The American public’s environmental, scientific, and civic literacies are generally low. While environmental science courses often recognize the human dimensions of environmental problems and solutions, they typically treat such phenomena as matters of opinion and rarely engage with social scientific ways of knowing. Recently, there has been a push in higher education to advance broader scientific literacy, but little attention has been paid to helping students gain an understanding of how socio-scientific evidence and claims are generated. Our work here aims to develop the knowledge framework that facilitates the integration of knowledge across biophysical and social science domains. In this research brief, we report on a project in which an interdisciplinary team developed a model of climate adaptation and mitigation to help teach undergraduates about the coupled human-climate system. The research team found this process to be integral to both thinking and learning about a system with biophysical and social variables. This project is unique in that we then used this model to develop not just curricula but also a framework that can be used to guide and assess interdisciplinary instruction at the collegiate level. This framework allows learners to make sense of complex socio-environmental issues and reason with scientific information from the social and biophysical sciences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Bandura A (1977) Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Boud D, Feletti G (1998) The challenge of problem-based learning. Psychology Press
Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res 18:32–42
Brundiers K, Wiek A, Redman CL (2010) Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: from classroom into the real world. Int J Sustain High Educ 11(4):308–324
Castree N (2014) Changing the Intellectual Climate. Nat Clim Chang 4:763–768
Coyle K (2005) Environmental literacy in America: what ten years of NEETF/Roper research and related studies say about environmental literacy in the U.S. The National Environmental Education & Training Foundation.
Crawford B, Jordan RC (2013) Inquiry, models, and complex reasoning to transform learning in environmental education. In: Krasny and Dillon (eds.) Transdisciplinary Research in Environmental Education. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Dauer JT, Long TM (2015) Long-term conceptual retrieval by college biology majors following model-based instruction. J Res Sci Teach DOI:. doi:10.1002/tea.21258
Dietz T (2013) New Essays in Risk, Energy, and Sustainability. In: Dietz T, Jorgenesen A (eds) Chapter 3: Epistemology, ontology, and the practice of structural human ecology pp. 31–52 in Structural Human Ecology. Washington State University Press, Pullman, WA
Dunlap RE, Catton Jr W (1994) Struggling with human exemptionalism: the rise, decline, and revitalization of environmental sociology. Am Sociol 25:5–30
Duschl RA, Schweingruber HA, Shouse AW (2007) Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Fiske SJ, Crate SA, Crumley CL, Galvin K, Lazrus H, Lucero L, Oliver-Smith A, Orlove B, Strauss S, Wilk R (2014) Changing the atmosphere. Anthropology and climate change. Final report of the AAA Global Climate Change Task Force: 137. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association
Flyvbjerg B (2001) Making social science matter: why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge University Press
Hmelo-Silver CE (2004) Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educ Psychol Rev 16(3):235–266
Jordan RC, Duncan RG (2009) Preservice teachers’ image of science in ecology when compared to genetics. J Biol Educ 43:62–69
Jordan RC, Singer F, Vaughan J, Berkowitz A (2009) What should every citizen know about ecology? Front Ecol Environ 7:495–500
Jordan RC, Sorensen AE, Hmelo-Silver C (2014) A conceptual representation to support ecological systems learning. Nat Sci Educ 43:141–146
Keen M, Brown VA, Dyball R (2005a) Social learning in environmental management: towards a sustainable future. Earthscan, London
Keen M, Brown VA, Dyball R (2005b) Fostering ecoliteracy through model-based instruction. Front Ecol Environ 12:138–139
Long TM, Dauer JT, Kostelnik KM, Momsen JL, Wyse SA, Speth EB, Ebert-May D (2014) Fostering ecoliteracy through model-based instruction. Front Ecol Environ 12:138–139
Meyer JHF, Land R (2005) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. High Educ 49:373–388
Middendorf J, Pace D (2004) Decoding the disciplines: a model for helping students learn disciplinary ways of thinking. New Dir Teach Learn 98:1–12
Miller JD (2002) Civic scientific literacy. FAS Public Interest Report. J Fed Am Sci 55:3–6
Mistry RS, Brown CS, Chow KA, Collins GS (2012) Increasing the complexity of young adolescents’ beliefs about poverty and inequality: results of an 8th grade social studies curriculum intervention. J Youth Adoles 41(6):704–716
National Research Council (2011) Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. In: Successful K-12 STEM education: identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Committee on Highly Successful Science Programs for K-12 Science Education. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
NGSS Lead States (2013) Next generation science standards: for states, by states. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Pennington D, Bammer G, Danielson A, Gosselin D, Gouvea J, Habron G, Hawthorne D, Parnell R, Thompson K, Vincent S, Wei C (2015) The EMBeRS project: employing model-based reasoning in socio-environmental synthesis. J Environ Sci Stud in press
Pickett STA, Kolasa J, Jones CG (2007) Ecological understanding: the nature of theory and the theory of nature, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Robelia B, Murphy T (2012) What do people know about key environmental issues? A review of environmental knowledge surveys. Environ Ed Res 18(3) 2012:299–321
Rosenblueth A, Wiener N (1945) The role of models in science. Philos Sci 12(4):316–321
Sadler TD, Zeidler DL (2005) Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. J Res Sci Teach 42:112–138
Sadler TD, Barab SA, Scott B (2007) What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Res Sci Educ 37:371–391
Schwartz DL, Martin T (2004) Inventing to prepare for future learning: the hidden efficiency of encouraging student production in statistics instruction. Cognition Instruct 222:129–184
Sterman JD (1994) Learning in and about complex systems. Syst Dynam Rev 10:291–330
U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) (2009) Climate literacy: the essential principles of climate science. Available athttp://www.globalchange.gov/browse/educators (accessed 9 6 2015).
Vincent S, Focht W (2009) US higher education environmental program managers’ perspectives on curriculum design and core competencies: implications for sustainability as a guiding framework. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 10(2):164–183
Wilensky U, Reisman K (2006) Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories—an embodied modeling approach. Cognition Instruct 24:171–209
Wilson TD, Gilbert DT (2003) Affective forecasting. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 35:345–411
York R (2013) New Essays in Risk, Energy, and Sustainability. In: Dietz T, Jorgenesen A (eds) Metatheoretical foundations of post-normal prediction pp. 19–30 in Structural Human Ecology. Washington State University Press, Pullman, WA
We would like to acknowledge the Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center in Annapolis, Maryland for hosting and facilitating this work under the Learning across Natural and Social Sciences pursuit.
About this article
Cite this article
Sorensen, A.E., Jordan, R.C., Shwom, R. et al. Model-based reasoning to foster environmental and socio-scientific literacy in higher education. J Environ Stud Sci 6, 287–294 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0352-7
- Environmental Literacy
- Climate Change
- Science education