Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bioconversion of coconut husk fibre through biorefinery process of alkaline pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mature coconut husk (MCH) and young coconut husk (YCH) are abundantly generated as a by-product from coconut-based industry, which eventually lead to environmental pollution. However, the lignocellulose content in both types of coconut husk has the potential to be exploited as feedstock by way of biochemical processes through the concept of biorefinery. In this study, the MCH and YCH were subjected to alkaline pretreatment by sodium hydroxide (NaOH). Subsequently, enzymatic hydrolysis using Accellerase® 1500 was conducted to convert the lignocellulosic materials into fermentable sugars. The changes in surface morphology of MCH and YCH throughout the process were also observed. Alkaline pretreatment successfully removed 20.15 and 31.17% of lignin content in MCH and YCH, respectively. The increase in cellulose content after alkaline pretreatment was detected around 17% for MCH and 20% for YCH. For optimisation of enzymatic hydrolysis, 10% enzyme loading for 24 h showed significantly higher (p < 0.05) reducing sugar content in MCH and YCH hydrolysates of 19.17 g/L and 24.33 g/L, respectively. The efficiency of the hydrolysis process was proven by high sugar recovery of 71.23% for MCH and 89.49% for YCH. Concurrently, the morphological analysis showed the effect of the treatments on the surface of MCH and YCH, where the structure became swollen and collapsed as the majority of lignocellulosic materials were digested. Therefore, the study pointed out the potential of reutilising MCH and YCH as alternative resources for the future biochemical process feedstock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang Y, Iqbal A, Qadri R (2018) Breeding of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.): the tree of life. In: Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Fruits. Springer, Berlin, pp 673–725

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. FAO (2018) Coconut crops - area harvested & production quantity. FAOSTAT. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed 19 Jun 2020 19 Jun 2020

  3. Hayatullina Z, Mohamed N, Soelaiman I-N, Muhammad N (2018) Virgin coconut oil polyphenol effects on antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation on osteoblast cell. Sains Malays 47(10):2401–2409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mohamad Ja'afar S, Mohd Khalid R, Othaman R (2019) Coconut oil based microemulsion formulations for hair care product application. Sains Malays 48(3):599–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tun MM, Juchelkova D, Win MM, Thu AM, Puchor T (2019) Biomass energy: an overview of biomass sources, energy potential, and management in Southeast Asian countries. Resources 8(2):81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anuar MF, Fen YW, Zaid MHM, Matori KA, Khaidir REM (2018) Synthesis and structural properties of coconut husk as potential silica source. Results Phys 11:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tooy D, Nelwan L, Pangkerego F (2014) Evaluation of biomass gasification using coconut husks in producing energy to generate small-scale electricity. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Energy and Manufacturing Engineering (ICAEME), pp 84–88

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reddy N, Yang Y (2015) Innovative biofibers from renewable resources. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Bakker R (2013) Availability of lignocellulosic feedstocks for lactic acid production-feedstock availability, lactic acid production potential and selection criteria. Wageningen UR-Food & Biobased Research.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carre B, Hebrant M, Brosse N, Latif NHA, Hussin MH (2019) Effect of different prehydrolysis processes on lignin extractability of coconut husk fibres. J Phys Sci 30:207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saiful Bahari (2020) Sisa Pertanian Sumber Tenaga Boleh Diperbaharui di Malaysia. https://www.majalahsains.com/sisa-pertanian-sumber-tenaga-boleh-diperbaharui-di-malaysia/. Accessed 23 March 2020

