Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Growth in literacy and numeracy achievement: evidence and explanations of a summer slowdown in low socio-economic schools

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The phenomenon of summer slide or setback has gained a great deal of attention in the USA. It is understood to account for as much as 80 % of the difference in achievement for students between low and high socio-economic families over their elementary schooling. In a mixed method longitudinal study of reforms in low socio-economic school communities in Victoria, Australia this phenomenon in the achievement growth of primary and secondary school students for both literacy and numeracy was identified. The longitudinal analysis of achievement data revealed decelerated growth during Terms 4 and 1, the spring and summer months in the Australian school calendar. In this article we present these findings and the reflections of Principals, literacy and numeracy leaders and coaches about these findings and their suggestions for action. We argue that reforming school practices during Terms 1 and 4 and developing a deeper understanding of students’ out-of-school learning and knowledge are essential for enhancing growth in achievement from September to March and for narrowing the achievement gap between marginalised and advantaged students. Further research of this phenomenon in the Australian context is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Findings for Koori, ELL and refugee students are not reported here.

  2. Reading Recovery is a structured intervention program for Grade 1 students was also being used for students in other grades in some pilot schools.

  3. At least one primary school in one regional network was within the area of the ‘Black Saturday’ bushfire that occurred in February 2009 and many others would have been impacted through relatives and community connections across the network and region.

References

  • Alexander, K., Entwisle, D., & Olson, L. (2007). Summer learning and its implications: Insights from the beginning school study. New Directions for Youth Development, 2007(114), 11–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allington, R. & McGill- Franzen, A. (2003). The Impact of summer setback on the reading achievement gap. The Phi Delta Kappan, 85(1), 68–75.

  • Boaler, J. (2008). Promoting ‘relational equity’ and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed ability approach. British Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 167–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borman, G. D., & Dowling, N. M. (2006). Longitudinal effects of a multiyear summer school: Evidence from the Teach Baltimore randomized field trial. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(1), 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D., Cheeseman, J., Gervasoni, A., Gronn, D., Horne, M., McDonough, A., Montgomery, P., Roche, A., Sullivan, P., Clarke, B. & Rowley, G. (2001). Early numeracy research project. http://www.edcation.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/teachingresources/maths/enrp. Accessed February 12, 2010.

  • Cobb, P. (2008, July). The challenges of scale: Designing learning organizations for instructional improvement in mathematics [PowerPoint slides]. Paper presented at ICME11, Monterrey. http://www.icme11.org/sites/icme11/files/PaulCobbSlides.pps. Accessed February 12, 2010.

  • Comber, B., & Kamler, B. (2004). Getting out of deficit: Pedagogies of reconnection. Teaching Education, 15(3), 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H., Nye, B., Charlton, K., Lindsay, J., & Greathouse, S. (1996). The effects of summer vacation on achievement test scores: A narrative and meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 66, 227–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culican, S. J., Emmitt, M., & Oakley, C. (2001). Literacy and learning in the middle years: Major report on the middle years literacy research project. http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/teachlearn/student/MYLiteracyFullReport.pdf. Accessed February 12, 2010.

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2011, June). Improving learning: What can we learn from reforms around the world? [PowerPoint slides]. Paper presented at the Successful Learning Conference held at the University of Sydney, Sydney NSW. http://sydney.edu.au/education_social_work/professional_learning/resources/papers/Darling-HammondD_11_LesssonsFromReformAroundTheWorld.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2011.

  • De Bortolli, L., & Thomson, S. (2010). Contextual factors that influence the achievement of Australia’s Indigenous students: Results from PISA 2000–2006. Hawthorn: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education (DOE). (2008). Percentile/SFO comparison charts v(5)ppt, Data and Evaluation Division, February, 2008. http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/ptileSFO_v5.00.ppt. Accessed April 18, 2012.

  • Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (DEECD). (2009a). Literacy and Numeracy Pilots in Low SES Communities: Progress Report (unpublished). Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (DEECD): Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (DEECD). (2009b). Mathematics Developmental Continuum P-10. Melbourne, Australia. http://www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/teachingresources/maths/mathscontinuum/default.htm. Accessed August 29, 2011.

  • Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (DEECD). (2010). The summer achievement gap, Shine February.

  • Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (DEECD). (2012). Student Family Occupation Prep-12. http://www.education.vic.gov.au/management/srp/budget/ref011/default.htm. Accessed April 18, 2012.

  • Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). National Smarter Schools Partnerships Canberra: Department of Education, Employment & Workplace Relations. http://smarterschools.gov.au/. Accessed August 29, 2011.

  • Earl, L., & Timperley, H. (2008). Understanding how evidence and learning conversations work. In L. Earl & H. Timperley (Eds.), Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence for improvement (pp. 1–12). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Queensland. (2001). The Queensland school longitudinal reform study. Brisbane: GoPrint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R. (2007). Educational improvement in Victoria. http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/staffdev/schlead/Richard_Ewps-v1-20070817.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2011.

  • Evans, R. (2005). Reframing the achievement gap. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(8), 582–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. D. R., Kelley, J., Sikora, J., & Treiman, D. J. (2010). Family scholarly culture and educational success: Books and schooling in 27 nations. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 28, 171–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2009). Large scale reform comes of age. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2), 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2008). Distributed School Leadership: Developing tomorrow’s leaders (Leading School Transformation Series). London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D., Lingard, B., & Mills, M. (2000). Productive pedagogies. Education Links, 60, 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P., & Crevola, C. (1999). Key features of a whole-school, design approach to literacy teaching in schools. http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/teachlearn/student/hillcrev.pdf. Accessed February 12, 2010.

