Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Thermal behavior and kinetic study on the co-pyrolysis of biomass with polymer waste

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The intrinsic smaller hydrogen to carbon (H/C) ratio for lignocellulosic biomass significantly affects the yield and production of target products. Co-pyrolyzing of biomass with hydrogen-rich chemicals or raw materials offers an alternative pathway to improve the H/C ratio of feedstock and thus upgrade the bio-oils. In this work, the co-pyrolysis of rice husk (RH) with epoxy resin (ER) was attempted, and its kinetic was comprehensively studied using the model-free and model-fitting methods. The co-pyrolysis mechanism and kinetic compensation effects were probed as well. The thermogravimetric analysis indicated that the decomposition of RH-ER blend with a weight ratio of 1:1 can be divided into three stages with heating temperatures of 27–270, 270–500, and 500–850 °C and corresponding mass loss of 6.86, 49.30, and 5.60%, respectively. For the model-free models applied, the activation energies (Ea) displayed an uptrend in the degree of conversion (α) range of 0.05–0.2 and a downtrend in α range of 0.2–0.6. Comparing the six methods, the Ea values from Friedman method was significantly larger than those from other models. The Flynn–Wall–Ozawa (FWO) method was more reliable with higher correlation coefficients. The obtained Ea values gradually increased from 65.06 to 159.55 kJ/mol (0.05 ≤ α ≤ 0.20) and then decreased to 38.32 kJ/mol (0.2 < α ≤ 0.60). The Ea values calculated based on three-dimensional diffusion (Jander equation) was comparable to that from the FWO method and could be responsible for the co-pyrolysis mechanism for RH-ER blend. An excellent linear relationship lnA = 0.2058Ea − 2.63095 can be observed, indicating that the compensation effect existed between the Ea and lnA during RH and ER co-pyrolysis. The pre-exponential factor (A) was determined as 2.9E8 min−1 using the average Ea value of 107.48 kJ/mol. Through this study, it is expected to promote the collaborative disposal of multisource solid waste.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Wang C, Zhang X, Liu Q, et al. A review of conversion of lignocellulose biomass to liquid transport fuels by integrated refining strategies[J]. Fuel Process Technol 2020, 208: 106485.

  2. Hu B, Lu Q, Wu Y et al (2020) Insight into the formation mechanism of levoglucosenone in phosphoric acid-catalyzed fast pyrolysis of cellulose[J]. J Energy Chem 43:78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dai G, Wang K, Wang G et al (2019) Initial pyrolysis mechanism of cellulose revealed by in-situ DRIFT analysis and theoretical calculation[J]. Combust Flame 208:273–280

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Qi W, Liu G, He C et al (2019) An efficient magnetic carbon-based solid acid treatment for corncob saccharification with high selectivity for xylose and enhanced enzymatic digestibility[J]. Green Chem 21(6):1292–1304

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang Q, Zhou H, Bartocci P et al (2021) Prospective contributions of biomass pyrolysis to China’s 2050 carbon reduction and renewable energy goals[J]. Nat Commun 12(1):1–12

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Qi W, Yang W, Xu Q et al (2020) Comprehensive research on the influence of nonlignocellulosic components on the pyrolysis behavior of Chinese distiller’s grain[J]. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8(8):3103–3113

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gui B, Qiao Y, Wan D et al (2013) Nascent tar formation during polyvinylchloride (PVC) pyrolysis[J]. Proc Combust Inst 34(2):2321–2329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng S, Qiao Y, Huang J et al (2019) Effects of Ca and Na acetates on nitrogen transformation during sewage sludge pyrolysis[J]. Proc Combust Inst 37(3):2715–2722

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang H, Cheng Y, Vispute TP et al (2011) Catalytic conversion of biomass-derived feedstocks into olefins and aromatics with ZSM-5: the hydrogen to carbon effective ratio[J]. Energy Environ Sci 4(6):2297–2307

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Yufei X, Jingxuan L, Jian HAHL. Alcohol-mediated reduction of biomass-derived furanic aldehydes via catalytic hydrogen transfer[Z]. 2019: 23, 2168–2179.

