Abstract
Collaborations between mathematicians and mathematics teacher educators are increasingly being expected, and realized, within the context of mathematics teacher education. Most research related to collaborative efforts between members of the mathematics and mathematics education communities has focused on the products, rather than the process of collaboration. In this article, I present the results of an interpretative phenomenological analysis investigating the lived experiences of a mathematician and a mathematics teacher educator as they team-taught a mathematics content and mathematics methods course for prospective secondary mathematics teachers. I present extracts from interviews to illustrate the instructors’ perceptions that through collaboration and participation in the practice of the “other,” they were able to increase the awareness of their own practice and the practices characterizing their respective communities. The results of this study illustrate the potential of collaboration across these communities as a form of professional development for mathematics and mathematics education faculty.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For the purposes of this research, I use the term “mathematician” to refer to an individual who holds a terminal degree in the subject matter of mathematics and has little formal training in pedagogy or teacher preparation. I use the term “mathematics teacher educator” (MTE) to refer to an individual who holds a terminal degree in mathematics or education, and who has extensive training in pedagogy and/or teacher preparation within the discipline of mathematics. In general, the distinction between these two groups is not always clear, and individuals may refer to themselves under both titles (Even 2008; Millman et al. 2009).
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0821996, Principal Invesitagor, Rebecca McGraw, University of Arizona.
I limit the discussion here to these two themes for two reasons. One, in the presentation of the results, it is important to provide the reader with sufficient exposure to the instructors’ voices, so as to “communicate a sense of what the data are like” (Smith et al. 2009, p. 109). These excerpts from the instructors serve as the basis of evidence in this qualitative study. Moreover, in remaining true to IPA as a methodology, it is important for me to focus on the depth of analysis in this case and explore fully the interpretation of these emergent themes.
References
Adler, J., & Davis, Z. (2006). Opening another black box: Researching mathematics for teaching in mathematics teacher education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(4), 270–296.
Albrecht, N. M. R. (2003). University faculty collaboration and its impact on professional development (Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University.) Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (Publication No. AAT 3090338).
Association of Public and Land-grant Universities. (2012). Mathematics teacher education partnership: Guiding principles for secondary mathematics teacher preparation programs (Revised working draft—August 23, 2012). Retrieved May 27, 2013, from http://www.aplu.org/page.aspx?pid=2184.
Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 83–104). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In E. Simmt, & B. Davis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 3–14). Edmonton, AB: Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group.
Ball, D. L., Ferrini-Mundy, J., Kilpatrick, J., Milgram, R. J., Schmid, W., & Schaar, R. (2005). Reaching for common ground in K-12 mathematics education. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 52(9), 1055–1058.
Bass, H. (1997). Mathematicians as educators. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 44(1), 18–21.
Bass, H. (2005). Mathematics, mathematicians, and mathematics education. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 42(4), 417–430.
Beckmann, S. (2011). The community of math teachers, from elementary school to graduate school. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 58(3), 368–371.
Bleiler, S. K. (2012). Team-teaching experiences of a mathematician and a mathematics teacher educator: An interpretative phenomenological case study. (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (3504993).
Burton, L. (1999). The practices of mathematicians: What do they tell us about coming to know mathematics? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 121–143.
Burton, L. (2002). Recignising commonalities and reconciling differences in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50, 157–175.
Burton, L. (2004). Mathematicians as enquirers: Learning about learning mathematics. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
Cheng, S. (2006). The role of mathematicians in K-12 education: A personal perspective. In M. S. Sole, J. Soria, J. L. Varona, & J. Verdera (Eds.), Proceedings of the international congress of mathematics, Madrid 2006 (vol. 3, pp. 1688–1690). Zurich, Switzerland: European Mathematical Society.
Common Ground Conference Report. (2006). Reports from Finding Common Ground, Indianapolis, March, 2006. Retrieved June 14, 2010, from Mathematical Association of America. http://www.maa.org/common-ground/.
Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (2001). The mathematical education of teachers. Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society.
Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (2012). The mathematical education of teachers II. Providence, RI/Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society and Mathematical Association of America.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Crow, J., & Smith, L. (2005). Co-teaching in higher education: Reflective conversation on shared experience as continued professional development for lecturers and health and social care students. Reflective Practice, 6(4), 491–506.
Darling-Hammond, L., Pacheco, A., Michelli, N., LePage, P., Hammerness, K., & Youngs, P. (2005). Implementing curriculum renewal in teacher education: Managing organizational and policy change. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 442–479). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Dörfler, W. (2003). Mathematics and mathematics education: Content and people, relation and difference. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 147–170.
Eaton, P. T., & Carbone, R. E. (2008). Asking those who know: A collaborative approach to continuing professional development. Teacher Development, 12(3), 261–270.
Even, R. (2008). Facing the challenge of educating educators to work with practicing mathematics teachers. In B. Jaworski, & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education, vol. 4: The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (pp. 57–74). Rotterdam: Sense.
Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Findell, B. (2001). The mathematical education of prospective teachers of secondary school mathematics: Old assumptions, new challenges. In CUPM discussion papers about mathematics and the mathematical sciences in 2010: What should students know? (pp. 31–41). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
Goldin, G. A. (2003). Developing complex understandings: On the relation of mathematics education research to mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 171–202.
Goos, M., & Geiger, V. (2010). Theoretical perspectives on mathematics teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 499–507.
