Abstract
This study aims to document and examine mathematics teacher educators’ (MTEs) knowledge sources in teacher education practices. The study adopts a mixed-method, embedded research design. Data were collected via a questionnaire with elicitations about MTEs’ descriptive features as well as with open-ended items. Target population was all MTEs working in mathematics education departments across Turkish universities. The questionnaire was emailed to all MTEs, and 281 out of 522 returned with their answers. MTEs’ written statements were examined via inductive thematic analysis. A post hoc quantitative analysis was also conducted to explore the relationships between knowledge sources and four variables: gender, self-identification, teaching experience and academic ranking. The analysis allowed the determination of a variety of knowledge sources in teacher education practices and established certain relationships. The findings are discussed with regard to MTEs’ professional development, conceptions of knowing and learning and the contribution of different sources to the teacher education practices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agaç, G. (2018). An investigation of perspectives and knowledge base of teaching staff related to effective mathematics teaching. Unpublished PhD thesis, Institution of Educational Sciences, Gaziantep University, Turkey.
Anthony, G., Averill, R., & Drake, M. (2018). Occasioning teacher-educators’ learning through practice-based teacher education. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 20(3), 4–19.
ATE (2008). Teacher education standarts. The Association of teacher educators in US. http://www.ate1.org/pubs/uploads/materialstouse1.pdf
Bleiler, S. K. (2015). Increasing awareness of practice through interaction across communities: the lived experiences of a mathematician and mathematics teacher educator. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(3), 231–252.
Boyd, P., K. Harris, & Murray, J. (2007). Becoming a teacher educator. Guidelines for the induction of newly appointed lecturers in Initial Teacher Education. University of Bristol, Higher Education Academy.
Brennan, M., & Zipin, L. (2016). The work of teacher-educators. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 302–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2016.1200246.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Chapter 8: relationships of knowledge and practice: teacher learning in communities. Review of research in education, 24(1), 249–305.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: the report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education. . Lawrence Erlbaum.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. . Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. International Pearson Merril Prentice Hall.
Çetinsaya, G. (2014). Büyüme, kalite, uluslararasılaşma: türkiye yükseköğretimi için bir yol haritası, 2. Baskı, YÖK Yayınları, No: 2014/2, Ankara.
Davey, R., & Ham, V. (2010). ‘It’s all about paying attention!’… but to what? The ‘6 Ms’ of mentoring the professional learning of teacher educators. Professional development in education, 36(1–2), 229–244.
Dengerink, J., Lunenberg, M., & Kools, Q. (2015). What and how teacher educators prefer to learn. Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy, 41(1), 78–96.
Ellis, V., McNicholl, J., & McNally, J. (2011). ‘The work of teacher education’: final research report. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/207290.pdf
Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in continuing education, 26(2), 247–273.
Goldin, G. A. (2003). Developing complex understandings: on the relation of mathematics education research to mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 171–202.
Goodwin, A. L., Smith, L., Souto-Manning, M., Cheruvu, R., Tan, M. Y., Reed, R., & Taveras, L. (2014). What should teacher educators know and be able to do? Perspectives from practicing teacher educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 284–302.
Goos, M., & Bennison, A. (2018). Boundary crossing and brokering between disciplines in pre- service mathematics teacher education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30, 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0232-4.
Hangül, T. (2018). An investigation of teacher educators’ evaluations about mathematical quality of instruction. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Institution of Educational Sciences, Marmara University, Turkey.
Harrison, J. K., & McKeon, F. (2008). The formal and situated learning of beginning teacher educators in England: Identifying characteristics for successful induction in the transition from workplace in schools to workplace in higher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(2), 151–168.
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.
Hoban, G. F. (2004). Seeking quality in teacher education design: a four-dimensional approach. Australian Journal of Education, 48(2), 117–133.
Howey, K. R., & Zimpher, N. L. (1990). Professors and deans of education. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. (pp. 349–390). Macmillan.
Jaworski, B. (2008). Development of the mathematics teacher educator and its relation to teaching development. IN: Jaworski, B. and Wood, T. (eds.). The International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education Volume 4: The Mathematics Teacher Educator as a Developing Professional. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, pp. 335–361.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
Kitchen, J., & Parker, D. C. (2009). Self-study communities of practice: developing community, critically inquiring as community. In C. A. Lassonde, S. Galman, & C. Kosnik (Eds.), Self-study Research Methodologies for Teacher Educators. (pp. 107–128). Sense.
Korthagen, F. (2000). Teacher educators, from neglected group to spearheads in the development of education. In G. Willems, J. Stakenborg, & W. Veugelers (Eds.), Trends in Dutch Teacher Education. (pp. 36–49). Garant.
Kremer-Hayon, L., & Zuzovsky, R. (1995). Themes, processes and trends in the professional development of teacher educators. In T. Russell & F. Korthagen (Eds.), Teachers who teach teachers: Reflections on teacher education. (pp. 155–171). The Falmer Press.
Krokfors, L., Kynäslahti, H., Stenberg, K., Toom, A., Maaranen, K., Jyrhämä, R., Byman, R., & Kansanen, P. (2011). Investigating Finnish teacher educators’ views on research-based teacher education. Teaching Education, 22(1), 1–13.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2001). Crossing over to Canaan. . Jossey-Bass.