  • Hooley, N. (2009). Narrative life: Democratic curriculum and indigenous learning. London: Springer.

  • Howley, C. B., Howley, A. A., & Huber, D. S. (2005). Prescriptions for rural mathematics instruction: Analysis of the rhetorical literature. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(7). Retrieved January 3, 2011 from http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/20-7.pdf.

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). It’s not the culture of poverty, it’s the poverty of culture: The problem with teacher education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 37(2), 104–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S. (2004). Student and school characteristics: Equity funding for a new Student Resource Package for Victorian Government Schools. Unpublished commissioned research for the Department of Education and Training, personal communication.

  • Lamb, S. (2007). School reform and inequality in urban Australia: A case of residualising the poor. In R. Teese, S. Lamb, & M. Duru-Bellat (Eds.), International studies in educational inequality, theory and policy (Vol. 3 Inequality: Educational Theory & Public Policy, pp. 1–38). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Lampert, M., Beasley, H., Ghousseini, H., Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. (2010). Using designed instructional activities to enable novice teachers to manage ambitious mathematics teaching. In M. K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the disciplines (pp. 129–141). Rotterdam: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Bristol, PA: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Strauss, T., Sacks, R., Memon, N., & Yashkina, A. (2006). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter. Leadership and Policy, 6(1), 37–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lokan, J., Greenwood, L., & Cresswell, J. (2001). 15-Up and counting, reading, writing, reasoning… How literate are Australia’s students? Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Melbourne: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGaw, B. (2008, February 23). International benchmarking of Australian schools. Paper presented to the Annual General Meeting of Victorian Council of School Organisations, Melbourne.

  • Ministerial Council on Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs (MCEEDYA). (2010). National report: Achievement in reading, writing, language conventions and numeracy 2009, Canberra, Australia. http://www.naplan.edu.au/reports/national_report.html. Accessed January 3, 2011.

  • Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (2009). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. In N. Gonzalez, L. Moll, & C. Amanti (Eds.), Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities and classrooms (pp. 71–87). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, M. (2008). From shallow to deep: Toward a thorough cultural analysis of school achievement patterns. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 39(4), 369–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemon, D., Izard, J., Breed, M., & Virgona, J. (2006). Scaffolding Numeracy in the middle years. http://www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/teachingresources/maths/snmy/default.htm. Accessed February 12, 2010.

  • Siemon, D., Virgona, J. & Corneille, K. (2001). The middle years Numeracy Research Project: 5-9. http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/curricman/middleyear/MYNumeracyResearchFullReport.pdf. Accessed February 12, 2010.

  • Stein, M., Engle, R., Smith, M., & Hughes, E. (2010). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teese, R., & Lamb, S. (2009). Low achievement and social background: patterns, processes and interventions. Discussion paper http://www.lowsesschools.nsw.edu.au/wcb-content/uploads/psp/file/Richard%20Teese%20Low%20SES%20forum/low_ses_discussion_paper_v1.pdf. Accessed April 18, 2012.

  • Teese, R., & Polesel, J. (2003). Undemocratic schooling: Equity and quality in mass secondary education in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, S., Cresswell, J., & De Bortolli, L. (2004). Facing the future: A focus on mathematical literacy among Australian 15-year-old students in PISA 2003. Melbourne: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, S., & Fleming, N. (2004). Summing it up: Mathematics achievement in Australian schools in TIMSS 2002 (TIMSS Australia Monograph No 6). Camberwell, VIC: ACER.

  • Timperley, H., & Parr, J. (2010). Weaving evidence, inquiry and standards to build better schools. Wellington: NZCER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vale, C., Davies, A., Hooley, N., Weaven, M., Davidson, K. & Loton, D. (2010a). Leadership to improve mathematics outcomes in low SES school networks and schools. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 12(2), 47–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vale, C., Weaven, M., Davies, A. & Hooley, N. (2010b). Student centred approaches: Teachers’ learning and practice. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education. Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 571–578). Freemantle: MERGA.

  • Vale, C., Davies, A., Hooley, N., Weaven, M., Davidson, K. & Loton, D. (2011). Outcome evaluation of literacy and numeracy pilots in low SES school communities 2009–2010: Final report. Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. Victoria University, March, 2011.

  • Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (VCAA). (2007). Victorian essential learning standards. http://vels.vcaa.vic.edu.au/. Accessed October 31, 2011.

  • Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (VCAA). (2009a). VCAA on demand adaptive test for number. http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/prep10/ondemand/index.html. Accessed February 12, 2010.

  • Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (VCAA). (2009b). VCAA On demand adaptive test for reading. http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/prep10/ondemand/index.html. Accessed February 12, 2010.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study reported in this article is part of larger evaluation of the Literacy and Numeracy Pilots in Low SES School Communities that was jointly funded by the Australian and Victorian Governments. We wish to sincerely thank the teachers, principals, coaches, network leaders and education staff of the DEECD Regions participating in this study who gave generously of their time so we could gain insight into the pilot and their practices and who provided achievement data for analysis. We also wish to acknowledge staff in the Office of Government School Education, DEECD, who provided direction and advice on the evaluation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colleen Vale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vale, C., Weaven, M., Davies, A. et al. Growth in literacy and numeracy achievement: evidence and explanations of a summer slowdown in low socio-economic schools. Aust. Educ. Res. 40, 1–25 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-012-0065-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-012-0065-9

Keywords

Navigation