Grassl, R., & Mingus, T. T. Y. (2007). Team teaching and cooperative groups in abstract algebra: Nurturing a new generation of confident mathematics teachers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(5), 581–597.
Hanks, W. F. (1991). Foreward. In J. Lave & E. Wenger (Eds.), Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (pp. 13–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heaton, R. M., & Lewis, W. J. (2011). A mathematician–mathematics educator partnership to teach teachers. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 58(3), 394–400.
Hemmi, K. (2006). Approaching proof in a community of mathematical practice (Doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University). Available from WorldCat Dissertations and Theses database.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.
Hodge, A. M., Gerberry, C. V., Moss, E. R., & Staples, M. E. (2010). Purposes and perceptions: What do university mathematics professors see as their role in the education of secondary mathematics teachers? PRIMUS, 20(8), 646–663.
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Kahan, J. A., Cooper, D. A., & Bethea, K. A. (2003). The role of mathematics teachers’ content knowledge in their teaching: A framework for research applied to a study of student teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(3), 223–252.
Kehle, P., Maki, D., Norton, A., & Nowlin, D. (2005). Design and implementation of linking courses: Connecting college mathematics with high school mathematics for pre-service teachers. Paper presented at the Joint Meeting of the American Mathematical Society and the Mathematical Association of America, Atlanta, GA.
Koirala, H. P., Davis, M., & Johnson, P. (2008). Development of a performance assessment task and rubric to measure prospective secondary school mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and skills. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 127–138.
Krainer, K. (2008). Researchers and their roles in teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 253–257.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lester, J. N., & Evans, K. R. (2009). Instructors’ experiences of collaboratively teaching: Building something bigger. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(3), 373–382.
Madison, B. L. (2006). Tensions and tethers: Assessing learning in undergraduate mathematics. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Supporting assessment in undergraduate mathematics (pp. 3–10). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
McCallum, W. (2003). Promoting work on education in mathematics departments. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 50(9), 1093–1098.
McGraw, R., Lynch, K., Koc, Y., Budak, A., & Brown, C. A. (2007). The multimedia case as a tool for professional development: An analysis of online and face-to-face interaction among mathematics pre-service teachers, in-service teachers, mathematicians, and mathematics teacher educators. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 95–121.
Millman, R., Iannone, P., & Johnston-Wilder, P. (2009). Educators and the teacher training context. In R. Even & D. L. Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics (pp. 127–133). New York, NY: Springer.
Nardi, E. (2008). Amongst mathematicians: Teaching and learning mathematics at university level. New York, NY: Springer.
Nardi, E., Jaworski, B., & Hegedus, S. (2005). A spectrum of pedagogical awareness for undergraduate mathematics: From “tricks” to “techniques”. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(4), 284–316.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved June 11, 2010, from http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/final-report.pdf.
National Research Council. (2003). Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Patterson, K. B., Syverud, S. M., & Seabrooks-Blackmore, J. (2008). A call for collaboration: Not jack of all trades. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 45(1), 16–21.
Potari, D., Sakonidis, H., Chatzigoula, R., & Manaridis, A. (2010). Teachers’ and researchers’ collaboration in analyzing mathematics teaching: A context for professional reflection and development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 473–485.
Ralston, A. (2004). Research mathematicians and mathematics education: A critique. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 51(4), 403–411.
Sanchez, M. (2011). A review of research trends in mathematics teacher education. PNA, 5(4), 129–145.
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method, and research. London: Sage.
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53–80). London: Sage.
Sowder, J. T. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 157–223). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Steele, M. D. (2005). Comparing knowledge bases and reasoning structures in discussions of mathematics and pedagogy. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 291–328.
Steen, L. A. (2006). Asking the right questions. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Supporting assessment in undergraduate mathematics (pp. 11–18). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Sultan, A., & Artzt, A. F. (2005). Mathematicians are from Mars, math educators are from Venus: The story of a successful collaboration. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 52(1), 48–53.
Thompson, D. R., Beneteau, C., Kersaint, G., & Bleiler, S. K. (2012). Voices of mathematicians and mathematics teacher educators co-teaching prospective secondary teachers. In J. M. Bay-Williams (Ed.), Professional collaborations in mathematics teaching and learning: Seeking success for all—74th yearbook (pp. 229–242). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (2006). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved January 1, 2013, from http://www.ewenger.com/theory/communities_of_practice_intro.htm.
Williams, S. T. (2005). Merging content and pedagogy: An investigation of the specific factors of an innovative master’s degree program for secondary mathematics teachers that contribute to reported changes in beliefs and instructional practices (Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (Publication No. AAT 3203437).
Wood, L. N., Petocz, P., & Reid, A. (2012). Becoming a mathematician: An international perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.
Wu, H. (2006). How mathematicians can contribute to K-12 mathematics education. In M. S. Sole, J. Soria, J. L. Varona, & J. Verdera (Eds.), Proceedings of the international congress of mathematics, Madrid 2006 (vol. 3, pp. 1676–1688). Zurich, Switzerland: European Mathematical Society.
Zaslavsky, O., & Leikin, R. (2004). Professional development of mathematics teacher educators: Growth through practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 5–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bleiler, S.K. Increasing awareness of practice through interaction across communities: the lived experiences of a mathematician and mathematics teacher educator. J Math Teacher Educ 18, 231–252 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9275-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9275-6