Abstract
Concrete, which forms the skeleton of buildings, is the most important building material to ensure the continuity of a building’s durability and to survive a possible earthquake. Concrete durability is directly related to its constituent materials. In this study, it was investigated how concrete aggregate and chemical admixture change the strength of concrete according to their type. The research question of this study is: what is the place and importance of aggregate and chemical admixture in increasing concrete strength? Recent earthquakes, especially in Turkey, have shown that most of the buildings that collapsed had poor-quality concrete. The aim of this study is to determine the concrete mix designs for the production of superplasticizer concrete for the production of concrete with the desired strength depending on the tested parameters. In this study, the effect of the parameters that make up the tested concrete content on concrete strength was investigated both experimentally and statistically. Water–cement ratio, aggregate type, Los Angeles abrasion resistance of aggregates, aggregate–cement ratio and new-generation polycarboxylate-supported superplasticizer chemical admixture are the parameters in the concrete content. Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS, an up-to-date software, using the experimental findings. There was a very good agreement between both measured and predicted values. The equations with a coefficient of determination R2 > 0.96 were derived. The developed statistical method was found to be unique and highly accurate. Thus, it is aimed to provide safe, economical, practical and time-saving pre-mix designs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Concrete is a building material obtained as a result of mixing the aggregate, cement, and water that constitute it in certain standards [1, 2]. Basic components utilized in the preparation of concrete are variation sizes of aggregates, cement and water. In addition to these, chemical additives and mineral additives are needed to produce concrete with the required high strength [3,4,5].
Since aggregates form more than 60% of the concrete volume, the physical and mechanical characteristics of the aggregates directly affect the features of the concrete [6, 7]. The effect of the type of aggregate in concrete on the properties of concrete has been studied since ancient times and has been an important research topic. The effect of the aggregate types such as basalt, limestone and sandstone on strength and durability of concrete in the concrete production was investigated [8, 9]. In Alyamac and İnce [10], the hardened concrete characteristics of self-compacting concretes produced utilizing waste marble powder were researched . In Alyamac and Tugrul [11], waste marble powder was used instead of aggregate to produce durable, aesthetic, and eco-friendly concrete. In Hong et al. [12], different types of aggregate were tested to investigate the effects of aggregate content on the strength of concrete. In Tugrul Tunc [13], the strength characteristics of concrete specimens produced using quartzite natural aggregates were determined. In Tugrul Tunc [14], the usability of basalt aggregates of Elazig province in Turkey in concrete production was experimentally investigated. The strength of cementitious composites produced using basalt aggregate has been studied in the previous study [15]. In Chang et al. [16], a series of tests were conducted using different components for the production of ultra-high-strength concrete.
Abrasion resistance of concrete aggregates is an important parameter that should be examined for all structures, especially engineering structures such as roads and airports [17, 18]. Among the tests to determine aggregate abrasion resistance, Los Angeles test is recommended because it is easy to apply [19, 20]. It can be said that the resistance to abrasion increases with decreasing Los Angeles value (LA) [18]. Since concrete strength is directly related to the properties aggregate in content, aggregate abrasion resistance directly affects concrete strength [21,22,23].
According to TS 802 [24], mixing water should be selected as the minimum amount that will provide the workability and durability properties needed in fresh and hardened concrete. One of the most important parameters affecting concrete strength is the water-to-cement ratio (W/C). This ratio is directly related to the strength class of concrete, as it directly affects all properties, especially the strength properties of concrete [25]. In Haddad et al. [26], self-compacting concrete mixes were designed for high water-to-cement ratios (W/C = 0.40 and 0.50) and the strength of the produced concrete specimens was compared. Topcu et al. [27] investigated the effect of different water-to-cement ratios and hyper-plasticizer content on the 28-day compressive strength of concrete. It was determined that concrete strength decreased as the water-to-cement ratio increased. Since aggregate is cheaper than cement, the higher the ratio of aggregate to cement in concrete, the greater the economic gain, provided that concrete is produced to certain required standards. Therefore, choosing the right aggregate is very important in concrete production.
Chemical additives are materials that are added to the concrete in a very small amount compared to the cement content during the mixing process to improve the properties of fresh and hardened concrete [4]. The opposite effects can occur as a result of adding these additives to the mixture more than they should be, and they may not provide any benefit if they are used too little [28]. Among the most commonly used chemical additives, plasticizers, set retardants, set accelerators, air-entraining additives, waterproofing additives, and antifreeze can be shown [29]. In Basyigit and Ozturk [30], the optimum value of setting accelerator admixture in concrete was investigated.
During the production phase of the concrete mix, its design must be done correctly in order to obtain concrete suitable for its purpose. In order to determine the optimum concrete mix designs, statistical/numerical modeling studies should be given importance. In In Açıkgenç et al. [31], self-compacting concretes containing waste marble aggregate were analyzed with artificial neural networks model and concrete design was performed. In Alyamac et al. [32], Response Surface Methodology, a multi-purpose statistical method, was used to produce self-compacting concrete using waste marble instead of aggregate. In Tugrul Tunc [33], the equations that can be safely used for high-performance eco-friendly concretes produced using waste aggregates have been developed. In Tunc and Alyamac [34], the strength properties of a series of concretes produced by utilizing different aggregate types were analyzed both experimentally and by Response Surface Methodology.
