Skip to main content
Log in

A subordinated Markov model for stochastic mortality

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
European Actuarial Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we propose a subordinated Markov model for modeling stochastic mortality. The aging process of a life is assumed to follow a finite-state Markov process with a single absorbing state and the stochasticity of mortality is governed by a subordinating gamma process. We focus on the theoretical development of the model and have shown that the model exhibits many desirable properties of a mortality model and meets many model selection criteria laid out in Cairns et al. (ASTIN Bull 36:79–120, 2006; Scand Actuar J 2:79–113, 2008). The model is flexible and fits either historical mortality data or projected mortality data well. We also explore applications of the proposed model to the valuation of mortality-linked securities. A general valuation framework for valuing mortality-linked products is presented for this model. With a proposed risk loading mechanism, we can make an easy transition from the physical measure to a risk-neutral measure and hence is able to calibrate the model to market information. The phase-type structure of the model allows us to apply the matrix-analytic methods that have been extensively used in ruin theory in actuarial science and queuing theory in operations research (see Asmussen in Applied probability and queues. Wiley, New York, 1987; Asmussen and Albrecher in Ruin probabilities, 2nd edn. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2010; Neuts in Matrix-geometrix solutions in stochastic models. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1981). As a result, many quantities of interest such as the distribution of future survival rates, prediction intervals, the term structure of mortality as well as the value of caps and floors on the survival index can be obtained analytically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An example of the fitted model based on a 5-state Markov aging process is given in (27) and (28).

  2. We use the same terminology as in [34, 35]. However, in [11], it is called the zero-coupon longevity bond or \((t,x)\)-bond.

References

  1. Aalen OO (1995) Phase type distributions in survival analysis. Scand J Stat 22:447–463

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Asmussen S (1987) Applied probability and queues. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Asmussen S, Albrecher H (2010) Ruin probabilities, 2nd edn. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ballotta L, Haberman S (2006) The fair valuation problem of guaranteed annuity options: the stochastic mortality environment case. Insur Math Econ 38:195–214

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Biffis E (2005) Affine processes for dynamic mortality and actuarial valuation. Insur Math Econ 37:443–468

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Biffis E, Denuit M (2006) Lee-Carter goes risk-neutral: an application to the Italian annuity market. Giornale dell’Istituto Italiano degli Attuari LXIX:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blake D, Dowd K, Cairns AJG (2008a) Longevity risk and the grim reaper’s toxic tail: the survivor fan charts. Insur Math Econ 42:1062–1066

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Blake DP, Cairns AJ, Dowd K (2008b) The birth of the life market. Asia Pa J Risk Insur 3:6–36

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boyle P, Hardy M (2003) Guaranteed annuity options. ASTIN Bull 33:125–152

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Brouhns N, Denuit M, Vermunt J (2002) A Poisson log-bilinear regression approach to the construction of projected lifetables. Insur Math Econ 31:373–393

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Cairns AJG, Blake D, Dowd K (2006) Pricing death: frameworks for the valuation and securitization of mortality risk. ASTIN Bull 36:79–120

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Cairns AJG, Blake D, Dowd K (2006) A two-factor model for stochastic mortality with parameter uncertainty. J Risk Insur 1:687–718

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cairns AJG, Blake D, Dowd K (2008) Modelling and management of mortality risk: a review. Scand Actuar J 2:79–113

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. CMI (2004) Projecting future mortality: a discussion paper. Continuous mortality investigation working paper 3

  15. CMI (2005) Projecting future mortality: towards a proposal for a stochastic methodology. Continuous mortality investigation working paper 15

  16. CMI (2007) Stochastic projection methodologies: Lee-Carter model features, example results and implications. Continuous mortality investigation working paper 15

  17. Dahl M (2004) Stochastic mortality in life insurance: market reserves and mortality-linked insurance contracts. Insur Math Econ 35:113–136

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Dahl M, Melchior M, Moller T (2008) On systematic mortality risk and risk minimization with survivor swaps. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2:114–146

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Dahl M, Møller T (2006) Valuation and hedging of life insurance liabilities with systematic mortality risk. Insur Math Econ 39:193–217

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Dowd K, Cairns AJG, Blake D (2006) Mortality-dependent financial risk measures. Insur Math Econ 38:427–440

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Foo J, Kevin Leder K, Michor F (2011) Stochastic dynamics of cancer initiation. Phys Biol. doi:10.1088/1478-3975/8/1/015002

  22. GAD (2001) National population projections: review of methodology for projecting mortality. National statistics quality review series, report no. 8. Government Actuary’s Department

  23. Hautphenne S, Latouche G (2011) The Markovian binary tree applied to demography. J Math Biol. doi:10.1007/s00285-011-0437-1

  24. Hurd T, Kuznetsov A (2007) Affine Markov chain model of multifirm credit migration. J Credit Risk 3:3–29

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jarrow RA, Lando D, Turnbull SM (1997) A Markov model for the term structure of credit risk spreads. Rev Financial Stud 10:481–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kay R (1986) A Markov model for analysing cancer markers and disease states in survival studies. Biometrics 42:855–865

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee RD, Carter LR (1992) Modeling and forecasting U.S. mortality. J Am Stat Assoc 87:659–675

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lee SCK, Lin XS (2011) Modeling dependent risks with multivariate Erlang mixtures. ASTIN Bulletin, to appear

  29. Lee SCK, Lin XS (2010) Modeling and evaluating insurance losses via mixtures of Erlang distributions. N Am Actuar J 14(1):107–130

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Lin XS, Liu X (2007) Markov aging process and phase-type law of mortality. N Am Actuar J 11:92–109

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Longini IM, Clark WS, Gardner L, Brundage JF (1991) The dynamics of CD4+ T-lymphocyte decline in HIV-infected individuals: a Markov modelling approach. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 4:1141–1147

    Google Scholar 

  32. Madan DB, Carr P, Chang EC (1998) The Variance Gamma process and option pricing. Eur Finance Rev 2:79–105

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Madan DB, Milne F (1991) Option pricing with V.G. martingale components. Math Finance 1:39–55

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Milevsky MA, Promislow SD (2001) Mortality derivatives and the option to annuitise. Insur Math Econ 29:299–318

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Milevsky MA, Promislow SD, Young J (2006) Killing the law of large numbers: mortality risk premiums and the Sharpe ratio. J Risk Insur 73:673–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Neuts MF (1981) Matrix-geometrix solutions in stochastic models. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pitacco E (2004) Survival models in a dynamic context: a survey. Insur Math Econ 35:279–298

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Renshaw A, Haberman S (2003) Lee-Carter mortality forecasting with age-specific enhancement. Insur Math Econ 33:255–272

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Renshaw A, Haberman S (2006) A cohort-based extension to the Lee-Carter model for mortality reduction factors. Insur Math Econ 38:556–570

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Tuljapurkar S, Boe C (1998) Mortality changes and forecasting: how much and how little do we know? N Am Actuar J 2:13–47

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Willets R (1999) Mortality in the next millennium. Presented at the Staple Inn Actuarial Society on 7 December

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). We would like to thank two reviewers, Andrei Badescu and Soohan Ahn for their insightful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to X. Sheldon Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, X., Lin, X.S. A subordinated Markov model for stochastic mortality. Eur. Actuar. J. 2, 105–127 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-012-0047-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-012-0047-3

Keywords

Navigation