  12. Clark JH (2017) From waste to wealth using green chemistry: the way to long-term stability. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 8:10–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo H, Wang X-D, Lee D-J (2018) Proteomic researches for lignocellulose-degrading enzymes: a mini-review. Bioresour Technol 265:532–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mupondwa E, Li X, Tabil L, Sokhansanj S, Adapa P (2017) Status of Canada’s lignocellulosic ethanol: Part I: pretreatment technologies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:178–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hassan SS, Williams GA, Jaiswal AK (2018) Emerging technologies for the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 262:310–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. He J, Huang C, Lai C, Huang C, Li X, Yong Q (2018) Elucidation of structure-inhibition relationship of monosaccharides derived pseudo-lignin in enzymatic hydrolysis. Ind Crop Prod 113:368–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shinde SD, Meng X, Kumar R, Ragauskas AJ (2018) Recent advances in understanding the pseudo-lignin formation in a lignocellulosic biorefinery. Green Chem 20(10):2192–2205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen HZ, Liu ZH (2017) Enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass from low to high solids loading. Eng Life Sci 17(5):489–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ezeilo UR, Zakaria II, Huyop F, Wahab RA (2017) Enzymatic breakdown of lignocellulosic biomass: the role of glycosyl hydrolases and lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 31(4):647–662

    Google Scholar 

  20. Luo X, Liu J, Zheng P, Li M, Zhou Y, Huang L, Chen L, Shuai L (2019) Promoting enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass by inexpensive soy protein. Biotechnol Biofuels 12(1):51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cabral MMS, de Souza Abud AK, de Farias Silva CE, Almeida RMRG (2016) Bioethanol production from coconut husk fiber. Ciênc Rural 46(10):1872–1877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D (2008) Determination of structure carbohydrates and lignin in biomass: laboratory analytical procedures (LAP). Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42618 [Internet].

  23. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D (2008) Determination of ash in biomass: laboratory analytical procedures (LAP). Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42622 [Internet].

  24. Garriga M, Almaraz M, Marchiaro A (2017) Determination of reducing sugars in extracts of Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) algae by UV-visible spectrophotometry (DNS method). Actas Inga 3:173–179

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sengupta S, Basu G (2016) Properties of coconut fiber. Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering 2015

  26. Carrijo O, Liz R, Makishima N (2002) Fiber of green coconut shell as an agricultural substrate. Hortic Bras 20(4):533–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lomelí-Ramírez MG, Anda RR, Satyanarayana KG, de Muniz GIB, Iwakiri S (2018) Comparative study of the characteristics of green and brown coconut fibers for the development of green composites. BioRes 13(1):1637–1660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nikhontha K, Krisanapook K, Imsabai W (2019) Fruit growth, endocarp lignification, and boron and calcium concentrations in Nam Hom (aromatic) coconut during fruit development. Journal of ISSAAS 25(1):21–31

    Google Scholar 

  29. Geitmann A (2010) Mechanical modeling and structural analysis of the primary plant cell wall. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13(6):693–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vassilev SV, Vassileva CG, Song Y-C, Li W-Y, Feng J (2017) Ash contents and ash-forming elements of biomass and their significance for solid biofuel combustion. Fuel 208:377–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mahato D, Prasad R, Mathur B (2009) Surface morphological, band and lattice structural studies of cellulosic fiber coir under mercerization by ESCA, IR and XRD techniques. Indian J Pure Appl Phys 47:643–647

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fatmawati A, Agustriyanto R, Liasari Y (2013) Enzymatic hydrolysis of alkaline pretreated coconut coir. Bul Chem React Eng Catal 8(1):34–39

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sangian H, Widjaja A (2018) The effect of alkaline concentration on coconut husk crystallinity and the yield of sugars released. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  34. de Araújo CKC, de Oliveira CA, de Araújo Padilha CE, de Sousa Júnior FC, do Nascimento RJA, de Macedo GR, dos Santos ES (2017) Enhancing enzymatic hydrolysis of coconut husk through Pseudomonas aeruginosa AP 029/GLVIIA rhamnolipid preparation. Bioresour Technol 237:20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Łukajtis R, Rybarczyk P, Kucharska K, Konopacka-Łyskawa D, Słupek E, Wychodnik K, Kamiński M (2018) Optimization of saccharification conditions of lignocellulosic biomass under alkaline pre-treatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Energies 11(4):886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gonçalves FA, Ruiz HA, dos Santos ES, Teixeira JA, de Macedo GR (2016) Bioethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia stipitis and Zymomonas mobilis from delignified coconut fibre mature and lignin extraction according to biorefinery concept. Renew Energy 94:353–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gonçalves FA, Ruiz HA, da Costa NC, dos Santos ES, Teixeira JA, de Macedo GR (2014) Comparison of delignified coconuts waste and cactus for fuel-ethanol production by the simultaneous and semi-simultaneous saccharification and fermentation strategies. Fuel 131:66–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. da Costa NC, de Araújo Padilha CE, de Jesus AA, de Santana Souza DF, de Assis CF, de Sousa Junior FC, dos Santos ES (2019) Pressurized pretreatment and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with in situ detoxification to increase bioethanol production from green coconut fibers. Ind Crop Prod 130:259–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ding TY, Hii SL, Ong L (2012) Comparison of pretreatment strategies for conversion of coconut husk fiber to fermentable sugars. BioResources 7(2):1540–1547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Putrino FM, Tedesco M, Bodini RB, de Oliveira AL (2020) Study of supercritical carbon dioxide pretreatment processes on green coconut fiber to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Bioresources Technology:123387