It is obvious that the biggest reason for the collapse of approximately 230 thousand buildings in the recent earthquakes of magnitude 7.8 and 7.7 in Turkey is poor-quality concrete. For this reason, it is very important to produce concrete with the desired strength by taking into account the relevant standards and regulations in order to build the structures durable. There are many studies in the literature to investigate the concrete strength. However, there is a lack of experimental and statistical studies on the effect of aggregate type and chemical admixture on concrete strength. Considering the fact that the concrete content and concrete mix ratio should be decided in order to obtain the desired concrete strength and this should be achieved with high accuracy, the present study has a high original value.
The novelty of the present study compared to previous studies is to determine how the constituent materials of concrete such as aggregate type, aggregate abrasion resistance and chemical admixtures change the concrete strength. By utilizing the findings of the present study, which is both an experimental and statistical study, the optimum concrete content and concrete mix design will be made to ensure the production of high-quality concrete in accordance with its purpose. The quality concrete is of great importance for the durability and continuity of structures.
The aim of this study is to determine the optimum concrete mix designs in the production of superplasticizer concrete depending on the tested parameters. It is aimed to predict with high accuracy the compressive strength and splitting tensile strength values, which are the most important hardened concrete properties, without testing by using dimensionless parameters such as Los Angeles abrasion value, water–cement ratio, aggregate–cement ratio and chemical additive ratio with experimental data. Thus, safe, economical, practical and time-saving pre-mix designs will be presented to application engineers and the literature.
2 Materials and Method
2.1 Materials
In the present study, different aggregate types such as basalt, marble, limestone and natural aggregate (stream bed material) extracted from Elazığ province of Turkey were tested. Some of these aggregate types are waste aggregates. These types of aggregates are easy to obtain and cheap. In addition, the grain size curves of the aggregates that are deemed suitable for use in concrete must remain between the A32–B32 standard curves according to TS 802 [24]. In the present experimental study, Dmax = 8 mm was chosen for the aggregates tested. The tested aggregates were firstly sieve-analyzed and made available for use in the relevant concrete production. Saturated surface dry weights and water absorption values of these aggregates were determined in accordance with TS 706 EN 12620+A1 [35] (Table 1). Thus, the necessary information about the physical properties of these aggregates has been provided. In Table 1, basalt aggregates with different properties are symbolized as BS1 and BS2, natural aggregates as NA, waste marble aggregates as WM, and limestone aggregates with different properties as LS1 and LS2.
In the current study, Chryso Fluid Optima 280 SC3 a new-generation polycarboxylate-supported superplasticizer was used in order to ensure processability and prevent decomposition since water–cement ratios are low. The characteristic properties of the related additive provided by the manufacturer are given in Table 2.
The specific gravity of CEM I 42.5 N Portland cement used in concrete production in the present study is 3.06 g/cm3, and the Blaine specific surface area is 3490 cm2/g. The initial setting time of this cement is 2.6 h, and the final setting time is 3.5 h. In accordance with TS EN 197-1, 1-day, 7-day and 28-day compressive strengths of cement mortar have been determined as 26.7 MPa, 39.4 MPa and 48.5 MPa, respectively [34]. In addition, a liquid-brown-colored, highly water-reducing superplasticizing chemical admixture with a density of 1.075 ± 0.02 g/cm3, pH 4.00 ± 1 and chloride content < 0.1% was used in the experimental studies [4].
2.2 Los Angeles Abrasion Test
Los Angeles abrasion tests were conducted with the present device (Fig. 1a) separately for each aggregate in order to determine the abrasion losses of the aggregates to be utilized in the concrete mixes. For the experimental test, a total of 5000 g aggregate sample, 2500 g of coarse aggregate and 2500 g of medium aggregate, was washed, dried in a drying oven at 110 ± 5 °C and weighed in accordance with the relevant standard [35]. This process was continued until the aggregate sample reached a constant weight. The balls and oven-dried aggregates were left in the drying oven, which was 31–33 revolutions per minute at a constant speed, and the gate was closed and 500 cycles were made. At the end of the test, the balls inside the Los Angeles abrasion test device were carefully cleaned of aggregate particles to avoid experimental errors. The aggregate particles obtained at the end of the experimental test were sieved with a mesh size of 1.6 mm, and the particles remaining on the sieve were weighed (Fig. 1b). After these processes, Eq. (1) was used to calculate the LA abrasion loss value (%) [36]. As a result of Los Angeles abrasion tests performed in accordance with the relevant standard [36] for these six types of aggregates, it was decided that they could be utilized in concrete.
where LA = Los Angeles abrasion value (%), m = the weight of the material remaining on the 1.6 mm sieve (g).
2.3 Compressive Strength Test and Splitting Tensile Strength Test
The cubic specimens of 150 mm × 150 mm × 150 mm obtained from concrete mixes were subjected to compressive strength test in accordance with TS EN 12390-3 standard [37] at the end of a 28-day curing period. In this experimental test, a concrete test press with a capacity of 2500 kN was used (Fig. 2a). The specimens placed in the device were loaded at a constant speed of 6.8 MPa/s, their fracture loads were determined, and their compressive strength value was calculated using Eq. (2). The view of the specimens after the compressive strength test is given in Fig. 2c,
where fc = compressive strength (MPa), P = the maximum load that causes the specimen to fracture (N), and A = the cross-sectional area of the specimen perpendicular to the load application direction (mm2).
In addition, the cubic specimens of 150 mm × 150 mm × 150 mm were subjected to the splitting tensile strength test in accordance with the TS EN 12390-6 standard [38] at the end of the 28-day curing period (Fig. 2b). The specimens placed in the test device were loaded with a constant speed of 1.05 MPa/s, their fracture loads were determined, and the test was conducted. The splitting tensile strength value was calculated using Eq. (3). The view of the specimens after the splitting tensile strength test is shown in Fig. 2d.
where ft = splitting tensile strength (MPa), P = pressure load causing fracture (N), D = diameter of cubic specimen (mm) and L = length of cubic specimen (mm).
2.4 Statistical Analysis
SPSS is an advanced statistical software program. SPSS can successfully perform statistical studies such as data analysis, data management and data visualization. With this program, statistical modeling and regression analysis based on various data can be performed. Available in different versions, IBM SPSS Statistics 22 program was used in the present study. SPSS includes analytical and research graphics in addition to standard 2D and 3D graphics. It enables the investigation of outliers and data analysis. Different data estimation methods can be tried with SPSS.
In this study, an analysis based on “Nonlinear Estimation” has been made. From the “Data View” tab, after defining the relevant parameters to the program and entering the data, the Analyze → Regression → Nonlinear sequence is applied, respectively. The formulation is created from the “Model Expression” tab by selecting the dependent parameter (fc) and independent parameters (W/C, A/C, CA, LA) from the “Nonlinear Regression” window. After defining the sensitivity ranges of the relevant parameters in the “Parameters” tab, the analysis is performed. The formula that gives the highest determination coefficient (R2) is determined, and the process is ended. In order to determine the most suitable model, many different models have been tested using SPSS in the present study.
3 Experimental Results and Discussion
In this study, firstly, SEM pictures, EDX and FTIR analyses of six types of aggregates to be tested from the relevant region were made and Los Angeles abrasion test was performed separately for these aggregates. A total of 150 concrete cube specimens were prepared with these aggregates. Slump test was performed for fresh concrete properties. After 28 days of curing, 75 specimens were tested for concrete compressive strength and 75 specimens were tested for splitting tensile strength. The effects of the relevant parameters, water–cement ratio (W/C), aggregate–cement ratio (A/C), chemical admixture ratio (CA) and Los Angeles abrasion value (LA), on the strength were discussed both experimentally and statistically by modeling. The comprehensive and detailed flowchart of the study is given in Fig. 3.
In this study, the effect of aggregate type and chemical admixture used in concrete mixtures on concrete strength was investigated experimentally and statistically by varying the related parameters. By using various aggregate types (such as limestone, basalt and marble), concrete mixes with a chemical additive (CA) for 400 kg/m3 cement content and for W/C = 0.38, 0.40, 0.42 and 0.45 were prepared. A series of trial mixes were produced to determine the optimum proportion of chemical admixture to be included in the concrete. Since the highest strength for superplasticizer concrete was determined for a chemical admixture ratio of 1.2%, this ratio was settled on. Therefore, in the concrete mixes produced, the chemical admixture was added at 0% and 1.2% by weight of cement and tested. In addition, reference concrete mixes with W/C = 0.50, 0.55 and 0.60 with limestone and natural aggregate with a cement content of 300 kg/m3 and 400 kg/m3 were prepared. In this study, a total of 25 concrete mixes were prepared in order to obtain high-strength superplasticizer concrete and to determine the fresh and hardened concrete properties (Table 3).
Concrete mixes containing basalt aggregate types are named BS1C and BS2C, concrete mixes containing natural aggregate NAC, concrete mixes containing waste marble aggregate WMC, and concrete mixes containing limestone aggregate types are named LS1C and LS2C in the present study. Saturated surface dry weights of the aggregates were used while preparing concrete mixes. In addition, the slump values representing the fresh concrete properties of the tested concrete specimens are presented in Table 3. Accordingly, it was concluded that the consistency classes of the concrete specimens in question were S3 to S4 and were compatible with their strength values.
The concrete mixes (BS1C, BS2C, NAC, WMC, LS1C, and LS2C) were prepared by using a vertical axis rotating in a mixer with the mix design given in Table 3. In order to determine the mechanical properties of the hardened concrete mixes, 150 concrete specimens of 150 mm × 150 mm × 150 mm were produced. The concrete specimens were placed in a curing pool at 23 ± 2 °C and cured for 28 days. The compressive strength in accordance with TS EN 12390-3 standard [37] for 75 cubic specimens of 150 mm × 150 mm × 150 mm removed from curing, and splitting tensile strength tests in accordance with TS EN 12390-6 standard [38] for 75 specimens of the same dimensions were carried out. The compressive strength and splitting tensile strength values obtained as a result of the tests are given in Table 3 as the arithmetic mean of 3 concrete specimens for each series. The total test series is 25 and 3 for compressive strength and 3 for tensile strength at splitting were produced from each series. A total of 150 specimens, 75 specimens for compressive strength and 75 specimens for splitting tensile strength, were subjected to the experimental test to determine the related strengths.
3.1 SEM Images, EDX Analysis and FTIR Analysis of the Aggregates
In the present study, the microstructural morphology and chemical content of the aggregates tested were investigated. In this context, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) test was performed using the existing energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) micro-analyzer to examine the microstructure. SEM images and EDX analysis findings are presented in Fig. 4.
