Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Empagliflozin combined with short-term intensive insulin therapy improves glycemic variability and 1,5-anhydroglucitol in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

We aimed to compare glycemic variability (GV) parameters using both a flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system and cardiometabolic risk parameters in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) between cohorts receiving short-term intensive insulin infusion (STII) plus empagliflozin (EMPA) combination therapy vs. STII therapy alone.

Methods

In a 2-week, open-label, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial, newly diagnosed patients with T2DM [fasting plasma glucose (FPG) > 11.1 mmol/L or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) > 9.0%] or patients with poor glycemic control (HbA1c > 7.0%) on oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD) received either STII+EMPA therapy (n = 30) or STII therapy alone (n = 30). FGM was carried over 14 days, and the data were used to calculate time in range (TIR [3.9–10 mmol/L]) and compare GV parameters. 1,5-Anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) and cardiometabolic indicators of oxidative stress, inflammation, and vascular endothelial function were also compared.

Results

After treatment, the TIR percentage was significantly higher (p < 0.05), and the time below range (TBR; < 3.9 mmol/L) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the STII+EMPA group than that in the STII group. The various measured glycemic parameters were significantly lower, and the average daily dose of insulin was also significantly lower in patients with STII+EMPA treatment (all p < 0.05). Plasma 1,5-AG levels were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the STII+EMPA group than that in the control group.

Conclusions

Newly diagnosed patients with T2DM or with poor glycemic control on OAD attained greater benefit and lower GV from STII+EMPA treatment than that for STII treatment alone. The 1,5-AG marker is a good indicator of the effects of short-term glycemic control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

GV:

Glycemic variability

FGM:

Flash glucose monitoring

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

STII:

Short-term intensive insulin infusion

EMPA:

Empagliflozin

FPG:

Fasting plasma glucose

HbA1c :

Hemoglobin A1c

OAD:

Oral antidiabetic drugs

TIR:

Time in range

1,5-AG:

1,5-Anhydroglucitol

TBR:

Time below range

SGLT2:

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor

BMI:

Body mass index

MBG:

Mean blood glucose

LAGE:

Largest amplitude of glycemic excursions

SDBG:

Standard deviation of blood glucose

MAGE:

Mean amplitude of glucose excursions

CV:

Coefficient of variation

MODD:

Mean daily differences

GA:

Glycated albumin

TC:

Total cholesterol

TG:

Triglycerides

HDL-C:

High-density plasma glucose

LDL-C:

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

Hs-CRP:

Hypersensitive C-reactive protein

MDA:

Malondialdehyde

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-α

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

8-OHdG:

8-Hydroxydeoxyguanosine

8-iso-PGF2α:

8-Isoprostaglandin F2α

vWF:

von Willebrand Factor

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

References

  1. Li Y, Teng D, Shi X, et al. Prevalence of diabetes recorded in mainland China using 2018 diagnostic criteria from the American Diabetes Association: national cross sectional study. BMJ. 2020;369:m997Published 2020 Apr 28. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m997.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sun B, Luo Z, Zhou J. Comprehensive elaboration of glycemic variability in diabetic macrovascular and microvascular complications. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20(1):9Published 2021 Jan 7 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-020-01200-7.

  3. Handsaker JC, Brown SJ, Bowling FL, et al. Contributory factors to unsteadiness during walking up and down stairs in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(11):3047–53. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-0955.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gómez-Peralta F, Carramiñana-Barrera F, Félix-Redondo FJ, Fraile-Gómez J, Extreme Rescue Study Group. Glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes switching from premixed insulin to long-acting basal insulin analogue plus oral antidiabetic drugs: an observational study. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(10):959–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.03000.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou J, Zheng F, Guo X, et al. Glargine insulin/gliclazide MR combination therapy is more effective than premixed insulin monotherapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2015;31(7):725–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2661.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Neeland IJ, Salahuddin U, McGuire DK. A safety evaluation of empagliflozin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016;15(3):393–402. https://doi.org/10.1517/14740338.2016.1135900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zinman B, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, et al. Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of a randomized, placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcome trial of empagliflozin (EMPA-REG OUTCOME™). Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014;13:102Published 2014 Jun 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-13-102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Liang M, McEvoy JW, Chen Y, et al. Association of a biomarker of glucose peaks, 1,5-anhydroglucitol, with subclinical cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(10):1752–9. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-0840.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yaron M, Roitman E, Aharon-Hananel G, et al. Effect of flash glucose monitoring technology on glycemic control and treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(7):1178–84. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-0166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhihua H, Qiuxiao Z, Yanhong G, et al. Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in combination with short-term intensive insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a prospective, open-label, parallel-controlled randomized clinical trial. Chinese Journal of Diabetes. 2021;13(12):1141–7. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115791-20210708-00373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chinese diabetes society. Chinese guidelines for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes (2017 edition). Zhonghua Tang Niao Bing Za Zhi. 2018, 10(1):4-67. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2018.01.003

  12. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S13–28. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-S002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Committee for the Expert Consensus on intensive short-term insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes. Expert consensus on intensive short-term insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes (2021edition). Zhonghua Tang Niao Bing Za Zhi. 2022;14(1):21–31. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115791-20211109-00611.

  14. Danne T, Nimri R, Battelino T, et al. International consensus on use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(12):1631–40. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-1600.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tuttle KR, Levin A, Nangaku M, et al. Safety of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: pooled analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(6):1445–52. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-2034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Filippatos G, Butler J, Farmakis D, et al. Empagliflozin for heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction with and without diabetes. Circulation. 2022;146(9):676–86. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059785.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Maiorino MI, Bellastella G, Casciano O, et al. The effects of subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple insulin injections on glucose variability in young adults with type 1 diabetes: the 2-year follow-up of the observational METRO study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018;20(2):117–26. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2017.0334.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou Z, Sun B, Huang S, et al. Glycemic variability: adverse clinical outcomes and how to improve it? Cardiovasc Diabetol 2020;19(1):102. Published 2020 Jul 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-020-01085-6

  19. Li LQ, Yao MY, Ma JX, Xue P, Li YK. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion combined with liraglutide reduced glycemic variability and oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a study based on the flash glucose monitoring system. Endocr J. 2019;66(10):871–80. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ19-0016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Raj R, Mishra R, Jha N, et al. Time in range, as measured by continuous glucose monitor, as a predictor of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2022;10(1):e002573. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002573.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma C, Sheng J, Liu Z, Guo M. Excretion rates of 1,5-anhydro-D-glucitol, uric acid and microalbuminuria as glycemic control indexes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44291Published 2017 Mar 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44291.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chehregosha H, Khamseh ME, Malek M, Hosseinpanah F, Ismail-Beigi F. A view beyond HbA1c: role of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Ther. 2019;10(3):853–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0619-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gameiro J, Agapito Fonseca J, Jorge S, Lopes JA. Acute kidney injury definition and diagnosis: a narrative review. J Clin Med 2018;7(10):307. Published 2018 Sep 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7100307

  24. Tatsch E, De Carvalho JA, Hausen BS, et al. Oxidative DNA damage is associated with inflammatory response, insulin resistance and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes. Mutat Res. 2015;782:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2015.10.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Goldberg RB. Cytokine and cytokine-like inflammation markers, endothelial dysfunction, and imbalanced coagulation in development of diabetes and its complications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(9):3171–82. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-2534.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Li C, Zhang J, Xue M, et al. SGLT2 inhibition with empagliflozin attenuates myocardial oxidative stress and fibrosis in diabetic mice heart. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18(1):15Published 2019 Feb 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-019-0816-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Li J, Shen X. Effect of rosiglitazone on inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress after intensive insulin therapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2019;11:35Published 2019 May 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-019-0432-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Li C, Zhang J, Xue M, et al. SGLT2 inhibition with empagliflozin attenuates myocardial oxidative stress and fibrosis in diabetic mice heart. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18x(1):15Published 2019 Feb 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-019-0816-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Koyani CN, Plastira I, Sourij H, et al. Empagliflozin protects heart from inflammation and energy depletion via AMPK activation. Pharmacol Res. 2020;158:104870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104870.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank all the participants of this study and the medical care professionals for their valuable contributions. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

Funding

This work was supported by Hebei Health Commission, grant number: 20200924.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZH: research design, statistical analyses and interpretation of the data, drafting, and revision of the manuscript; LZ, YZ, YH, HZ, and MW: research design, statistics guidance, and revision of the manuscript; QZ, YG, and ZL: research design and conduction, collection of the data, and assistance in data analysis; YC, LJ, XZ, XW, JW, JZ, and HH: research conduction and collection of the data. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lihui Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol was approved by the ethics committee of The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University (No.2019-R078). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Trial registration

ChiCTR1900022412

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hao, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Q. et al. Empagliflozin combined with short-term intensive insulin therapy improves glycemic variability and 1,5-anhydroglucitol in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-023-01271-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-023-01271-8

Keywords

Navigation