Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics and kinetic analysis of the catalytic pyrolysis of oily sludge under new nickel-ore–based catalysts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thermal analysis of oily sludge (OS) from steel mills was conducted to understand its added value. The effect of additional catalysts (calcined olivine (C-OL), iddingsite (C-ID), xiuyan jade (C-XY), and their nickel carrier on OS pyrolysis performance was also investigated. The physical properties of OS showed a large number of resins and irons. It was found that OS pyrolysis involves water evaporation, light hydrocarbon escape, the crack of resins, asphaltene decomposition, and inorganic mineral decomposition. TG results demonstrated that the prepared catalyst can effectively improve the weight loss, in which the C-OL (Ni) increased by 11.58 wt.%. The kinetic behavior of the three main weight loss zones in the catalytic pyrolysis of OS was subsequently analyzed. The apparent activation energies of the main stages of OS pyrolysis were 61.03, 18.07, and 62.92 kJ/mol, respectively. The addition of C-OL significantly reduced the apparent activation energies by 31.34, 5.74, and 44.46 kJ/mol. The evaluation of the pre-exponential factor revealed that all stages of OS pyrolysis followed a diffusion model, and the reaction path was not changed by the ore catalysts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jin X, Teng D, Fang J et al (2021) Petroleum oil and products recovery from oily sludge: characterization and analysis of pyrolysis products. Environ Res 202:111675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang L, Tong K, Wang X et al (2015) Research progress of ultrasonic technology for oil sludge treatment. Environ Protect Oil Gas Fields (in Chinese) 25:73-76+87

    Google Scholar 

  3. Song Q, Zhao H, Jia J et al (2019) Characterization of the products obtained by pyrolysis of oil sludge with steel slag in a continuous pyrolysis-magnetic separation reactor. Fuel 255:115711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang Q, Han X, Mao F et al (2014) A model for predicting solid particle behavior in petroleum sludge during centrifugation. Fuel 117:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karamalidis AK, Voudrias EA (2007) Release of Zn, Ni, Cu, SO42 and CrO42 as a function of pH from cement-based stabilized/solidified refinery oily sludge and ash from incineration of oily sludge. J Hazardous Mater 141:591–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.07.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Z, Guo Q, Liu X, Cao C (2007) Low temperature pyrolysis characteristics of oil sludge under various heating conditions. Energy Fuels 21:957–962. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef060628g

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gao N, Li J, Quan C, Tan H (2020) Product property and environmental risk assessment of heavy metals during pyrolysis of oily sludge with fly ash additive. Fuel 266:117090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kan T, Strezov V, Evans TJ (2016) Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: a review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 57:1126–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fahmy TYA, Fahmy Y, Mobarak F et al (2020) Biomass pyrolysis: past, present, and future. Environ Dev Sustain 22:17–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0200-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu X, Gholizadeh M (2019) Biomass pyrolysis: a review of the process development and challenges from initial researches up to the commercialisation stage. J Energy Chem 39:109–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2019.01.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin B, Huang Q, Chi Y (2018) Co-pyrolysis of oily sludge and rice husk for improving pyrolysis oil quality. Fuel Processing Technol 177:275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S C, Y W, N G, et al (2016) Pyrolysis of oil sludge with oil sludge ash additive employing a stirred tank reactor. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 120:511 520 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2016.06.024

  13. Shie J-L, Lin J-P, Chang C-Y et al (2003) Pyrolysis of oil sludge with additives of sodium and potassium compounds. Resour Conserv Recycl 39:51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00120-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Heng Q, Huang S, Lou W et al (2021) Study on the difference between in-situ and ex-situ catalytic pyrolysis of oily sludge. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:50500–50509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14233-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin B, Wang J, Huang Q, Chi Y (2017) Effects of potassium hydroxide on the catalytic pyrolysis of oily sludge for high-quality oil product. Fuel 200:124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.03.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hou J, Zhong D, Liu W (2022) Catalytic co-pyrolysis of oil sludge and biomass over ZSM-5 for production of aromatic platform chemicals. Chemosphere 291:132912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang F, Zhang H, Du M et al (2021) Effects of TiO2/bentonite on the pyrolysis process of oily sludge. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 20:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang Q, Hao K, Benally C et al (2022) The role and potential of attapulgite in catalytic pyrolysis of refinery waste activated sludge. Pet Sci 19:354–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2021.09.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gong Z, Zhang H, Liu C et al (2021) Co-pyrolysis characteristics and kinetic analysis of oil sludge with different additives. J Therm Sci 30:1452–1467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-021-1421-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lu C, Zhang X, Gao Y et al (2021) Parametric study of catalytic co-gasification of cotton stalk and aqueous phase from wheat straw using hydrothermal carbonation. Energy 216:119266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang X, Xu J, Ran S et al (2022) Experimental study on catalytic pyrolysis of oily sludge for H2 production under new nickel-ore-based catalysts. Energy 249:123675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang J, Xu X, Liang S et al (2018) Enhanced hydrogen production in catalytic pyrolysis of sewage sludge by red mud: thermogravimetric kinetic analysis and pyrolysis characteristics. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:7795–7807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ma X, Zhao X, Gu J, Shi J (2019) Co-gasification of coal and biomass blends using dolomite and olivine as catalysts. Renew Energy 132:509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tursun Y, Xu S, Abulikemu A, Dilinuer T (2019) Biomass gasification for hydrogen rich gas in a decoupled triple bed gasifier with olivine and NiO/olivine. Bioresour Technol 272:241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yao D, Yang H, Chen H, Williams PT (2018) Investigation of nickel-impregnated zeolite catalysts for hydrogen/syngas production from the catalytic reforming of waste polyethylene. Appl Catal B 227:477–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.01.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vyazovkin S (2002) Thermal analysis. Anal Chem 74:2749–2762. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac020219r

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pinzi S, Buratti C, Bartocci P et al (2020) A simplified method for kinetic modeling of coffee silver skin pyrolysis by coupling pseudo-components peaks deconvolution analysis and model free-isoconversional methods. Fuel 278:118260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mishra RK, Mohanty K (2018) Pyrolysis kinetics and thermal behavior of waste sawdust biomass using thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresour Technol 251:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mian I, Li X, Jian Y et al (2019) Kinetic study of biomass pellet pyrolysis by using distributed activation energy model and Coats Redfern methods and their comparison. Bioresour Technol 294:122099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Subramanian S, Ragula UBR (2020) Kinetics of catalytic and non-catalytic pyrolysis of Nerium oleander. Fuel 280:118591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vyazovkin S, Burnham AK, Favergeon L et al (2020) ICTAC Kinetics Committee recommendations for analysis of multi-step kinetics. Thermochimica Acta 689:178597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2020.178597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Trejo F, Rana MS, Ancheyta J (2010) Thermogravimetric determination of coke from asphaltenes, resins and sediments and coking kinetics of heavy crude asphaltenes. Catalysis Today 150:272–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2009.07.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sadhukhan AK, Gupta P, Saha RK (2009) Modelling of pyrolysis of large wood particles. Bioresour Technol 100:3134–3139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Coats AW, Redfern JP (1964) Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data. Nature 201:68–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/201068a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Alves JLF, da Silva JCG, Mumbach GD et al (2022) Prospection of catole coconut (Syagrus cearensis) as a new bioenergy feedstock: insights from physicochemical characterization, pyrolysis kinetics, and thermodynamics parameters. Renew Energy 181:207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.09.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Spiecker PM, Gawrys KL, Trail CB, Kilpatrick PK (2003) Effects of petroleum resins on asphaltene aggregation and water-in-oil emulsion formation. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem and Eng Aspects 220:9–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(03)00079-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Moncayo-Riascos I, Taborda E, Hoyos BA et al (2020) Effect of resin/asphaltene ratio on the rheological behavior of asphaltene solutions in a de-asphalted oil and p-xylene: a theoretical–experimental approach. J Mol Liq 315:113754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schorling P-C, Kessel DG, Rahimian I (1999) Influence of the crude oil resin/asphaltene ratio on the stability of oil/water emulsions. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects 152:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(98)00686-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gupta GK, Mondal MK (2019) Kinetics and thermodynamic analysis of maize cob pyrolysis for its bioenergy potential using thermogravimetric analyzer. J Therm Anal Calorim 137:1431–1441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08053-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Badshah SL, Shah Z, Alves JLF et al (2021) Kinetic and thermodynamics study of the pyrolytic process of the freshwater macroalga, Chara vulgaris. J Appl Phycol 33:2511–2521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-021-02459-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20201365); Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Process Enhancement and New Energy Equipment Technology; the Top-notch Academic Program Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions; Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (19KJB610001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jiayu Xu: conceptualization, investigation, writing original draft. Longyuan Yang: validation, writing–review and editing. Hui Xu: supervision, resources. Yue Jiang: visualization, formal analysis. Yuan Guo: formal analysis. Shuai Ran: visualization. Ying Gao: conceptualization, writing–review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Xu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 2878 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, J., Yang, L., Xu, H. et al. Characteristics and kinetic analysis of the catalytic pyrolysis of oily sludge under new nickel-ore–based catalysts. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 14, 10421–10429 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03069-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03069-w

Keywords

Navigation