SEM images are selected at × 5000 magnification. When the microstructure of the basalt aggregate tested in the present study is analyzed, a regular settlement with less pore space can be seen. However, it is possible to say from the SEM image that there are too many elements (Fig. 4a). This situation is consistent with the elemental map obtained as a result of EDX analysis given in Fig. 4a. It is seen that elements such as Fe, O, Si and Al are at high levels. The occasional brightness appearance in the SEM image also indicates the presence of these elements, especially the Si element (Fig. 4a). The presence and concentration of elements such as Fe and Si indicate that basalt aggregate can be durable [39,40,41].
When examining the microstructure in the SEM image for the waste marble aggregate tested, the presence of strong bonds draws attention, although small pore spaces were observed (Fig. 4b). According to the elemental structure, the existence of a large number of elements is observed. In EDX analysis, Ca, O, Fe, Al, Si and Mg are the most prominent elements (Fig. 4b). This situation is supported by previous studies [18, 42, 43].
When the microstructure is examined in the SEM image in Fig. 4c for the tested limestone aggregate, it is seen that the pore spaces are excessive. In addition, prominent micro-cracks are noticeable. This indicates that limestone aggregate can be less durable than others. According to the elemental structure, relatively few elements are observed. While Ca, O, C, N and Al elements are observed in EDX analysis, it is seen that the element with the highest value is Ca (Fig. 4c). This is supported for marble aggregate and its derivatives by previous studies [44, 45].
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy is a technique for obtaining structural, compositional and functional information from the titration of functional groups of the sample macromolecules under investigation. This spectroscopic technique is advantageous compared to other techniques in that it provides fast, sensitive and efficient results in a relatively inexpensive way, without the need for lengthy sample preparation procedures involving the use of additional substances such as staining and labeling, and without damaging the sample. When Fig. 5 is examined, it is seen that there is a fluctuation for all three aggregate types after 1000 wave number. This difference indicates C–O (carbon–oxygen) tension and the formation of oligosaccharides, carbohydrates, etc. FTIR analysis of limestone and marble aggregate shows that they are similar to each other (Fig. 5b, c). Accordingly, it is concluded from the FTIR analysis that basalt aggregate will be more durable (Fig. 5a).
3.2 Variation of Concrete Strength with Water-to-Cement Ratio
As water and cement are effective materials in concrete content, water-to-cement ratio is the main parameter affecting concrete strength. It is known from previous studies [46,47,48] that concrete strength decreases with the increase of water-to-cement ratio. In the present study, the effect of this change on the decreasing trend with the different types of aggregates tested in the concrete content is discussed. Since the properties of the same type of aggregate can differ from each other, it has been observed that its effect on concrete strength is also different. It was determined that the compressive strength values of BS1C specimens produced with a type of basalt aggregate were approximately 23% higher than BS2C specimens produced with another type of basalt aggregate (Fig. 6a). It was determined that the splitting tensile strength values of BS1C specimens were approximately 12% higher than BS2C specimens (Fig. 6b). Similarly, it has been calculated that there are 23% difference for compressive strength and 17% difference for splitting tensile strength between LS1C and LS2C specimens produced with limestone aggregates with different properties.
The highest strength values were obtained for BS1C, and the lowest strength values were obtained for LS2C for the superplasticizer concrete. It is seen that the lowest strength values are obtained from NAC specimens produced with natural aggregates for the concrete without chemical additive. Although the usability of this aggregate type in concrete is economically advantageous, it is not recommended in terms of strength [49, 50]. However, it is seen that the strength values in accordance with the relevant standards [28] are obtained for the concrete produced with this aggregate in the present study. In addition, it is seen that the tendency of the concrete strength to change with water-to-cement ratio is compatible with the literature [48, 51, 52]. It is clearly seen in Fig. 6 how the strength of 6 series of concrete specimens produced according to various aggregate types changes with water-to-cement ratio. The determination coefficients (R2) of the fitting nonlinear curves varying between 0.96 and 1.0 show the reliability of the obtained findings (Fig. 6).
3.3 Variation of Concrete Strength with Aggregate-to-Cement Ratio
Since the most basic material forming the concrete is aggregate, it directly affects the strength of concrete. The effect of the type and property of the aggregate on concrete strength is quite high [53, 54]. As seen in Fig. 6, concrete strength is listed as BS1C, BS2C, LS1C, WMC LS2C and NAC from high to low. Basalt aggregate (BS1) is seen to be the most durable aggregate in terms of concrete strength. This situation is also supported by the literature [14]. Generally, it is seen that the compressive strength and splitting tensile strength increased as the dimensionless aggregate-to-cement ratio (A/C) increased. Although the aggregate-to-cement ratio of three specimens tested for LS2C increased, there is a clear decrease in strength values (Fig. 7a, b). This is because chemical additive is not used for these three specimens. For the LS2C specimens tested, it is seen that the A/C value increased approximately 40%, and the compressive strength decreased approximately 16% (Fig. 7a). Similarly, it is seen that with the increase of A/C value approximately 40%, the splitting tensile strength decreased approximately 27% (Fig. 7b). Thus, the effect of chemical additive on strength is clearly seen. The effect of chemical additive increasing concrete strength is clearly seen. This situation is also supported by the literature [55,56,57].
In Fig. 7, it is seen that the determination coefficients (R2) of the linear curves fitted to each series of test results for the superplasticizer concrete specimens are generally higher than 0.90. An increasing trend is observed for these curves. Concrete specimens without chemical additive tend to increase among themselves. However, the determination coefficients of the fitted curves are relatively lower than the others (Fig. 7a, b). The reason for this is that lower strength values are obtained compared to specimens containing chemical additive with the same properties.
3.4 Variation of Concrete Strength with the Los Angeles Abrasion Value (LA) of the Aggregate
One of the most current tests applied to measure the abrasion resistance of aggregates is the Los Angeles abrasion test. As the Los Angeles abrasion value (LA) determined by this test increases, the abrasion resistance of the aggregate decreases [18, 34]. The LA value of utilized BS1 aggregate type in BS1C specimens, in which the highest strength of superplasticizer concrete was obtained, was measured as 9.2%. The LA value of utilized LS2 aggregate type in LS2C specimens, in which the lowest strength of superplasticizer concrete was obtained, was measured as 46.2%. Thus, this situation indicates that concrete (BS1C) produced with BS1 aggregate type will have high strength, while concrete (LS2C) produced with LS2 aggregate type will have low strength.
It was calculated that the aggregate Los Angeles abrasion value (LA) increased approximately 5 times and the mean compressive strength value decreased approximately 35% among the concrete specimens containing chemical additive, i.e., superplasticizer concrete specimens (Fig. 8a). Similarly, it has been calculated that the aggregate abrasion value increases approximately 5 times and the mean splitting tensile strength value decreases approximately 27% among the superplasticizer concrete specimens (Fig. 8b).
3.5 Comparison of Present Study Findings with Previous Study Findings
From the present experimental study, it was determined that the highest concrete strength values were measured for the BS1C specimens produced with a type of basalt aggregate BS1 and the lowest concrete strength values were measured for the LS2C specimens produced with limestone aggregate type LS2 for the superplasticizer concrete. In Fig. 9, concrete strength values varying with water-to-cement ratio have been presented for both the findings of the present study and the findings of the previous studies. In this context, the concrete strength values have been analyzed and discussed for concrete specimens produced with sandstone [3], for specimens produced with natural aggregate-recycled aggregate [58] and for specimens produced with river sand-crushed aggregate [59].
The strength values of BS1C specimens and LS2C specimens from the present study were compared with the findings of the previous study. When the findings of the present study were analyzed, it was observed that the 28-day compressive strength and 28-day splitting tensile strength generally decreased parabolically with increasing water–cement ratio (Fig. 9a, b). It is thought that the reason for the difference in the strength values for constant water–cement ratio values is the chemical additive used. The reason for the strength values measured for increasing water–cement ratio can also be explained by the use of chemical admixture. In addition, relatively high strength values were obtained even in the samples produced with natural aggregates taken from the river bed. Thus, it is clearly understood that chemical admixture has a very important effect on concrete strength considering its type.
4 Statistical Analysis and Discussion
Within the scope of the present study, it is aimed to estimate the compressive strength and splitting tensile strength of superplasticizer concrete specimens by a nonlinear statistical model developed using IBM SPSS statistics 22 software for statistical data analysis. For this purpose, many different models have been tested. In the analyzes, the experimental results given in Table 3 and the selected effective dimensionless parameters were used. After detailed analysis, the most suitable model was selected and Eqs. (4) and (5) were developed, respectively, in order to calculate the compressive strength and splitting tensile strength of the superplasticizer concrete with high accuracy. There appears to be a fairly good fit between measured fc values and predicted fc values. This is also understood by the fact that the curve fitted to the data almost coincides with the perfect agreement (Fig. 10a). In addition, the determination coefficient R2 = 0.98 indicates the safe usability of the developed Eq. (4), because R2 close to 1.0 means that the developed equation is very close to the truth [60, 61].
The data obtained from the experiments were compared with the data obtained from the models in order to verify the accuracy and limitation of the developed models. In order to predict the accuracy of Eqs. (4) and (5), absolute relative deviation ARD (%) calculation has been made by Eq. (6). ARD (%) calculation was performed in accordance with previous studies [32, 34, 62]. In Fig. 10b, it is seen that the absolute relative deviation values for the measured fc values and predicted fc values are mostly scattered around the zero axis. It has been determined that the models developed to calculate compressive strength and splitting tensile strength within the scope of the present study with the area deviation values between −5 and + 5% are determined to be highly accurate.
where W/C = dimensionless water-to-cement ratio, A/C = dimensionless aggregate-to-cement ratio, CA = chemical additive ratio used as a percentage of cement, and LA = Los Angeles abrasion value.
Similarly, it is observed that splitting tensile strength (ft) values calculated with Eq. (5) developed to predict ft values are very close to the measured ft values. There appears to be a fairly good fit between measured ft values and predicted ft values. This is because the curve fitting in the graph almost coincides with the perfect agreement (Fig. 11a). In addition, the determination coefficient R2 = 0.96 indicates the safe usability of the developed Eq. (5).
It is seen that absolute relative deviation values for measured ft values and predicted ft values are mostly scattered around the zero axis (Fig. 11b). It has been determined that the model is developed to calculate the splitting tensile strength value of the concrete containing chemical additive within the scope of the present study with the deviation values generally between − 5 and + 5%, because the obtained deviation values are thought to be quite small for the findings obtained with such a statistical model [63, 64].
