Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dam Break Flow: A Comparative Model Study Using OpenFOAM and BASEMENT

  • Research Article-Civil Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dam break flows have been a focus of attention for a long in the hydraulic engineering discipline. The interest stems from their high hazard potential to human life and property. This research investigates a laboratory dam break flow using a 3D Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and a 2D shallow water Eq. (2D SWE) model. The two numerical models have been compared to measured data regarding flow depth, streamwise surface flow velocity, and point velocity. The results show that as far as a simulation of water depths at gauging stations is concerned, both models are almost at par with an error of about 20% of the mean depth value. Further, the comparison of surface velocity field reveals that though both models are capable of reproducing the salient flow features, e.g., oblique hydraulic jump, wake, etc., the 3D RANS model is more accurate in predicting the jump length and the so-called wet–dry fronts. The important contribution of this research lies in clearly enunciating the tradeoffs between a 2D SWE model and a 3D RANS model. The former model is computationally efficient and accurate as far as flow depth and velocity are concerned while the latter model provides a more complete result output, e.g., vertical flow velocity, turbulent kinetic energy and turbulent dissipation, etc. However, for obtaining significant accuracy with a 3D model a more accurate turbulence model than RANS is required which necessitate usage of very refined mesh (~ mm), thus, raising the cost of the simulation manifold.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haider, S.; Gabriel, H.F.; Khan, S.A.: SuperCritical flow simulation at a right channel junction. Comparison between a uniform and sparse m–esh. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 21, 2984–2990 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0811-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shige-eda, M.; Akiyama, J.: Numerical and experimental study on two-dimensional flood flows with and without structures. J. Hydraul. Eng. 129(10), 817–821 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haider, S.; Paquier, A.; Morel, R.; Champagne, J.Y.: Urban flood modelling using computational fluid dynamics. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. UK J. Water Marit. Eng. 156, 129–135 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abderrezzak, K.E.; Paquier, A.: Modelling flash flood propagation in urban areas using a two-dimensional numerical model. Nat. Hazards 50, 433–460 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haider, S.; Saeed, U.; Shahid, M.: 2D numerical modelling of two dam-break flood studies in an urban locality. Arab. J. Geosci. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05709-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Larocque, A.L.; Imran, J.; Chaudhry, M.H.: 3D numerical simulation of partial breach dam-break flow using the LES and κ-ε turbulence models. J. Hydraul. Res. 51(2), 145–157 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2012.734862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kamath, A.; Fleit, G.; Bihs, H.: Investigation of free surface turbulence damping in RANS simulations for complex free surface flows. Water 11, 456–481 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Langhi, M.; Hosoda, T.; Dey, S.: Analytical solution of κ-ε model for non-uniform flows. J. Hydraul. Eng. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Soares-Frazao, S.; Zech, Y.: Experimental study of dam-break flow against an isolated obstacle. J. Hydraul. Res. 45(sup1), 27–36 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2007.9521830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozmen-Cagatay, H.; Kocaman, S.: Dam-break flow in the presence of obstacle: experiment and CFD simulation. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 5(4), 541–552 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2011.11015393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Weller, H.; Tabor, G.; Jask, H.; Fureby, C.: A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques. Comput. Phys. 12, 620–631 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirt, C.; Nichols, B.: Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 39, 201–225 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ubbink, O.; Numerical Prediction of Two Fluid Systems with Sharp Interfaces. Dissertation, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, UK (1997)

  14. Berberovic, E.; Investigation of free-surface flow associated with drop impact: numerical simulations and theoretical modeling. Dissertation, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, UK (2010)

  15. Vetsch, D.; Siviglia, A.; Caponi, F.; Ehrbar, D.; Gerke, E.; Kammerer, S.; Koch, A; Peter, S.; Vanzo, D.; Vonwiller, L.; Facchini, M.; Gerber, M.; Volz, C.; Farshi, D.; Mueller, R.; Rousselot, P.; Veprek, R.; Faeh, R.: System Manuals of Basement Version 2.8. Laboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glacialogy (VAW), ETH Zurich (2018). http://www.basement.ethz.ch. Accessed 24 May 2022

  16. Biswas, R.; Strawn, R.C.: Tetrahedral and hexahedral mesh adaptation for CFD problems. Appl. Numer. Math. 26(1–2), 135–151 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9274(97)00092-5

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Hirsch, C.: Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows: the Fundamentals of Computational Fluid Dynamics. Butterworth-Heinemann (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bayon, A.; Valero, D.; Garcia-Bartual, R., et al.: Performance assessment of OpenFOAM and Flow-3D in the numerical modeling of a low Reynolds number hydraulic jump. Environ Model Softw. 80, 322–335 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zedler, E.; Street, R.L.: Large-eddy simulation of sediment transport: currents over ripples. J. Hydraul. Eng. 127(6), 444–452 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fischer-Antze, T.; Rüther, N.; Olsen, N.R.B.; Gutknecht, D.: Three-dimensional (3D) modeling of nonuniform sediment transport in a channel bend with unsteady flow. J. Hydraul. Res. 47, 670–675 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3826/jhr.2009.3252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schlichting, H.; Gersten, K.: Boundary-layer Theory. Springer (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilcox, D.: Turbulence Modeling for CFD. DCW Industries, La Canada, California, USA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pope, S.B.: Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Celik, I.B.; Ghia, U.; Roache, P.J.: Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. ASME J Fluids Eng 130, 1–4 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shigematsu, T.; Liu, P.L.-F.: Numerical modelling of the initial stages of dam-break waves. J. Hydraul. Res. 42(2), 183–195 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2004.9628303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cea, L.; Puertas, J.; Vazquez-Cendon, M.E.: Depth-averaged modeling of turbulent shallow water flow with wet-dry fronts. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 14, 303–341 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-007-9009-3

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Alcrudo, F.; Garcia, P.; Brufau, P.; Murillo, J; Garcia, D.; Mulet, J.; Testa, G.; Zuccala, D.: The model city flooding experiment. http://www.impact-project.net/AnnexII_DetailedTechnicalReports/AnnexII_PartB_WP3/Model_City_Flooding_Experiment.pdf (2005). Accessed 13 July 2019

  28. Ingram, R.G.; Chu, V.H.: Flow around islands in Rupert Bay: an investigation of the bottom friction effects. AGU Oceans 92, 14521–14533 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen, D.; Jirka, G.H.: Experimental study of plane turbulent wakes in shallow water layers. Fluid Dyn. Res. 16, 11–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We extend our gratitude to State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, China for funding this research through Project grant No. 2020SD01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering (SCEE), NUST Institute of Civil Engineering (NICE), National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST), Sector H-12, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan

    Sajjad Haider, Hamza Farooq Gabriel & Ammara Mubeen

  2. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Department of Hydropower Engineering, School of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China

    Lei Yang

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan

    Muhammad Shahid

Authors
  1. Sajjad Haider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hamza Farooq Gabriel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lei Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Muhammad Shahid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ammara Mubeen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sajjad Haider.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haider, S., Gabriel, H.F., Yang, L. et al. Dam Break Flow: A Comparative Model Study Using OpenFOAM and BASEMENT. Arab J Sci Eng 49, 5385–5401 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08400-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08400-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation