Abstract
Objective
We aimed to compare glycemic variability (GV) parameters using both a flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system and cardiometabolic risk parameters in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) between cohorts receiving short-term intensive insulin infusion (STII) plus empagliflozin (EMPA) combination therapy vs. STII therapy alone.
Methods
In a 2-week, open-label, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial, newly diagnosed patients with T2DM [fasting plasma glucose (FPG) > 11.1 mmol/L or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) > 9.0%] or patients with poor glycemic control (HbA1c > 7.0%) on oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD) received either STII+EMPA therapy (n = 30) or STII therapy alone (n = 30). FGM was carried over 14 days, and the data were used to calculate time in range (TIR [3.9–10 mmol/L]) and compare GV parameters. 1,5-Anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) and cardiometabolic indicators of oxidative stress, inflammation, and vascular endothelial function were also compared.
Results
After treatment, the TIR percentage was significantly higher (p < 0.05), and the time below range (TBR; < 3.9 mmol/L) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the STII+EMPA group than that in the STII group. The various measured glycemic parameters were significantly lower, and the average daily dose of insulin was also significantly lower in patients with STII+EMPA treatment (all p < 0.05). Plasma 1,5-AG levels were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the STII+EMPA group than that in the control group.
Conclusions
Newly diagnosed patients with T2DM or with poor glycemic control on OAD attained greater benefit and lower GV from STII+EMPA treatment than that for STII treatment alone. The 1,5-AG marker is a good indicator of the effects of short-term glycemic control.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- GV:
-
Glycemic variability
- FGM:
-
Flash glucose monitoring
- T2DM:
-
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
- STII:
-
Short-term intensive insulin infusion
- EMPA:
-
Empagliflozin
- FPG:
-
Fasting plasma glucose
- HbA1c :
-
Hemoglobin A1c
- OAD:
-
Oral antidiabetic drugs
- TIR:
-
Time in range
- 1,5-AG:
-
1,5-Anhydroglucitol
- TBR:
-
Time below range
- SGLT2:
-
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor
- BMI:
-
Body mass index
- MBG:
-
Mean blood glucose
- LAGE:
-
Largest amplitude of glycemic excursions
- SDBG:
-
Standard deviation of blood glucose
- MAGE:
-
Mean amplitude of glucose excursions
- CV:
-
Coefficient of variation
- MODD:
-
Mean daily differences
- GA:
-
Glycated albumin
- TC:
-
Total cholesterol
- TG:
-
Triglycerides
- HDL-C:
-
High-density plasma glucose
- LDL-C:
-
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
- Hs-CRP:
-
Hypersensitive C-reactive protein
- MDA:
-
Malondialdehyde
- TNF-α:
-
Tumor necrosis factor-α
- IL-6:
-
Interleukin-6
- 8-OHdG:
-
8-Hydroxydeoxyguanosine
- 8-iso-PGF2α:
-
8-Isoprostaglandin F2α
- vWF:
-
von Willebrand Factor
- VEGF:
-
Vascular endothelial growth factor
- ELISA:
-
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
References
Li Y, Teng D, Shi X, et al. Prevalence of diabetes recorded in mainland China using 2018 diagnostic criteria from the American Diabetes Association: national cross sectional study. BMJ. 2020;369:m997Published 2020 Apr 28. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m997.
Sun B, Luo Z, Zhou J. Comprehensive elaboration of glycemic variability in diabetic macrovascular and microvascular complications. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20(1):9Published 2021 Jan 7 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-020-01200-7.
Handsaker JC, Brown SJ, Bowling FL, et al. Contributory factors to unsteadiness during walking up and down stairs in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(11):3047–53. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-0955.
Gómez-Peralta F, Carramiñana-Barrera F, Félix-Redondo FJ, Fraile-Gómez J, Extreme Rescue Study Group. Glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes switching from premixed insulin to long-acting basal insulin analogue plus oral antidiabetic drugs: an observational study. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(10):959–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.03000.x.
Zhou J, Zheng F, Guo X, et al. Glargine insulin/gliclazide MR combination therapy is more effective than premixed insulin monotherapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2015;31(7):725–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2661.
Neeland IJ, Salahuddin U, McGuire DK. A safety evaluation of empagliflozin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016;15(3):393–402. https://doi.org/10.1517/14740338.2016.1135900.
Zinman B, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, et al. Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of a randomized, placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcome trial of empagliflozin (EMPA-REG OUTCOME™). Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014;13:102Published 2014 Jun 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-13-102.
Liang M, McEvoy JW, Chen Y, et al. Association of a biomarker of glucose peaks, 1,5-anhydroglucitol, with subclinical cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(10):1752–9. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-0840.
Yaron M, Roitman E, Aharon-Hananel G, et al. Effect of flash glucose monitoring technology on glycemic control and treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(7):1178–84. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-0166.
Zhihua H, Qiuxiao Z, Yanhong G, et al. Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in combination with short-term intensive insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a prospective, open-label, parallel-controlled randomized clinical trial. Chinese Journal of Diabetes. 2021;13(12):1141–7. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115791-20210708-00373.
Chinese diabetes society. Chinese guidelines for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes (2017 edition). Zhonghua Tang Niao Bing Za Zhi. 2018, 10(1):4-67. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2018.01.003
American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S13–28. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-S002.
Committee for the Expert Consensus on intensive short-term insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes. Expert consensus on intensive short-term insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes (2021edition). Zhonghua Tang Niao Bing Za Zhi. 2022;14(1):21–31. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115791-20211109-00611.
Danne T, Nimri R, Battelino T, et al. International consensus on use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(12):1631–40. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-1600.
Tuttle KR, Levin A, Nangaku M, et al. Safety of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: pooled analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(6):1445–52. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-2034.
Filippatos G, Butler J, Farmakis D, et al. Empagliflozin for heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction with and without diabetes. Circulation. 2022;146(9):676–86. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059785.
Maiorino MI, Bellastella G, Casciano O, et al. The effects of subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple insulin injections on glucose variability in young adults with type 1 diabetes: the 2-year follow-up of the observational METRO study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018;20(2):117–26. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2017.0334.
Zhou Z, Sun B, Huang S, et al. Glycemic variability: adverse clinical outcomes and how to improve it? Cardiovasc Diabetol 2020;19(1):102. Published 2020 Jul 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-020-01085-6
Li LQ, Yao MY, Ma JX, Xue P, Li YK. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion combined with liraglutide reduced glycemic variability and oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a study based on the flash glucose monitoring system. Endocr J. 2019;66(10):871–80. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ19-0016.
Raj R, Mishra R, Jha N, et al. Time in range, as measured by continuous glucose monitor, as a predictor of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2022;10(1):e002573. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002573.
Ma C, Sheng J, Liu Z, Guo M. Excretion rates of 1,5-anhydro-D-glucitol, uric acid and microalbuminuria as glycemic control indexes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44291Published 2017 Mar 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44291.
Chehregosha H, Khamseh ME, Malek M, Hosseinpanah F, Ismail-Beigi F. A view beyond HbA1c: role of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Ther. 2019;10(3):853–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0619-1.
Gameiro J, Agapito Fonseca J, Jorge S, Lopes JA. Acute kidney injury definition and diagnosis: a narrative review. J Clin Med 2018;7(10):307. Published 2018 Sep 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7100307
Tatsch E, De Carvalho JA, Hausen BS, et al. Oxidative DNA damage is associated with inflammatory response, insulin resistance and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes. Mutat Res. 2015;782:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2015.10.003.
Goldberg RB. Cytokine and cytokine-like inflammation markers, endothelial dysfunction, and imbalanced coagulation in development of diabetes and its complications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(9):3171–82. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-2534.
Li C, Zhang J, Xue M, et al. SGLT2 inhibition with empagliflozin attenuates myocardial oxidative stress and fibrosis in diabetic mice heart. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18(1):15Published 2019 Feb 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-019-0816-2.
Li J, Shen X. Effect of rosiglitazone on inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress after intensive insulin therapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2019;11:35Published 2019 May 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-019-0432-z.
Li C, Zhang J, Xue M, et al. SGLT2 inhibition with empagliflozin attenuates myocardial oxidative stress and fibrosis in diabetic mice heart. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18x(1):15Published 2019 Feb 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-019-0816-2.
Koyani CN, Plastira I, Sourij H, et al. Empagliflozin protects heart from inflammation and energy depletion via AMPK activation. Pharmacol Res. 2020;158:104870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104870.
Acknowledgment
We thank all the participants of this study and the medical care professionals for their valuable contributions. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.
Funding
This work was supported by Hebei Health Commission, grant number: 20200924.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZH: research design, statistical analyses and interpretation of the data, drafting, and revision of the manuscript; LZ, YZ, YH, HZ, and MW: research design, statistics guidance, and revision of the manuscript; QZ, YG, and ZL: research design and conduction, collection of the data, and assistance in data analysis; YC, LJ, XZ, XW, JW, JZ, and HH: research conduction and collection of the data. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The protocol was approved by the ethics committee of The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University (No.2019-R078). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Trial registration
ChiCTR1900022412
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hao, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Q. et al. Empagliflozin combined with short-term intensive insulin therapy improves glycemic variability and 1,5-anhydroglucitol in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-023-01271-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-023-01271-8