It is known from the previous study [65] that there is a good match between compressive strength and splitting tensile strength and that both parameters change directly proportional to each other. In Fig. 12, the variation of ft values with fc values is presented for both measured and predicted values. In addition, when both the experimental findings and statistical findings obtained are analyzed, it was observed that fc values varied approximately 7–9 times ft values. This is supported by previous study [66]. The determination coefficient between fc values and ft values for measured values was determined as R2 = 0.89. The determination coefficient between fc values and ft values for predicted values was determined as R2 = 0.86. It is possible to say that there is a good harmony with these determined coefficients.
5 Conclusions
The main conclusions drawn from present study are presented below:
-
Since it is aimed to build earthquake-resistant structures with the production of superplasticizer concrete, the current study contributed to the quality of life.
-
Since waste aggregates are also recycled in the current study, it is thought that it will have a positive impact in terms of both sustainable environment and energy since it is thought that environmental damage will be reduced. Thus, it is thought that a great contribution will be made in terms of national economic security.
-
By obtaining the desired strength from concrete, it is thought that potential sectoral application areas, global market projections, employment contribution and competitiveness in the relevant market will increase. As can be seen, superplasticizer concretes have a significant superiority in terms of strength.
-
For the production of superplasticizer concrete tested in the present study, new numerical models have been designed to contribute to concrete technology in terms of determining concrete strength and mix design by advancing university–industry cooperation. In this respect, it is considered to be an original study carried out on a systematic basis within the scope of research and development.
-
When the variation of concrete strength values with water-to-cement ratio is examined, it is determined that the determination coefficients (R2) of the fitted nonlinear curves (decreasing parabolic) change between 0.96 and 1.0.
-
It was concluded that the strength values of concrete specimens containing chemical additive increased with a nearly perfect agreement (R2 > 0.90) with the aggregate-to-cement ratio.
-
From the developed equations by SPSS in the present study, a fairly good fit (R2 = 0.98 and R2 = 0.96, respectively) was determined between the measured and predicted values of compressive strength and splitting tensile strength.
-
Absolute relative deviation (ARD) ratios for predicted fc values were determined to generally vary between − 5% and + 5%.
-
Investigation of the change of concrete strength depending on the parameters LA, W/C, A/C, CA adds originality to the study. In addition, it was seen that the method developed using these four parameters gave high accuracy values.
In the present study, with the statistical method developed using experimental findings and concrete strength for different test parameters, it is concluded that it is predicted in a practical, economical and reliable way. Thus, it is aimed to offer pre-concrete mix designs that can be used safely, economically, practically and to save time.
On February 6, 2023, at least 53,537 people in Turkey and at least 8476 people in Syria lost their lives and approximately 230,000 buildings collapsed as a result of the earthquakes of magnitude 7.8 and 7.7 in the region including Elazığ province, where the current study was conducted. This situation shows that more importance should be given to the production of durable and long-lasting concrete in line with the relevant regulations.
Data Availability
Data will be made available on request. Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Subramaniam, D.N.; Hareindirasarma, S.; Janarthanan, B.: An alternative approach to optimize aggregate-to-cement ratio and compaction in pervious concrete. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 47(10), 13063–13071 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-06737-1
Ali, B.; Qureshi, L.A.; Baig, H.S.; Malik, S.; Din, M.; Aslam, H.M.U.: Effect of molasses and water–cement ratio on properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 45(5), 3455–3467 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-04117-w
Cihan, M.T.; Avşar, Y.E.: Predictability of the mechanical properties of glass fibrous mortar. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 48(4), 4439–4449 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-07018-7
TugrulTunc, E.: An experimental study based on the strength properties of concrete containing chemical admixture. Eur. J. Sci. Technol. 17, 901–908 (2019). https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.649737
Sunarsih, E.S.; As’ad, S.; Sam, A.R.M.; Kristiawan, S.A.: Properties of fly ash-slag-based geopolymer concrete with low molarity sodium hydroxide. Civ. Eng. J. 9(02), 381–392 (2023). https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-02-010
Kryeziu, D.; Selmani, F.; Mujaj, A.; Kondi, I.: Recycled concrete aggregates: a promising and sustainable option for the construction industry. J. Hum. Earth Future 4(2), 166–180 (2023). https://doi.org/10.28991/HEF-2023-04-02-03
TugrulTunc, E.: Effect of aggregates with different physical properties on concrete strength for different water to cement ratio and different cement content. Afyon Kocatepe Univ. J. Sci. Eng. 20, 487–497 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3541/akufemubid.668948
Kogbara, R.B.; Iyengar, S.R.; Grasley, Z.C.; Rahman, S.; Masad, E.A.; Zollinger, D.G.: Relating damage evolution of concrete cooled to cryogenic temperatures to permeability. Cryogenics 64, 21–28 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2014.09.001