Lanier, J. E., & Little, J. (1986). Research on teacher education. InM. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook on research on teaching (pp. 527–569).
Lawson, T., Çakmak, M., Gündüz, M., & Busher, H. (2015). Research on teachin practicum–a systematic review. European journal of teacher education, 38(3), 392–407.
Leung, F. K. S. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 35–51.
Loughran, J. (2011). On becoming a teacher educator. Journal of Education for Teaching., 37(3), 279–291.
Lunenberg, M., Korthagen, F., & Swennen, A. (2007). The teacher educator as a role model. Teaching And Teacher Education, 23(5), 586–601.
Margolin, I. (2011). Professional development of teacher educators through a “transitional space”: A surprising outcome of a teacher education program. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(3), 7–25.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.
Mayer, D., Mitchell, J., Santoro, N., & White, S. (2011). Teacher educators and ‘accidental’careers in academe: an Australian perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(3), 247–260.
McKeon, F., & Harrison, J. (2010). Developing pedagogical practice and professional identities of beginning teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 36(1–2), 25–44.
Murray, J., & Male, T. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator: evidence from the field. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 125–142.
Murray, J., Swennen, A., & Shagrir, L. (2009). Understanding teacher educators’ work and identities. In A. Swennen & M. van der Klink (Eds.), Becoming a teacher educator: theory and practice for teacher educators. (pp. 29–43). Springer.
NCTM. (2020). Mathematics teacher educator. Retrieved from https://www.nctm.org/Publications/Mathematics-Teacher-Educator/About-Mathematics-Teacher-Educator/
Poyas, Y., & Smith, K. (2007). Becoming a community of practice. The blurred identity of clinical faculty teacher educators. Teacher Development, 11(3), 313–334.
Robinson, M., & McMillan, W. (2006). Who teaches the teachers? Identity, discourse and policy in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(3), 327–336.
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Focus on research methods: whatever happened to qualitative description?. Research in Nursing and Health, 23(4), 334–340.
Shagrir, L. (2010). Professional development of novice teacher educators: professional self, interpersonal relations and teaching skills. Professional Development in Education, 36(1–2), 45–60.
Smith, K. (2005). Teacher educators’ expertise: what do novice teachers and teacher educators say? Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 177–192.
Smith, K. (2020). Expansive learning for teacher educators-the story of the Norwegian national research school in teacher education (NAFOL). Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00043.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Grounded theory research: procedures, canons and evaluative criteria, qualitative sociology. Human Sciences Press, 13(1), s. 3–21.
Superfine, A. C., & Li, W. (2014). Exploring the mathematical knowledge needed for teaching teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 303–314.
Swennen, A., Jones, K., & Volman, M. (2010). Teacher educators: their identities, sub-identities and implications for professional development. Professional development in education, 36(1–2), 131–148.
Van der Klink, M., Kools, Q., Avissar, G., White, S., & Sakata, T. (2017). Professional development of teacher educators: what do they do? Findings from an explorative international study, Professional Development in Education, 43(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2015.1114506.
van Veen, K. (2013). The knowledge base of teacher educators: the nature, dilemmas, and challenges. In M. Ben-Peretz (Ed.), Teacher Educators as Members of an Evolving Profession. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Van Velzen, C., Van der Klink, M., Swennen, A., & Yaffe, E. (2010). The induction and needs of beginning teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 36(1–2), 61–75.
White, S., Murray, J., Goodwin, A. L., Kosnik, C., & Beck, C. (2020). On the shoulder of giants: advice for beginning teacher educators. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 1–14.
Williams, J., & Ritter, J. K. (2010). Constructing new professional identities through self-study: From teacher to teacher educator. Professional Development in Education, 36(1–2), 77–92.
Yogev, S., & Yogev, A. (2006). Teacher educators as researchers: a profile of research in Israeli teacher colleges versus university departments of education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(1), 32–41.
Zeichner, K. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator: a personal perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.001.
Funding
This study is as a by-product of the second authors’ doctoral work supported by Scientific Research Project Unit of Gaziantep University, Turkey (Grant number: EF.DT.16.01).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1. Questionnaire applied to mathematics teacher educators
Appendix 1. Questionnaire applied to mathematics teacher educators
Do you have teaching experience? | ( )No | |
( )Yes Please indicate at what level and the duration in years. | …… years at primary level | |
…… years at secondary level | ||
…… years at high school level | ||
How would you identify yourself? | ( ) Mathematician | ( ) Mathematics Educator |
-
1.
How would you describe the notion of “effective mathematics teaching”?
-
2.
What features do you focus on while evaluating the effectiveness (strengths and weaknesses) of a mathematics teaching in the classroom? Please explain in detail.
-
3.
To what features do you pay particular attention during your lectures in order to set an example for your students to become effective teachers of mathematics in the future?
-
4.
What kind of extracurricular activities do you design for your students towards their development to be able to teach mathematics effectively in the future?
-
5.
What are your knowledge sources that constitute the basis for all your explanations until now about effective mathematics teaching?
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ozmantar, M.F., Agac, G. Mathematics teacher educators’ knowledge sources in teacher education practices. Math Ed Res J 35, 175–201 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00382-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00382-x