Personal Best (PB) goals are defined as specific, challenging, and competitively self-referenced goals involving a level of performance or effort that meets or exceeds an individual’s previous best. Much of the available research underpinning arguments for PB goal-setting is self-report-based; thus, the causal effect of PB goals on learning outcomes remains in question. The present experiment examined the impact of PB goal-setting (against a no-goal condition) on 68 Year 5 and 6 schoolchildren’s problem-solving during an arithmetic fluency-building activity, SuperSpeed Math. Equivalence of the two conditions was established across a range of prior ability and self-report motivational variables, including prior mathematical ability; Personal Best, Mastery, and Performance goal orientations at the individual and classroom level; mathematics self-concept; and valuing of and interest in mathematics. Controlling for initial problem-solving performance, students who set PB goals in subsequent rounds showed a small but reliable advantage over students in the control condition. These results suggest PB goals may provide a way for students to experience both challenge and success in a range of classroom activities. Suggestions for future research based on these initial findings are made.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Reliability coefficients are not provided as these were single-item constructs.
Alschuler, A. S. (1969). The effects of classroom structure on achievement motivation and academic performance. Educational Technology, IX, 19–24.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.
Anderman, E. M., Gimbert, B., O’Connell, A. A., & Riegel, L. (2015). Approaches to academic growth assessment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12053.
Beady, C. H., Slavin, R. E., & Fennessey, G. M. (1981). Alternative student evaluation structures and a focused schedule of instruction in an innercity junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 518–523.
Biffle, C. (2007a). SuperSpeed math. Yucaipa: Crafton Hills College.
Biffle, C. (2007b). SuperSpeed letters and phonics. Yucaipa: Crafton Hills College.
Boomsma, A., & Herzog, W. (2013). R function swain: Correcting structural equation model t-statistics and indexes under small-sample and/or large-model conditions. Retrieved March 28, 2017, from http://www.ppsw.rug.nl/~boomsma/swain.pdf.
Bratina, T. A., & Krudwig, K. M. (2003). Get it right and get it fast! Building automaticity to strengthen mathematical proficiency. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 25, 47–63.
Breaugh, J. A. (2003). Effect size estimation: Factors to consider and mistakes to avoid. Journal of Management, 29, 79–97.
Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets and human nature: Promoting change in the Middle East, the schoolyard, the racial divide, and willpower. American Psychologist, 67, 614–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029783.
Edgington, E., & Onghena, P. (2007). Randomization tests. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.
Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 632–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023952.
Graham, J. W., & Hoffer, S. M. (2000). Multiple imputation in multivariate research. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnable, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (pp. 201–218). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Publications.
Herzog, W., & Boomsma, A. (2009). Small-sample robust estimators of noncentrality-based and incremental model fit. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510802561279.
Huitema, B. (2011). The analysis of covariance and alternatives: Statistical methods for experiments, quasi-experiments, and single-case studies (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657–690.
Keselman, H. J., Othman, A.R., & Wilcox, R.R. (2013). Preliminary testing for normality: Is this a good practice? Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 12(2), 2. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/jmasm/vol12/iss2/2
Klein, H. J., Wesson, M. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., Wright, P. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2001). The assessment of goal commitment: A measurement model meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 32–55. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2931.
Kratochwill, T. R., & Levin, J. R. (Eds.). (2014). Single-case intervention research: Methodological and statistical advances. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Latham, E. A., & Locke, G. P. (2013). Goal setting theory, 1990. In E. A. Locke & G. P. Latham (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 3–15). New York: Routledge.
Liem, G. A. D., Ginns, P., Martin, A. J., Stone, B., & Herett, M. (2012). Personal best goals and academic and social functioning: A longitudinal perspective. Learning and Instruction, 22, 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.11.003.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717.
Marsh, H. W. (1990). Self description questionnaire—I (SDQ I). Manual. Macarthur, NSW. Australia: University of Western Sydney.
Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & Hau, K. T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling techniques (pp. 315–353). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.
Martin, A. J. (2006). Personal bests (PBs): A proposed multidimensional model and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 803–825. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X55389.
