Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A double-exponential GARCH model for stochastic mortality

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
European Actuarial Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a generalized GARCH-based stochastic mortality model is developed, which incorporates conditional heteroskedasticity and conditional non-normality. First, a detailed empirical analysis of the UK mortality rates from 1922 to 2009 is provided, where it was found that both the conditional heteroskedasticity and conditional non-normality are important empirical long-term structures of mortality. To describe conditional non-normality, a double-exponential distribution that allows conditional skewness and the heavy-tailed features found in the datasets was selected. For the practical implementation of the proposed model, a two-stage scheme was introduced to estimate the unknown parameters. First, the Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation (QMLE) method was employed to estimate the GARCH structure. Next, the MLE was adopted to estimate the unknown parameters of the double-exponential distribution using residuals as input data. The model was then back-tested against the previous 10 years of mortality data to assess its forecasting ability, before Monte Carlo simulation was carried out to simulate and produce a table of forecast mortality rates from the optimal distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J Econ 31:307–327

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cairns A, Blake D, Dowd K (2006) A two-factor model for stochastic mortality with parameter uncertainty: theory and calibration. J Risk Insur 73(4):687–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cairns A, Blake D, Dowd K, Coughlan GD, Epstein D, Ong A, Balevich I (2007) A quantitative comparison of stochastic mortality models using data from England and Wales and the United States. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1340389. Accessed 24 Aug 2012

  4. Chen H, Cox SH, Wang SS (2010) Is the home equity conversion mortgage in the United States sustainable? Evidence from pricing mortgage insurance premiums and non-recourse provisions using the conditional Esscher transform. Insur: Math Econ 46:371–384

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Currie ID (2006) Smoothing and forecasting mortality rates with p-splines. http://www.ma.hw.ac.uk/iain/research/talks.html. Accessed 13 Aug 2012

  6. Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1981) Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica 49:1057–1072

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Engle R (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of UK inflation. Econometrica 50:987–1008

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gao Q, Hu C (2009) Dynamic mortality factor model with conditional heteroskedasticity. Insur Math Econ 40(3):410–423

    Google Scholar 

  9. Giacometti R, Bertocchi M, Rachev ST, Fabozzi FJ (2012) A comparison of the Lee–Carter model and ARGARCH model for forecasting mortality rates. Insur: Math Econ 50(1):85-93

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee RD, Carter LR (1992) Modeling and forecasting US mortality. J Am Stat Assoc 87(419):659–671

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee RD (2000) The Lee-Carter method for forecasting mortality, with various extensions and applications. N Am Actuar J 4:80–93

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Mitchell D, Brockett P, Mendoza-Arriaga R, Muthuraman K (2013) Modeling and forecasting mortality rates. Insur: Math Econ 52(2):275–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Renshaw AE, Haberman S (2012) Parametric mortality improvement rate modelling and projecting. Insur: Math Econ 50:309–333

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Renshaw AE, Haberman S (2006) A cohort-based extension to the Lee–Carter model for mortality reduction factors. Insur: Math Econ 38:556–570

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Siu TK, Tong H, Yang H (2004) On pricing derivatives under GARCH models: a dynamic Gerber–Shiu approach. N Am Actuar J 8(3):17–31

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor SJ (1986) Modelling financial time series. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Willets R (1999) Mortality in the next millennium. In: Paper presented to the Staple Inn Actuarial Society, London, England

  18. Willets R (2004) The cohort effect: insights and explanations. Br Actuar J 10(4):833-877

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Celeste M. H. Chai.

Appendix: Forecasts of mortality rates

Appendix: Forecasts of mortality rates

See Tables 7, 8, 9

Table 7 Selected AR-GARCH and double-exponential parameters (age process)
Table 8 Selected AR-GARCH and double-exponential parameters (time process)
Table 9 Selected simulated death rates (age process) for years 2010–2014

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chai, C.M.H., Siu, T.K. & Zhou, X. A double-exponential GARCH model for stochastic mortality. Eur. Actuar. J. 3, 385–406 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-013-0077-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-013-0077-5

Keywords

Navigation