimbazafy JH, King T (2013) Habitat preferences of the critically endangered greater bamboo lemur (Prolemur simus) and densities of one of its primary food sources, Madagascar giant bamboo (Cathariostachys madagascariensis), in sites with different degrees of anthropogenic and natural disturbance. Int J Primatol 34:486–499
Orr DW (1992) Ecological literacy: education and the transition to a postmodern world. SUNY
Patterson M, Williams D (1998) Paradigms and problems: the practice of social science in natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 11:279–295
Pickett STA, Burch WR Jr, Grove JM (1999) Interdisciplinary research: maintaining the constructive impulse in a culture of criticism. Ecosystems 2:302–307
Polasky S, Carpenter SR, Folke C, Keeler B (2011) Decision-making under great uncertainty: environmental management in an era of global change. Trends Ecol Evol 26(8):398–403
Redman CL, Grove JM, Kuby LH (2004) Integrating social science into the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network: social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems 7(2):161–171
Rhoten D, O’Connor E, Hackett E (2009) The act of collaborative creation and the art of integrative creativity: originality, disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity. Thesis Eleven 96:83–108
Robinson BE, Baumgartner J (2011) Cultivating a demand for clean cookstoves. Science 334:1636–1637
Schmidt AH, Robbins AST, Combs JK, Freeburg A, Jesperson RG, Rogers HS, Sheldon KS, Wheat E (2012) A new model for training graduate students to conduct interdisciplinary, interorganizational, and international research. Bioscience 62(3):296–304
Smith GA (2002) Place-based education. Phi Delta Kappan 83(8):584
Sobel D (2004) Place-based education: connecting classroom and community. Nature and Listening 4
Tuck E, McKenzie M (2014) Place in research: theory, methodology, and methods. Routledge
Van Den Hoek J, Baumgartner J, Doucet-Beer E, Hildebrandt T, Robinson BE, Zinda JA (2012) Understanding the challenges and rewards of social-ecological research in China. Soc Nat Resour 25:1324–1329
Xu J, Wilkes A (2004) Biodiversity impact analysis in northwest Yunnan, southwest China. Biodivers Conserv 13(5):959–983
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NSF grants DGE-0549369 “Training Program on Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Development in Southwest China” and DGE-0549407 “Vulnerability and Sustainability in Coupled Human-Natural Systems: An Integrative Traineeship in Sustainability and the Global Environment.” We thank all the trainees and faculty who participated in both IGERT programs and provided us with the rich and rewarding experiences that inspired these reflections, Dr. Julie Foertsch for conducting and summarizing the evaluation that was the basis for this manuscript, and three reviewers for their engaging and insightful comments as well as their generous understanding of IGERT programs. The authors take full responsibility for the analysis and conclusions in this paper. Finally, we express our appreciation to the late Dr. Josh Posner of the China IGERT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allendorf, T.D., Beattie, R.B. & Diosana, C.C. Shared place and space: a comparison of two interdisciplinary graduate programs. J Environ Stud Sci 7, 324–335 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-016-0392-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-016-0392-7