Martin, A. J. (2011a). Personal Best (PB) approaches to academic development: Implications for motivation and assessment. Educational Theory and Practice, 33, 93–99.
Martin, A. J. (2011b). The Motivation and Engagement Scale. Sydney, Australia: Lifelong Achievement Group.
Martin, A. J. (2015). Implicit theories about intelligence and growth (personal best) goals: Exploring reciprocal relationships. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12038.
Martin, A. J., Anderson, J., Bobis, J., Way, J., & Vellar, R. (2012). Switching on and switching off in mathematics: An ecological study of future intent and disengagement among middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025988.
Martin, A. J., Durksen, T. L., Williamson, D., Kiss, J., & Ginns, P. (2014). Personal Best (PB) goal setting and students’ motivation in science: A study of science valuing and aspirations. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 31, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.2014.19.
Martin, A. J., & Elliot, A. J. (2016a). The role of personal best (PB) and dichotomous achievement goals in students’ academic motivation and engagement: A longitudinal investigation. Educational Psychology, 36, 1285–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1093606.
Martin, A. J., & Elliot, A. J. (2016b). The role of personal best (PB) goal setting in students’ academic achievement gains. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.014.
Martin, A. J., & Liem, G. A. D. (2010). Academic personal bests (PBs), engagement, and achievement: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.01.001.
McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247–255.
Muthén, L.K. & Muthén, B.O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Nordstokke, D. W., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010). A new nonparametric test for equal variances. Psicologica, 31, 401–430.
Nordstokke, D. W., Zumbo, B. D., Cairns, S .L., & Saklofske, D. H. (2011). The operating characteristics of the nonparametric Levene test for equal variances with assessment and evaluation data. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 16. 84. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=16&n=5.
Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 160–164.
Schmidt, F. L. (2013). The economic value of goal setting to employers. In E. A. Locke & G. P. Latham (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 16–20). New York: Routledge.
Schunk, D. H. (1985). Participation in goal setting: Effects on self-efficacy and skills of learning-disabled children. The Journal of Special Education, 19, 307–317.
Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1989). Learning goals and children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 279–293.
Seijts, G. H., Latham, G. P., & Woodwark, M. (2013). Learning goals: A qualitative and quantitative review. In E. A. Locke & G. P. Latham (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 195–212). New York: Routledge.
Slavin, R. E. (1980). Effects of individual learning expectations on student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 520–524.
Steiner, E. T., & Ashcraft, M. H. (2012). Three brief assessments of math achievement. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1101–1107. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0185-6.
Swain, A.J. (1975). Analysis of parametric structures for variance matrices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Statistics, University of Adelaide, Australia.
Tallmadge, G. A. (1977). The joint dissemination review panel ideabook. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education & US Office of Education.
Weinberg, R. S. (2002). Goal setting in sport and exercise: Research to practice. In J. L. Van Raalte & B. W. Brewer (Eds.), Exploring sport and exercise psychology (pp. 25–48). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Whisman, M. A., & McClelland, G. H. (2005). Designing, testing, and interpreting interactions and moderator effects in family research. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3188.8.131.52.
Williams, K. J. (2013). Goal setting in sports. In E. A. Locke & G. P. Latham (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 375–396). New York: Routledge.
Yeager, D. S., & Walton, G. M. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They’re not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81, 267–301. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311405999.
Yu, K., & Martin, A. J. (2014). Personal best (PB) and ‘classic’ achievement goals in the Chinese context: their role in predicting academic motivation, engagement and buoyancy. Educational Psychology, 34, 635–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.895297.
Yuan, K. H. (2005). Fit indices versus test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 115–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4001_5.
The present study was supported by Discovery Research Project Grant DP140104294.
About this article
Cite this article
Ginns, P., Martin, A.J., Durksen, T.L. et al. Personal Best (PB) goal-setting enhances arithmetical problem-solving. Aust. Educ. Res. 45, 533–551 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0268-9
- Goal setting
- Personal Best (PB) goals