  41. Kim JS, Lee Y, Kim TH (2016) A review on alkaline pretreatment technology for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 199:42–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. McIntosh S, Vancov T (2011) Optimisation of dilute alkaline pretreatment for enzymatic saccharification of wheat straw. Biomass Bioenergy 35(7):3094–3103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kumar AK, Sharma S (2017) Recent updates on different methods of pretreatment of lignocellulosic feedstocks: a review. Bioresour Bioprocess 4(1):7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Soontornchaiboon W, Kim SM, Pawongrat R (2016) Effects of alkaline combined with ultrasonic pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of agricultural wastes for high reducing sugar production. Sains Malays 45(6):955–962

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kumar AK, Parikh BS, Cotta MA (2018) Application of natural deep eutectic solvents in biomass pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification and cellulosic ethanol production. Mater Today Proc 5(11):23057–23063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jnawali P, Kumar V, Tanwar B, Hirdyani H, Gupta P (2018) Enzymatic production of xylooligosaccharides from brown coconut husk treated with sodium hydroxide. Waste Biomass Valor 9(10):1757–1766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bukhari NA, Loh SK, Bakar NA, Ismail M (2017) Hydrolysis of residual starch from sago pith residue and its fermentation to bioethanol. Sains Malays 46(8):1269–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. dos Santos AC, Ximenes E, Kim Y, Ladisch MR (2019) Lignin–enzyme interactions in the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Trends Biotechnol 37(5):518–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Fatmawati A, Agustriyanto R (2015) Kinetic study of enzymatic hydrolysis of acid-pretreated coconut coir. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol 1. AIP Publishing LLC, p 030012

  50. Robinson PK (2015) Enzymes: principles and biotechnological applications. Essays Biochem 59:1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lin L, Yan R, Liu Y, Jiang W (2010) In-depth investigation of enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass wastes based on three major components: cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Bioresour Technol 101(21):8217–8223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sugiharto YEC, Harimawan A, Kresnowati MTAP, Purwadi R, Mariyana R, Fitriana HN, Hosen HF (2016) Enzyme feeding strategies for better fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysis of empty fruit bunch. Bioresour Technol 207:175–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Du J, Cao Y, Liu G, Zhao J, Li X, Qu Y (2017) Identifying and overcoming the effect of mass transfer limitation on decreased yield in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose at high solid concentrations. Bioresour Technol 229:88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Marcos M, García-Cubero MT, González-Benito G, Coca M, Bolado S, Lucas S (2013) Optimization of the enzymatic hydrolysis conditions of steam-exploded wheat straw for maximum glucose and xylose recovery. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 88(2):237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Gabhane J, William SP, Gadhe A, Rath R, Vaidya AN, Wate S (2014) Pretreatment of banana agricultural waste for bio-ethanol production: individual and interactive effects of acid and alkali pretreatments with autoclaving, microwave heating and ultrasonication. Waste Manag 34(2):498–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Muharja M, Junianti F, Ranggina D, Nurtono T, Widjaja A (2018) An integrated green process: subcritical water, enzymatic hydrolysis, and fermentation, for biohydrogen production from coconut husk. Bioresour Technol 249:268–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kadam KL, Rydholm EC, McMillan JD (2004) Development and validation of a kinetic model for enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol Prog 20(3):698–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Gao D, Chundawat SP, Sethi A, Balan V, Gnanakaran S, Dale BE (2013) Increased enzyme binding to substrate is not necessary for more efficient cellulose hydrolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(27):10922–10927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kim I, Han J-I (2012) Optimization of alkaline pretreatment conditions for enhancing glucose yield of rice straw by response surface methodology. Biomass Bioenergy 46:210–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Bensah EC (2013) Mensah M (2013) Chemical pretreatment methods for the production of cellulosic ethanol: technologies and innovations. Int J Chem Eng 2013:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Khatri V, Meddeb-Mouelhi F, Adjallé K, Barnabé S, Beauregard M (2018) Determination of optimal biomass pretreatment strategies for biofuel production: investigation of relationships between surface-exposed polysaccharides and their enzymatic conversion using carbohydrate-binding modules. Biotechnol Biofuels 11(1):144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Binod P, Janu K, Sindhu R, Pandey A (2011) Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production. In: Biofuels. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 229–250