  11. Asadieraghi M, Daud WMAW (2015) In-situ catalytic upgrading of biomass pyrolysis vapor: co-feeding with methanol in a multi-zone fixed bed reactor[J]. Energy Convers Manage 92:448–458

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang F, Zheng Y, Zhai Q et al (2020) Catalytic co-pyrolysis of Yunnan pine and hydrogen donor over desilicated ZSM-5 for light aromatics[J]. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45(51):26929–26937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Duan D, Zhang Y, Lei H et al (2019) Renewable jet-fuel range hydrocarbons production from co-pyrolysis of lignin and soapstock with the activated carbon catalyst[J]. Waste Manage 88:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xue Y, Zhou S, Bai X (2016) Role of hydrogen transfer during catalytic copyrolysis of lignin and tetralin over HZSM-5 and HY zeolite catalysts[J]. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4(8):4237–4250

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang X, Lei H, Chen S et al (2016) Catalytic co-pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass with polymers: a critical review[J]. Green Chem 18(15):4145–4169

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Abnisa F, Daud WMAW (2014) A review on co-pyrolysis of biomass: an optional technique to obtain a high-grade pyrolysis oil[J]. Energy Convers Manage 87:71–85

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang L, Bao Z, Xia S et al (2018) Catalytic pyrolysis of biomass and polymer wastes[J]. Catalysts 8(12):659

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang Y, Dai L, Fan L et al (2017) Microwave-assisted catalytic fast co-pyrolysis of bamboo sawdust and waste tire for bio-oil production[J]. J Anal Appl Pyrol 123:224–228

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Xue Y, Bai X (2018) Synergistic enhancement of product quality through fast co-pyrolysis of acid pretreated biomass and waste plastic[J]. Energy Convers Manage 164:629–638

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Xiong J, Yu S, Wu D et al (2020) Pyrolysis treatment of nonmetal fraction of waste printed circuit boards: focusing on the fate of bromine[J]. Waste Manage Res 38(11):1251–1258

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Yao Z, Xiong J, Yu S et al (2020) Kinetic study on the slow pyrolysis of nonmetal fraction of waste printed circuit boards (NMF-WPCBs)[J]. Waste Manage Res 38(8):903–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yin F, Zhuang Q, Chang T, et al. Study on pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of mixed plastic waste[J]. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 2021.

  23. Yao Z, Yu S, Su W et al (2020) Kinetic studies on the pyrolysis of plastic waste using a combination of model-fitting and model-free methods[J]. Waste Manage Res 38:77–85

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Cortés AM, Bridgwater AV (2015) Kinetic study of the pyrolysis of miscanthus and its acid hydrolysis residue by thermogravimetric analysis[J]. Fuel Process Technol 138:184–193

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Merdun H, Laougé ZB (2021) Kinetic and thermodynamic analyses during co-pyrolysis of greenhouse wastes and coal by TGA[J]. Renew Energy 163:453–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ke Q, Wu C, Chen X. Model-free cure kinetics of additional liquid silicone rubber[J]. Thermochimica Acta. 2020, 688: 178584.

  27. Luo Q, Yao Z, Qi W et al (2021) A comprehensive study on the combustion kinetic modeling of typical electronic plastic waste—television set (TV) plastic shell[J]. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 71(6):701–710

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Badshah SL, Shah Z, Francisco Alves J L, et al. Pyrolysis of the freshwater macroalgae Spirogyra crassa: evaluating its bioenergy potential using kinetic triplet and thermodynamic parameters[J]. Renew Energy. 2021.

  29. Alves JLF, Da Silva JCG, Mumbach GD, et al. Thermo-kinetic investigation of the multi-step pyrolysis of smoked cigarette butts towards its energy recovery potential[J]. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 2020.

  30. Badshah SL, Shah Z, Alves JLF, et al. Kinetic and thermodynamics study of the pyrolytic process of the freshwater macroalga, Chara vulgaris[J]. J Appl Phycol 2021: 1–11.

  31. Zhang S, Su Y, Ding K et al (2018) Effect of inorganic species on torrefaction process and product properties of rice husk[J]. Biores Technol 265:450–455

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Kumar M, Mishra PK, Upadhyay SN. Thermal degradation of rice husk: effect of pre-treatment on kinetic and thermodynamic parameters[J]. Fuel. 2020, 268: 117164.

  33. Gan DKW, Loy ACM, Chin BLF et al (2018) Kinetics and thermodynamic analysis in one-pot pyrolysis of rice hull using renewable calcium oxide based catalysts[J]. Biores Technol 265:180–190

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Yuan S, Zhou Z, Li J et al (2010) HCN and NH3 released from biomass and soybean cake under rapid pyrolysis[J]. Energy Fuels 24(11):6166–6171

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Hao Z, Yin X, Huang Y et al (2017) Characteristics of nox precursors and their formation mechanism during pyrolysis of herb residues[J]. J Fuel Chem Technol 45(3):279–288

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Tang S, Zheng C, Yan F et al (2018) Product characteristics and kinetics of sewage sludge pyrolysis driven by alkaline earth metals[J]. Energy 153:921–932

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Ngo TNLT, Chiang K (2021) Co-thermal degradation characteristics of rice straw and sewage sludge[J]. Sustain Environ Res 31(1):1–14

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Balasundram V, Ibrahim N, Kasmani RM et al (2017) Thermogravimetric catalytic pyrolysis and kinetic studies of coconut copra and rice husk for possible maximum production of pyrolysis oil[J]. J Clean Prod 167:218–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Loy ACM, Gan DKW, Yusup S et al (2018) Thermogravimetric kinetic modelling of in-situ catalytic pyrolytic conversion of rice husk to bioenergy using rice hull ash catalyst[J]. Biores Technol 261:213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lim ACR, Chin BLF, Jawad ZA et al (2016) Kinetic analysis of rice husk pyrolysis using Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose (KAS) method[J]. Proc Eng 148:1247–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ding Y, Huang B, Li K, et al. Thermal interaction analysis of isolated hemicellulose and cellulose by kinetic parameters during biomass pyrolysis[J]. Energy. 2020, 195: 117010.

  42. Chen W, Wang C, Ong HC, et al. Torrefaction, pyrolysis and two-stage thermodegradation of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin[J]. Fuel. 2019, 258: 116168.

  43. Wang B, Xu F, Zong P et al (2019) Effects of heating rate on fast pyrolysis behavior and product distribution of Jerusalem artichoke stalk by using TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS[J]. Renew Energy 132:486–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Stefanidis SD, Kalogiannis KG, Iliopoulou EF et al (2014) A study of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis via the pyrolysis of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin[J]. J Anal Appl Pyrol 105:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang J, Minami E, Kawamoto H (2020) Thermal reactivity of hemicellulose and cellulose in cedar and beech wood cell walls[J]. J Wood Sci 66(1):41

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Dong Z, Yang H, Liu Z, et al. Effect of boron-based additives on char agglomeration and boron doped carbon microspheres structure from lignin pyrolysis[J]. Fuel. 2021, 303: 121237.

  47. Lu Q, Xie W, Hu B et al (2021) A novel interaction mechanism in lignin pyrolysis: phenolics-assisted hydrogen transfer for the decomposition of the β-O-4 linkage[J]. Combust Flame 225:395–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen M, Zhong W, Wu K et al (2020) Catalytic pyrolysis mechanism of β-O-4 type of lignin dimer: The role of H proton[J]. Energy Fuels 35(1):575–582

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Shen Y, Chen X, Ge X, et al. Thermochemical treatment of non-metallic residues from waste printed circuit board: pyrolysis vs. combustion[J]. J Clean Prod 2018, 176: 1045–1053.

  50. Chen Y, Yang J, Zhang Y et al (2018) Kinetic simulation and prediction of pyrolysis process for non-metallic fraction of waste printed circuit boards by discrete distributed activation energy model compared with isoconversional method[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(4):3636–3646

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang W, Li X, Yang R (2011) Pyrolysis and fire behaviour of epoxy resin composites based on a phosphorus-containing polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (DOPO-POSS)[J]. Polym Degrad Stab 96(10):1821–1832

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Alves JLF, Da Silva JCG, Da Silva Filho VF et al (2019) Determination of the bioenergy potential of Brazilian pine-fruit shell via pyrolysis kinetics, thermodynamic study, and evolved gas analysis[J]. BioEnergy Res 12(1):168–183

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Yao Z, Yu S, Su W et al (2019) Kinetic modeling study on the combustion treatment of cathode from spent lithium-ion batteries[J]. Waste Manage Res 38(1):100–106

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Vyazovkin S, Chrissafis K, Di Lorenzo ML et al (2014) ICTAC Kinetics Committee recommendations for collecting experimental thermal analysis data for kinetic computations[J]. Thermochim Acta 590:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Liu W, Xu J, Han J et al (2018) Kinetic and mechanism studies on pyrolysis of printed circuit boards in the absence and presence of copper[J]. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7(2):1879–1889

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Tran K, Werle S, Trinh TT, et al. Fuel characterization and thermal degradation kinetics of biomass from phytoremediation plants[J]. Biomass Bioenergy. 2020, 134: 105469.

  57. Chen W, Kuo P (2011) Isothermal torrefaction kinetics of hemicellulose, cellulose, lignin and xylan using thermogravimetric analysis[J]. Energy 36(11):6451–6460

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Fan F, Zheng Y, Huang Y et al (2017) Combustion kinetics of biochar prepared by pyrolysis of Macadamia shells[J]. BioResour 12(2):3918–3932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Hu M, Chen Z, Wang S et al (2016) Thermogravimetric kinetics of lignocellulosic biomass slow pyrolysis using distributed activation energy model, Fraser-Suzuki deconvolution, and iso-conversional method[J]. Energy Convers Manage 118:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. LTY21B070002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Not applicable.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhitong Yao or Wei Qi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, Z., Cai, D., Chen, X. et al. Thermal behavior and kinetic study on the co-pyrolysis of biomass with polymer waste. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 14, 1651–1662 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02480-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02480-7

Keywords

Navigation