Piasta, W.; Góra, J.; Turkiewicz, T.: Properties and durability of coarse igneous rock aggregates and concretes. Constr. Build. Mater. 126, 119–129 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.022
Alyamac, K.E.; Ince, R.: A preliminary concrete mix design for SCC with marble powders. Constr. Build. Mater. 23, 1201–1210 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.012
Alyamac, K.E.; Tugrul, E: A durable, eco-friendly and aesthetic concrete work: marble concrete. In: 11th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering (ACE 2014), vol. 50, pp. 21–25 (2014)
Hong, L.; Gu, X.; Lin, F.: Influence of aggregate surface roughness on mechanical properties of interface and concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 65, 338–349 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.131
TugrulTunc, E.: Strength properties of hardened concrete produced with natural aggregates for different water/cement ratios. Eur. J. Sci. Technol. 14, 280–287 (2018). https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.486093
TugrulTunc, E.: Effects of basalt aggregates on concrete properties. Qual. Stud. 13, 68–79 (2018). https://doi.org/10.12739/NWSA.2018.13.2.E0043
Ragab, M.; Abo El-Naga, I.: Performance assessment of cold asphalt concrete mixtures containing recycled paving materials. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 47(4), 4351–4360 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06101-9
Chang, W.; Zheng, W.; Hao, M.: Lateral dilation and limited value of volumetric ratio of stirrups for ultra-high strength concrete confined with spiral stirrups. Mater. Struct.Struct. 54(3), 125 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01718-6
Sapozhnikov, N.: Composite pavement for highways, streets and airports with enriched limestone quarry waste as a coarse aggregate for the concrete of the subbase. U.S. Patent Application No. 11/501,957 (2007)
TugrulTunc, E.; Alyamac, K.E.: A preliminary estimation method of Los Angeles abrasion value of concrete aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 222, 437–446 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.176
Ugur, I.; Demirdag, S.; Yavuz, H.: Effect of rock properties on the Los Angeles abrasion and impact test characteristics of the aggregates. Mater CharactCharact. 61(90), 96 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2009.10.014
TugrulTunc, E.; Alyamac, K.E.: The effect of aggregate type on Los Angeles abrasion loss for different test parameters. Firat Univ. J. Eng. Sci. 32, 1–10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.35234/fumbd.569198. (in Turkish)
Li, H.; Zhang, M.; Ou, J.: Abrasion resistance of concrete containing nano-particles for pavement. Wear 260, 1262–1266 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2005.08.006
Siddique, R.: Compressive strength, water absorption, sorptivity, abrasion resistance and permeability of self-compacting concrete containing coal bottom ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 47, 1444–1450 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.081
He, Z.; Chena, X.; Cai, X.: Influence and mechanism of micro/nano-mineral admixtures on the abrasion resistance of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 197, 91–98 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.224
TS 802: Concrete Mix Calculation Principles. Turkish Standards Institute, Ankara (2016).
Firoozi, S.; Dehestani, M.; NavayiNeya, B.: Effect of water to cement ratio on the mode III fracture energy of self-compacting concrete. Mater. Struct.Struct. 51, 1–10 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1208-x
Haddad, R.H.; Odeh, R.A.; Amawi, H.A.; Ababneh, A.N.: Thermal performance of self-compacting concrete: destructive and nondestructive evaluation. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 40, 1205–1214 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2013-0037
Topcu, I.B.; Uygunoglu, T.; Hocaoglu, I.: Electrical conductivity of setting cement paste with different mineral admixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 28, 414–420 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.068
ACI 212.3R-10: Report on Chemical Admixtures for Concrete, p. 65. American Concrete Institute, Indianapolis (2010)
Whitney, D.P.: Chemical admixtures. In: Nawy, E. (Ed.) Concrete Construction Engineering Handbook, pp. 1–21. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2008)
Başyiğit, C.; Öztürk, A.: The effect of chemical additive amount on shot concrete and concrete compressive strength. Sinop Univ. Sci. J. 4, 71–83 (2019). https://doi.org/10.33484/sinopfbd.494656. (in Turkish)
Açıkgenç, M.; Alyamaç, K.E.; İnce, R.: Determination of strength properties of self compacting concrete manufactured with marble powder by using artificial neural network. SDU Int. J. Technol. Sci. 4, 72–79 (2012) (in Turkish)
Alyamac, K.E.; Ghafari, E.; Ince, R.: Development of eco-efficient self-compacting concrete with waste marble powder using the response surface method. J. Clean. Prod. 144, 192–202 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.156
TugrulTunc, E.: Recycling of marble waste: a review based on strength of concrete containing marble waste. J. Environ. Manag. 231, 86–97 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.034
TugrulTunc, E.; Alyamac, K.E.: Determination of the relationship between the Los Angeles abrasion values of aggregates and concrete strength using the response surface methodology. Constr. Build. Mater. 260, 119850 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119850
TS 706 EN 12620+A1: Aggregates for Concrete. Turkish Standards Institute, Ankara (2009).
ASTM C131: Standard Test Method for Resistance to Degradation of Small-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine. ASTM International, West Conshohocken (2006)
TSEN 12390-3: Concrete-Hardened Concrete Tests-Part 3: Determination of Compressive Strength in Test Samples. Turkish Standards Institute, Ankara (2003).
TS EN 12390-6: Concrete-Hardened Concrete Tests-Part 3: Determination of Splitting Tensile Strength of Test Samples. Turkish Standards Institute, Ankara (2010).
Tasong, W.A.; Cripps, J.C.; Lynsdale, C.J.: Aggregate-cement chemical interactions. Cem. Concr. Res.. Concr. Res. 28, 1037–1048 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00067-2
Karakuş, A.: Investigating on possible use of Diyarbakir basalt waste in stone mastic asphalt. Constr. Build. Mater. 25, 3502–3507 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.043
Wang, Z.; Wang, H.; An, D.; Ai, T.; Zhao, P.: Laboratory investigation on deicing characteristics of asphalt mixtures using magnetite aggregate as microwave-absorbing materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 124, 589–597 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.137
Seghir, N.T.; Mellas, M.; Sadowski, Ł; Żak, A.: Effects of marble powder on the properties of the air-cured blended cement paste. J. Clean. Prod. 183, 858–868 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.267
Pappu, A.; Thakur, V.K.; Patidar, R.; Asolekar, S.R.; Saxena, M.: Recycling marble wastes and jarosite wastes into sustainable hybrid composite materials and validation through Response surface methodology. J. Clean. Prod. 240, 118249 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118249
Qureshi, T.; Kanellopoulos, A.; Al-Tabbaa, A.: Autogenous self-healing of cement with expansive minerals-I: impact in early age crack healing. Constr. Build. Mater. 192, 768–784 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.143
Suleiman, A.R.; Nelson, A.J.; Nehdi, M.L.: Visualization and quantification of crack self-healing in cement-based materials incorporating different minerals. Cem. Concr. Compos.. Concr. Compos. 103, 49–58 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.04.026
Ghaly, A.M.; Cahill, J.D., IV.: Correlation of strength, rubber content, and water to cement ratio in rubberized concrete. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 32, 1075–1081 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1139/l05-063
Bentz, D.P.; Peltz, M.A.; Winpigler, J.: Early-age properties of cement-based materials. II: influence of water-to-cement ratio. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 21, 512–517 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:9(512)
Lotfi-Omran, O.; Sadrmomtazi, A.; Nikbin, I.M.: A comprehensive study on the effect of water to cement ratio on the mechanical and radiation shielding properties of heavyweight concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 229, 116905 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116905
Tošić, N.; Marinković, S.; Dašić, T.; Stanić, M.: Multicriteria optimization of natural and recycled aggregate concrete for structural use. J. Clean. Prod. 87, 766–776 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.070
Laserna, S.; Montero, J.: Influence of natural aggregates typology on recycled concrete strength properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 115, 78–86 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.037
Nikbin, I.M.; Beygi, M.H.A.; Kazemi, M.T.; Amiri, J.V.; Rabbanifar, S.; Rahmani, E.; Rahimi, S.: A comprehensive investigation into the effect of water to cement ratio and powder content on mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 57, 69–80 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.098
Nematollahzade, M.; Tajadini, A.; Afshoon, I.; Aslani, F.: Influence of different curing conditions and water to cement ratio on properties of self-compacting concretes. Constr. Build. Mater. 237, 117570 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117570
Shaaban, M.; Edris, W.F.; Odah, E.; Ezz, M.S.; Al-Sayed, A.A.K.A.: A green way of producing high strength concrete utilizing recycled concrete. Civ. Eng. J. 9(10), 2467–2485 (2023). https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-10-08
Wang, X.; Saifullah, H.A.; Nishikawa, H.; Nakarai, K.: Effect of water–cement ratio, aggregate type, and curing temperature on the fracture energy of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 259, 119646 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119646
Yilmaz, U.S.; Turken, H.: The effects of various curing materials on the compressive strength characteristic of the concretes produced with multiple chemical admixtures. Sci. Iran. 19, 77–83 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2011.11.038
Wibowo, A.; Klein, H.P.; Grigsby, R.A.: U.S. Patent Application No. 15/033,129 (2016)
Hasdemir, S.; Tuğrul, A.; Yılmaz, M.: The effect of natural sand composition on concrete strength. Constr. Build. Mater. 112, 940–948 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.188
Radonjanin, V.; Malešev, M.; Marinković, S.; Al Malty, A.E.S.: Green recycled aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 47, 1503–1511 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.076
Mohammed, T.U.; Ahmed, T.; Apurbo, S.M.; Mallick, T.A.; Shahriar, F.; Munim, A.; Awal, M.A.: Influence of chemical admixtures on fresh and hardened properties of prolonged mixed concrete. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9187627
Gao, X.; Yang, J.; Zhu, H.; Xu, J.: Estimation of rubberized concrete frost resistance using machine learning techniques. Constr. Build. Mater. 371, 130778 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130778
Afshoon, I.; Miri, M.; Mousavi, S.R.: Comprehensive experimental and numerical modeling of strength parameters of eco-friendly steel fiber reinforced SCC containing coarse copper slag aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 367, 130304 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130304
Fatemi, S.; Varkani, M.K.; Ranjbar, Z.; Bastani, S.: Optimization of the water-based road-marking paint by experimental design, mixture method. Prog. Org. Coat.. Org. Coat. 55, 337–344 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2006.01.006
Ahmad, S.; Alghamdi, S.A.: A statistical approach to optimizing concrete mixture design. Sci. World J. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/561539
Jin, R.; Yan, L.; Soboyejo, A.B.; Huang, L.; Kasal, B.: Multivariate regression models in estimating the behavior of FRP tube encased recycled aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 191, 216–227 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.012
Bouaissi, A.; Li, L.Y.; Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Bui, Q.B.: Mechanical properties and microstructure analysis of FA–GGBS–HMNS based geopolymer concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 210, 198–209 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.202
Min, F.; Yao, Z.; Jiang, T.: Experimental and numerical study on tensile strength of concrete under different strain rates. Sci. World J. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/173531
Funding
Open access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ETT contributed to conceptualization, methodology, software, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, visualization, investigation, validation, and writing—reviewing and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tugrul Tunc, E. Strength and Durability of Superplasticizer Concrete Based on Different Component Parameters: An Experimental and Statistical Study. Arab J Sci Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-08985-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-08985-9