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  63. Xu J, Cheng JJ (2011) Pretreatment of switchgrass for sugar production with the combination of sodium hydroxide and lime. Bioresour Technol 102(4):3861–3868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Gonçalves FA, Ruiz HA, dos Santos ES, Teixeira JA, de Macedo GRJW, Valorization B (2019) Valorization, comparison and characterization of coconuts waste and cactus in a biorefinery context using NaClO 2–C 2 H 4 O 2 and sequential NaClO 2–C 2 H 4 O 2/autohydrolysis pretreatment. Waste Biomass Valor 10(8):2249–2262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Soares J, Demeke MM, Van de Velde M, Foulquié-Moreno MR, Kerstens D, Sels BF, Verplaetse A, Fernandes AAR, Thevelein JM, Fernandes PMB (2017) Fed-batch production of green coconut hydrolysates for high-gravity second-generation bioethanol fermentation with cellulosic yeast. Bioresour Technol 244:234–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Zaini NABM, Chatzifragkou A, Charalampopoulos D (2019) Alkaline fractionation and enzymatic saccharification of wheat dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS). Food Bioprod Process 118:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Prasad S, Pavithran C, Rohatgi P (1983) Alkali treatment of coir fibres for coir-polyester composites. J Mater Sci 18(5):1443–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Brahmakumar M, Pavithran C, Pillai R (2005) Coconut fibre reinforced polyethylene composites: effect of natural waxy surface layer of the fibre on fibre/matrix interfacial bonding and strength of composites. Compos Sci Technol 65(3-4):563–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Yew BS, Muhamad M, Moha S (2019) Effect of alkaline treatment on structural characterisation, thermal degradation and water absorption ability of coir fibre polymer composites. Sains Malays 48(3):653–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Xu J, Cheng JJ, Sharma-Shivappa RR, Burns JC (2010) Sodium hydroxide pretreatment of switchgrass for ethanol production. Energy Fuel 24(3):2113–2119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Arsyad M, Wardana I, Irawan YS (2015) The morphology of coconut fiber surface under chemical treatment. Matéria (Rio de Janeiro) 20(1):169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Dong M, Wang S, Xu F, Wang J, Yang N, Li Q, Chen J, Li W (2019) Pretreatment of sweet sorghum straw and its enzymatic digestion: insight into the structural changes and visualization of hydrolysis process. Biotechnol Biofuels 12(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful and would like to thank the Department of Food Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, for providing the necessary facilities to conduct this research.

Funding

This research was funded by the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia for Research Grant Scheme (GGPM-2018-066).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Food Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Malaysia

    Nur Akmal Solehah Din, Seng Joe Lim, Mohamad Yusof Maskat & Nurul Aqilah Mohd Zaini

Authors
  1. Nur Akmal Solehah Din
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seng Joe Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohamad Yusof Maskat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nurul Aqilah Mohd Zaini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nurul Aqilah Mohd Zaini.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Din, N.A.S., Lim, S.J., Maskat, M.Y. et al. Bioconversion of coconut husk fibre through biorefinery process of alkaline pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 11, 815–826 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00895-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00895-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation